RE: Falkland 78

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

RE: Falkland 78

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> Mods and Scenarios >> RE: Falkland 78

Page: << < prev 1 [2]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: Falkland 78 - 12/4/2014 11:17:07 PM

sprsc

Posts: 27
Joined: 11/3/2014
Status: offline

Yes it is tricky as RN. Protect the Ark Royal head away from the Argentina threat (at first). Churchill yes - ineffective I agree. Indeed, generally subs seem prone to easy detection and destruction in this simulator. I wonder if surface forces / air forces have a bias?

(in reply to Flankerk)

Post #: 31

RE: Falkland 78 - 12/5/2014 10:50:32 AM

Flankerk

Posts: 417
Joined: 6/21/2006
Status: offline

Definitely no bias!
Churchill is in an awkward area and its probably too shallow to effect a decent attack. Are the Mk8 loadouts correct?
Assume she'd have some guided torpedoes at that stage.
In command for most subs they can get in an undetected attack, but then need to clear out once fired. This seems spot on.
To lessen the chance of detection at launch you'd need to attack with the layer between or have the quiet launch type tubes.

(in reply to sprsc)

Post #: 32

RE: Falkland 78 - 12/5/2014 6:13:09 PM

sprsc

Posts: 27
Joined: 11/3/2014
Status: offline

I take your point! No bias...

I'll try moving the sub into deeper water and see if it has a better chance. I just tried the brilliant scenario "Hold the Line". Really trick but I just made it. Here too, lots of subs and apart from missile attacks not much success - for me :-)

(in reply to Flankerk)

Post #: 33

RE: Falkland 78 - 8/13/2015 8:14:03 AM

Dimitris

Posts: 13282
Joined: 7/31/2005
Status: offline

Is this ready for release?

_____________________________

Facebook
Twitter

(in reply to Flankerk)

Post #: 34

RE: Falkland 78 - 11/1/2015 10:59:14 PM

sprsc

Posts: 27
Joined: 11/3/2014
Status: offline

Hi - yes I believe so.

(in reply to Dimitris)

Post #: 35

RE: Falkland 78 - 11/6/2015 9:34:38 PM

Sensei.Tokugawa

Posts: 341
Joined: 4/6/2010
From: Wielu�, Poland
Status: offline

You really need to edit Argentinian Ventico de Mayo first - magazine loadouts show as its organic weapons in the weapon tab.

_____________________________

"-What if one doesn't make it?
-Then we know he was no good for SpetsNaz. ..."
V. Suvorov, "Spetsnaz;the Story behind the Soviet SAS"

...No escape from Passchendaele .../ God Dethroned, "Passiondale"

(in reply to sprsc)

Post #: 36

RE: Falkland 78 - 11/11/2015 8:36:13 PM

sprsc

Posts: 27
Joined: 11/3/2014
Status: offline

Hi all, I have made a few minor changes including adding some additional load outs to the Argentinian Carrier. Also replayed the scenario with the latest version of Command - new version is excellent. Well done developers, great product gets better with every version.

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by sprsc -- 11/11/2015 9:37:39 PM >

(in reply to Sensei.Tokugawa)

Post #: 37

RE: Falkland 78 - 11/12/2015 1:34:47 PM

Sensei.Tokugawa

Posts: 341
Joined: 4/6/2010
From: Wielu�, Poland
Status: offline

In the latest version I am still getting the Argentinian carrier with A/A loadouts, check the .jpeg file I am attaching below. According to the game database it's supposed to have only some organic A/A guns - no guided missiles, no chaffs and definitely no bombs.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

(in reply to sprsc)

Post #: 38