Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> Mods and Scenarios >> RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues Page: <<   < prev  53 54 [55] 56 57   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/7/2015 10:50:44 PM   
mikmykWS

 

Posts: 11524
Joined: 3/22/2005
Status: offline
Added to our list. Thanks

Mike

_____________________________


(in reply to Vici Supreme)
Post #: 1621
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/8/2015 4:03:07 PM   
Vici Supreme

 

Posts: 558
Joined: 12/4/2013
From: Southern Germany
Status: offline
[ADDED AGM-65G in DB v438]

Was building stuff in the editor and noticed that the recently added platform #4087 - Hawk 209 of the Indonesian Air Force could get an additional (supposedly) AGM-65D Maverick IR air-to-ground loadout.



Thanks

Supreme

< Message edited by emsoy -- 6/11/2015 5:55:31 AM >


_____________________________


(in reply to mikmykWS)
Post #: 1622
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/8/2015 4:54:46 PM   
Vici Supreme

 

Posts: 558
Joined: 12/4/2013
From: Southern Germany
Status: offline
[ADDED DB v439]

My last wish for today. This one is a hypothetical but it's actually not that far fetched IMO.

RQ-4E Euro Hawk

Based on the RQ-4B Global Hawk Block 20, the Euro Hawk program was cancelled due to cost explosions in development. Having started in 2005, the Euro Hawk was only one year away from initial deliveries to the German Air Force when in May 2013 the project was cancelled. The below specifications were taken from German product websites and articles. It remains unclear if the Euro Hawk uses additional sensors of the Global Hawk it was based on or entirely relies on its SIGINT suite.

Ferry Range: 13500 NM
Mission Range: 9920+ NM

ISIS-A (ELINT + COMINT):

quote:

When flying at altidudes of around 15km (49212ft), the "ISIS"-system (ISIS-A) is capable of successfully intercepting, locating and recording all radio signals within a 400km (215 NM) radius. The signals are then send to the ground station (ISIS-G).


I'd love to have this UAV in the sim. Thanks for considering!

Supreme

http://www.eurohawk.de/ (product website in German)
http://www.northropgrumman.com/Capabilities/RQ4Block20GlobalHawk/Documents/Euro_Hawk_Brochure.pdf
Two PDFs included as a ZIP-file

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by emsoy -- 6/14/2015 11:26:37 AM >


_____________________________


(in reply to Vici Supreme)
Post #: 1623
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/8/2015 5:31:06 PM   
caiman_

 

Posts: 10
Joined: 3/29/2014
Status: offline
[FIXED B678.12]

quote:

Thanks for the bump :) It has not been forgotten, it just ended up a little further down on the list as it requires a fair bit of work


Ok thanks for the answer.
I noticed something else which may need a DB tweak.
i wanted to disable an airbase with apache missiles but it cannot target a runway-grade taxiway only runway. Should it not be able to target also these taxiway .
The same problem affect the durandal bomb. Maybe other one too but these two are the only anti-runway that i know

< Message edited by emsoy -- 6/9/2015 7:04:21 PM >

(in reply to mikmykWS)
Post #: 1624
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/8/2015 6:41:44 PM   
ckfinite

 

Posts: 377
Joined: 7/20/2013
Status: offline
[UPDATED DB v438]

I'm not entirely sure if this is an issue, but I wanted to ask and see.

In game, the AN/APG-81 and AN/APG-77 have search areas of about 30 degrees. However, in a few online apocryphal sources, they're cited as having FOVs of 120 degrees (+-60), an idea that is backed up by this video, when measured. Is there a reason why these two radars have their current narrow FOV?

< Message edited by emsoy -- 6/9/2015 7:22:58 PM >

(in reply to caiman_)
Post #: 1625
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/8/2015 6:42:09 PM   
Liare

 

Posts: 2
Joined: 6/4/2015
Status: offline
[ADDED DB v440]

quote:

ORIGINAL: emsoy

Thanks Liare,

I understand Danish so feel free to post

Mods in DB v438:

- Updated radar
- My sources say the Bullpup was phased out in 1982, when most other European air forces stopped using it too. Hence the cut-off date in the database.
- Added strike loadouts to recon version.
- Added: "TF-35XD Draken -- Denmark (Air Force), 72-92, 6x"
- Willemoes Harpoon loadout: Scenario designer has the ability to change the launchers to wartime loadout if needed, in the scenario editor
- Updated forts.

After 5 posts or so you should be able to post links. Would be great to see what you have been able to dig up of info on the missing subs and MTBs.

Thanks again!
one more thing, there where 20 RF-35XD's, 20 F-35XD's and 11 TF-35XD ordered from Saab, all delivered, along with some later deliveries of out-of-service J-35D's for spare parts.

the utility of the Bullpup is questionable anyway, i dont have any written accounts of it being retained except that, apparently, a small stock of AGM-12D's where kept for bridge demolition until high yield GBU-10 Paveway where delivered in the late 1980's along with the first F-16 Blk. 15 OCU planes.

the highlights in terms of missing warships, from a gameplay perspective anyway, is the following.

Triton Class ASW Corvette
also known as the Albatros-class, build in Italy, in service 55-81.

Daphne Class Patrol craft
based on the royal navy Ford class seaward defence boat, in service 61-91.

Delfinen class submarine
domestically designed small coastal submarines, 4 533mm torpedo tubes, in service 61-90

Falken class MTB
domestic MTB design, in service 61-78

Flyvefisken class MTB
Domestic redesign of the WW2 era E-boats, in service 54-74

Hvidbjørnen class arctic patrol vessels
in service 62-91, these had a secondary in-shore ASW role around greenland.

Narvalen Class submarine
german 205 class submarines, in service 70-04

Tumleren class submarine
german 205 class submarines, bought used from norway 89-04

Søløven class Patrol craft/MTB
improved Royal navy Brave class boats, in service 65-90.

Lindormen class minelayer
domestic minelayer design, in service 78-04

Falster class minelayer
domestic minelayer design, in service 63-04

Sund class minelayer/mine sweeper
ex-USN craft, Adjutant Class in service 55-89.

there's also a host of small patrol cutters, home guard cutters and what not added, but the current ship selection is quite poor for anybody who wants to build a baltic-conflict cold war type scenario since the motley collection of MBTs and mine layers that would have made the straits of Denmark such a daunting proposition for the soviet baltic fleet simply aren't there.

and yes, that's motor torpedo boats in service up to the 1970's, high speed wooden boats can be surprisingly sneaky when they have islands to hide in and around, if you could be so kind as to add the link i have send your way in a PM Emsoy ? :)

<Link inserted by moderator>
http://www.navalhistory.dk/english/Naval_Lists/Periods/1945_.htm

anyway, i gather that sensor information is required as well, how much is required ? is a radar/sonar model/make enough or is more detailed performance statistics required ?

older janes books should have at least some of that info in them, but i do not have a massive collection.

< Message edited by emsoy -- 8/10/2015 5:39:32 PM >

(in reply to caiman_)
Post #: 1626
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/8/2015 7:08:43 PM   
ExNusquam

 

Posts: 513
Joined: 3/4/2014
From: Washington, D.C.
Status: offline
quote:

In game, the AN/APG-81 and AN/APG-77 have search areas of about 30 degrees. However, in a few online apocryphal sources, they're cited as having FOVs of 120 degrees (+-60), an idea that is backed up by this video, when measured. Is there a reason why these two radars have their current narrow FOV?

From the Mega-FAQ talking about that issue (it's present on a lot more than just AESAs):

quote:

Why is the AN/AWG-9 radar on the F-14 Tomcat limited to a 40 deg search arc?

Although the AN/AWG-9 has a +/- 65 degrees frontal scan sector, the aircraft doesn’t search arcs larger than 40 deg / 2 bars or 20 deg / 4 bars at a time. This is so that tracks can be updated every 2 seconds. A full 130 deg / 8 bar sweep may take as much as 30 seconds and has limited tactical use. As such, it has a 40 degree frontal arc in Command.

Looking beyond Command v1.04, the plan is to allow the AI and player to turn the search arc (scan cone) sideways, so the aircraft can scan 65-25 deg off-angle. The aircraft can then launch medium-range missiles, turn 60-ish degrees to reduce the closure rate, and still guide missiles to the target. Getting this to work properly for all aircraft/weapon and tactical combinations is a bit of a pain so will take time to implement and test. However the database has already been updated supports this so the groundwork has already been done. The developer won’t give any promises on ETA, though.

(in reply to ckfinite)
Post #: 1627
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/8/2015 8:31:04 PM   
ckfinite

 

Posts: 377
Joined: 7/20/2013
Status: offline
[UPDATED DB v438]

quote:

From the Mega-FAQ talking about that issue (it's present on a lot more than just AESAs):


The issue with that, though, is that the Gripen NG's AESA has the full 120 degree search volume. Furthermore, the video I linked (if you believe it) shows AN/APG-81 searching a 120 degree volume with a 90% detection rate (19/21) in 3 seconds (and maintaining track on all of those targets), which is about as fast as the F-14's radar can search a 40 degree volume. Reasonably, modern AESAs can search much faster than the F-14's first generation PESA could, and the Gripen's radar can even be angled like you mention to expand beyond the 120 degree search volume.

I think that either the Gripen NG's radar's capability should either be reduced to something like that of the AN/APG-81, or the AN/APG-81's capability should be increased to match that of the PA-05/A Mk. 4. As far as I know, the two radars are similar in capability, though AN/APG-81 may be somewhat more so.

< Message edited by emsoy -- 6/9/2015 7:23:53 PM >

(in reply to ExNusquam)
Post #: 1628
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/8/2015 10:29:36 PM   
mikmykWS

 

Posts: 11524
Joined: 3/22/2005
Status: offline
Request list updated to this point.

Mike

_____________________________


(in reply to ckfinite)
Post #: 1629
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/9/2015 2:41:40 AM   
ExNusquam

 

Posts: 513
Joined: 3/4/2014
From: Washington, D.C.
Status: offline
quote:

The issue with that, though, is that the Gripen NG's AESA has the full 120 degree search volume. Furthermore, the video I linked (if you believe it) shows AN/APG-81 searching a 120 degree volume with a 90% detection rate (19/21) in 3 seconds (and maintaining track on all of those targets), which is about as fast as the F-14's radar can search a 40 degree volume. Reasonably, modern AESAs can search much faster than the F-14's first generation PESA could, and the Gripen's radar can even be angled like you mention to expand beyond the 120 degree search volume.

Yeah, I'd forgotten how quickly AESAs scan. I looked up unclass docs on the APG-79 and that indicated 2800 beams per second, and if you assume a 2.5° beam, it's more than enough coverage.

You're completely right, and the other AESAs should probably have their search areas expanded.

(in reply to ckfinite)
Post #: 1630
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/9/2015 9:09:48 AM   
Helderik

 

Posts: 32
Joined: 6/25/2014
Status: offline
[UPDATED DB v438]

I am not sure if this has been added to the list already:

The Dutch Air Force is (or will be) fielding the GBU-39 SDB1 with it's F-16's and F-35s in the future. I am not sure of the exact IOC, but expect 2015 or 2016. The following link opens a article (in dutch) with a video showing footage of live testing in an Arizona test range with dutch F-16's. The article was dated January 29th 2015 so I guess we are close to operational status.

https://magazines.defensie.nl/vliegendehollander/2015/01/small-diameter-bomb (in dutch)

Could you please add the GBU-39 SDB1 loadout to
1). the dutch F-16 MLU.
2). the dutch F-35A

I'll try to find more information when they will become (or became) operational.

Edit: found a document of 2010 with the intention of the dutch government to buy 603 SDB1s.
http://www.dsca.mil/major-arms-sales/netherlands-gbu-39-small-diameter-bombs

Thank you!


Erik


< Message edited by emsoy -- 6/11/2015 5:57:11 AM >

(in reply to ExNusquam)
Post #: 1631
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/9/2015 9:45:06 AM   
ComDev

 

Posts: 5735
Joined: 5/12/2006
Status: offline
Hello Erik,

I belive these loadouts are already in the database along with AIM-9X? Please download the 1.08 RC and rebuild the scenario with the latest database, and the aircraft should appear in the list.

Thanks!

_____________________________



Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!

(in reply to Helderik)
Post #: 1632
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/9/2015 11:09:28 AM   
Dimitris

 

Posts: 13282
Joined: 7/31/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ExNusquam

quote:

The issue with that, though, is that the Gripen NG's AESA has the full 120 degree search volume. Furthermore, the video I linked (if you believe it) shows AN/APG-81 searching a 120 degree volume with a 90% detection rate (19/21) in 3 seconds (and maintaining track on all of those targets), which is about as fast as the F-14's radar can search a 40 degree volume. Reasonably, modern AESAs can search much faster than the F-14's first generation PESA could, and the Gripen's radar can even be angled like you mention to expand beyond the 120 degree search volume.

Yeah, I'd forgotten how quickly AESAs scan. I looked up unclass docs on the APG-79 and that indicated 2800 beams per second, and if you assume a 2.5° beam, it's more than enough coverage.

You're completely right, and the other AESAs should probably have their search areas expanded.

AESAs have a fundamental (so far anyway) limitation; the more the beam goes off-boresight, the less (dramatically less) the antenna gain becomes. At the edges of the search arc the practical detection range is less than half of the boresight detection range.

This became a hot point in evaluating AESAs vs traditional mechanical antennas, as the high off-boresight ability is particularly useful both for search and also for post-BVR launch cranking (IIRC the EF-Typhoon team for a while was reportedly reluctant to push forward for an AESA because it considered the original [mechanical] CAPTOR as a better for for the BVR combat environment because of these factors).

Both the EF-Typhoon and Su-35 (and the B-1B before them) have adopted hybrid or "swashplate" phased arrays (combination of mechanical-swivel backplane and phased array front-end), to get around this limitation. In most aircraft applications (e.g. B-2, F-22, F-35, F-18E, MiG-31, MiG-35, T-50, Rafale etc.) the designers place fixed arrays and accept the penalty of limited practical scan arcs.

_____________________________


(in reply to ExNusquam)
Post #: 1633
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/9/2015 11:49:51 AM   
ckfinite

 

Posts: 377
Joined: 7/20/2013
Status: offline
[UPDATED DB v438]

quote:

Both the EF-Typhoon and Su-35 (and the B-1B before them) have adopted hybrid or "swashplate" phased arrays (combination of mechanical-swivel backplane and phased array front-end), to get around this limitation. In most aircraft applications (e.g. B-2, F-22, F-35, F-18E, MiG-31, MiG-35, T-50, Rafale etc.) the designers place fixed arrays and accept the penalty of limited practical scan arcs.


Hmm, so why does the Gripen NG have the full 120 degrees at 110nmi? Gripen, like EF2000 and Su-35, has a mechanical system to change the AESA's angle, but this would seem to fall into the "selectable search area" that the Mega-FAQ said was unimplemented. The PA-05/A Mk 4 isn't that much more capable than AN/APG-81, as far as I know, so why does it have a search volume that is so much bigger?

< Message edited by emsoy -- 6/9/2015 7:24:26 PM >

(in reply to Dimitris)
Post #: 1634
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/9/2015 11:52:21 AM   
ComDev

 

Posts: 5735
Joined: 5/12/2006
Status: offline
Hm agree that arc for the other AESAs should be expanded. Will update. Thanks

_____________________________



Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!

(in reply to ckfinite)
Post #: 1635
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/9/2015 5:07:06 PM   
Helderik

 

Posts: 32
Joined: 6/25/2014
Status: offline
[ADDED DB v438]

quote:

ORIGINAL: emsoy

Hello Erik,

I belive these loadouts are already in the database along with AIM-9X? Please download the 1.08 RC and rebuild the scenario with the latest database, and the aircraft should appear in the list.

Thanks!


Hi Emsoy, thank you for your response! Indeed, i just checked that the F-16 indeed has a GBU-39 loadout and stores. However, the F-35 does not have this loadout yet. Could you please add it to the dutch F-35 (#3902)?
I guess it doesn't make sense to buy hundreds of GBU39s when they don't intend to use them on the F-35. I'll see if I can find more proof that they will be used on the F-35...

< Message edited by emsoy -- 6/11/2015 6:02:37 AM >

(in reply to ComDev)
Post #: 1636
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/9/2015 6:07:25 PM   
ComDev

 

Posts: 5735
Joined: 5/12/2006
Status: offline
Done, thanks

_____________________________



Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!

(in reply to Helderik)
Post #: 1637
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/9/2015 6:57:20 PM   
Tomcat84

 

Posts: 1952
Joined: 7/10/2013
Status: offline
[UPDATED & ADDED DB v438]

quote:

ORIGINAL: emsoy

Hello Erik,

I belive these loadouts are already in the database along with AIM-9X? Please download the 1.08 RC and rebuild the scenario with the latest database, and the aircraft should appear in the list.

Thanks!



I am only seeing a loadout that has 4 SDBs. Each rack can actually carry 4 so my loadout request would be one loadout with the full 8 SDBs and one with 4 SDBs and a single GBU-49.

< Message edited by emsoy -- 6/11/2015 6:02:09 AM >


_____________________________

My Scenarios and Tutorials for Command

(Scenarios focus on air-warfare :) )

(in reply to ComDev)
Post #: 1638
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/9/2015 10:24:43 PM   
gabravo2005

 

Posts: 25
Joined: 9/25/2013
Status: offline
[FIXED DB v438]

Just noticed something, not sure if intentional or not, but the A-12 Avenger II and the A/F-117X and F-117X cannot deploy the SDB's because they do not have JTID16's loaded.

Thanks for an awesome simulator!

< Message edited by emsoy -- 6/10/2015 6:33:32 AM >

(in reply to Tomcat84)
Post #: 1639
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/12/2015 8:23:53 PM   
Vici Supreme

 

Posts: 558
Joined: 12/4/2013
From: Southern Germany
Status: offline
[CORRECTED DB v439]

Request to adjust the primary loadouts of both AH-1Z platforms in the DB (#336 and #2843). I noticed that the real "primary" loadouts for the AH-1Z are missing or have been mistakenly misconfigured.

Affected are the loadouts:

#1519 - AGM-114K Hellfire II, HYDRA 70mm Rockets, AIM-9M Sidewinder (BAI/CAS [Use gun])
#13752 - AGM-114K Hellfire II, HYDRA 70mm Rockets (BAI/CAS [Use gun])

Both will give you 14 Hydras (in 2x7-shot LAU-68D/A) per loadout whereas the Zulu Cobra appears to pack 38 Hydras (in 2x19-shot LAU-61C/A), no matter what's the configuration of weapons carried. Sure, the Viper can carry the seven shot rocket launcher, it just appears to not doing so. A quick google search will clear things up I guess. I searched for images of an AH-1Z carrying the LAU-68D/A but was unable to find a single one. That's why I think we could use the existing ones and add a little more firepower to them.

So please adjust existing or create these loadouts:

8x AGM-114K Hellfire II
38x HYDRA 70mm Rocket
(2x AIM-9M Sidewinder)

(1)(2)(3)


Can you also please change the name of the helicoper to AH-1Z Viper. Like the former Huey became the Venom, didn't the Zulu Cobra/Super Cobra became the Viper?? It just sounds more awesome.

Thank you!

Supreme

< Message edited by emsoy -- 6/14/2015 11:40:58 AM >


_____________________________


(in reply to gabravo2005)
Post #: 1640
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/12/2015 9:29:06 PM   
hellfish6


Posts: 843
Joined: 6/15/2008
Status: offline
[FIXED DB v439]

Can I bump my request for the South African Valour-class to be able to handle a medium-sized helicopter on its pad? Unless, of course, it's been shot down.

quote:

The frigates are designed to carry one Denel Oryx-class or two SuperLynx helicopters, which significantly improves and extends the ship’s surveillance, operational and sea rescue capabilities.

quote:

Helicopters: One 10mt (Oryx or Rooivalk) or two 5mt (AgustaWestland SuperLynx 300).


http://www.defenceweb.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=6524:fact-file-valour-class-small-guided-missile-frigates-&catid=79:fact-files&Itemid=159


< Message edited by emsoy -- 6/14/2015 11:47:18 AM >


_____________________________


(in reply to Vici Supreme)
Post #: 1641
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/12/2015 10:08:54 PM   
nocacounsel

 

Posts: 56
Joined: 12/26/2008
Status: offline
[ALREADY THERE, RENAMED DB v439]

Though very small in number, it might be nice to have the largest aerial tanker ever proposed and built (and perhaps even still in use with Iran) added to the database--the KC-25, KC-747 or KC-33A:

KC-25 (based on the 747-200F or -300?) or KC-747 as I guess Iran would call them:
http://foxtrotalpha.jalopnik.com/the-worlds-only-kc-747-tanker-is-flown-by-the-iranian-a-1581314071
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/aircraft/kc-25.htm
https://imgur.com/YuJB5aj

Cited as KC-33A (based on the 747-400F) or KC-33B (based on the 747-400ERF apparently) at Wiki:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_747#Government.2C_military.2C_and_other_variants
http://www.boeing-747.com/special_boeing_747s/boeing_kc-33a.php

Lenghty discussion on tankers relevant to Australia:
http://www.ausairpower.net/TE-AAR-Expand.html

Thank you!

< Message edited by emsoy -- 6/14/2015 11:51:38 AM >

(in reply to hellfish6)
Post #: 1642
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/12/2015 11:50:45 PM   
mikmykWS

 

Posts: 11524
Joined: 3/22/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: phatstar

Though very small in number, it might be nice to have the largest aerial tanker ever proposed and built (and perhaps even still in use with Iran) added to the database--the KC-25, KC-747 or KC-33A:

KC-25 (based on the 747-200F or -300?) or KC-747 as I guess Iran would call them:
http://foxtrotalpha.jalopnik.com/the-worlds-only-kc-747-tanker-is-flown-by-the-iranian-a-1581314071
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/aircraft/kc-25.htm
https://imgur.com/YuJB5aj

Cited as KC-33A (based on the 747-400F) or KC-33B (based on the 747-400ERF apparently) at Wiki:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_747#Government.2C_military.2C_and_other_variants
http://www.boeing-747.com/special_boeing_747s/boeing_kc-33a.php

Lenghty discussion on tankers relevant to Australia:
http://www.ausairpower.net/TE-AAR-Expand.html

Thank you!


Iran's is in the database.

Entry 1660 Boeing 747-100 Tanker --Iran 1978

_____________________________


(in reply to nocacounsel)
Post #: 1643
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 6/14/2015 8:47:26 AM   
ComDev

 

Posts: 5735
Joined: 5/12/2006
Status: offline
Hi FoxZz,

Thank you for the detailed information! We've finally gotten around to look at it in detail. Things have been moving a bit slowly lately and Im sorry for that, but most of the suggestions have been added in DB v439 (please note that 1.08 RC3 uses v438, so these changes will be included in the next RC release).

Some comments below:

quote:

ORIGINAL: FoxZz

Hi, there is some errors concerning French units of the database for the Build 678.3:

First of all, some units are not fitted with the right Exocet version :

- Atlantique II maritime patrol aicraft should have AM.39 Exocet block II instead of the AM.39 exocet block I in its 2009 version
- F70 AA Frigates should have MM.40 block II instead of MM.40 block I from 2006 up to today versions.
- Lafayette frigate in its 1996 version should have the MM.40 block II since this ship has been introduced with the last available missile and its 2014 version should have MM.40 Exocet Block III, its previous block II have been converted in block III.
- Rubis class submarine in its 2012 version should have SM.39 exocet block II


Done!

quote:

ORIGINAL: FoxZz
About submarines :

- Le Triomphant SSBN has a magazine of 18 weapons + 4 already loaded in torpedo tubes, and it can carry both torpedos and Exocet missiles. Currently ingame, it only carries 12 Torpedos. This should be corrected. Exocet should be SM.39 block II for the 2012 version (ID #456) and block I for the 1998 version (#158). It should also get the shrouded/advanced proplusor property (pump jet). A new 2016 version should be created for the entry in service of the F21 Artemis Torpedo. This new version should also introduce M51.2 ballistic missiles with the new TNO nuclear head instead of the TN 75.It lacks Syracuse satcom (II and III in its last version)


It seems rare that TTs and mags are full, as you need room to replace/reload weapons. So is probably most realistic to have 18 weapons total, i.e. 14 in mags. Also added the ability to carry Exocets, but none are loaded by default.

quote:

ORIGINAL: FoxZz
- Rubis class SSN, in addition to the already above-mentionned exocet issue, a new version of this submarine should be introdued in the DB for the introduction of the F21 Artemis Torpedo in replacement of the F17 one, in 2016. It lacks Syracuse III satcom.

- Barracuda Suffren class SSN, it can carry 20 weapons in magazine (not 16 as currently displayed) in addition to 4 weapons already loaded in torpedo tubes. In addition of torpedos and exocet missiles, it will also carry SCALP Naval cruise missiles which will be launched by torpedo tubes in the same fashion as exocet missiles (hence all weapons in the same magazine). Surface version of the Scalp MdCN and submarine version are identical, it can also deploy FG29 mines. Only difference is surface ones are stored into a sylver while submarine one are stored into a dedicated capsule. Barracuda should also be classified as a SSN, and get the following properties : Non magnetic hull, shock resistant, shrouded propulsor/advanced propulsor (pump jet). It is also fitted with a dry dock shelter for special forces insertion.It also lacks the Syracuse III system as well as the Link 16.


As above, seems there is no room to move weapons around if magazines are this full :)

Do you have more information on the SCALP Naval and expected in-service date? 2018 sounds a bit optimistic to be honest.

quote:

ORIGINAL: FoxZz

About surface ships :

- Horizon class frigates should be armed with 2*20mm F2 GIAT guns instead of the 30mm Oerlikon currenlty displayed. It should also get the Syracuse III satcom. The ships also lacks the 2 SADRAL Mistral mounts they are fitted with IRL. They also lacks docking facilities for RHIBs.


Seems Sadral launchers were planned, but the ship is currently not carrying them:
http://navalanalyses.blogspot.no/2014/07/horizon-class-destroyers-of-french-and.html

quote:

ORIGINAL: FoxZz
- Aquitaine class frigates lacks Link 16, as well as Syracuse III stacom. It's propulsion is CODLOG (Combined diesel electric or gaz, not CODAG, the very silent electric propulsion is used until 16 knots. French Fremm max speed is 28 knots. Its small artillery is based on 2 Narwhal teleoperated 20mm guns by Nexter not standard F2 FIAT 20mm guns.
Info on the Narwhal

- La Fayette class light frigates lacks the Syracuse II satcom as well as the Praire/masker ability. It should also get MM40 block III in its last version, as explained above. They lack docking facilities for RHIB

About Prairie/masker capability, The 3 above mentionned ships are stealth frigates which have been build to be as discreet as possible in both radar and IR field than in accoustic field. However, those ships begin to Cavitate very early ingame (8 knots) which is kind of weid. Especially since the Aquitaine class frigate is said very silent up to 16 knots, as well as Horizon class and Lafayette class which are said to be very efficient in this field. I didn't found anything on the net saying Aquitaine or Horizon could have a Prairie/masker system, however, considering that Lafayette have one, that those ships are the legacy of the Lafayette, and that they have been thought as stealth since the begining, I guess they have something similar. I asked for further infomations, but still, those ships shouldn't cavitate so early.
EDIT : I still wait more info for FREMM and Horizon, but F70 ASM frigates were fitted with a Prairie Masker too
EDIT 2 : FREMM and Horizon Frigates doesn't use a Prairie Masker system because they don't need it, they used technologies from nuclear submarines to redducced directly the noises prodduced by the ship by isolating the engines from the hull, and other features, so masking noise isn't necessary anymore. Moreover, they also improved propellers by otptimizing their shape and so on. FREMM frigates also use fix blades on electric mode (up to 16 knots) which greatly reducce the risks of cavitation. So Indeed, cavitation should happend at much higher speed than it is currently, like 16 knots.

- R91 Charles de Gaulle carrier lacks its Syracuse satcom (II and III in the last version). The Carrier magazine lacks also importants weapons, it doesn't have a buddy buddy refuelling system (generic buddy store), it lacks a stock of Ecocet SM.39 block II for the Rafale, it lacks a stock of Apache anti runway cruise missiles and different kind of GBUs used by the Rafale (I'll come back to this point later on). A new 2017 version should be implemented with Only Rafale equipement, and also Meteor missile loadout, and more cargo space due too the space freed by the retirement of the SEM and its maintenance machines, this new 2017 version will also include a new Heraklès radar to replace the Arabel, several old radars will also be replaced like DRBJ11b and the DRBV26.

- Mistral class LHD/LPD lacks Link 11/22, Link 16, Syracuse III satcom. Its 30mm guns should be replaced with 20mm F2 GIAT guns and 20mm Narwhal in its last version.

- Meuse class Tankers should receive Syracuse III satcom.


Do you know when the system was installed?

quote:

ORIGINAL: FoxZz
EDIT : F70 ASM Frigates should be fitted with a Prairie Masker too.

About Aircrafts :

- A400M, it lacks the Terrain following mode, the "AR-400" RWR, the "MIRAS" MAWS, the Night Vision Goggles, the Link 16, the Directionnal Infrared Counter mesures (DIRCM), the LWR, the "saphir 400" decoys launcher. It should also have a Helmet mounted sight display (same as the Tiger one)

- The E3F Sentry in its last version lacks the Link 16

- The E2C Hawkeye lacks a Satcom

- the A330 MRTT lacks a satcom and link 16.

- The Br Atlantique 2 can take 8 MU90 in ASW, ingame it's only 7. 15 ATl2 will be modernised (signed in 2013) and those will have better detetection performances both surface and underwater, and will have Link 16, 22 and a satcom. It will also include enhanced self protection capabilities such as automated decoys and MAWS, maybe this version can be included in the next updatee.


Various sources say 8x Mk46 but only 7x MU90. Not sure why, been trying to find a good photo of the weapons bay to confirm this.

Do you have more details (such as in-service date, new sensors, etc) on the upgraded variant?

quote:

ORIGINAL: FoxZz
- NH90 Caiman, those helicopters belong to the Army not the Air force, the Saphir M decoys should operate without OODA, it's automated.

- Tigre HAD and HAP, they should also operate Saphir M decoys without OODA delays, it's automated. It lacks the loadout with 8 hellfire (2*4) and 24 SNEB rocket (2*12), which would be the main loadout of the Tiger HAD. Tiger HAP also lacks the loadouts with the Fuel tank and the sneb rockets, just make the same as the HAD.

- The Mirage 2000-5F should have the Link 16 in its 2012 version. The Plane should also have a loadout "interception" with 1 center line 1300L fuel tank, 4 mica EM and 2 MICA IR. The Mirage 2000 should also get 4.9 agility has its F16 and Mig 29 counterparts, mainly because their manoauvrability is very close from each others (The Mirage even having an edge).


Haven't added the Intercept loadout because it would be identical to the long-range one except for two drop tanks. The player wouldn't notice the difference except having shorter range.

quote:

ORIGINAL: FoxZz

- The Rafale :

Sensors :

- OSF and OSF IT ecompasses a laser rangefinder which isn't present ingame. The IT version in an improved version with a much longer range than the standard OSF and this should also be translated ingame.

- OSF IRST, the IRST was indeed removed on the 2014 version (F3-O4T) due to obsolescence and will come back in the F3R standars in 2018. The lack of IRST is compensated by the Mica IR head that is IRST capable and with the DDM, but also with the improved TV version (OSF-IT) which is very good according to the pilots. But the F3R version should have the OSF-IR IRST it. I suggest also to find a way to represent the Mica IR IRST capability.


Done. The 'Act As Sensor' property for the MICA IR missile is already set, so should be able to use it as an IRST in the simulator.

quote:

ORIGINAL: FoxZz
- Spectra DDM and DDM NG should be implemented ingame in the same manner as the EO-DAS of the F35, it's a 360° infrared surveillance that can detect and track any hot source at very long distances such as the rocket boost of a missile being fired, the exhaust fume or the heating of the head of the missile. The DDM NG is an imrpoved version of the DDm with a longer range and a better resolution. So I suggest the same thing than on the F-35 a 360° IR captor in addition to the standard MAWS. DDM NG accuracy will be use for a future DIRCM implementation


The DDM-NG is currently implemented as a standard MAWS because I haven't quite been able to find out how the system works. Can the pilot chose to see the IR image on a HHD? Any details here would be great!

quote:

ORIGINAL: FoxZz
- Spectra EW system : This system does ELINT and SIGINT as well as RWR and LWR, the ELINT function should be implemented. Indeed, this system is not only a RWR but a complete electronic warfare suit which can detect an emission with a 1° accuracy and classify and identify it in its database before applying the proper jamming, it can also give a fire solution. Which brings us to the next point, Spectra can do both offensive and defensive jamming by the game dfinition. In game Defensive jamming happend only just before the hit roll of the incomming missile, but Rafale jamming goes well beyond that since it can directly jamm, in stealthy manner, the ennemy radar and sensors. This ingame should be translated into an offesnive jamming capability both in air to air and air to ground.
Each generation of rafale (F1, F2, F3, F3.4, F3R) improves the power and the capabilities of Spectra with lastly GaN antennas.


Added ELINT capabilities. The offensive ECM capabilities will have to wait as there are a couple things in the EW model that are currently missing.

quote:

ORIGINAL: FoxZz
- With the F3R version, Rafale will get a new designation pod that works both in A/A and A/G, the Tallios, would be nice if it was implemented.

- Data Fusion on the Rafale brings all the informations gathered by the different sensors of the plane and brings the pilot one clear picture of the situation, this give him a very good situation awarness, which should definitely reducce by a fair margin the OODA cycle, but I don't know how this can be done.

Properties :

- Rafale should definitealy get the Supermanouverability property as the Typhoon and the Raptor as it largely matches those. And I would also argue for it getting 5.5 agility.

- Rafale M should also get Advanced Bombing sights INS/GPS it doesn't have it currenlty while other versions got it.


The bombsight is only used when delivering iron bombs or dumb rockets. The naval variant isn't carrying these types of munitions so doesn't need the bombsight.

quote:

ORIGINAL: FoxZz
- All the versions should get as well Night Navigation and Attack since the Rafale is as much a fighter than a bomber and that it can use all its weaponnery including gun both night and day.

- About the HMD/S It's most likely that the Rafale will have one for the F3R version. It should already have got one for the F3 standard (Sagem gerfaut) but due to technical issues, it has been delayed, but with the recent exports to Egypyt, India and Qatar, it's most likely that it will got it in 2018.

In comms, Rafale F3R doesn't have an AMRAAM datalink but a Meteor Datalink, one way only.


Yeah Meteor and AMRAAM uses the same datalink type in the sim :)

quote:

ORIGINAL: FoxZz
Weapons/Loadouts :

- Since the F3 standard, all the Rafale whatever the version can use the same weapons. For example, B and C Rafale can shoot the Exocet as much as the M, and use the buddy buddy pod as well, and the M can use all the GBU collection. So there is several weapons that should be made available for different versions.


Understood, but would also like to limit weapon options by the operationally available ones.

Don't think the Air Force uses Exocets?

quote:

ORIGINAL: FoxZz
- Several lacks to the inventory of each other : GBU 16 for the F3R, GBU 49 since 2012, GBU 22, GBU 24B (standard bomb), Apache anti runway weapon, AM.39 block II and buddy store for C/B.


It seems the Apache was actually never operational, the weapons were placed in storage as they came off the production line.

Also, I haven't been able to find any photos showin GBU-16s being carried. GBU-49 and GBU-24 will be used with F3R I think? And GBU-22 has not been integrated?

quote:

ORIGINAL: FoxZz
- With the F3R version, the hard point number 3 will be open and up to 8 missiles will be carried, some trials already have been done. I propose here to add 2 optionnal MICA-EM to existing loadouts of the F3R version.

- The Rafale in all the standard air to ground loadouts where the weapon is carried under the center line fuselage (ASMPA, 1 scalp, 1 exocet, 1 apache and so on) use 6 missiles.

- The light CAP with only 4 missiles should only have one center line 1200L tank. In this configuration, the Rafale can supercruise up to Mach 1.6.

- The standard cap is 6 A/A missiles (including 2 Mica IR) and one center line 1200L tank, in this configuration, it can supercruise at mach 1.4. There is also versions with 2 1300L tanks and up to 3.



Noted, but the kinematics model isn't detailed enough yet.

As for fuel tanks, see my above comment.

quote:

ORIGINAL: FoxZz

- The buddy buddy configuration is 1 center line refuelling pod 2 2000L tanks and 2 1250L tanks, ingame it lacks the 2 1250L tanks.

- Ground based Rafale can take 2 exocet missiles instead of 1. It would be nice to have such a loadout available.


We had this earlier but removed it because it isn't an operational loadout it seems.

quote:

ORIGINAL: FoxZz

Missiles/Weapons :

- Mistral : The Mistral family is very weirdly depicted, Mistral 1 have better stats than Mistral 2 while it should be the opposite sinc ethe Mistral 2 is an improvment of the Mistral 1, lastly, it's Probability of Hit (PH) is very low. Mistral missiles are higly precises missiles very resistent to counter-mesures and with a great manouverability, they achieved 95% hit rate in trials againt all kind of targets. It should be depicted, I would argue for a base PH of 85% for the Mistral 1 version and 90% for the Mistral II version. Secondly, all Mistral missiles have the same accuracy, doesn't matter if it's shoulder launched, simbad launched or air launched.

- Mica : First of all, this missile, in both version (both EM and IR mica share the same boddy, only the commutable head change), should have the Anti-Air dogfight capability and the High-Off Boresight stuff. Indeed this missile is remplacing both Magic II WVR missile and the Super 530 BVR missile, thus it's both a dogfight and a BVR missile. It is equipped with thrust vectoring engine and can take above 50G loading factor. It is planned to be used with an HMD (mod4) and Mica is the first missile ever to have scored a hit on a target situated in th six of the Rafale.
For all those reasons and also the very advanced mica auto director (dual band for the IR) which can resist to last counter mesures and is almost immuned to IR flares, both versions should definitely have 95% base probability of hit as other missiles of its time frame.

- AASM : This weapon isn't a glide bomb but a Rockets boosted bomb which greatly increase its range, give it an off boresight capability, and a custom trajectory (it can go up and down, it can do top attacks, etc), tanks to this, it can be fired at very low altitude and even at those very low altitude, it still have a range of 15km. Ingame, AASM should have a much lower minimum weapon release such as 300m/900ft. Also, it's accuracy is metric, not deca metric.

- ANL/SeaVenom Missile : this missile will be the new light anti-ship missile for Helicopters (NH90 and Panther for french navy)and should arrive around 2020. It would be nice if it could be implemented.

Voila, I hope you'll be able to implement those changes. I wish I could have posted links, but I had to delete those otherwise I couldn't have post, I'm not yet allowed to post links it seems.



< Message edited by emsoy -- 6/14/2015 9:50:31 AM >


_____________________________



Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!

(in reply to FoxZz)
Post #: 1644
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/14/2015 9:00:20 AM   
ComDev

 

Posts: 5735
Joined: 5/12/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ojms
Hi,

I'm not sure if this got missed or if there is a reason why it's not been added (I understand you are very busy though).

Thanks.


quote:

ORIGINAL: ojms

Please can you update the Royal Navy Type 26 GCS to include a 24 cell VLS Mk41 as per this document:

http://www.parliament.uk/documents/commons-committees/defence/141009_SoS_re_Type_26_Global_Combat_Ship.pdf

It looks like it is going to have a combination of Tomahawk, RUM-139 and Harpoon/LSRAM

Thanks.




I believe the Mk41 with TACTOMs were added a couple of database builds ago

Thanks!

_____________________________



Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!

(in reply to ojms)
Post #: 1645
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/14/2015 9:39:24 AM   
ComDev

 

Posts: 5735
Joined: 5/12/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Triode
So, can you please add Su-25SM2 and Su-25SM3 in database with ability to use Kh-58 and Kh-25MP, as both modifications can take up this missiles on their pylons and both have L-150 "Pastel" able to put data in ARM ?


Thanks for the heads-up Triode Added the Su-25SM2 and SM3 and the advanced self-defence suite for the SM3, but no ARM missiles yet. Would be great to have photos of operational aircraft carrying the Kh-58 and Kh-25MP weapons. I have a feeling those will only be used by more specialized platforms like the Su-34, Su-24M2 and MiG-29K.

_____________________________



Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!

(in reply to Triode)
Post #: 1646
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/14/2015 9:57:49 AM   
ComDev

 

Posts: 5735
Joined: 5/12/2006
Status: offline
Thanks again Triode, have added the Kh-31PD to PAK-FA and Su-35S. Should probably add it to Su-34 and MiG-29K, but will wait for additional information.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Triode
I doubt that Kh-31A exist in some large quantity in RuAF. In 2008-2011 MoD buy something like ~400 unspecified Kh-31 missiles (as example 146 in 2009 and 75 in 2010)
but I think it is Kh-31P and K-31PK for Su-34, KTRV never give type of missile they sell for russian MoD in their annual reports , always unspecified Kh-38,Kh-31,Kh-35

Currently MoD buy Kh-31PD for Su-35S, citation from "Herald of corporation KTRV" January 2015 page 2

"As example, anti-radiation missile Kh-58, can be installed inside the T-50 and is suspended on Su-35S. Another example - anti-ship missile X-59MK. After it was increased its range, it is can be used effectively by these types of aircraft. Recently was launched into serial production missile X-31PD, which also used for armaments of these types of aircraft"
http://ktrv.ru/files.images/ktrv_vestnik_01_2015.pdf in russian
So,Kh-31PD in production for Su-35S

And about Kh-31AD , upgrade of Kh-31A

from "Development, testing And serial production precision weapons" report by Advisory council on legislative support development of the defense-industrial complex
under the Chairman of the Federation Council Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation , citation from page 12:
"In the area of military air forces - a new weapon for the fighter 5th generation. it also includes a new anti-ship missiles of air basing - high speed Kh-31AD, low-altitude Kh-35UE and Kh-59MK"
http://council.gov.ru/media/files/41d46c1ff354d063bebd.pdf n russian

So even if MoD will buy some AShM Kh-31 variant it will be Kh-31AD after end of testing and since Kh-31AD cant be used with Su-24,M,M2 and dont end tests with Su-34,Mig-29K and T-50,
I expect that first contract for Kh-31AD will be signed in 2017-2019

also funny things from KTRV annual reports:

from annual report 2012:
"Prepared and submitted to the JSC "Rosoboronexport" materials products Kh-31P, PD to address adaptation of this weapon on the plane "Rafale", as well as basic data for the preparation of commercial offers for the supply of products X-31PD in India."

Rafale with Kh-31PD

"delivery of products X-31A to Vietnam in the amount of 49.6 million USD"

so in 2012 Kh-31A still in production



_____________________________



Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!

(in reply to Triode)
Post #: 1647
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/14/2015 10:51:06 AM   
ComDev

 

Posts: 5735
Joined: 5/12/2006
Status: offline
The Boeing 747 tanker is already in there as 'Boeing 747-100 Tanker'. In DB v439 I've renamed it to the following:
KC-25A [Boeing 747-100, KC-747] -- Iran (Air Force), 1978, 4x

quote:

ORIGINAL: phatstar

Though very small in number, it might be nice to have the largest aerial tanker ever proposed and built (and perhaps even still in use with Iran) added to the database--the KC-25, KC-747 or KC-33A:

KC-25 (based on the 747-200F or -300?) or KC-747 as I guess Iran would call them:
http://foxtrotalpha.jalopnik.com/the-worlds-only-kc-747-tanker-is-flown-by-the-iranian-a-1581314071
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/aircraft/kc-25.htm
https://imgur.com/YuJB5aj

Cited as KC-33A (based on the 747-400F) or KC-33B (based on the 747-400ERF apparently) at Wiki:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_747#Government.2C_military.2C_and_other_variants
http://www.boeing-747.com/special_boeing_747s/boeing_kc-33a.php

Lenghty discussion on tankers relevant to Australia:
http://www.ausairpower.net/TE-AAR-Expand.html

Thank you!



_____________________________



Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!

(in reply to nocacounsel)
Post #: 1648
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/14/2015 10:20:54 PM   
orca

 

Posts: 501
Joined: 11/6/2013
Status: offline
[ADDED DB v439]

I couldn't find the SPYDER SAM in the database. Unless I'm missing it, can this be added?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SPYDER

< Message edited by emsoy -- 6/18/2015 9:49:46 PM >

(in reply to ComDev)
Post #: 1649
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/15/2015 7:45:37 AM   
Rory Noonan

 

Posts: 2816
Joined: 12/18/2014
From: Brooklyn, NY
Status: offline
[ADDED DB v439]

I'd like to request the addition of the FA-50 Golden Eagle for the Phillipine Air Force. 12 have been ordered, with the first two set to be delivered in the next few months.

References:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KAI_T-50_Golden_Eagle#Philippines - Overview
http://www.airforce-technology.com/projects/-fa-50-light-combat-aircraft-south-korea/ - Technical data

I'm working on a scenario of escalating tensions in the Spratly Islands set in the near future, and it'd be nice to give the Phillipine AF some teeth

Thanks!

< Message edited by emsoy -- 6/18/2015 9:52:13 PM >

(in reply to orca)
Post #: 1650
Page:   <<   < prev  53 54 [55] 56 57   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> Mods and Scenarios >> RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues Page: <<   < prev  53 54 [55] 56 57   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.453