Non-steam version

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

Non-steam version

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [[Fantasy]] >> Sovereignty: Crown of Kings >> Non-steam version

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

Non-steam version - 5/4/2015 9:55:49 PM

Krashzero

Posts: 8
Joined: 1/6/2010
Status: offline

My apologies if this has been asked. For those of us who have no desire to use Steam, but have already purchased the game, will we be notified when it is available for download? Or should we just check from time to time?
Many thanks.

Post #: 1

RE: Non-steam version - 5/4/2015 11:23:08 PM

budd

Posts: 2972
Joined: 7/4/2009
From: Tacoma
Status: offline

from what i understand the early access will be about a year. I imagine it will be listed as released on the front page when it goes official.

_____________________________

Enjoy when you can, and endure when you must. ~Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

"Be Yourself; Everyone else is already taken" ~Oscar Wilde

*I'm in the Wargamer middle ground*
I don't buy all the wargames I want, I just buy more than I need.

(in reply to Krashzero)

Post #: 2

RE: Non-steam version - 5/5/2015 3:55:04 AM

Jim D Burns

Posts: 4013
Joined: 2/25/2002
From: Salida, CA.
Status: offline

I too hate Steam, but went ahead and logged into Steam to get the game installed. I then went to offline mode to play it. It still bugs me that Steam client needs to load to run in offline mode, but for this game I think putting up with Steam for now is worth it. Later I�ll un-install it and use strictly the Matrix version once it�s available.

Note to Matrix: I think it�s a real disservice to force your loyal customers to put up with a service they hate like Steam just to access the early release. The game should be available to run in non-Steam mode as well.

Jim

_____________________________

(in reply to Krashzero)

Post #: 3

RE: Non-steam version - 5/23/2015 8:25:12 AM

Krashzero

Posts: 8
Joined: 1/6/2010
Status: offline

Many thanks to both of you for replying.

Jim: Couldn't agree with you more, regarding your point.

Many thanks again,

Jon

(in reply to Jim D Burns)

Post #: 4

RE: Non-steam version - 6/19/2015 3:31:05 PM

Lord Zimoa

Posts: 837
Joined: 10/10/2008
Status: offline

The problem is we would have to maintain and update two platforms and as we are a very small team, that would be precious time lost we otherwise could invest into game improvement and development.

On another note Steam is by far the easiest platform we ever encountered to update and deliver updates/patches to customers and in case it goes wrong they can simply recover to an older version...

For Early Access it was and is the smartest thing to do.... once we are past that we will try to get the game on as many platforms as possible as a final product, but we know how much extra work that will take to deliver and maintain, so for the best of the EA development process, Steam is ideal for us.

_____________________________

www.thelordzgamesstudio.com
www.panzer-corps.com
www.commander-games.com

(in reply to Krashzero)

Post #: 5

RE: Non-steam version - 8/30/2015 8:30:36 PM

Krashzero

Posts: 8
Joined: 1/6/2010
Status: offline

Firstly, my apologies, I had not realised you had put a post up regarding my query. Secondly, it is much appreciated you took time to reply.

I do not dispute that maintaining a game on two platforms would be difficult, especially when Steam is involved. While I appreciate that, for you as a developer and game producer, Steam is an easy way to update a game, as a games player and buyer I take great displeasure/dislike to be expected to install an intrusive piece of software and be expected to log on to the internet to play it. I do not always have access to a connection and so would not be able to play it when I choose. I have to say from your reply, realistically, I do not think you will be releasing it other than via Steam. I'm just glad you released Panzer Corps and Armageddon via Matrix before going to Steam because I would never have had the chance to own and play them.

The above is written very politely and with no offense meant.

Again, many thanks for replying.

(in reply to Lord Zimoa)

Post #: 6

RE: Non-steam version - 9/29/2015 10:46:44 PM

Jestre

Posts: 180
Joined: 8/8/2006
From: Rhode Island
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Krashzero

Firstly, my apologies, I had not realised you had put a post up regarding my query. Secondly, it is much appreciated you took time to reply.

I do not dispute that maintaining a game on two platforms would be difficult, especially when Steam is involved. While I appreciate that, for you as a developer and game producer, Steam is an easy way to update a game, as a games player and buyer I take great displeasure/dislike to be expected to install an intrusive piece of software and be expected to log on to the internet to play it. I do not always have access to a connection and so would not be able to play it when I choose. I have to say from your reply, realistically, I do not think you will be releasing it other than via Steam. I'm just glad you released Panzer Corps and Armageddon via Matrix before going to Steam because I would never have had the chance to own and play them.

The above is written very politely and with no offense meant.

Again, many thanks for replying.

I too was interested in this game until I saw it was steam-only for now. Wont buy a game using Steam so I will wait til it comes out thru Matrix.

Its a shame I have had to give up Civ and Total War series because of the decision to go Steam only by those companies..

(in reply to Krashzero)

Post #: 7

RE: Non-steam version - 10/14/2015 11:55:58 PM

Zap

Posts: 3639
Joined: 12/6/2004
From: LAS VEGAS TAKE A CHANCE
Status: offline

I too am steam free. So lost interest in this one.

_____________________________

(in reply to Jestre)

Post #: 8

RE: Non-steam version - 10/16/2015 1:53:34 AM

Astyreal

Posts: 37
Joined: 10/2/2010
Status: offline

quote:

Its a shame I have had to give up Civ and Total War series because of the decision to go Steam only by those companies..

You see who's losing out in this exchange, right?

< Message edited by Asty -- 10/16/2015 2:53:59 AM >

(in reply to Jestre)

Post #: 9

RE: Non-steam version - 10/18/2015 6:35:55 PM

zakblood

Posts: 22687
Joined: 10/4/2012
Status: offline

i too dislike steam, but as so many games are steam only or easier to maintain on steam took the plunge and installed it, steam is very easy to use, light in it's approach, doesn't spam or do any adverts and they say 100% they never ever will either, so re think guys, you are missing out on what's not only free, but does give access to some good steam only titles

(in reply to Astyreal)

Post #: 10

RE: Non-steam version - 11/5/2015 4:04:45 PM

Otto von Blotto

Posts: 273
Joined: 7/18/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Asty

quote:

Its a shame I have had to give up Civ and Total War series because of the decision to go Steam only by those companies..

You see who's losing out in this exchange, right?

I would say everyone is losing out, the company is losing many possible sales and the potential customers will either cave and install something they didn't really want (steam) or forget it and move on to another game.

< Message edited by Otto von Blotto -- 11/5/2015 5:06:53 PM >

_____________________________

"Personal isn't the same as important"

(in reply to Astyreal)

Post #: 11

RE: Non-steam version - 11/15/2015 7:30:06 PM

Hertston

Posts: 3564
Joined: 8/17/2002
From: Cornwall, UK
Status: offline

Much as I hate to say it, Steam is so dominant these days as the primary source of PC game distribution I no longer think it's reasonable to expect developers to accommodate those who refuse to use it. If the economics suggest such accommodation is a good idea, it will happen (no Steam cut if you buy direct, after all), but I suspect the number of 'lost sales' because of Steam exclusivity these days is very, very few.

< Message edited by Hertston -- 11/15/2015 8:31:10 PM >

(in reply to Otto von Blotto)

Post #: 12

RE: Non-steam version - 11/16/2015 10:26:47 PM

Otto von Blotto

Posts: 273
Joined: 7/18/2008
Status: offline

Really have things gotten that bad, I still would like to think there there are plenty of really good developers not using a steam only route and still quite a few buyers who don't want to buy using steam, at least 3 in this thread of 12 posts and 2 or 3 others who didn't want steam but wanted to play so much they did give in and decided to use steam so they could play.

I will certainly be waiting until the game is released in a non steam format and if it is steam only at the end then I will live without it and play another game.

< Message edited by Otto von Blotto -- 11/16/2015 11:30:04 PM >

_____________________________

"Personal isn't the same as important"

(in reply to Hertston)

Post #: 13

RE: Non-steam version - 11/17/2015 10:03:43 PM

Zap

Posts: 3639
Joined: 12/6/2004
From: LAS VEGAS TAKE A CHANCE
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hertston

Much as I hate to say it, Steam is so dominant these days as the primary source of PC game distribution I no longer think it's reasonable to expect developers to accommodate those who refuse to use it. If the economics suggest such accommodation is a good idea, it will happen (no Steam cut if you buy direct, after all), but I suspect the number of 'lost sales' because of Steam exclusivity these days is very, very few.

I just don't want to give into the dark force. Steam represents to me as just "another step towards giving my whole life over to another power" primitive thinking pattern , maybe. I purchase but don't really own it. Giving issue that fits in my perspective about the whole internet thing Cloud, other venues that own a part of me. It just something instilled in me, to resist, dangerous control on my freedom and independence. Probably, not the clearest presentation of my thinking process but it is what it is. So I don'tsee me going steam.

< Message edited by Zap -- 11/18/2015 12:45:48 AM >

_____________________________

(in reply to Hertston)

Post #: 14

RE: Non-steam version - 12/6/2015 5:12:59 PM

theshard92

Posts: 1
Joined: 12/6/2015
Status: offline

I too await the non-steam version. As for the person who says to just knuckle under and install steam, lets bring to your attention. There are several non-steam distribution sites that do not use steam and some that use no drm at all. I'm sure leaving links to those sites would probably get me banned or something but I can assure you they are there. And yes I have left several series of games as a follower, simply because they are on steam only. yeah I don't get to play their games but they also loose a loyal customer. When a certain drm free distribution site started publishing all sorts of games not only did I sign up and start buying I rebought many games just to support the companies decision to be good to us. The bonus of not having to search through a bunch of cd/dvd is a plus. I already own over 400 games on their catalog... so yeah they are loosing out.... I'm a big boy I don't have to play their game.... IF i buy a car I don't want to have to call the dealer to start my car everytime I want to use it.... I prefer drm free but even an activation code or cd requirement is one thing... ok we are "leasing" games not buying.... then you better offer them at rental prices.... just my 2 cents....

(in reply to Krashzero)

Post #: 15