Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: 1944 July 16

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: 1944 July 16 Page: <<   < prev  82 83 [84] 85 86   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: 1944 July 16 - 6/24/2015 10:36:39 PM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline
I had to check because - there is no stinkin' damage showing!

_____________________________


(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 2491
1944 July 17 - 6/26/2015 6:50:02 PM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline
1944 July 17

The Empire captured:


The Allies captured:
Saigon

There were Imperial amphibious or airborne operations at:


There were Allied amphibious or airborne operations at:
Pagan


Naval Bombardments
quote:


Allied Ships Bombarding Saigon
Allied Ships Bombarding Pagan


Our subs got CL Naka.
quote:


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Submarine attack near Terempa at 55,84

Japanese Ships
CL Naka, Torpedo hits 2, heavy fires, heavy damage

Allied Ships
SS Bonefish

CL Naka is sighted by SS Bonefish
SS Bonefish launches 4 torpedoes at CL Naka


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Quiet in China.

Air strikes in Thailand go well, including the first (small) strikes on Bangkok's aerodrome. The road between Moulmein and Bangkok remains defended by the Empire, but the (raw-AV to final-AV) to casualty ratios are in our favor for reducing the defense. Notably, Allied air support was busy elsewhere and did not contribute to this fight.
quote:


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ground combat at 55,60 (near Tavoy)

Allied Deliberate attack

Attacking force 33895 troops, 360 guns, 1451 vehicles, Assault Value = 1515

Defending force 17814 troops, 121 guns, 57 vehicles, Assault Value = 552

Allied adjusted assault: 571

Japanese adjusted defense: 875

Allied assault odds: 1 to 2

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), supply(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
2453 casualties reported
Squads: 80 destroyed, 92 disabled
Non Combat: 58 destroyed, 39 disabled
Engineers: 4 destroyed, 4 disabled
Guns lost 17 (12 destroyed, 5 disabled)
Vehicles lost 18 (3 destroyed, 15 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
1604 casualties reported
Squads: 24 destroyed, 60 disabled
Non Combat: 2 destroyed, 64 disabled
Engineers: 4 destroyed, 7 disabled
Guns lost 30 (4 destroyed, 26 disabled)
Vehicles lost 112 (3 destroyed, 109 disabled)

Assaulting units:
50th Tank Brigade
4th Marine Division
18th Cavalry Regiment
Provisionl Tank Brigade
192nd Tank Battalion
255th Indian Tank Brigade
254th Armoured Brigade
637th Tank Destroyer Battalion
82nd (West African) Division

Defending units:
7th RTA/A Division
38th/A Division
4th Tank Regiment
64th Inf Group Brigade
7th RTA/C Division


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Our forces at Mergui attack tomorrow, anchored by India's 26th Div. Tomorrow three armoured units will cross the river in combat formation into Pisanuloke. Catching Imperial units there will depend on whether they have already (by today) switched into strategic movement mode so that they can rail out prior to the river-crossing. Allied air groups are striking them, but I don't know if that affects the transition into strategic movement mode.

Saigon is ours! All units except the para Rgt will pursue the Imperials to Bien Hoa.
quote:


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ground combat at Saigon (60,71)

Allied Deliberate attack

Attacking force 46565 troops, 706 guns, 763 vehicles, Assault Value = 1450

Defending force 20310 troops, 222 guns, 84 vehicles, Assault Value = 438

Allied adjusted assault: 961

Japanese adjusted defense: 217

Allied assault odds: 4 to 1 (fort level 2)

Allied forces CAPTURE Saigon !!!

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), preparation(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
7122 casualties reported
Squads: 128 destroyed, 110 disabled
Non Combat: 249 destroyed, 54 disabled
Engineers: 73 destroyed, 7 disabled
Guns lost 95 (81 destroyed, 14 disabled)
Vehicles lost 60 (58 destroyed, 2 disabled)
Units retreated 10

Allied ground losses:
947 casualties reported
Squads: 3 destroyed, 59 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 16 disabled
Engineers: 1 destroyed, 4 disabled
Vehicles lost 34 (3 destroyed, 31 disabled)

Defeated Japanese Units Retreating!

Assaulting units:
706th Tank Battalion
503rd Parachute Regiment
31st Infantry Division
11th Airborne Division
1st Australian Division
711th Tank Battalion
2/6th Armoured Regiment
5th Australian Division
1st Medium Regiment
2nd Medium Regiment

Defending units:
33rd Division
2nd Ind.Mixed Brigade
17th Ind.Mixed Brigade
104th/A Division
23rd AA Regiment
113th JAAF AF Bn
109th JAAF AF Bn
Cape St.Jaques Fortress
104th/C Div /1
12th Base Force
33rd Army /1


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Our armored units advancing on Ubon were indeed forced out of road march by air strikes but will cross the river in battle formation tomorrow. The IJA 5th Tank Rgt is still in that city and moving NW. The unit SE of Pakse looks to be air support (possibly with defensive troops??) and is now heading SE to foul our hard won road network.

Two of the stragglers from the IJN foray were found trying to penetrate The Fleet's defenses.
quote:


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Night Time Surface Combat, near Terempa at 55,83, Range 8,000 Yards

Japanese Ships
DD Wakazuki, Shell hits 3, heavy fires, heavy damage
DD Michishio, Shell hits 3, on fire

Allied Ships
DD Aulick, Shell hits 2
DD Cogswell
DD O'Bannon
DD Picking
DD Halsey Powell
DD Pringle
DD Norman Scott, Shell hits 1

Reduced sighting due to 7% moonlight
Maximum visibility in Clear Conditions and 7% moonlight: 9,000 yards
Range closes to 24,000 yards...
Range closes to 18,000 yards...
CONTACT: Allies radar detects Japanese task force at 18,000 yards
Range closes to 12,000 yards...
Range closes to 8,000 yards...
CONTACT: Japanese lookouts spot Allied task force at 8,000 yards
CONTACT: Allied lookouts spot Japanese task force at 8,000 yards
DD Michishio engages DD Norman Scott at 8,000 yards
DD Wakazuki engages DD Picking at 8,000 yards
DD Cogswell engages DD Michishio at 8,000 yards
Range closes to 4,000 yards
DD Wakazuki engages DD Norman Scott at 4,000 yards
DD Wakazuki engages DD Cogswell at 4,000 yards
DD Picking engages DD Wakazuki at 4,000 yards
DD Michishio engages DD Aulick at 4,000 yards
Range closes to 2,000 yards
DD Aulick engages DD Michishio at 2,000 yards
DD Pringle engages DD Michishio at 2,000 yards
DD Aulick engages DD Michishio at 2,000 yards
Range increases to 4,000 yards
DD Michishio engages DD Cogswell at 4,000 yards
DD Wakazuki engages DD Norman Scott at 4,000 yards
Range increases to 7,000 yards
DD Norman Scott engages DD Michishio at 7,000 yards
DD Michishio engages DD Picking at 7,000 yards
Range increases to 10,000 yards
DD Michishio engages DD O'Bannon at 10,000 yards
DD Wakazuki engages DD Pringle at 10,000 yards
Range increases to 12,000 yards
DD Michishio engages DD Cogswell at 12,000 yards
DD Picking engages DD Wakazuki at 12,000 yards
DD Picking engages DD Wakazuki at 12,000 yards
Range increases to 13,000 yards
DD Michishio engages DD Cogswell at 13,000 yards
DD Pringle engages DD Wakazuki at 13,000 yards
DD Michishio engages DD Picking at 13,000 yards
DD Michishio engages DD O'Bannon at 13,000 yards
Tadaki, B. orders Japanese TF to disengage
DD Michishio engages DD Norman Scott at 13,000 yards
DD O'Bannon engages DD Wakazuki at 13,000 yards
DD Aulick engages DD Michishio at 13,000 yards
Range closes to 12,000 yards
DD Michishio engages DD Norman Scott at 12,000 yards
DD Wakazuki engages DD Picking at 12,000 yards
DD Picking engages DD Michishio at 12,000 yards
DD Michishio engages DD O'Bannon at 12,000 yards
Range closes to 8,000 yards
DD Norman Scott engages DD Michishio at 8,000 yards
DD Pringle engages DD Wakazuki at 8,000 yards
DD Cogswell engages DD Michishio at 8,000 yards
DD Aulick engages DD Michishio at 8,000 yards
Range increases to 10,000 yards
DD Michishio engages DD Norman Scott at 10,000 yards
DD Pringle engages DD Michishio at 10,000 yards
DD Michishio engages DD O'Bannon at 10,000 yards
DD Norman Scott engages DD Michishio at 10,000 yards
DD O'Bannon engages DD Wakazuki at 10,000 yards
Range increases to 12,000 yards
DD Michishio engages DD Norman Scott at 12,000 yards
DD Picking engages DD Michishio at 12,000 yards
Range closes to 10,000 yards
DD Norman Scott engages DD Michishio at 10,000 yards
DD Wakazuki engages DD Halsey Powell at 10,000 yards
DD Michishio engages DD Picking at 10,000 yards
DD Wakazuki engages DD Aulick at 10,000 yards
DD Norman Scott engages DD Wakazuki at 10,000 yards
Range closes to 8,000 yards
DD Wakazuki engages DD Halsey Powell at 8,000 yards
DD Halsey Powell engages DD Michishio at 8,000 yards
DD Wakazuki engages DD O'Bannon at 8,000 yards
DD Aulick engages DD Wakazuki at 8,000 yards
Range increases to 10,000 yards
DD Halsey Powell engages DD Michishio at 10,000 yards
DD Norman Scott engages DD Wakazuki at 10,000 yards
Range closes to 9,000 yards
DD Picking engages DD Michishio at 9,000 yards
DD Halsey Powell engages DD Wakazuki at 9,000 yards
DD Norman Scott engages DD Michishio at 9,000 yards
Range increases to 10,000 yards
DD Michishio engages DD Cogswell at 10,000 yards
DD Norman Scott engages DD Wakazuki at 10,000 yards
DD Cogswell engages DD Michishio at 10,000 yards
Task forces break off...


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


The Dili and Pagan operations are ongoing as noted before. Brunei invasion troops are loading at Morotai.
quote:


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ground combat at Dili (71,115)

Allied Bombardment attack

Attacking force 4290 troops, 70 guns, 29 vehicles, Assault Value = 125

Defending force 6675 troops, 52 guns, 42 vehicles, Assault Value = 184

Assaulting units:
30th Australian Brigade

Defending units:
57th Infantry Regiment
2nd Recon Regiment
24th Nav Gsn Unit
47th JNAF AF Unit


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

BB Washington is still fighting extreme flooding, currently at 96% flotation damage.

The road to Bangkok. The opposition included one very tough unit, and IMBde of division strength and likely high experience. Our troops will rest before going again.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 2492
RE: 1944 July 17 - 6/26/2015 6:50:52 PM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline
Ships reported sunk today. DD Cotten was damaged in the previous day's battles.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 2493
RE: 1944 July 17 - 6/26/2015 6:51:17 PM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline
Saigon.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 2494
RE: 1944 July 17 - 6/26/2015 6:51:40 PM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline
More Saigon.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 2495
RE: 1944 July 17 - 6/26/2015 6:52:09 PM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline
Adm White is behaving rather aggressively. He has been summoned to Cam Ranh Bay to replenish and have a drink.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 2496
RE: 1944 July 17 - 6/26/2015 6:52:29 PM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline
Tokyo is showing damage and likely has more to reveal.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 2497
RE: 1944 July 17 - 6/26/2015 6:52:51 PM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline
The Intel screen.



I went back in the AAR and looked. 276 strategic loss points for Japan prior to the raid on Tokyo, so 1,620 (+/-FOW) due to this raid. I don't know exactly how they are counted - 1 for 1, or some things count differently?? - but either way that sounds pretty good.

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by witpqs -- 6/26/2015 9:07:32 PM >


_____________________________


(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 2498
RE: 1944 July 17 - 6/26/2015 10:15:01 PM   
Drakanel

 

Posts: 253
Joined: 4/6/2015
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: witpqs

Adm White is behaving rather aggressively. He has been summoned to Cam Ranh Bay to replenish and have a drink.




Which ships are in that task force? Are you really sure he won't try to go and ram the ships at anchor at Singapore? You know, I would wonder about that

Nice to see Saigon in your hands. Though I think you said you're going to build Soc Trang's airfield already, right? Do you plan to expand Saigon as well to maximum?

As for BB washington.... 96% flotation, ouch. That's really... bad. Not many chances of survival there...

< Message edited by Drakanel -- 6/26/2015 11:16:16 PM >

(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 2499
RE: 1944 July 17 - 6/26/2015 10:37:27 PM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Drakanel

quote:

ORIGINAL: witpqs

Adm White is behaving rather aggressively. He has been summoned to Cam Ranh Bay to replenish and have a drink.




Which ships are in that task force? Are you really sure he won't try to go and ram the ships at anchor at Singapore? You know, I would wonder about that
It's a CL/DD task force. I took the precaution of reducing React Range from 6 to 0 until they get home! That doesn't always work, especially with so many IJN ASW groups nearby. I really just want to get them either out of Singapore LBA range or at least under the carriers' fighter umbrella.

Nice to see Saigon in your hands. Though I think you said you're going to build Soc Trang's airfield already, right? Do you plan to expand Saigon as well to maximum?
Eventually, both port and airfield. Although the Allies get almost limitless construction engineers they can't be everywhere at once and it's not always easy to move them where you want them when you want them there. Soc Trang is important for 4EB to hit Singapore with full bomb load, and Quinhon is important to hit Hong Kong and Canton with full bomb load. Saigon has nice facilities that are good enough for now. Support troops are on the way but no specialized construction units.

As for BB washington.... 96% flotation, ouch. That's really... bad. Not many chances of survival there...
Good crew, good captain, the same on 4x escorts. Cross your fingers!



< Message edited by witpqs -- 6/26/2015 11:38:57 PM >


_____________________________


(in reply to Drakanel)
Post #: 2500
RE: 1944 July 17 - 6/26/2015 11:20:01 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
Is that the Washington next to the Carriers?

You should have taken Groot with something and disbanded there. One AR, and you would have been able to save that ship.


(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 2501
RE: 1944 July 17 - 6/26/2015 11:27:27 PM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline
That is Washington next to the carriers.

I don't think I would want to invest all that to save the ship. A size 0 port does not help, and the other ships in the TF would no longer help, so it would be on the AR to help out. And by the time I got all that done everybody would still be 8 hexes from ~500 LBA at Singapore. Not to mention any DD available able to make the run at full speed for night surface actions, which are always dicey.

_____________________________


(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 2502
RE: 1944 July 17 - 6/27/2015 3:49:24 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: witpqs

That is Washington next to the carriers.

I don't think I would want to invest all that to save the ship. A size 0 port does not help, and the other ships in the TF would no longer help, so it would be on the AR to help out. And by the time I got all that done everybody would still be 8 hexes from ~500 LBA at Singapore. Not to mention any DD available able to make the run at full speed for night surface actions, which are always dicey.


If a lot of the flooding is counter flooding so to speak (not major damage) then the AR would help pump it out very quickly.

But here is an excellent viewpoint of how JFBs look at the game and AFBs. I would move heaven and earth to try and save a BB.

(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 2503
RE: 1944 July 17 - 6/27/2015 3:55:48 AM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline
I think it is not so much writing off the BB without great efforts as it is needing all the other forces at his disposal to support the Indochina Ops with supplies/reinforcements/new air units/fuel. Time is critical for virtually every line of advance he has going if he is to keep the Japanese off-balance. Can't let the land war bog down.

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 2504
1944 July 18 - 6/27/2015 5:33:32 AM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline
1944 July 18

The Empire captured:


The Allies captured:
Ubon

There were Imperial amphibious or airborne operations at:


There were Allied amphibious or airborne operations at:
Pagan


Naval Bombardments
quote:


Allied Ships Bombarding Mergui
Allied Ships Bombarding Pagan


Our subs had a day off.

Quiet in China.

Our armour made it into Pisanuloke in time to stop strategic movement out. The attack at Mergui went well, kicked off by royal battleships. I think (some of?) the defenders were in move mode there.
quote:


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Night Naval bombardment of Mergui at 53,62

Allied Ships
BB Queen Elizabeth
BB Valiant

Japanese ground losses:
102 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Non Combat: 3 destroyed, 11 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Airbase hits 4
Airbase supply hits 3
Runway hits 11
Port hits 2
Port fuel hits 2
Port supply hits 2

BB Queen Elizabeth firing at 2nd INA Gandhi Regiment
BB Valiant firing at Mergui


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ground combat at Mergui (53,62)

Allied Deliberate attack

Attacking force 15008 troops, 262 guns, 349 vehicles, Assault Value = 479

Defending force 7831 troops, 90 guns, 11 vehicles, Assault Value = 162

Allied adjusted assault: 193

Japanese adjusted defense: 117

Allied assault odds: 1 to 1 (fort level 4)

Allied Assault reduces fortifications to 3

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), forts(+), op mode(-), disruption(-)
preparation(-), morale(-), experience(-)
Attacker: fatigue(-)

Japanese ground losses:
627 casualties reported
Squads: 4 destroyed, 36 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 13 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 6 disabled
Guns lost 30 (4 destroyed, 26 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
139 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 16 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 17 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Assaulting units:
3rd Cavalry Regiment
4th Burma Battalion
11th PAVO Regiment
26th Indian Division

Defending units:
112th Infantry Regiment
9th Infantry Regiment
2nd INA Gandhi Regiment
8th JAAF AF Coy
91st JAAF AF Bn
8th Field Construction Battalion
211th Ship Eng Coy
311th Ship Eng Coy
9th JAAF AF Coy


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ground combat at Pisanuloke (58,57)

Allied Shock attack

Attacking force 2135 troops, 0 guns, 288 vehicles, Assault Value = 166

Defending force 9947 troops, 94 guns, 72 vehicles, Assault Value = 237

Allied adjusted assault: 155

Japanese adjusted defense: 94

Allied assault odds: 1 to 1 (fort level 4)

Allied Assault reduces fortifications to 3

Combat modifiers
Defender: forts(+), op mode(-), preparation(-), fatigue(-), morale(-)
experience(-)
Attacker: shock(+)

Japanese ground losses:
154 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 24 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 2 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Allied ground losses:
143 casualties reported
Squads: 6 destroyed, 8 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 6 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Vehicles lost 13 (1 destroyed, 12 disabled)

Assaulting units:
150th RAC Regiment
3rd Carabiniers Regiment
Gardner's Horse Regiment

Defending units:
4th RTA Division
3rd RTA Division
I./143rd Infantry Battalion
2nd RTA/C Division
Burma Area Army
21st Ind.Mixed Brigade


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The armour that crossed into Pisanuloke is enough to stop further crossing-shock attacks, so the 2nd British Div will stay in move mode and arrive tomorrow.

Ubon is ours and the 5th Tank Rgt was shattered.
quote:


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ground combat at Ubon (62,63)

Allied Shock attack

Attacking force 1248 troops, 6 guns, 212 vehicles, Assault Value = 119

Defending force 348 troops, 0 guns, 70 vehicles, Assault Value = 30

Allied adjusted assault: 64

Japanese adjusted defense: 13

Allied assault odds: 4 to 1 (fort level 0)

Allied forces CAPTURE Ubon !!!

Combat modifiers
Defender: leaders(+), disruption(-)
Attacker: shock(+)

Japanese ground losses:
Vehicles lost 62 (62 destroyed, 0 disabled)
Units retreated 1

Defeated Japanese Units Retreating!

Assaulting units:
775th Tank Battalion
640th Tank Destroyer Battalion

Defending units:
5th Tank Regiment


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Both units will pursue, leaving Ubon empty until others catch up. First attack at Phnom Penh tomorrow. Two Arm Rgt and one Inf Bde have made contact again just SW of Tourane and will attack tomorrow. Also, 2/11th Armoured Car Rgt will attack that support unit SE of Pakse.

Kamikazes made attacks on the USN fleet guarding BB Washington but all were destroyed by CAP. 97% flotation damage for Washington.

Recon of Tokyo continues finding additional damage. There are now 101 fighters at Tokyo!




Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 2505
RE: 1944 July 18 - 6/27/2015 5:34:02 AM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline
Added to strategic points.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 2506
RE: 1944 July 18 - 6/27/2015 5:34:54 AM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline
Indochina. There are approximately 80,000 Imperial troops in the Chiang Mai area.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 2507
RE: 1944 July 17 - 6/27/2015 5:37:47 AM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

I think it is not so much writing off the BB without great efforts as it is needing all the other forces at his disposal to support the Indochina Ops with supplies/reinforcements/new air units/fuel. Time is critical for virtually every line of advance he has going if he is to keep the Japanese off-balance. Can't let the land war bog down.

Definitely. Groot Natoena would be just a distraction that required big defense. As it is I have to be careful that the (eventual) invasion of Kuching does not take undue resources. I've been pulling base forces out of the eastern DEI like crazy.

_____________________________


(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 2508
RE: 1944 July 17 - 6/27/2015 6:02:44 AM   
Rio Bravo


Posts: 1794
Joined: 7/13/2013
From: Grass Valley, California
Status: offline
witpqs-

Interesting reading!

Quite the battle for Indochina.

Best Regards,

-Terry

_____________________________

"No one throws me my own guns and tells me to run. No one."

-Bret (James Coburn); The Magnificent Seven

(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 2509
RE: 1944 July 17 - 6/27/2015 6:58:32 AM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline
Thanks!

_____________________________


(in reply to Rio Bravo)
Post #: 2510
RE: 1944 July 17 - 6/27/2015 11:01:44 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: witpqs


quote:

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

I think it is not so much writing off the BB without great efforts as it is needing all the other forces at his disposal to support the Indochina Ops with supplies/reinforcements/new air units/fuel. Time is critical for virtually every line of advance he has going if he is to keep the Japanese off-balance. Can't let the land war bog down.

Definitely. Groot Natoena would be just a distraction that required big defense. As it is I have to be careful that the (eventual) invasion of Kuching does not take undue resources. I've been pulling base forces out of the eastern DEI like crazy.


Fair enough.

I see movement arrows at Chiang Mai now.

(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 2511
RE: 1944 July 17 - 7/3/2015 12:54:06 PM   
cdnice


Posts: 179
Joined: 5/7/2009
From: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Status: offline
I have a question since you seem to have landing nailed. I know that ideally there should be a DMS TF to clear the mines, a SCTF to intercept any raiders, a bombardment TF to soften up the target and then the amphibious force to land the ground troops followed by supply TF and a reserve TF with additional ground troops/support troops. My question is how do you coordinate them all? Are you setting follow orders? I believe I read somewhere that can cause issues. Or is it a matter of staging them over a couple of days (mine sweep/bombardment one day followed by landing)? Or is there some order built into the game where different tasked TF's proceed in a set order (to quote a (in)famous forumite, pretend I didn't read the manual .

_____________________________



(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 2512
RE: 1944 July 17 - 7/3/2015 12:54:57 PM   
cdnice


Posts: 179
Joined: 5/7/2009
From: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Status: offline
Oh, and a air cover TF too.......

_____________________________



(in reply to cdnice)
Post #: 2513
RE: 1944 July 17 - 7/3/2015 3:06:46 PM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline
First an aside - I don't use a mine sweeping task force anymore for most operations because the defense's guns just sink them all! I put mine sweeping assets in the invasion TFs instead. That does mean the minefields are around longer and have to be swept once the base is captured (defense guns don't fire on them when it's your own base), but the alternative is to start running out of mine sweepers.

I don't use 'follow'; I just order each TF by itself! Takes longer, might forget one, and I'm sure it's not foolproof either.

_____________________________


(in reply to cdnice)
Post #: 2514
RE: 1944 July 17 - 7/3/2015 4:35:39 PM   
cdnice


Posts: 179
Joined: 5/7/2009
From: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Status: offline
How many sweepers in a landing TF?

And thanks, that helps!

_____________________________



(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 2515
RE: 1944 July 17 - 7/3/2015 8:05:46 PM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: witpqs

First an aside - I don't use a mine sweeping task force anymore for most operations because the defense's guns just sink them all! I put mine sweeping assets in the invasion TFs instead. That does mean the minefields are around longer and have to be swept once the base is captured (defense guns don't fire on them when it's your own base), but the alternative is to start running out of mine sweepers.

I don't use 'follow'; I just order each TF by itself! Takes longer, might forget one, and I'm sure it's not foolproof either.


In the Marianas scenario where there are Amphib, CVE and ASW TFs to coordinate I just used the speed of the slowest TFs (amphib) to determine how many hexes it would move during the turn and set all the TFs to go to the hex that it would end up in. Exception: one ASW TF goes one hex further to "sweep" ahead of the rest. As witpqs said, it means giving orders to each TF each turn but when they are clustered together it is easy to do. I monitor fuel states and do a "Refuel TF at Sea" if needed before determining where the slowest TF will end up.

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 2516
1944 July 19 - 7/3/2015 8:46:25 PM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline
1944 July 19

The Empire captured:


The Allies captured:
Phnom Penh

There were Imperial amphibious or airborne operations at:


There were Allied amphibious or airborne operations at:
Pagan


Naval Bombardments
quote:


Allied Ships Bombarding Pagan


Our subs came up empty despite a couple of fights.

Quiet in China.

Continued air strikes and movement into Thailand from the west and north, plus a good attack at Mergui. That attack will continue tomorrow and the next attack east of Tavoy has been ordered. The first attack at Pisnuloke will be made tomorrow as well.
quote:


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ground combat at Mergui (53,62)

Allied Deliberate attack

Attacking force 14864 troops, 262 guns, 349 vehicles, Assault Value = 461

Defending force 7294 troops, 85 guns, 11 vehicles, Assault Value = 118

Allied adjusted assault: 362

Japanese adjusted defense: 111

Allied assault odds: 3 to 1 (fort level 3)

Allied Assault reduces fortifications to 2

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), forts(+), disruption(-), preparation(-)
morale(-), experience(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
282 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 32 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 6 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled

Allied ground losses:
304 casualties reported
Squads: 2 destroyed, 15 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 7 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Guns lost 12 (1 destroyed, 11 disabled)

Assaulting units:
4th Burma Battalion
11th PAVO Regiment
3rd Cavalry Regiment
26th Indian Division

Defending units:
112th Infantry Regiment
9th Infantry Regiment
2nd INA Gandhi Regiment
8th Field Construction Battalion
311th Ship Eng Coy
8th JAAF AF Coy
91st JAAF AF Bn
211th Ship Eng Coy
9th JAAF AF Coy



Damage of Bangkok's airfield complex is racking up slowly as most air assets are busy elsewhere. Sweeps over Bangkok have gutted fighter opposition there in combination with the tough Flying Fotresses. Tomorrow Five fighter squadrons (1x P-38J; 1x P-47D25; 2x P-51B; 1x P40N5) will all 40% LRCAP Chiang Mai to ambush Imperial transports flying out of Bangkok. Altitudes are split among 5,000, 7,000, and 10,000 ft.

Phnom Penh was taken handily. Bien Hoa will be assaulted tomorrow. Another victory over the retreating ex-defenders of Quinhon, this time routing them into Tourane. The unit near Pakse held firm against armoured cars, so tank destroyers are being sent in to help.
quote:


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ground combat at Phnom Penh (58,69)

Allied Deliberate attack

Attacking force 23563 troops, 343 guns, 372 vehicles, Assault Value = 747

Defending force 3962 troops, 32 guns, 8 vehicles, Assault Value = 74

Allied engineers reduce fortifications to 0

Allied adjusted assault: 604

Japanese adjusted defense: 12

Allied assault odds: 50 to 1 (fort level 0)

Allied forces CAPTURE Phnom Penh !!!

Combat modifiers
Defender: forts(+), leaders(+), disruption(-), preparation(-)
fatigue(-), morale(-), experience(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
2356 casualties reported
Squads: 50 destroyed, 16 disabled
Non Combat: 44 destroyed, 24 disabled
Engineers: 11 destroyed, 1 disabled
Guns lost 13 (12 destroyed, 1 disabled)
Vehicles lost 4 (4 destroyed, 0 disabled)
Units retreated 3

Allied ground losses:
26 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 5 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Defeated Japanese Units Retreating!

Assaulting units:
671th Tank Destroyer Battalion
32nd Infantry Division
780th Amphib Tank Battalion
2nd Australian Division

Defending units:
78th Infantry Regiment
12th Port Unit
15th JAAF AF Bn


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ground combat at 63,65 (near Pakse)

Allied Deliberate attack

Attacking force 468 troops, 0 guns, 64 vehicles, Assault Value = 41

Defending force 1080 troops, 0 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 1

Allied adjusted assault: 18

Japanese adjusted defense: 13

Allied assault odds: 1 to 1

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), fatigue(-)
Attacker: leaders(-)

Assaulting units:
2/11th Armoured Car Regiment

Defending units:
28th Air Flotilla


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ground combat at 66,66 (near Tourane)

Allied Deliberate attack

Attacking force 5672 troops, 78 guns, 240 vehicles, Assault Value = 397

Defending force 1018 troops, 10 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 13

Allied adjusted assault: 101

Japanese adjusted defense: 1

Allied assault odds: 101 to 1

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), leaders(+), leaders(-), fatigue(-)
experience(-), supply(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
538 casualties reported
Squads: 18 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 19 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 4 (4 destroyed, 0 disabled)
Units retreated 1

Allied ground losses:
5 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled

Defeated Japanese Units Retreating!

Assaulting units:
23rd Australian Brigade
2/5th Armoured Regiment
2/4th Armoured Regiment
22nd Australian Brigade

Defending units:
23rd Ind.Mixed Brigade


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Only sub action in the South China Sea for a change. Washington's condition improved slightly and is now still worse than when she was first hit.

Resupply efforts south of Japan ran into trouble.
quote:


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Morning Air attack on TF, near Torishima at 111,68

Weather in hex: Light cloud

Raid spotted at 1 NM, estimated altitude 8,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 0 minutes

Japanese aircraft
A6M5 Zero x 16

Allied aircraft
P-47D25 Thunderbolt x 16
TBF-1 Avenger x 16

Japanese aircraft losses
A6M5 Zero: 3 destroyed

Allied aircraft losses
P-47D25 Thunderbolt: 3 destroyed
TBF-1 Avenger: 1 damaged

Japanese Ships
xAK Bushu Maru, Torpedo hits 2, and is sunk
PB Kembu Maru
xAK Katsukawa Maru, Torpedo hits 2, and is sunk

Aircraft Attacking:
16 x TBF-1 Avenger launching torpedoes at 200 feet
Naval Attack: 1 x 22.4in Mk 13 Torp.

CAP engaged:
302 Ku S-1 with A6M5 Zero (16 airborne, 0 on standby, 0 scrambling)
16 plane(s) intercepting now.
Group patrol altitude is 15000 , scrambling fighters between 0 and 15000.
Raid is overhead



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Afternoon Air attack on TF, near Torishima at 111,68

Weather in hex: Heavy rain

Raid spotted at 12 NM, estimated altitude 7,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 5 minutes

Japanese aircraft
A6M5 Zero x 11

Allied aircraft
P-47D25 Thunderbolt x 9
TBF-1 Avenger x 15

Japanese aircraft losses
A6M5 Zero: 4 destroyed

Allied aircraft losses
TBF-1 Avenger: 1 damaged

Japanese Ships
PB Kembu Maru, Torpedo hits 1, and is sunk
PB Hakkaisan Maru

Aircraft Attacking:
15 x TBF-1 Avenger launching torpedoes at 200 feet
Naval Attack: 1 x 22.4in Mk 13 Torp.

CAP engaged:
302 Ku S-1 with A6M5 Zero (11 airborne, 0 on standby, 0 scrambling)
11 plane(s) intercepting now.
Group patrol altitude is 15000 , scrambling fighters between 0 and 15000.
Raid is overhead



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Dili and Pagan operations continue.

Intel. Toyko must have a little more damage showing.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 2517
RE: 1944 July 19 - 7/3/2015 8:46:50 PM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline
Tokyo.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 2518
RE: 1944 July 19 - 7/3/2015 9:58:43 PM   
Drakanel

 

Posts: 253
Joined: 4/6/2015
Status: offline
It's nice to see you're progressing so quickly, taking Phnom Penh with minimal problems. There doesn't seem to be much opposition, but still! But I do have another noobish question....

About your fighters doing LRCAP over Chiang Mai. Do you actually KNOW that there are transports operating there? Or do you just think so? And if you KNOW... how? :P

Is it the auxiliary airframes number you can see hovering on the base? I was under the impression that might also be recon planes, patrol planes or such?


< Message edited by Drakanel -- 7/3/2015 11:00:46 PM >

(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 2519
RE: 1944 July 19 - 7/4/2015 12:40:13 AM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Drakanel

It's nice to see you're progressing so quickly, taking Phnom Penh with minimal problems. There doesn't seem to be much opposition, but still! But I do have another noobish question....

About your fighters doing LRCAP over Chiang Mai. Do you actually KNOW that there are transports operating there? Or do you just think so? And if you KNOW... how? :P

Is it the auxiliary airframes number you can see hovering on the base? I was under the impression that might also be recon planes, patrol planes or such?


Hehe hehe - trade secret! Just kidding.

There are two ways that I know, one semi-direct and the other totally indirect.

First off, there are many dozen auxiliary types there, and there were even more a short time ago. More than 70 planes for search & recon... no way!

Add that to the situation, it is absolutely the thing to do - meaning get as many combat troops as possible out of pockets where they are being destroyed. That's the indirect way.

The semi-direct way is to add the first point (many auxiliaries) to the fact that I saw (in combat reports and/or SigInt reports) a fragment of the unit at Bangkok when the main unit was encircled at Rangoon. It's very safe to assume that the same thing is taking place with units at Chiang Mai now that several units have made it through the jungle to the base.

The 40% LRCAP of ~125 fighters (about 100 of them near best models) with excellent pilots should bag a bunch the first day to tell us the tale.

_____________________________


(in reply to Drakanel)
Post #: 2520
Page:   <<   < prev  82 83 [84] 85 86   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: 1944 July 16 Page: <<   < prev  82 83 [84] 85 86   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.609