RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer III: Oil be back.

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer III: Oil be back.

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> After Action Report >> RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer III: Oil be back.

Page: << < prev 56 57 [58] 59 60 next > >>

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer III: Oil be back. - 2/29/2016 10:33:08 PM

Mayhemizer_slith

Posts: 7654
Joined: 9/7/2011
From: Finland
Status: offline

One submarine sinks, who takes D? And where do aborted subs go?

Edit: I think I attacked the worst submarine. It is not fastest or the one with longest range...

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Mayhemizer -- 2/29/2016 10:36:43 PM >

(in reply to Mayhemizer_slith)

Post #: 1711

RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer III: Oil be back. - 2/29/2016 10:37:48 PM

AllenK

Posts: 7259
Joined: 2/17/2014
From: England
Status: offline

D can go on the 5-2 mover plus any A's to start with.

(in reply to Mayhemizer_slith)

Post #: 1712

RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer III: Oil be back. - 2/29/2016 10:41:04 PM

AllenK

Posts: 7259
Joined: 2/17/2014
From: England
Status: offline

Doesn't really matter who you attack as long as the X and D results are good. Unlike the majority for the Allies at the moment .....

Subs can go back to Pearl.

< Message edited by AllenK -- 2/29/2016 10:42:17 PM >

(in reply to AllenK)

Post #: 1713

RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer III: Oil be back. - 2/29/2016 10:43:13 PM

Mayhemizer_slith

Posts: 7654
Joined: 9/7/2011
From: Finland
Status: offline

Final result

Attachment (1)

(in reply to AllenK)

Post #: 1714

RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer III: Oil be back. - 2/29/2016 10:47:14 PM

Mayhemizer_slith

Posts: 7654
Joined: 9/7/2011
From: Finland
Status: offline

Good night. Ground strikes and maybe one attack will follow tomorrow.

(in reply to Mayhemizer_slith)

Post #: 1715

RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer III: Oil be back. - 3/1/2016 10:27:22 AM

Mayhemizer_slith

Posts: 7654
Joined: 9/7/2011
From: Finland
Status: offline

Mech is slowing down German attack

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Mayhemizer -- 3/1/2016 12:24:56 PM >

(in reply to Mayhemizer_slith)

Post #: 1716

RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer III: Oil be back. - 3/1/2016 10:27:42 AM

Mayhemizer_slith

Posts: 7654
Joined: 9/7/2011
From: Finland
Status: offline

No hit in Tirana either

Attachment (1)

(in reply to Mayhemizer_slith)

Post #: 1717

RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer III: Oil be back. - 3/1/2016 10:45:15 AM

Mayhemizer_slith

Posts: 7654
Joined: 9/7/2011
From: Finland
Status: offline

Germany rails Bf110 to Kazan.

Only one attack and it is automatic.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to Mayhemizer_slith)

Post #: 1718

RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer III: Oil be back. - 3/1/2016 10:51:06 AM

Mayhemizer_slith

Posts: 7654
Joined: 9/7/2011
From: Finland
Status: offline

Germany rebases FTR and Stuka near Tiflis.

Italy rebases Sparviero to Genoa.

Japan rebases FTR and NAV to Midway.

It is once again fine everywhere.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to Mayhemizer_slith)

Post #: 1719

RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer III: Oil be back. - 3/1/2016 6:55:08 PM

Jagdtiger14

Posts: 1686
Joined: 1/22/2008
From: Miami Beach
Status: offline

Was there something else under the Soviet INF? I see a 2 above the INF on the map.

_____________________________

Conflict with the unexpected: two qualities are indispensable; first, an intellect which, even in the midst of this obscurity, is not without some traces of inner light which lead to the truth; second, the courage to follow this faint light. KvC

(in reply to Mayhemizer_slith)

Post #: 1720

RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer III: Oil be back. - 3/1/2016 6:59:07 PM

Mayhemizer_slith

Posts: 7654
Joined: 9/7/2011
From: Finland
Status: offline

There was 1 saved oil in the city.

(in reply to Jagdtiger14)

Post #: 1721

RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer III: Oil be back. - 3/1/2016 8:08:24 PM

AllenK

Posts: 7259
Joined: 2/17/2014
From: England
Status: offline

Doh. I've just realised I could have converted that oil to a BP by sending it to the factory in Krasnodar.

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by AllenK -- 3/1/2016 8:09:17 PM >

(in reply to Mayhemizer_slith)

Post #: 1722

RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer III: Oil be back. - 3/1/2016 8:35:13 PM

AllenK

Posts: 7259
Joined: 2/17/2014
From: England
Status: offline

And yet again I discover a Transport has failed to load it's cargo properly. There should be 2 Trans and 2 Ftr at Casablanca but only 1 Ftr has made it. How many times have you got to double and triple check every transport move to make sure it's worked properly. Every I forget, I find the game has screwed it up

.

Although in this case, I'm certain the Ftr unit was showing as picked up and moving and not left behind, yet I still find it has been

.

This is really starting to get to be more than just irritating

< Message edited by AllenK -- 3/1/2016 9:12:59 PM >

(in reply to AllenK)

Post #: 1723

RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer III: Oil be back. - 3/2/2016 8:26:34 PM

AllenK

Posts: 7259
Joined: 2/17/2014
From: England
Status: offline

N/D 41 Allied 5

No DoW

CW & US Naval. China & USSR Land. France Pass.

CW sends 6 CP's to Biscay.

CV and CL move from San Diego to Mendochino. Do the Jap subs wish to intervene?

Edit: Wrong picture

< Message edited by AllenK -- 3/3/2016 7:37:06 PM >

(in reply to AllenK)

Post #: 1724

RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer III: Oil be back. - 3/2/2016 8:30:58 PM

Mayhemizer_slith

Posts: 7654
Joined: 9/7/2011
From: Finland
Status: offline

No thx.

If Japs have only one disorganized ship in sea area you can ask only about CP, Trans and other juicy targets.

Edit: is the picture from previous impulse?

< Message edited by Mayhemizer -- 3/2/2016 8:33:05 PM >

(in reply to AllenK)

Post #: 1725

RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer III: Oil be back. - 3/2/2016 9:04:40 PM

AllenK

Posts: 7259
Joined: 2/17/2014
From: England
Status: offline

The little task force continues to Hawaiian Is 3-box to join its comrades.

Queens leave Clarion for San Francisco. A CP sails into Clarion. I decline to intercept as it's fairly obvious it needs to stay there. The lonely CP is joined by a couple of battlewagons from San Diego.

CP and CL to Polynesia. Want a go this time?

Edit: Had to redo this, so only moved the single CP and CL to Polynesia, not 2.

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by AllenK -- 3/2/2016 9:27:53 PM >

(in reply to Mayhemizer_slith)

Post #: 1726

RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer III: Oil be back. - 3/2/2016 9:09:33 PM

Mayhemizer_slith

Posts: 7654
Joined: 9/7/2011
From: Finland
Status: offline

If I have two disorganized units, then yes please using unit in lower box. If I have only one disorganized unit, no thanks.

(in reply to AllenK)

Post #: 1727

RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer III: Oil be back. - 3/2/2016 9:43:56 PM

AllenK

Posts: 7259
Joined: 2/17/2014
From: England
Status: offline

I'll take it you meant organised units and as there are 2, go for the intercept.

It fails on an 8. The CL and CP stay put in Polynesia 0-box.

4 CA move from Norfolk to Clarion 1-box.

The 2 Trans and 1 of the Amph in Biscay move into St Vincent. Following Mayhemizer's instruction regarding "juicy targets". I try the intercept using German sub in 2-box.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to Mayhemizer_slith)

Post #: 1728

RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer III: Oil be back. - 3/2/2016 9:47:55 PM

Mayhemizer_slith

Posts: 7654
Joined: 9/7/2011
From: Finland
Status: offline

That truly is juicy enough target...

(in reply to AllenK)

Post #: 1729

RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer III: Oil be back. - 3/2/2016 9:53:36 PM

AllenK

Posts: 7259
Joined: 2/17/2014
From: England
Status: offline

On a 1, the intercept succeeds. No air is committed and the Allies decline subs.

The Allies also roll a 1 on their search.

They choose Naval Air and an Italian sub is sent back to port.

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by AllenK -- 3/2/2016 10:02:27 PM >

(in reply to AllenK)

Post #: 1730

RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer III: Oil be back. - 3/2/2016 9:58:39 PM

Mayhemizer_slith

Posts: 7654
Joined: 9/7/2011
From: Finland
Status: offline

Almost good job from Axis

let's say "nice try".

Sub goes to Bordeaux, thank you.

(in reply to AllenK)

Post #: 1731

RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer III: Oil be back. - 3/2/2016 10:08:44 PM

AllenK

Posts: 7259
Joined: 2/17/2014
From: England
Status: offline

It isn't over yet. The game asks whether to fight or abort. I guess both sides stay.

Searches of Axis 5 and Allies 10 finish this skirmish.

The ships continue to West Med where I guess the Axis will have another bash.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to Mayhemizer_slith)

Post #: 1732

RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer III: Oil be back. - 3/2/2016 10:11:28 PM

Mayhemizer_slith

Posts: 7654
Joined: 9/7/2011
From: Finland
Status: offline

Yes please, disorganize Italian NAV.

(in reply to AllenK)

Post #: 1733

RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer III: Oil be back. - 3/2/2016 10:14:11 PM

AllenK

Posts: 7259
Joined: 2/17/2014
From: England
Status: offline

Italian fighter is disorganised and on another 1, the intercept succeeds.

Ships stay in 0-box.

Nav in Genoa can get to 2-box (I missed that. Didn't think there were any more Nav's available other than the 1 there), Ftr in Florfence to 0-box. Any fliers?

(in reply to AllenK)

Post #: 1734

RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer III: Oil be back. - 3/2/2016 10:15:33 PM

Mayhemizer_slith

Posts: 7654
Joined: 9/7/2011
From: Finland
Status: offline

No additional planes, thank you.

(in reply to AllenK)

Post #: 1735

RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer III: Oil be back. - 3/2/2016 10:22:55 PM

AllenK

Posts: 7259
Joined: 2/17/2014
From: England
Status: offline

The Allied search is a 9.

I then find that the other ships and air cover in the 0-box aren't available for the combat. Had I known that would be the case, I wouldn't have risked this second intercept. My preference will be to redo this and move them to my alternative. Mayhemizer, okay with you?

(in reply to Mayhemizer_slith)

Post #: 1736

RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer III: Oil be back. - 3/2/2016 10:24:33 PM

Mayhemizer_slith

Posts: 7654
Joined: 9/7/2011
From: Finland
Status: offline

OK.

Edit: How about first intercept? I you would have rolled 9 there, my subs would had a feast. I'm not an expert in naval rules, but I guess only moving ships are in combat if other ships in sea area can't find. So they should be escorted.

< Message edited by Mayhemizer -- 3/2/2016 10:29:30 PM >

(in reply to AllenK)

Post #: 1737

RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer III: Oil be back. - 3/2/2016 10:55:42 PM

AllenK

Posts: 7259
Joined: 2/17/2014
From: England
Status: offline

I guess you are right about the moving ships in combat only, if others don't spot.

Good point about the first intercept. As the move to St. Vincent was based upon the assumption air cover in the 0-box would be available, then this too should be cancelled.

The Trans and Amph in Biscay return to various UK ports.

< Message edited by AllenK -- 3/2/2016 10:57:03 PM >

(in reply to Mayhemizer_slith)

Post #: 1738

RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer III: Oil be back. - 3/3/2016 7:53:22 PM

AllenK

Posts: 7259
Joined: 2/17/2014
From: England
Status: offline

CW sends 2 Trans from Middle East to Mozambique Channel where they pick up Cape Town Mil and a SA Hurricane. Sub goes from St Vincent to Malta.

A number of sea zones available for combat although some will be declined.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to AllenK)

Post #: 1739

RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer III: Oil be back. - 3/3/2016 8:01:45 PM

AllenK

Posts: 7259
Joined: 2/17/2014
From: England
Status: offline

West Med: Declined
Cape St Vincent: Declined
Bay of Bengal: Declined
Cape Naturaliste: Declined
East Indian Ocean: CW CA initiates. Searches Allied 10, Axis 2. Woeful Allied search rolls continue. Stand by for two dinged up cruisers. How do the Axis want to spend their surprise points?