RE: zhuk-me, updates or issues

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

RE: zhuk-me, updates or issues

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> Mods and Scenarios >> RE: zhuk-me, updates or issues

Page: << < prev 85 86 [87] 88 89 next > >>

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: zhuk-me, updates or issues - 3/17/2016 5:54:00 PM

Dysta

Posts: 1909
Joined: 8/8/2015
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Rudd

�Why would you have 20-meter poles spread across this features if it�s not high frequency radar? � Poling said.

OTH? It's in database, but purpose remain unknown.

From Australian source suggests for anti-propaganda, which can use HF/VHF/UHF to jam radio broadcastings that could reach China, to propagate anti-CCP messages.

Or maybe a part of the ELINT system. Remember the CVN venturing SCS in early March? China is definitely listening everything they could gathering, even it's encrypted.

EDIT: Or... If you believe China is also playing conspiracies, based on this:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Frequency_Active_Auroral_Research_Program

< Message edited by Dysta -- 3/18/2016 8:41:31 AM >

_____________________________

(in reply to Rudd)

Post #: 2581

RE: updates or issues - 3/17/2016 7:24:10 PM

lowchi

Posts: 421
Joined: 10/14/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: emsoy

This mod will probably never go operational, so dunno...

quote:

ORIGINAL: lowchi

Hi guys!

I used the search function, but it seems it has not been requested yet.
The F-15SE - Silent Eagle

I attached a Boeing Media Presentation from 2009. Hope there are enough infos in it.

Thanks! Regards Lowchi

https://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/israel-requests-extra-squadron-of-f-15s-418487/
http://www.popularmechanics.com/military/weapons/news/a18052/boeings-stealthy-f-15-silent-eagle-israel/

Maybe, who knows...

< Message edited by lowchi -- 3/17/2016 7:25:43 PM >

(in reply to ComDev)

Post #: 2582

RE: updates or issues - 3/19/2016 1:07:17 PM

Triode

Posts: 283
Joined: 9/26/2014
Status: offline

[UPDATED DB v443]

In database RVV-BD (aka R-37M) have range 220nm this is wrong

In normal conditions(lauch from 12km against inbound target) max range of RVV-BD is 200km , from "Vympel" site
http://vympelmkb.com/products/rvv-bd-raketa-klassa-vozduh-vozduh/170/ in russian

But on trials Mig-31 with RVV-BD from height ~20km, hit target at 304��

In 1997 R-37(izd610) change seeker from 9B-1388

to 9B-1103M-350 and became R-37M (izd 610M)

also there is "Izdeliye 810" extreme long range anti-air missile for PAK-FA bays with 400km range,target max altitude 40km ,this missile is "fat" RVV-BD, as "fat" as it can while still can fit into PAK-FA bays

from General Designer of JSC "GMKB" Vympel " Sokolowski G.A. at the Jubilee Scientific and Technical Conference "Aviation system in the XXI century" :

"In the area of long-range weapons of "Vympel" is working on the modernization of R-37 missiles. As part of the pilot project on a competitive basis based on the
izd. 610M(RVV-BD,aka R-37M) developed new izd. 810. This missile should be placed in the inner compartments. Range increased by 1.5 times, altitude targets up to 40 km. power unit work time - 360 seconds."

so, can you please :
-change range of RVV-BD(R-37M) to 200km
-add new weapon ,RVV-BD(R-37M) for Mig-31BM with range 300km ,ARH seeker with range 40km ,and place this instead of RVV-BD(R-37M) in Mig-31BM loadouts
-change seeker range in RVV-BD(R-37M) to 40km
-maybe add izd.810 to PAK-FA?

< Message edited by emsoy -- 4/10/2016 8:53:41 PM >

(in reply to lowchi)

Post #: 2583

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 3/20/2016 5:10:40 AM

stevenms2008

Posts: 8
Joined: 2/18/2016
Status: offline

[ALREADY THERE]

Requesting that the SeaRam be added to the Arleigh Burkes, or perhaps just a sub-class USS Porter (DDG-78) since it appears at the moment that only the four ships forward deployed to Spain will have it installed.

quote:

The Navy successfully launched the Raytheon SeaRAM Anti-Ship Missile Defense System from an Arleigh Burke-class guided missile destroyer for the first time ever on March 4, a final step in rapidly fielding a self-defense capability on the Mediterranean-based USS Porter (DDG-78) through an unconventional acquisition process.

Porter last week went through structural test firings to ensure a shield would properly protect the ship from the SeaRAM blast, followed by tracking exercises to verify the accuracy of the detect-to-engage sequence. Finally, on Friday the Navy had its first-ever live fire test of a SeaRAM from a DDG, which took place on a Spanish Navy test range in the Mediterranean.

I can't post links yet, but it's from an article on USNI.

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by emsoy -- 4/10/2016 9:02:51 PM >

(in reply to ComDev)

Post #: 2584

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 3/20/2016 2:35:47 PM

ComDev

Posts: 5735
Joined: 5/12/2006
Status: offline

I believe the Burke SeaRAM installation is already there?

_____________________________

Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!

(in reply to stevenms2008)

Post #: 2585

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 3/20/2016 8:39:09 PM

orca

Posts: 501
Joined: 11/6/2013
Status: offline

Future US frigate.

There's good chance this could be changed and the OTH missile is TBD. But could this be added?

http://www.dodbuzz.com/2016/03/16/development-of-navys-future-frigate/

(in reply to ComDev)

Post #: 2586

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 3/21/2016 12:00:58 AM

mikmykWS

Posts: 11524
Joined: 3/22/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: orca

Future US frigate.

There's good chance this could be changed and the OTH missile is TBD. But could this be added?

http://www.dodbuzz.com/2016/03/16/development-of-navys-future-frigate/

We added the add weapons, sensors and mags for this reason. Fact this particular ship might be exactly why we did it.

Mike

_____________________________

(in reply to orca)

Post #: 2587

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 3/21/2016 4:45:29 AM

orca

Posts: 501
Joined: 11/6/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mikmyk

quote:

ORIGINAL: orca

Future US frigate.

There's good chance this could be changed and the OTH missile is TBD. But could this be added?

http://www.dodbuzz.com/2016/03/16/development-of-navys-future-frigate/

We added the add weapons, sensors and mags for this reason. Fact this particular ship might be exactly why we did it.

Mike

Makes sense. I then have to thank this little ship for encouraging you

(in reply to mikmykWS)

Post #: 2588

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 3/21/2016 4:48:57 AM

orca

Posts: 501
Joined: 11/6/2013
Status: offline

[UPDATED DB v443]

I have a question about the AN/SLQ-32. Is the AN/SLQ-32(6) the name for the new SEWIP version? If so in the DB the AN/SLQ-32(6) on the DDG 112 is described as late 1980s technology. Isn't it much updated from the prior version and shouldn't it be late 2010s technology?

< Message edited by emsoy -- 4/10/2016 9:05:56 PM >

(in reply to orca)

Post #: 2589

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 3/21/2016 4:53:39 AM

Mgellis

Posts: 2054
Joined: 8/18/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mikmyk

quote:

ORIGINAL: orca

Future US frigate.

There's good chance this could be changed and the OTH missile is TBD. But could this be added?

http://www.dodbuzz.com/2016/03/16/development-of-navys-future-frigate/

We added the add weapons, sensors and mags for this reason. Fact this particular ship might be exactly why we did it.

Mike

Just posted the .ini file text to the catalog of modified platforms thread. The sensors and weapons are all in the database, so the modification was simple. FF 1 Freedom still has limited air defense, but she now has a potent anti-surface punch and a better sensor package than her LCS incarnation. Not perfect but definitely an improvement.

(in reply to mikmykWS)

Post #: 2590

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 3/21/2016 8:00:41 PM

DESRON420

Posts: 57
Joined: 9/30/2015
Status: offline

[NEED DETAILS, SEEMS UNREALISTICALLY HIGH]

quote:

ORIGINAL: emsoy

quote:

ORIGINAL: DESRON420

Some F-35-related suggestions:

1. External short-range 24x and long-range 16x SDB and SDB II loadouts

Thanks for your input Desron, do you know if this will be an operational loadout?

I don't know if this will be an operational loadout. I'm extrapolating from:

+ Cobham BRU-61/A Small Diameter Bomb Carriage System brochure
"Currently in service on F-15E with integration ongoing on F/A-22, F-35, and F-16."

+ March 4-11/14: FY15 Budget/ R&D via http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/raytheon-wins-usas-gbu-53-small-diameter-bomb-competition-06510/
�The Joint Miniature Munitions Bomb Rack Unit (JMM BRU) is an Air Force (AF) led ACAT III program. It is required for the Department of the Navy�s (DoN) carriage of the SDB II weapon in the internal bay of the F-35B and F-35C�. The BRU-61/A, currently in production in the AF, does not meet the needs to operate with SDB II within the F-35 internal bay in the DoN environment. The JMM BRU, designated BRU-61A/A, fills the capability gap�.�

+ 2x stations for BRU-61/A (9/3) in long-range configuration and 4x stations for BRU-61/A (10/9/3/2) from the diagram on http://theaviationist.com/2015/01/16/f-35-weapons-suite/

+ 4x SDB-II per BRU-61/A

Note that at 1460 lb loaded, the BRU-61/A + 4x SDB-II barely fits under the STOVL weight requirement on the outboard A/G pylons (10/2), so it might be possible to see F-35B with 16x external SDB-II prior to the F-35B modifications for internal SDB-II carriage.

Will work on getting more info about AARGM-ER.

< Message edited by emsoy -- 4/11/2016 9:13:36 PM >

(in reply to ComDev)

Post #: 2591

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 3/21/2016 9:40:13 PM

peterc100248

Posts: 94
Joined: 3/21/2016
Status: offline

[TEXT DESCRIPTION ERROR, NOT DATABASE ERROR. CONTACT DB DESCRIPTION GROUP]

Just a minor problem I noted. In the database when looking at information on the CBU-59 APAM, the information is for the Hawk anti-aircraft missile instead of the bomb.

< Message edited by emsoy -- 4/11/2016 9:14:11 PM >

(in reply to Temple)

Post #: 2592

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 3/22/2016 1:51:39 AM

mikmykWS

Posts: 11524
Joined: 3/22/2005
Status: offline

Does anybody have any information on a Russian aircraft active towed decoy system? The export version is named President-S but not sure what the native name is. I know it was tested in 2007 on a Mig-31 but don't know if it ever went operational. Could one of our good Russian friends look into this abit (Triode)?

Thanks!

Mike

_____________________________

(in reply to peterc100248)

Post #: 2593

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 3/22/2016 7:01:14 AM

blh42

Posts: 233
Joined: 7/10/2013
Status: offline

SAAB J32B with 4x RB24 or M/57 rockets

Blh

(in reply to mikmykWS)

Post #: 2594

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 3/22/2016 7:08:24 AM

Skjold

Posts: 240
Joined: 9/29/2015
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: blh42

SAAB J32B with 4x RB24 or M/57 rockets

Blh

J 32B got retired from the SwAF in 1973, 7 years prior to the start of the DB3000.

Edit: Its in the CWDB during its proper timeline if u wanna make a mission with it.

< Message edited by Skjold -- 3/22/2016 8:10:19 AM >

(in reply to blh42)

Post #: 2595

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 3/22/2016 11:28:02 AM

Dysta

Posts: 1909
Joined: 8/8/2015
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mikmyk

Does anybody have any information on a Russian aircraft active towed decoy system? The export version is named President-S but not sure what the native name is. I know it was tested in 2007 on a Mig-31 but don't know if it ever went operational. Could one of our good Russian friends look into this abit (Triode)?

Thanks!

Mike

http://m.aviationweek.com/awin/russia-tests-new-towed-radar-decoy-mig-31

It was locally called Blesna, according to the only source from AW. It means 'Lure' in Russian.

< Message edited by Dysta -- 3/22/2016 11:29:31 AM >

_____________________________

(in reply to mikmykWS)

Post #: 2596

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 3/22/2016 12:42:16 PM

Fer_Cabo

Posts: 111
Joined: 9/17/2015
Status: offline

[NEED MORE INFO, INCL IOC DATES]

I miss all those lovely Chinese & DPRK drones/UAVs...

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by emsoy -- 4/11/2016 9:15:46 PM >

(in reply to Temple)

Post #: 2597

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 3/22/2016 4:25:21 PM

Triode

Posts: 283
Joined: 9/26/2014
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mikmyk

Does anybody have any information on a Russian aircraft active towed decoy system? The export version is named President-S but not sure what the native name is. I know it was tested in 2007 on a Mig-31 but don't know if it ever went operational. Could one of our good Russian friends look into this abit (Triode)?

Thanks!

Mike

"Part" of President-S is ABRL

ABRL

Active towed radar trap (ABRL)

Active towed radar trap ABRL is designed to provide personal protection of aircraft in the front and / or rear hemispheres against guided missiles with radar homing by retargeting missiles at attacking towed trap.
Basic tactical and technical characteristics
Frequency range - centimetric
Gain, dB - 60-70
Energy potential, W - 3-12
Protection Sector in the front (PPP)
and rear (LPP) hemispheres, deg .:

azimuth from +60 to -60
elevation from 22.5 to -22.5
Time of work, minutes 5-10
Time of work at each start,sec 7-10
Weight, kg 5
The length of the tow cable, m 150
power from an aircraft
http://niiekran.ru/prod_abrl.php in russian

In pre serial production from end of 2015, RSC "MiG" want it for MiG-35

Do you have pictures of this Mig-31 with towed decoy system?

there is also "Blesna" and "Blesk" older towed decoy systems not connected to President-S

< Message edited by Triode -- 3/22/2016 4:26:55 PM >

(in reply to Fer_Cabo)

Post #: 2598

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 3/22/2016 5:12:50 PM

blh42

Posts: 233
Joined: 7/10/2013
Status: offline

Hypothetical swedish supersonic nuclear bomber Saab 36. Project was cancelled but would be fun to try out in a hypothetical scenario.

References https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saab_36
The nuclear program that also was cancelled had a bomb design for a 40kt device
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swedish_nuclear_weapons_program

Blh

(in reply to Triode)

Post #: 2599

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 3/22/2016 7:58:39 PM

.Sirius

Posts: 1404
Joined: 1/18/2013
Status: offline

Not much to go on but I'll have a go with a CWDB version

quote:

ORIGINAL: blh42

Hypothetical swedish supersonic nuclear bomber Saab 36. Project was cancelled but would be fun to try out in a hypothetical scenario.

References https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saab_36
The nuclear program that also was cancelled had a bomb design for a 40kt device
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swedish_nuclear_weapons_program

Blh

_____________________________

Paul aka Sirius
Command Developer
Warfaresims
Cold War Data Base 1946-1979 Author

Old radar men never die - Their echoes fade away in accordance with the inverse fourth power law

(in reply to blh42)

Post #: 2600

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 3/22/2016 8:10:44 PM

blh42

Posts: 233
Joined: 7/10/2013
Status: offline

Some additional info from another source:
Length: 17 m
Span: 9,6 m
Wing area: 54 square meters
Empty weight: 9000 kg
Max load: 1500 kg
Fuel: 4000 kg
Max take off weight: 15000 kg
Engine: Bristol Olympus
Thrust/weight ratio (take off): 0,73
Max speed: Mach 2,14 above 11 km; mach 1,2 at low altitude
Radius of action: 410 km
Ceiling: 18 km
Take off run: 490 m

quote:

ORIGINAL: .Sirius

Not much to go on but I'll have a go with a CWDB version

quote:

ORIGINAL: blh42

Hypothetical swedish supersonic nuclear bomber Saab 36. Project was cancelled but would be fun to try out in a hypothetical scenario.

References https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saab_36
The nuclear program that also was cancelled had a bomb design for a 40kt device
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swedish_nuclear_weapons_program

Blh

(in reply to .Sirius)

Post #: 2601

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 3/22/2016 10:36:43 PM

Skjold

Posts: 240
Joined: 9/29/2015
Status: offline

+1 for the SAAB 36 as a hypothethical in CWDB. blh42 for future reference anything regarding CWDB should be in this thread http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=3436158

(in reply to blh42)

Post #: 2602

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 3/22/2016 11:37:53 PM

mikmykWS

Posts: 11524
Joined: 3/22/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Triode

quote:

ORIGINAL: mikmyk

Does anybody have any information on a Russian aircraft active towed decoy system? The export version is named President-S but not sure what the native name is. I know it was tested in 2007 on a Mig-31 but don't know if it ever went operational. Could one of our good Russian friends look into this abit (Triode)?

Thanks!

Mike

"Part" of President-S is ABRL

ABRL

Active towed radar trap (ABRL)

Active towed radar trap ABRL is designed to provide personal protection of aircraft in the front and / or rear hemispheres against guided missiles with radar homing by retargeting missiles at attacking towed trap.
Basic tactical and technical characteristics
Frequency range - centimetric
Gain, dB - 60-70
Energy potential, W - 3-12
Protection Sector in the front (PPP)
and rear (LPP) hemispheres, deg .:

azimuth from +60 to -60
elevation from 22.5 to -22.5
Time of work, minutes 5-10
Time of work at each start,sec 7-10
Weight, kg 5
The length of the tow cable, m 150
power from an aircraft
http://niiekran.ru/prod_abrl.php in russian

In pre serial production from end of 2015, RSC "MiG" want it for MiG-35

Do you have pictures of this Mig-31 with towed decoy system?

there is also "Blesna" and "Blesk" older towed decoy systems not connected to President-S

Thanks Triode!

I don't have a picture of what was on the Mig-31 but will post if I find it.

Mike

_____________________________

(in reply to Triode)

Post #: 2603

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 3/23/2016 7:13:01 AM

Pancor

Posts: 71
Joined: 6/18/2015
From: Indonesia
Status: offline

[UPDATED DB v443]

Hello Everyone

it look like the #1934 - Hsiung Feng II missile has a IR seeker

just like this picture notice the bulge in the front that house the IR Seeker

But in the game it just have only radar could you add the IR Seeker

Thanks

Source:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hsiung_Feng_II

< Message edited by emsoy -- 4/11/2016 9:22:03 PM >

(in reply to mikmykWS)

Post #: 2604

RE: HMCS Provider (AOR 508) missed for DB 3000 - 3/23/2016 8:17:17 AM

ComDev

Posts: 5735
Joined: 5/12/2006
Status: offline

Added DB v443, thanks!

quote:

ORIGINAL: jun5896

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMCS_Provider_(AOR_508)

HMCS Provider at Pearl Harbor for RIMPAC 86

It was decommissioned in 1998, DB 3000 has only Protecteur-class Ships (AOR 509, AOR 510)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protecteur-class_replenishment_oiler

Provider is different from Protecteur.

_____________________________

Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!

(in reply to jun5896)

Post #: 2605

RE: zhuk-me, updates or issues - 3/23/2016 9:33:29 AM

ComDev

Posts: 5735
Joined: 5/12/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: VFA41_Lion

Umm... did the title of the thread change to "zhuk-me, updates or issues" ?

Lol... and what sales team figured it was a good idea to name their hottest (?) product Zhuk-ME?

Curious what they will name the next radar...

_____________________________

Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!

(in reply to VFA41_Lion)

Post #: 2606

Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 3/23/2016 9:35:58 AM

ComDev

Posts: 5735
Joined: 5/12/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: jun5896
http://www.deagel.com/Destroyers-and-Cruisers/27DD_a003217001.aspx
http://www.navyrecognition.com/index.php/news/defence-news/year-2015-news/july-2015-navy-naval-forces-defense-industry-technology-maritime-security-global-news/2925-japan-defense-ministry-unveiled-details-of-q27ddq-class-railgun-a-laser-armed-aegis-destroyer.html

It is some information for New Atago-sub-class "27DD" The two 27DD vessels are expected to be commissioned in 2020 and 2021.
Add expect specification of ships for DB3K(likes Chinese Type 55 Cruiser)

Not much to go on I'm afraid

< Message edited by emsoy -- 3/23/2016 9:37:02 AM >

_____________________________

Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!

(in reply to jun5896)

Post #: 2607

RE: zhuk-me, updates or issues - 3/23/2016 9:47:46 AM

ComDev

Posts: 5735
Joined: 5/12/2006
Status: offline

The W88 variant is already in the database. Added necessary weapon records so that you can add it to submarines in the scenario editor. Also added a full mount so that you can replace the W76 with W88 on mount-level. Up to you.

Thanks

quote:

ORIGINAL: mb

Hi Devs,

First, thank you not only for a REALLY great game, but also your great continued support of updating it and adding new features. It�s this updating and consistent new features that MAKE this game not only relevant but continuing to be so good and playable. I particularly love using and making the �cutting edge� or hypothetical units and scenarios.
The only correction, (which is minor so no rush), I can find is with the Trident missile. In the game, it carries the W76 warhead when it should carry the W88 warhead.

Again, great job Devs! Keep it up.

< Message edited by emsoy -- 3/23/2016 9:48:32 AM >

_____________________________

Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!

(in reply to mb)

Post #: 2608

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 3/23/2016 10:03:44 AM

ComDev

Posts: 5735
Joined: 5/12/2006
Status: offline

Thanks Triode, have updated as per your specifications.

Also added the 6x R-77-1, 2x R-27T, 2x R-73 loadout

quote:

ORIGINAL: Triode

About Su-35S loadouts and R-77(RVV-AE) vs R-77-1(RVV-SD) in RuAF

in database there is "light" loadout with 2xRVV-AE and 2xR-73M
while in Hmeymim it it is 2xR-77-1(RVV-SD) 2xR-27TE and 2xR-73M for Su-35S :
http://i.imgur.com/bVGJGbO.jpg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gpVEWipSx5k

also if we look at Su-35S from 23 IAP regiment of RuAF we can see interesting configurations of pylons they use, even without missile it is still interesting
6x AKU-170 (for R-77 family missiles) 2x APU-470 (launcher with liquid nitrogen for R-27T/TE seeker) 2xAPU-73 with R-73(M or L)

So, maybe "Heavy" loadout for Su-35S should recive + 2 R-27TE ?

also about RVV-AE vs RVV-SD in RuAF planes loadouts
Russian MoD don buy R-77 or RVV-AE in 90s , in 2003 they starting R-77-1 programm and in 2015 there is first big contract for R-77-1 :
http://zakupki.gov.ru/epz/order/notice/za44/view/common-info.html?regNumber=0173100004515001647 in russian
there is no RVV-AE contract for RuAF and no RVV-AE in RuAF arsenals (except in Akhtubins for demonstration and testing for foreing customers)
So, RVV-AE on Russian planes especially after 2015 is , well unrealistic
maybee it is make sense to change all RVV-AE in Su-35S,Su-34,Su-30SM,SU-27SM,Mig-29SMT,Mig-29K/KUB,Mig31BM loadouts after 2015 to R-77-1(RVV-SD) ?

quote:

RVV-AE vs RVV-SD in RuAF planes loadouts
Russian MoD don buy R-77 or RVV-AE in 90s , in 2003 they starting R-77-1 programm and in 2015 there is first big contract for R-77-1 :
http://zakupki.gov.ru/epz/order/notice/za44/view/common-info.html?regNumber=0173100004515001647 in russian
there is no RVV-AE contract for RuAF and no RVV-AE in RuAF arsenals (except in Akhtubins for demonstration and testing for foreing customers)
So, RVV-AE on Russian planes especially after 2015 is , well unrealistic
maybee it is make

_____________________________

Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!

(in reply to Triode)

Post #: 2609

S-400 - 3/23/2016 11:20:08 PM

DESRON420

Posts: 57
Joined: 9/30/2015
Status: offline

[MINOR IOC ADJUSTMENT DB v443 + FEEDBACK NEEDED]

I'd like to propose an alternate depiction of S-300PMU/S-400 systems that adds granularity and versatility for scenario designers.

I am not a Russian speaker or a professional analyst, and I would appreciate corrections to the below if I have included inaccuracies. I have relied on the monograph 'Russian Ballistic Missile Defense: Rhetoric and Reality' by Keir Giles at http://www.strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pdffiles/PUB1277.pdf , the SAM battery/battalion configuration descriptions at http://www.ausairpower.net/APA-Rus-SAM-Site-Configs-B.html and http://www.ausairpower.net/APA-S-400-Triumf.html , and the S-400 deployment and semi-official Russian state media sheets linked at http://theaviationist.com/2015/11/13/s-400-triumf-infographic/ .

This alternate depiction involves four changes from the existing setup.

#1. Add individual S-400 batteries, each comprising

4x 5P85/5P90 TEL
1x 92N6 GRAVE STONE FC radar
1x 96L6 search radar (optional)

and add an S-400 battalion headquarters unit comprising

1x 55K6 command post
1x 91N6 BIG BIRD search / battle management radar

This will decentralize S-400 systems, add flexibility to scenario designers, come closer to the apparent scale on which individual units are deployed, and make S-400 units harder to take out with single massive saturation attacks.

#2. Expand the range of missiles available to the 5P85/5P90 TELs to include

48N6E - 1 / tube slot
48N6E2 - 1 / tube slot
48N6E3 - 1 / tube slot
40N6E - 1 / tube slot?
9M96E - 4 / tube slot
9M96E2 - 4 / tube slot

#3. Tweak the SAM ranges somewhat:

48N6E3/DM: 130-140 nm range as opposed to current 80 nm range
9M96E2: Add with 9M96E stats and extended 50-65 nm range against aerodynamic targets

#4. Set the default 5P85/5P90 TEL loadout to 4x 48N6E2/3. The 40N6 is still in the realm of speculation and has never been photographed in the wild.

< Message edited by emsoy -- 4/11/2016 9:30:20 PM >

(in reply to Rudd)

Post #: 2610