Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Global War: Japanese Aggression

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> After Action Report >> RE: Global War: Japanese Aggression Page: <<   < prev  18 19 [20] 21 22   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Global War: Japanese Aggression - 12/11/2015 10:15:10 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Turn 27. Jan/Feb 1944. Formosa. Japan's New Home Country.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 571
RE: Global War: Japanese Aggression - 12/11/2015 10:20:50 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Turn 27. Jan/Feb 1944. Japanese Production. Japanese Oil.

Japan has no factories to produce anything. Japan has 8 oil points saved in the Dutch East Indies but no way to get to it.

For the Western Allies, the Pacific is now a mop up operation aimed at taking the 6 objective cities the Japanese still hold. These cities are: (1) Taihoku, Formosa, (2) Batavia, Neth. East Indies, (3) Port Arthur, Manchuria, (4) Singapore, Malaya, (5) Colombo, Ceylon and (6) Kwajalein, Marshall Islands.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 572
RE: Global War: Japanese Aggression - 12/11/2015 10:21:41 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Turn 27. Jan/Feb 1944. Victory Totals.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 573
RE: Global War: Japanese Aggression - 12/11/2015 10:24:20 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Turn 27. Jan/Feb 1944. Allied #1. Land Combat. Olbia, Sardinia.

The USA used an o-chit with Eisenhower to double their combat factors in a combined USA and CW attack to take Olbia, Sardinia. An attack that succeed with flying colors and resulted of the completed conquest of Sardinia by the USA.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 574
RE: Global War: Japanese Aggression - 12/11/2015 10:26:24 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Turn 27. Jan/Feb 1944. Sardinia. Western Med. Italian Coast.

In addition to the complete conquest of Sardinia, the Western Allies also finally managed to drive the axis completely out of the Western Med giving them (the Western Allies) uncontested control of that sea area.

Next on the (Western) allies to-do list is the Italian coast.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by rkr1958 -- 12/11/2015 11:26:54 PM >


_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 575
RE: Global War: Japanese Aggression - 12/11/2015 10:35:23 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Turn 27. Jan/Feb 1944. CP Losses.

German u-boats and Italian subs continue to press the Battle of the Atlantic and managed to sink 8 CW CPs and force another 6 CW CPs to abort this turn.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 576
RE: Global War: Japanese Aggression - 12/11/2015 10:46:48 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Turn 27. Jan/Feb 1944. Euro-Axis Oil. Or Lack There Of.

The USA, CW and the Soviets all took an air action on Allied impulse #15 and used that oil to successfully strategically bomb all 7 German oil resources. And since the German have no saved oil points from last turn this meant that the Germans had no oil for reorganization at the end of this turn. So on the Eastern Front the Germans were unable to reorganize Rommel, Manstein, Guderian, 5 arm/mech/mot units and 10 air (9 fighter, 1 bomber) units. And on the Western Front, the Germans were unable to reorganize von Leeb. And to the delight of the Western Allied Merchant Marine (i.e., convoys), the Germans were unable to reogranize 8 of their u-boat units (4 in Brest, 3 in the North Atlantic and 1 in Cape St. Vincent), which left them with only 1 organized u-boat unit which is in the 0-box of the Central Atlantic.

So, a few more lessons learn by mean this turn. I learned the value of air actions, the real power of strategic bombing, and how vulnerable axis oil resources are if left undefended. As the German player I now know that from the mid game on (i.e., post US entry and mobilization in England), that I need substantiation and dedicated anti-air resources (fighters & AA divisions) defending my precious oil supply. Again, an obvious lesson that I knew from WW-2 but didn't think through to apply in this game (i.e., MWiF). Also, for me this is another example of how "accurately" the play of MWiF represent WW-2 at the corps, capital ship and strategic military level.

MWiF is the BEST Representation of WW-2 at the the corps, capital ship and strategic military level EVER!




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by rkr1958 -- 12/11/2015 11:55:32 PM >


_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 577
RE: Global War: Japanese Aggression - 12/11/2015 10:56:50 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Turn 27. Jan/Feb 1944. The Western Front.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 578
RE: Global War: Japanese Aggression - 12/11/2015 10:58:23 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Turn 27. Jan/Feb 1944. The Eastern Front.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 579
RE: Global War: Japanese Aggression - 12/11/2015 10:59:32 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Turn 27. Jan/Feb 1944. Destroyed & Repair Pools.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 580
RE: Global War: Japanese Aggression - 12/11/2015 11:00:07 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Turn 27. Jan/Feb 1944. Sea Areas.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 581
RE: Global War: Japanese Aggression - 12/11/2015 11:00:58 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Turn 27. Jan/Feb 1944. Geo-Political.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 582
RE: Global War: Japanese Aggression - 12/11/2015 11:01:53 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Turn 27. Jan/Feb 1944. Trade.





Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 583
RE: Global War: Japanese Aggression - 12/11/2015 11:02:28 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Turn 27. Jan/Feb 1944. Economic Reports.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 584
RE: Global War: Japanese Aggression - 12/12/2015 12:10:22 PM   
Centuur


Posts: 8802
Joined: 6/3/2011
From: Hoorn (NED).
Status: offline
To "mop up" the remaining Japanese possessions in the Pacific, the way to go is to conquer Formosa and Thailand. After that, the Japanese are completely conquered and the Allies can simply walk into the other objective hexes now controlled by the Japanese. Formosa is poorly defended and if that's the case with Bangkok too, next turn it's V-Day in the Pacific...



_____________________________

Peter

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 585
RE: Global War: Japanese Aggression - 12/12/2015 1:38:20 PM   
brian brian

 

Posts: 3191
Joined: 11/16/2005
Status: offline
Things should take an interesting turn in the Balkans quite soon...

(in reply to Centuur)
Post #: 586
RE: Global War: Japanese Aggression - 12/12/2015 4:46:37 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Centuur

To "mop up" the remaining Japanese possessions in the Pacific, the way to go is to conquer Formosa and Thailand. After that, the Japanese are completely conquered and the Allies can simply walk into the other objective hexes now controlled by the Japanese. Formosa is poorly defended and if that's the case with Bangkok too, next turn it's V-Day in the Pacific...


I promise you that I've completed the next turn before I read your post but that's exactly the direction the Western Allies went this turn in the Pacific with successful amphibious invasions of Formosa and Siam (i.e., Thailand).

quote:

ORIGINAL: brian brian

Things should take an interesting turn in the Balkans quite soon...
The allies want those oil fields at Polesti! Either captured or knocked out through strategic bombing.


< Message edited by rkr1958 -- 12/12/2015 5:47:58 PM >


_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to Centuur)
Post #: 587
RE: Global War: Japanese Aggression - 12/12/2015 4:50:53 PM   
brian brian

 

Posts: 3191
Joined: 11/16/2005
Status: offline
I was just noting that both sides seemed to have overlooked the cleverly hidden coup cell the game designer placed in a certain Balkan country, still neutral in this game...I know what Winston would do...

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 588
RE: Global War: Japanese Aggression - 12/12/2015 5:43:48 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: brian brian

I was just noting that both sides seemed to have overlooked the cleverly hidden coup cell the game designer placed in a certain Balkan country, still neutral in this game...I know what Winston would do...

Yes they are. Do I need to dig through the rules to see what conditions would activate Yugoslavia or Greece? Or might someone more knowledgeable with the game, say someone who learned it playing with paper and cardboard, fill me in?

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to brian brian)
Post #: 589
RE: Global War: Japanese Aggression - 12/12/2015 5:50:32 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Turn 28. Mar/Apr 1944. Weather. Actions.

The allies won the initiative again, elected to go first, got favorable weather rolls and was making significant progress only to see this turn cut short at the end of the allies' last impulse with a roll of 1 against a 10% chance of ending. And like last turn the allies moved both first and last, reducing their chance to again move first in the next turn. Though, they would dearly love to move first and effectively achieve a double-move. But that's next turn and I'm very much getting ahead of myself as I haven't even summarized what happened this turn.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 590
RE: Global War: Japanese Aggression - 12/12/2015 5:57:30 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Turn 28. Mar/Apr 1944. Axis Oil. Or Allied Targeting of Axis Oil.

The allies again this turn made it a priority to target axis oil through strategic bombing. The allies did have some success, though not at the level of last turn where all axis oil resources for the turn were destroyed. This turn, the allies managed to destroy 3 of 7 German oil resources and the USA managed to destroy 1 of 2 "saved" Italian oil points in Triesta.

The short turn frustrated allied planners as they really wanted one more impulse to continue targeting and reducing axis oil. But, this is war and things don't always go your way. It's still frustrating though for the allied player. However, the German player is relieved to have 4 precious oil points for reorganization.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 591
RE: Global War: Japanese Aggression - 12/12/2015 6:06:36 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Turn 28. Mar/Apr 1944. Euro-Axis. Use Oil.

Germany used their 4 available oil points to reorganize all their HQ units and their fighters. They were still 4.7 oil points short of being able to reorganize all of their units. To help with this oil shortage the German player, last turn and this, paid for two o-chits (one each turn), that when available will be used to reorganized all their HQ units, which in themselves will be used before the o-chit is played to organize other German ground units (e.g., mech, mot, armor).

The lost of 1 of 2 saved Italian oil points was serious for the Italians. With only 1 saved oil point and with no prospect of getting any more, the Italians could only use 0.45 or less oil points for reorganization. Also, the 1 remaining saved oil point will likely be a high priority target for allied strategic bombers and may very well be destroyed next turn, leaving the Italians will no oil for reorganization.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 592
RE: Global War: Japanese Aggression - 12/12/2015 6:06:47 PM   
Courtenay


Posts: 4003
Joined: 11/12/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: rkr1958


quote:

ORIGINAL: brian brian

I was just noting that both sides seemed to have overlooked the cleverly hidden coup cell the game designer placed in a certain Balkan country, still neutral in this game...I know what Winston would do...

Yes they are. Do I need to dig through the rules to see what conditions would activate Yugoslavia or Greece? Or might someone more knowledgeable with the game, say someone who learned it playing with paper and cardboard, fill me in?

If the CW has four corps in any one country adjacent to Yugoslavia, it may align Yugoslavia during an Allied DOW step.
If France has four corps in any one country adjacent to Yugoslavia, it may align Yugoslavia during an Allied DOW step.

In this situation, if the CW invades either Italy or Albania with four corps, this would trigger Yugoslav activation. Sicily counts. Divisions and US units don't.

_____________________________

I thought I knew how to play this game....

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 593
RE: Global War: Japanese Aggression - 12/12/2015 6:43:34 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Courtenay


quote:

ORIGINAL: rkr1958


quote:

ORIGINAL: brian brian

I was just noting that both sides seemed to have overlooked the cleverly hidden coup cell the game designer placed in a certain Balkan country, still neutral in this game...I know what Winston would do...

Yes they are. Do I need to dig through the rules to see what conditions would activate Yugoslavia or Greece? Or might someone more knowledgeable with the game, say someone who learned it playing with paper and cardboard, fill me in?

If the CW has four corps in any one country adjacent to Yugoslavia, it may align Yugoslavia during an Allied DOW step.
If France has four corps in any one country adjacent to Yugoslavia, it may align Yugoslavia during an Allied DOW step.

In this situation, if the CW invades either Italy or Albania with four corps, this would trigger Yugoslav activation. Sicily counts. Divisions and US units don't.
Thanks! As the allied player, I definitely need to make it a priority to clear the axis out of the Italian coast and maintain sole control there.


_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to Courtenay)
Post #: 594
RE: Global War: Japanese Aggression - 12/12/2015 6:44:14 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Turn 28. Mar/Apr 1944. Economic Reports.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 595
RE: Global War: Japanese Aggression - 12/12/2015 6:46:21 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Turn 28. Mar/Apr 1944. Captured IJN Heavy Cruiser Asama.

FYI ...




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 596
RE: Global War: Japanese Aggression - 12/12/2015 6:48:56 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Turn 28. Mar/Apr 1944. Western Allies Successfully Establish Themselves in Southern France.

And how did they do this?




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 597
RE: Global War: Japanese Aggression - 12/12/2015 6:51:00 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Turn 28. Mar/Apr 1944. Allied #5. Amphibious Landings. Or Land Combat, Southern France.

Initially by rolling well on two amphibious landings in Southern France.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 598
RE: Global War: Japanese Aggression - 12/12/2015 6:53:50 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Turn 28. Mar/Apr 1944. Allied #9. Land Combat. Southern France.

And then by using and O-Chit with Eisenhower to double combat factors to expand the allied beachhead and to capture a major port (Marseilles). Note that the 2nd land combat shown here was a combination amphibious landings (CW units) and land attack (USA units).




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by rkr1958 -- 12/12/2015 7:54:55 PM >


_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 599
RE: Global War: Japanese Aggression - 12/12/2015 6:56:00 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Turn 28. Mar/Apr 1944. The Western Front.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 600
Page:   <<   < prev  18 19 [20] 21 22   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> After Action Report >> RE: Global War: Japanese Aggression Page: <<   < prev  18 19 [20] 21 22   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.559