Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> Mods and Scenarios >> RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues Page: <<   < prev  60 61 [62] 63 64   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 7/17/2015 9:22:15 AM   
ComDev

 

Posts: 5735
Joined: 5/12/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: 1Eddie2

Hi again, just a short list of missing UK units. Most are already in-game with other countries.

RAF

Britten-Norman Islander, in service as 'Islander BN2T CC Mk2', used for photographic reconnaissance and light communications. Outfit unknown.

Super King Air B200 and B200T used as an advanced multi-engine trainer for student pilots.

(Short) Tucano T1 is a basic lead-in fast-jet training aircraft.

Agusta A109E used for VIP transport. Only one in service.

Griffin HAR2, based on the Bell 412EP and based in Cyprus for SAR roles.


Thanks, but I seriously doubt these will ever be used in scenarios? Can add if requested by scen designer

quote:


Royal Navy Fleet Air Arm (aircraft)

Avenger T1, based on the Super King Air 300 military, is used for navigator training.

3x Scan Eagle, but I think I've mentioned it before.

Army Air Corps

Defender AL-2. Used C2, communications, reconnaissance and photographics roles. Equipped with DAS and an EO pod under the nose. Based on the Britten-Norman Defender 4000. One Defender T3 (trainer) also in use but it's probably not much use in CMANO.


As above

quote:


Lynx AH9A. There is a Lynx AH9 in game however all of these were upgraded to AH9A standard. Uses the LHTEC CTS800-4N (1,362 shp) engines, the same as the Wildcat so that it had commonality with them.


Added, thanks!

quote:


There's also the Bell Griffin HT1 and Eurocopter AS350 Squirrel HT1 training aircraft that equip RAF/AAC squadrons but are contractor owned.

Royal Navy (ships)

P 257 Clyde (modified River Class batch 1 PB) is missing. This has been in service for a few years and patrols the Falklands. Has a 30mm DS30B and strengthened deck for flight operations, supporting the weight of a Merlin helicopter.

Forth class (River Class batch 2). 3x ships (Forth, Medway, Trent) similar to the Brazilian Amazonas class with Merlin-capable flight deck, 30mm DS30B, Kelvin Hughes SharpEye nav radar and Terma 4103 2D naval air & surface surveillance radar.


Added in DB v440.

quote:


Army (land)
Warrior 40mm. The current Warriors are receiving an upgrade to the 40mm CTA from their 30mm Rardens. Includes new EO sights and comms.

And that's about it.


Will add the Warrior to Mike's to-do list.

Thanks again!

_____________________________



Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!

(in reply to 1Eddie2)
Post #: 1831
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 7/17/2015 9:35:57 AM   
ComDev

 

Posts: 5735
Joined: 5/12/2006
Status: offline 		Thanks for the I-Derby stuff guys

_____________________________



Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!

(in reply to SASR)
Post #: 1832
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 7/17/2015 9:48:35 AM   
ComDev

 

Posts: 5735
Joined: 5/12/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: orca

More news on SEWIP.

Block 1 is in full rate production. Block 2 to start low rate production.

http://defensesystems.com/articles/2015/07/13/navy-lockheed-sewip-contract.aspx?m=1


Sweet, thanks! Need info on designation etc, will be on the lookout

_____________________________



Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!

(in reply to orca)
Post #: 1833
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 7/17/2015 11:32:36 AM   
SASR

 

Posts: 82
Joined: 3/1/2015
Status: offline 		I Think I found the Designation for SEWIP Block 1. SEWIP Block 1 will be the AN/SLQ-32(V)ESE. The AN/SLQ-32(V)5 is a 1980s system, and the AN/SLQ-32(V)6 is SEWIP BLock 2. They probably skipped a number designation for SEWIP Block 1 because it is just meant to replace some obsolete parts in existing SLQ-32 systems.

From : dote / osd / mil / pub / reports / FY2014 / pdf / navy / 2014sewip / pdf

"The SEWIP Block 1 upgrade focused on the replacement of obsolete parts in the AN/SLQ-32"

From : deagel / com / Ship-Protection-Systems /ANSLQ-32V5_a /0 /0 /1 /6 /1 /4 /0 /0 /1 /aspx

"Under the Surface Electronic Warfare Improvement Program (SEWIP) existing AN/SLQ-32 systems were upgraded improving data processing to better correlate and display signals intercepts from the legacy antenna. The AN/SLQ-32(V) Electronic Surveillance Enhancement (ESE) upgraded capabilities were developed by the Naval Research Laboratory. ESE was designed as a single-unit replacement for the existing SLQ-32(V) signal processing elements to be installed on the majority of US Navy capital ships. SEWIP program will enhance processors and control consoles on surface ships through 2025."

"The first SEWIP upgrade was introduced in October 2004, and the second upgrade was expected by December 2005. The SLQ-32(V) ESE was approved for low-rate initial production by the US Navy in early June 2005."

(in reply to ComDev)
Post #: 1834
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 7/17/2015 11:34:37 AM   
SASR

 

Posts: 82
Joined: 3/1/2015
Status: offline 		The SEWIP BLock 2 Will be the AN/SLQ-32(V)6. There is a small RCS version of SEWIP Block 2 being fitted onto the LCSs called the AN/SLQ-32C(V)6

From : janes / com / article /4 3 8 9 2 / sewip-block- 2 -set-for-at-sea-operational-test

"According to the company, the DDG 51 Arleigh Burke-class Flight IIA guided-missile destroyer USS Bainbridge received the SEWIP Block 2 system in July for operational testing. The Block 2 implementation has received the in-service designation AN/SLQ-32(V)6."

- janes / com / article /4 7 8 3 7 / surface-navy- 2015 -sewip-lite-set-for-lcs

"The US Navy (USN) is concluding an evaluation of a scaled-down version of Lockheed Martin's AN/SLQ-32(V)6 electronic warfare (EW) system - developed under the Surface Electronic Warfare Improvement Program (SEWIP) Block 2 upgrade - on board the Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) USS Freedom (LCS 1).

Designated AN/SLQ-32C(V)6, the so-called 'SEWIP Lite' system was installed on board Freedom last year following an accelerated development programme executed by Lockheed Martin Mission Systems and Training in partnership with the USN. Plans are now being drawn up to introduce the small radar cross section (RCS) AN/SLQ-32C(V)6 to both LCS variants as a fleetwide fit."

(in reply to SASR)
Post #: 1835
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 7/17/2015 12:58:17 PM   
Cheechako

 

Posts: 33
Joined: 7/10/2015
Status: offline 		More SEWIP from:

defenseindustrydaily / com / us-navy-from-slick-32s-to-sewip-05365

"SEWIP Block 2 is described as an upgrade, but it’s more like a major home renovation. It replaces the old SLQ-32 receivers and antennas with modern digital technologies, adding new capability, flexibility, and signal processing muscle. Block 2 also modifies the software, creating a single, unified interface to the combat system in place of multiple interfaces to individual components of the combat system. This makes future upgrades simpler, and may also have the effect of improving performance. Lockheed Martin’s ICEWS materials touted under 200ms end-to-end latency, a low false alarm rate, and good high-pulse throughput for cluttered environments.


SEWIP Block 3 and beyond could look very different. Block 3 looks to add improvements to SEWIP’s Electronic Attack (EA, or jamming) capability. ... Initial Operational Test & Evaluation isn’t scheduled until summer 2018."

There's been ~ $300 million awarded in block 2 orders in the past 12 months.

< Message edited by Cheechako -- 7/17/2015 1:57:48 PM >

(in reply to SASR)
Post #: 1836
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 7/17/2015 5:03:17 PM   
xavierv


Posts: 517
Joined: 7/10/2013
Status: offline 		[CHANGED TO DASH-8 DB v440]

Happy to report that my install of CMANO works again thanks to the new public realse built.

Two things I would like to report regarding UAE:
1- The change log mentions the addition of a new Abu Dhabi class (this one I guess )But it is still missing from the UAE Surface ship list.
EDIT 18/07/2015, false alarm the vessel class is now showing... not sur what is going on

2- I always found it weird to see a CN-295 MPA for UAE... and I just checked. I can confirm they got some Dash-8 instead.
Wiki entry: The UAE , meanwhile, he was selected and planned to acquire 4 copies by €156.2 million in the year 2001. However, they have not confirmed the order and instead have acquired two Dash-8 Q300MP airplanes in February 2009.
Actual pic of Dash-8 MPA of UAE: http://i.imgur.com/5DvvSlh.jpg

< Message edited by emsoy -- 7/19/2015 4:59:32 PM >

_____________________________

www.navalnews.com

(in reply to Cheechako)
Post #: 1837
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 7/17/2015 5:53:17 PM   
Hydrolek

 

Posts: 23
Joined: 10/3/2014
Status: offline 		[ADDED DB v440]

Key Points
Poland has agreed to buy the JASSM in order to increase its long-range strike capabilities
The programme will also include upgrades to allow Poland's F-16C/D Block 52 Fighting Falcon fighter aircraft to carry the missile
Poland is adding a standoff cruise missile capability to its air force, signing an agreement to buy the Lockheed Martin AGM-158A Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile (JASSM) on 11 December.

In addition to the purchase of the missiles, the programme will also include the upgrade of 46 Polish Air Force Lockheed Martin F-16C/D Block 52 Fighting Falcon fighter aircraft to carry the missiles.

Tomasz Siemoniak, Polish minister of national defence and deputy prime minister, stated during the signing ceremony at the 31 Tactical Air Base at Krzesiny that "never in [Poland's] history have we had such a modern weapon".

Poland is purchasing the new capability as part of an effort to increase its airborne, naval, and land-based long-range strike assets. This is combined with new defensive missile programmes and is intended to deter hostile actions against Poland. These efforts have been given new impetus by the crisis in Ukraine and concerns about Russia's intentions.

Following the government-to-government letter of offer and acceptance on 11 December, a contract is expected to be awarded to contractor Lockheed Martin in the first quarter of 2015, a company statement said.

The agreement to buy the JASSM follows US Congress approval on 2 October of the sale of up to 40 of the stealthy cruise missiles and the F-16 upgrade package.

According to the Polish Ministry of Defence (MoD), the upgrade process for its F-16s will include the installation of retrofit kits and new software for the aircraft to Mid-Life Update tape M6.5 standard.

Beginning in 2015 two Polish F-16s will have the new software integrated and will conduct flight-trials in the United States. The remaining 44 aircraft will receive the software upgrade and retrofit kits at Polish air bases from the second half of 2016 onwards, when the country also expects to receive its first batch of missiles.

When the US Defense Security Co-operation Agency notified the possible sale of the JASSM to Poland on 17 September it estimated the maximum cost of the programme at USD500 million: a figure that Polish sources previously described as "unacceptably high".

However, Polish deputy defence minister Czeslaw Mroczek, responsible for negotiating the purchase, stated that the price of the contract "was negotiated [for a] long [time], but we received a very good price and the contract includes not only the acquisition of JASSM missiles, but also the development of customised software and training".

< Message edited by emsoy -- 7/19/2015 1:36:14 PM >

(in reply to xavierv)
Post #: 1838
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 7/18/2015 4:47:02 AM   
MR_BURNS2


Posts: 974
Joined: 7/18/2013
From: Austria
Status: offline 		[UPDATED DB v440]

Multiple sources claim that "Bolide" variant of RBS-70 Sam can engage cruise missiles and even ground targets.

http://saab.com/globalassets/commercial/land/weapon-systems/ground-based-air-defence-missile-systems/rbs-70-ng/rbs_70_ng_transforming_high.pdf

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=7b9_1197695902

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qb7V2gG_lDA





< Message edited by emsoy -- 7/19/2015 5:08:13 PM >

_____________________________

Windows 7 64; Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 920 @ 2.67GHz (8 CPUs), ~2.7GHz; 6144MB RAM; NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970;



(in reply to Hydrolek)
Post #: 1839
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 7/18/2015 7:38:48 AM   
xavierv


Posts: 517
Joined: 7/10/2013
Status: offline 		F-35 reality check
https://defenseissues.wordpress.com/2015/07/16/f-35-reality-check/

Not sure if this could be useful in any ways. It "seems" very technical and the guy "seems" like he knows what he is talking about (I am not Engineer...) but on the other hand, it is quite negative overall.

_____________________________

www.navalnews.com

(in reply to MR_BURNS2)
Post #: 1840
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 7/18/2015 5:01:30 PM   
mikmykWS

 

Posts: 11524
Joined: 3/22/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: navyrecognition

Happy to report that my install of CMANO works again thanks to the new public realse built.

Two things I would like to report regarding UAE:
1- The change log mentions the addition of a new Abu Dhabi class (this one I guess )But it is still missing from the UAE Surface ship list.
EDIT 18/07/2015, false alarm the vessel class is now showing... not sur what is going on

2- I always found it weird to see a CN-295 MPA for UAE... and I just checked. I can confirm they got some Dash-8 instead.
Wiki entry: The UAE , meanwhile, he was selected and planned to acquire 4 copies by €156.2 million in the year 2001. However, they have not confirmed the order and instead have acquired two Dash-8 Q300MP airplanes in February 2009.
Actual pic of Dash-8 MPA of UAE: http://i.imgur.com/5DvvSlh.jpg


Abu Dhabi is there. Please remember that if you're opening a scenario and then viewing the db viewer it opens the db it was created with. Please check again and make sure you have version 1.08.

Abu

_____________________________


(in reply to xavierv)
Post #: 1841
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 7/18/2015 8:00:36 PM   
SuaveWatermelon

 

Posts: 65
Joined: 1/3/2014
Status: offline
quote:

F-35 reality check
https://defenseissues.wordpress.com/2015/07/16/f-35-reality-check/

Not sure if this could be useful in any ways. It "seems" very technical and the guy "seems" like he knows what he is talking about (I am not Engineer...) but on the other hand, it is quite negative overall.


I'm no expert myself, but I know that Picard has had a long stint of criticizing anything and everything with the F-35 (much like Bill Sweet man; though I don't know Picard's exact identity).

Too many dubious and unqualified statements within the post such as

quote:


F-35 also has twice the frontal area, which cancels out its double amount of dry thrust


Seeing as he has not sourced the data to back this claim, this man's credibility is questionable at best (If he were credible, he would source the data for the F-35's frontal area, the equations used to calculate the applicable types of drag, etc).

He also attributed a quote to "Griffiths" without either stating who that is, the source that he retrieved the quote from, or the context in which it was said. Anyone who is worth their salt will do these things.

quote:

“What we can do in our airplane is get above the Mach with afterburner, and once you get it going … you can definitely pull the throttle back quite a bit and still maintain supersonic, so technically you’re pretty much at very, very min[imum] afterburner while you’re cruising,” Griffiths said. “So it really does have very good acceleration capabilities up in the air.”


He also cites wing loading as a reason that the F-35 cannot supercruise (he doesn't mention lifting body design).

Some of Picard's other "interesting" statements

http://theaviationist.com/2013/02/11/typhoon-aerial-combat/ (check the comments)

He does not qualify himself or his statements and is therefore not worth yours or anyone else's attention.

(in reply to mikmykWS)
Post #: 1842
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 7/18/2015 8:29:33 PM   
SuaveWatermelon

 

Posts: 65
Joined: 1/3/2014
Status: offline 		Also while the F-35 is the subject, not sure if any of you have seen this, but Avweek had an interesting bit about the F-16 and F-35 BFM test
from back in April, not long after the test occurred.

quote:

The F-35 Joint Strike Fighter has been flown in air-to-air combat maneuvers against F-16s for the first time and, based on the results of these and earlier flight-envelope evaluations, test pilots say the aircraft can be cleared for greater agility as a growth option.

Although the F-35 is designed primarily for attack rather than air combat, U.S. Air Force and Lockheed Martin test pilots say the availability of potential margin for additional maneuverability is a testament to the aircraft’s recently proven overall handling qualities and basic flying performance. “The door is open to provide a little more maneuverability,” says Lockheed Martin F-35 site lead test pilot David “Doc” Nelson.

The operational maneuvers were flown by Nelson in AF-2, the primary Flight Sciences loads and flutter evaluation aircraft, and one of nine F-35s used by the Edwards AFB-based 412th Test Wing for developmental testing (DT).


and

quote:

Work is underway as part of efforts to clear the final system development and demonstration (SDD) maneuvering envelopes on the way to initial operational capability (IOC)


and

quote:

The operational maneuver tests were conducted to see “how it would look like against an F-16 in the airspace,” says Col. Rod “Trash” Cregier, F-35 program director. “It was an early look at any control laws that may need to be tweaked to enable it to fly better in future. You can definitely tweak it—that’s the option.”


http://aviationweek.com/defense/f-35-flies-against-f-16-basic-fighter-maneuvers

(To read this article, you need to register. Fortunately this is free (I'm not 100% certain of the stipulations, but that was what I did with no troubles)).

What's important to note is that this was a Developmental test and not an Operational test (which means that this test is not meant to evaluate the operational capabilities of the F-35, but instead to test flight software for potential tweaks, which 'Doc' Nelson says can be done).

I'll see what else I can find, but it's clear that it's too early to tell just how maneuverable the F-35 will be when it hits block 3F or 4.

(in reply to SuaveWatermelon)
Post #: 1843
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 7/19/2015 12:08:57 AM   
ckfinite

 

Posts: 377
Joined: 7/20/2013
Status: offline 		The S-400 (2013) doesn't have the 9M96 missile in DB439. It's pretty easy to find pictures of a S-400 TEL with the missile, like this one from APA:


(in reply to SuaveWatermelon)
Post #: 1844
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 7/19/2015 3:07:56 PM   
ComDev

 

Posts: 5735
Joined: 5/12/2006
Status: offline
quote:



NTC "Zaslon" ( this is former NTC "Leninets" creators of radar stations for Su-34 and Mig-31) show radar complex "Zaslon" for project 20385 and 20386 ships

X-band radar from RLK "Zaslon"




on 20385



on 20386


from video presentation on IMDS-2015:
in RLK "Zaslon included stations of X-band, stations of S-band and datalinks for missiles, range of RLK "Zaslon" is 75km against target with RCS=1 sq.m. , max range of detection for active radio emission target 300km ,the number of tracked targets - more than 100.
This system is capable of producing active jamming in the area of up to 360 degrees in the frequency range of X and Ku.



Looking at photos it seems the Zaslon system isn't installed yet on 2038.5?

_____________________________



Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!

(in reply to SASR)
Post #: 1845
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 7/19/2015 3:13:48 PM   
ComDev

 

Posts: 5735
Joined: 5/12/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Splinter00S

Since I saw that generic light/medium CATOBAR carriers were added to the database, I thoguht that perhaps it could be useful to have generic versions of other aircraft carriers as well, such as:
-heavy CATOBAR carrier (e.g. generic Kitty Hawk class)
-light/medium STOBAR carrier (e.g. generic Liaoning carrier)
-light/medium STOVL carrier (e.g generic Invincible class or generic QE class)
-light/medium LHA/LHD (e.g. generic America class or Wasp class)


Will add if requested by scen designers

quote:


In addition, I noticed there wasn't an entry for the Laser Weapon System, and since it has been sucessfully tested and is currently deployed on USS Ponce I thought it could make a good addition as a hypothetical CIWS system.
I can't post links but the Office of Navel Research, NAVSEA, and several other military news websites have articles about the LAWS (30kW solid state laser) and it's deployment on the USS Ponce (currently has shot down a ScanEagle UAV, destroyed several boats, and potentially has the accuracy to target individual people/weapons on a boat).


It's in there already:

AN/SEQ-3 (SC-1) LaWS Laser Weapon System

_____________________________



Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!

(in reply to Splinter00S)
Post #: 1846
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 7/19/2015 3:32:13 PM   
ComDev

 

Posts: 5735
Joined: 5/12/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: 1Eddie2
The RAF C-130J upgrade will be considered substantial enough for it to be named Hercules C6 (it is current C5). Nine have been fitted with external fuel tanks for extended range and are likely for special forces use.


Thanks Eddie. Do you have more info on the capacity of those fuel tanks?

_____________________________



Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!

(in reply to 1Eddie2)
Post #: 1847
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 7/19/2015 3:42:23 PM   
ComDev

 

Posts: 5735
Joined: 5/12/2006
Status: offline 		Sweet, thanks!

Any photos of the boats with the system installed?


quote:

ORIGINAL: SASR

The SEWIP BLock 2 Will be the AN/SLQ-32(V)6. There is a small RCS version of SEWIP Block 2 being fitted onto the LCSs called the AN/SLQ-32C(V)6

From : janes / com / article /4 3 8 9 2 / sewip-block- 2 -set-for-at-sea-operational-test

"According to the company, the DDG 51 Arleigh Burke-class Flight IIA guided-missile destroyer USS Bainbridge received the SEWIP Block 2 system in July for operational testing. The Block 2 implementation has received the in-service designation AN/SLQ-32(V)6."

- janes / com / article /4 7 8 3 7 / surface-navy- 2015 -sewip-lite-set-for-lcs

"The US Navy (USN) is concluding an evaluation of a scaled-down version of Lockheed Martin's AN/SLQ-32(V)6 electronic warfare (EW) system - developed under the Surface Electronic Warfare Improvement Program (SEWIP) Block 2 upgrade - on board the Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) USS Freedom (LCS 1).

Designated AN/SLQ-32C(V)6, the so-called 'SEWIP Lite' system was installed on board Freedom last year following an accelerated development programme executed by Lockheed Martin Mission Systems and Training in partnership with the USN. Plans are now being drawn up to introduce the small radar cross section (RCS) AN/SLQ-32C(V)6 to both LCS variants as a fleetwide fit."

quote:

Designated AN/SLQ-32C(V)6, the so-called 'SEWIP Lite' system was installed on board Freedom last year following an accelerated development programme executed by Lockheed Martin Mission Systems and Training in partnership with the USN. Plans are now being drawn up to introduce the small radar cross section (RCS) AN/SLQ-32C(V)6 to both LCS variants as a fleetwide fit."


_____________________________



Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!

(in reply to SASR)
Post #: 1848
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 7/19/2015 4:09:19 PM   
ComDev

 

Posts: 5735
Joined: 5/12/2006
Status: offline 		But is the S-400 operational with the 9M96M missile? Don't think it is, yet. Or?


quote:

ORIGINAL: ckfinite

The S-400 (2013) doesn't have the 9M96 missile in DB439. It's pretty easy to find pictures of a S-400 TEL with the missile, like this one from APA:





_____________________________



Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!

(in reply to ckfinite)
Post #: 1849
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 7/19/2015 4:22:09 PM   
ComDev

 

Posts: 5735
Joined: 5/12/2006
Status: offline 		BIG BUMP!

BIG BUMP!

BIG BUMP!

What was the deal with the North Korean SSB submarine reported earlier this year? Does it exist, or was it just propaganda?

Thanks!

< Message edited by emsoy -- 7/19/2015 5:23:10 PM >

_____________________________



Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!

(in reply to ComDev)
Post #: 1850
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 7/19/2015 4:30:53 PM   
Triode

 

Posts: 283
Joined: 9/26/2014
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: emsoy


Looking at photos it seems the Zaslon system isn't installed yet on 2038.5?


No, radar will be installed after ship hiting water
here is Gremyashiy from 29.01.2015
http://files.balancer.ru/forums/attaches/2015/01/29-3725473-20385-gremyaschij-vid-na-kormovuyu-chast-nadstrojki.jpg

2038.5 currently in not very good situation, this ship should have engines from MTU, but sanction ...
so, OSK say they could change MTU engines for Kolomna (the same as on 20380) without change in date of delivery
(wich is doubtful since they already missing planned launching in 2014) and currently decided that there will be only two of 20385

still Navy dont like 20380 and here came 20386:


citation:
"Within the framework of the International Maritime Defense Show IMDS-2015 in St. Petersburg "Lenta.ru" managed to get an exclusive interview with the chief of department state defense order the United Shipbuilding Corporation Anatoly Shlemov, who spoke about the future projects of ships and submarines for the Russian Navy.

-Let's talk about for last corvettes. A lot of models ...

-What kind of models?

-At the stands.

-We have a serial type corvette - 20380 build four units, two more are under construction. It was decided to build two Project 20385 corvette, and to further develop the project 20386."
http://lenta.ru/articles/2015/07/03/shlemov/ in russian

so there will be only two 20385 (in some unknown time when problems with engines will be resolwed) and then 20386

(in reply to ComDev)
Post #: 1851
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 7/19/2015 4:35:35 PM   
Triode

 

Posts: 283
Joined: 9/26/2014
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: emsoy

But is the S-400 operational with the 9M96M missile? Don't think it is, yet. Or?





At start of S-400 development it was plan of using 9M96 in it,
than this plans turn into separate S-350 program

(in reply to ComDev)
Post #: 1852
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 7/19/2015 5:44:08 PM   
ComDev

 

Posts: 5735
Joined: 5/12/2006
Status: offline 		Thanks Triode So need to wait a little with the Zaslon radar then.

And the S-400 answer was... no?

_____________________________



Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!

(in reply to Triode)
Post #: 1853
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 7/19/2015 6:03:56 PM   
Triode

 

Posts: 283
Joined: 9/26/2014
Status: offline 		No, S-400 dont use 9m96 (capable, tested with it, but don't procured in this configuration)
only S-350 use 9m96 (more precisely 9m96D/9m96E2)

(in reply to ComDev)
Post #: 1854
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 7/19/2015 6:32:26 PM   
MrGandi

 

Posts: 52
Joined: 4/5/2014
Status: offline 		Hello emsoy,

Thank you for pointing out to place questions regarding DB questions here.
Not sure how often you did this already to us

When I use the MQ-1C it has same 360 degree radar range as the E-3C at same altitude. So way over 40+km.
Please see screenshot attached.


Attachment (1)

(in reply to Triode)
Post #: 1855
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 7/19/2015 6:40:14 PM   
MrGandi

 

Posts: 52
Joined: 4/5/2014
Status: offline 		Sorry guys taking back my MQ-1c issue.

Had first older DB build.
After updating to the newest build the issue remained.
However when I ad again a MQ-1C to the scenrio the radar range looks right now.




(in reply to MrGandi)
Post #: 1856
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 7/19/2015 7:02:13 PM   
ComDev

 

Posts: 5735
Joined: 5/12/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Triode

No, S-400 dont use 9m96 (capable, tested with it, but don't procured in this configuration)
only S-350 use 9m96 (more precisely 9m96D/9m96E2)


Thanks!

_____________________________



Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!

(in reply to Triode)
Post #: 1857
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 7/19/2015 7:02:51 PM   
ComDev

 

Posts: 5735
Joined: 5/12/2006
Status: offline 		....aaand BUMP!


quote:

ORIGINAL: emsoy

BIG BUMP!

BIG BUMP!

BIG BUMP!

What was the deal with the North Korean SSB submarine reported earlier this year? Does it exist, or was it just propaganda?

Thanks!



_____________________________



Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!

(in reply to ComDev)
Post #: 1858
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 7/19/2015 7:33:34 PM   
Coiler12

 

Posts: 1203
Joined: 10/13/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: emsoy

....aaand BUMP!


quote:

ORIGINAL: emsoy

BIG BUMP!

BIG BUMP!

BIG BUMP!

What was the deal with the North Korean SSB submarine reported earlier this year? Does it exist, or was it just propaganda?

Thanks!



Found this aggregation of pieces on it (and SLBMs in general)

-Apparently, the missile exists, but the submarine (much less its operational status) is far more dubious.
EDIT: 38-North says the submarine is still being built, just that it's not integrated with the missile yet.

< Message edited by Coiler12 -- 7/19/2015 8:37:22 PM >

(in reply to ComDev)
Post #: 1859
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 7/19/2015 8:40:26 PM   
mikmykWS

 

Posts: 11524
Joined: 3/22/2005
Status: offline 		I'd just close for now. Not enough data.

Mike

_____________________________


(in reply to Coiler12)
Post #: 1860
Page:   <<   < prev  60 61 [62] 63 64   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> Mods and Scenarios >> RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues Page: <<   < prev  60 61 [62] 63 64   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

2.047