Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: TGW AAR

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Norm Koger's The Operational Art Of War III >> After Action Reports >> RE: TGW AAR Page: <<   < prev  6 7 8 9 [10]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: TGW AAR - 4/17/2015 4:38:58 AM   
Cmdr_Vessery

 

Posts: 268
Joined: 7/21/2007
Status: offline 		Saturation bombing results of the Soviet airfield at Vladimir.



Aircraft losses listed in the next post.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Cmdr_Vessery)
Post #: 271
RE: TGW AAR - 4/17/2015 4:39:32 AM   
Cmdr_Vessery

 

Posts: 268
Joined: 7/21/2007
Status: offline 		Airfield Vladimir aircraft losses.




As you can see, I brought in ALOT of support for the 6 bomber air groups. I had 6 AS fighter groups within range for cover.

On the battle front where movement is static right now, I am targeting specific airfields for strategic bombing to reduce Soviet air power. OFC, conducting these types of bomber raids is hard on the bomber groups, cuz, now I have 2 bomber groups that are in reorg.. doh..

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Cmdr_Vessery -- 4/17/2015 5:54:48 AM >

(in reply to Cmdr_Vessery)
Post #: 272
RE: TGW AAR - 4/17/2015 4:52:02 AM   
Cmdr_Vessery

 

Posts: 268
Joined: 7/21/2007
Status: offline 		Steve,

Got a unit question for you.. And, I'm sure that it's correct, but I gotta ask anyway.

129th FLak unit has 100 88's, is that correct? The others seem like they have about half that. But, it is listed as "OKH Army flak", so I'm assuming that the equipment list is good. Makes for a really nice tank buster unit... :)




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Cmdr_Vessery)
Post #: 273
RE: TGW AAR - 4/17/2015 3:16:45 PM   
sPzAbt653


Posts: 9511
Joined: 5/3/2007
From: east coast, usa
Status: offline
quote:

129th FLak unit has 100 88's, is that correct?


Can't find the site for that right now, I'll look later when I have more time.

(in reply to Cmdr_Vessery)
Post #: 274
RE: TGW AAR - 4/17/2015 11:11:44 PM   
sPzAbt653


Posts: 9511
Joined: 5/3/2007
From: east coast, usa
Status: offline 		Still can't find it. Too many pages of notes and not enough organization on my part. I thought it was Sturmvogel or Panzerkiel, but those searches aren't bringing anything up.

I remember reading an article somewhere about the SturmFlak Regiments and the differences between them and the standard Flak regiments. Whatever the source, it was based on something because I know I didn't make it up. Of course, the source could have been wrong or inaccurate.

< Message edited by sPzAbt653 -- 4/18/2015 12:15:51 AM >

(in reply to sPzAbt653)
Post #: 275
RE: TGW AAR - 4/18/2015 3:41:51 AM   
Cmdr_Vessery

 

Posts: 268
Joined: 7/21/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: sPzAbt653

Still can't find it. Too many pages of notes and not enough organization on my part. I thought it was Sturmvogel or Panzerkiel, but those searches aren't bringing anything up.

I remember reading an article somewhere about the SturmFlak Regiments and the differences between them and the standard Flak regiments. Whatever the source, it was based on something because I know I didn't make it up. Of course, the source could have been wrong or inaccurate.

No worries. It caught my eye cause it was much bigger than the other flak units. Good by me. No need to look further.

(in reply to sPzAbt653)
Post #: 276
RE: TGW AAR - 4/18/2015 6:47:21 AM   
sPzAbt653


Posts: 9511
Joined: 5/3/2007
From: east coast, usa
Status: offline 		Another possibility is that particular unit was combined with some other smaller units without reflecting it in the unit name. For example, 129th Flak Reg plus 36th, 58th and 92nd Flak Btns. Something like that.

(in reply to Cmdr_Vessery)
Post #: 277
RE: TGW AAR - 4/23/2015 8:06:04 PM   
governato

 

Posts: 1079
Joined: 5/6/2011
From: Seattle, WA
Status: offline 		Btw, the number of IL-4 being produced seems way way high. My sources quote about 4400 being produced in total, consistent with the fact that the scenario allows to field only about 200 of them ...

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 278
RE: TGW AAR - 4/23/2015 8:14:49 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: governato
Btw, the number of IL-4 being produced seems way way high. My sources quote about 4400 being produced in total, consistent with the fact that the scenario allows to field only about 200 of them ...

This figure you quoted, 4400 being produced, is that during the entire war or just a snapshot of one year's production or what? I'm
not aware of what the "actual" number is supposed to be but I would like it to be accurate. What's your source dude?

_____________________________

If we're all created in the image of god then why aren't we all invisible?

(in reply to governato)
Post #: 279
RE: TGW AAR - 4/23/2015 10:19:41 PM   
sPzAbt653


Posts: 9511
Joined: 5/3/2007
From: east coast, usa
Status: offline 		Yeah, I didn't include the Air Unit stuff in the Soviet OOB Doc.

Production numbers won't be exactly as they were historically because production fluctuates during the scenario. Also, TGW doesn't produce all of the historical types of planes, the air unit oob has been streamlined to fit the scenario. For the Il-4, most of those units are removed in May 1942, only the Long Range Bomber units stay. Regardless what planes the LRB's used historically, in TGW they only contain the obsolete Pe-'s and Il-4's. A couple of those units are in for the duration of the scenario, as they were historically. So there could be 100,000 of them produced, but only a couple hundred will ever be in action at any point.

More important are the numbers for Lost and Assigned, which at scenarios end should resemble historical numbers. However, we don't have any scenario end files for TGW v1.8 yet, so there could be some needed changes.

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 280
RE: TGW AAR - 4/29/2015 8:56:53 PM   
governato

 

Posts: 1079
Joined: 5/6/2011
From: Seattle, WA
Status: offline 		you can check this post for a simple formula for how take care of the production modifiers along the course of the scenario, given a figure for the overall production.

http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/fb.asp?m=3238867

Larry, for the Il-4 production numbers there is Wikipedia, but when I designed EF41-45 I cross checked with a Russian website, I think there is a link (if it is still active) in the scenario notes.


(in reply to sPzAbt653)
Post #: 281
Page:   <<   < prev  6 7 8 9 [10]
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Norm Koger's The Operational Art Of War III >> After Action Reports >> RE: TGW AAR Page: <<   < prev  6 7 8 9 [10]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

3.000