Lokasenna
Posts: 9297
Joined: 3/3/2012 From: Iowan in MD/DC Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: JocMeister quote:
ORIGINAL: Lokasenna quote:
ORIGINAL: JocMeister quote:
ORIGINAL: mind_messing I've quite enjoyed it. It's good fun playing the middle tier Japanese destroyers and crusiers, though I've yet to give the American tree a go. Got the chance to play some today. Really fun. Very easy to get into and quite addicting. The tier II cruiser was a really bad grind though. That Cruiser sucked. Had time to play one round with the tier III which felt a lot better with the extra guns although slower. Time to decide if I should go BB or stick with the CA line. Any hints? The first battleships are absolute garbage. You're better off skipping them using free XP. I bought a small amount of doubloons and kept some ships I had gone through (they become "elite" and you have to transfer the XP off of them using doubloons at a rate of 25 XP to 1 doubloon) just so I could play ships I enjoyed to skip ships I didn't enjoy. My summary of ships I've played so far: South Carolina - skipped it, heard nothing but complaints from my friend who did play it Kawachi - OK, but only 9KM range. 9KM! That's DD range. Myogi - kind of fun. Wyoming is a bit better, maybe. I'm almost to the Kongo, which looks like a huge improvement. In general, IJN BBs are faster and shoot a bit better, while USN BBs are slower but maybe a bit more armored. Cruisers... USN is marginally better on some, IJN on others. The St Louis is better than the Tenryu (T3). The Kuma and Phoenix, both T4, are comparable. The Omaha is ROCKING compared to the Furutaka. The Furutaka is just awful. Everything about it is worse than the Kuma except for the health, which is still crappy. The Aoba (T6) is a bit better but has issues. I'm suffering through so I can get the Mogami... The Cleveland is marginally OP. DDs - I prefer Japanese. They have torpedoes worth calling them torpedoes, but the guns on them are horrendous. In general, IJN DDs are torp boats that happen to have guns while the USN DDs are gun boats that happen to have torps. I'm going to go up the USN line to get back into an Omaha-like playstyle. I love the quick/agile ships with decent guns, and torpedoes to back them up. Fun stuff. I've heard they are going to split the cruiser line into CL and CA lines at some point, which would be nice. Haven't played carriers, but might sometime. EDIT - by the way, I kept the St Louis in my port. It's super fun to play. Is kind of slow, sure, but an 8-gun broadside is so much fun. I think it is a bit hardier than an Omaha also, despite only a 500 HP difference (27300 vs 26800) - armor, I imagine. The upper tier CAs are apparently very good. I would look in the tech tree if I were you and look at the details for the ships. Mouse over the guns icon and see its firing rate, and traverse speed. Click the triangle for your Concealment and Maneuverability on the right hand side to see your "get spotted at" range and to see how fast your rudder shifts and your ship turns. I find those to be most important, at least how I play. Thanks! Some solid advice there! Things are moving much faster now with the St.Luis. Averaging around 500-800 XP per battle. Decided to go for the CA line. Mainly because most guys playing BBs seems to prefer sitting back doing...pretty much nothing while the enemy cap flags... Strangely enough the Tier IV CA looks worse then the St.Luis? I guess its faster though with the TTs? Also decided to not try DDs. Looks like a lot of fun but I´ll continue with the CAs for now. Seems a little bit easier tbh. But I´ve seen some guys playing DDs that are devastating. Might try it when I get better. The Phoenix is a proto-Omaha. Very comparable to the Kuma on the IJN side. Both are fun. If you like the St Louis, you'll like the Phoenix and Omaha. Things change when you get to the Cleveland - I'm not there yet, but my friend is and I can understand his frustration in adjusting.
|