Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> After Action Report >> RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR Page: <<   < prev  26 27 [28] 29 30   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR - 5/11/2016 3:59:24 PM   
Orm


Posts: 22154
Joined: 5/3/2008
From: Sweden
Status: offline
Nov/Dec 1939

Production:
China (5):
INF
GARR

CW (13):
INF
FTR2
2 x Pilot
TRS (1st)
CP
CVP0
CVP1

USA(11):
GARR
BB (1st)
TRS (1st)
NAV3
Pilot

USSR (10):
GARR
2 x INF
Pilot

_____________________________

Have a bit more patience with newbies. Of course some of them act dumb -- they're often students, for heaven's sake. - Terry Pratchett

(in reply to Orm)
Post #: 811
RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR - 5/11/2016 4:12:16 PM   
Orm


Posts: 22154
Joined: 5/3/2008
From: Sweden
Status: offline
Jan/Feb '40

Reinforcements: Barely worth mentioning.

Germany:
2 x MIL

Japan:
2 x MIL

CW:
The Queens
NAV2

USSR:
2 x INF
GARR

Germany removes one LND3, USA one CVP1, and USSR one FTR2.

_____________________________

Have a bit more patience with newbies. Of course some of them act dumb -- they're often students, for heaven's sake. - Terry Pratchett

(in reply to Orm)
Post #: 812
RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR - 5/11/2016 4:13:46 PM   
Orm


Posts: 22154
Joined: 5/3/2008
From: Sweden
Status: offline
While Germany installed a Vichy government the Italians conquered British Somaliland.

_____________________________

Have a bit more patience with newbies. Of course some of them act dumb -- they're often students, for heaven's sake. - Terry Pratchett

(in reply to Orm)
Post #: 813
RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR - 5/11/2016 4:16:50 PM   
Jagdtiger14


Posts: 1686
Joined: 1/22/2008
From: Miami Beach
Status: offline
quote:

And once again you are too quick with the "they would have" or "they wouldn't have" like they are KNOWN factors. E.g you mention the Dunkirk hex. You obviously do not recall the CW units being out of supply at one point? A few well placed ground strikes on these black print units and shore bombardment means jack. Re the air - yes maybe its a miscommunication but in post 797 you state "the Germans would not have taken their air out".


Wow Warspite, I'm only trying to give you some pointers in this post-France debrief we were having. Things for you to consider the next time you play the Allies. In no way am I perfect and I'm sure there are veterans at this game who might disagree with me on some of my points. Please take all this in the spirit I've meant it, which is constructive.

Well, about KNOWN factors, you are right...anything could happen. I try to predict what my opponent will/might do (usually worst case), and then try to stay a move ahead if possible. Those units in Antwerp were out of supply at some point(s?)...but I was looking at the first Allied impulse of N/D'39 I believe. If they were OOS at that time, then I stand corrected.

It looks like post 797 was a miscommunication. I read what you said as the German air leaving the North Sea (aborting), and I wrote back that they "the Germans would have not taken their air out" (...of the North Sea. In other words not aborting out of the sea area and remaining there)...sorry probably my fault in not reading you correctly and then not communicating clearly.
You wrote: "...who says the Germans would have taken their aircraft out of the sea area?"
I responded: "I'm saying the Germans would not have taken their air out..."


< Message edited by Jagdtiger14 -- 5/11/2016 4:50:31 PM >


_____________________________

Conflict with the unexpected: two qualities are indispensable; first, an intellect which, even in the midst of this obscurity, is not without some traces of inner light which lead to the truth; second, the courage to follow this faint light. KvC

(in reply to warspite1)
Post #: 814
RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR - 5/11/2016 4:17:08 PM   
Orm


Posts: 22154
Joined: 5/3/2008
From: Sweden
Status: offline
Jan/Feb '40

Both sides rolled a 4 on the initiative roll, but since Axis had a positive modifier (+1), they win the initiative.

Now the world holds its breath while we wait and see if they will use the initiative to go first this turn.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Have a bit more patience with newbies. Of course some of them act dumb -- they're often students, for heaven's sake. - Terry Pratchett

(in reply to Orm)
Post #: 815
RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR - 5/11/2016 4:25:27 PM   
Jagdtiger14


Posts: 1686
Joined: 1/22/2008
From: Miami Beach
Status: offline
Is there any way to show us the entire Vichy fleet?

_____________________________

Conflict with the unexpected: two qualities are indispensable; first, an intellect which, even in the midst of this obscurity, is not without some traces of inner light which lead to the truth; second, the courage to follow this faint light. KvC

(in reply to Orm)
Post #: 816
RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR - 5/11/2016 4:53:28 PM   
Orm


Posts: 22154
Joined: 5/3/2008
From: Sweden
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Jagdtiger14

Is there any way to show us the entire Vichy fleet?

Here it is.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Have a bit more patience with newbies. Of course some of them act dumb -- they're often students, for heaven's sake. - Terry Pratchett

(in reply to Jagdtiger14)
Post #: 817
RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR - 5/11/2016 5:02:28 PM   
Jagdtiger14


Posts: 1686
Joined: 1/22/2008
From: Miami Beach
Status: offline
Thank you Orm!

_____________________________

Conflict with the unexpected: two qualities are indispensable; first, an intellect which, even in the midst of this obscurity, is not without some traces of inner light which lead to the truth; second, the courage to follow this faint light. KvC

(in reply to Orm)
Post #: 818
RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR - 5/11/2016 7:04:16 PM   
AllenK


Posts: 7259
Joined: 2/17/2014
From: England
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Orm

Jan/Feb '40

Both sides rolled a 4 on the initiative roll, but since Axis had a positive modifier (+1), they win the initiative.

Now the world holds its breath while we wait and see if they will use the initiative to go first this turn.





Following a tripartite pact conference, the Axis powers graciously invite their Allied counter-parts to open the batting for this turn.

(in reply to Orm)
Post #: 819
RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR - 5/11/2016 7:14:13 PM   
Orm


Posts: 22154
Joined: 5/3/2008
From: Sweden
Status: offline
quote:

Following a tripartite pact conference, the Axis powers graciously invite their Allied counter-parts to open the batting for this turn.

Thank you. Very generous.

And in response of that kindness I rolled a one for the new weather.

I really, really should not roll the weather.



Picture from Jan/Feb '40 Impulse #1 (Allied) - Weather

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Orm -- 5/11/2016 7:16:53 PM >


_____________________________

Have a bit more patience with newbies. Of course some of them act dumb -- they're often students, for heaven's sake. - Terry Pratchett

(in reply to AllenK)
Post #: 820
RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR - 5/12/2016 4:36:15 AM   
Shannon V. OKeets

 

Posts: 22095
Joined: 5/19/2005
From: Honolulu, Hawaii
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Orm

Nov/Dec 1939

Production:
China (5):
INF
GARR

CW (13):
INF
FTR2
2 x Pilot
TRS (1st)
CP
CVP0
CVP1

USA(11):
GARR
BB (1st)
TRS (1st)
NAV3
Pilot

USSR (10):
GARR
2 x INF
Pilot

For what it's worth, ...

I agree completely with the China and Commonwealth builds.

But not for the USA and USSR builds. Early in the war I prefer to build carriers for the USA. They take a long time and will be needed against Japan. I do not build anything that take only a short time to come in for the USA. They will not have any use for them until they are in the war. If desperate for something to build, I'll build the marine units. The CVP0 builds are okay as fillers. AMPH and TRS are my other preferred builds. My idea is to plan on the USA entering the war sometime in 1941 and having the ships to fight Japan and the sea lift to get stuff over to Europe or out to the Pacific. The air, land, and pilots can be delayed until mid-1940 and still arrive in time for spring 1941. ATRs and paratroops are always useful too, so I sometimes put them into production fairly early.

For the USSR, I like to get in one or two MECH and stay away from building the GARR until things look threatening on the western front. I'm not real keen on pilots or air units either. If the USSR husbands it air units early in the conflict with Germany, they shouldn't be desperate for air cover. My experience is that the Germans outrun their best air units so the USSR doesn't have to defend against a whole lot of German air missions. Now, if the Axis is bringing every air unit Italy can build to the fight - then that is a different story. But the decision to build pilots and air units can be delayed for a bit. Getting as many land units on the map as possible is my goal as the USSR.

- Again, for what it is worth.

_____________________________

Steve

Perfection is an elusive goal.

(in reply to Orm)
Post #: 821
RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR - 5/12/2016 4:52:38 AM   
Shannon V. OKeets

 

Posts: 22095
Joined: 5/19/2005
From: Honolulu, Hawaii
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: brian brian

I like to defend the Alps with four units - the MTN in Nice, 4 pt INF to the north, inf division along the Alpine hexsides, CAV near the Swiss border.

Then bring the Syrian garrison to Nice on first impulse, though this risks a surprise port strike on it.

Italy's best chance to crack the Alps is on the surprise impulse with doubled air and HQ support from Balbo (risks 'Magic 14'). Nice is also vulnerable to shore bombardment. But if they get the first hex, the ooze begins and that eventually becomes serious.

But if the Italian set-up or DOW leads them in other directions, the CAV can move north, the Alpine hexsides can be uncovered, and the INF from Syria can rail north. Local MIL can handle the area best from turn 2 onwards, releasing the Infantry division and the other INF to the north as well.

Okay, ....

But that is a heavily weighted frontline against the Italians. Since you plan on reducing it immediately if the Italians aren't threatening anything, that is what wins me over to your setup. I like to have an HQ in the south of France (rail it to the frontline against Germany in the second turn) to reorganize the French TRS and bring over the French unit from North Africa in the Allied 2nd impulse (4th game impulse). Yeah, that leaves North Africa open to the Italians to walk all over. But they have to first DOW France (good for US entry) and it will take them some time - building a TERR for France can sometimes put a roadblock in their way. What I am most concerned with is getting more French land units in the frontline (and behind it) against Germany.

_____________________________

Steve

Perfection is an elusive goal.

(in reply to brian brian)
Post #: 822
RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR - 5/12/2016 4:56:02 AM   
Shannon V. OKeets

 

Posts: 22095
Joined: 5/19/2005
From: Honolulu, Hawaii
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: brian brian

The key to defending Belgium is fast units that can enter Brussels in the rain. Let REServes cover the two Maginot cities.

After that it is imperative to keep two stacks of three units in the clear hexes in Belgium, each with anti-tank assets. Those are tough for the Germans to crack, but the other hexes don't allow a breakthrough, there is the Meuse river, etc. If the Germans DOW Belgium in 1939, abandon the Maginot immediately.

After Belgium keep the anti-tank guns stacked with two units in the hex most desired by the Germans, never take them as a loss, pick for the Shatter unit if necessary. Never place them with only one other unit - they are the most valuable French units.

In a non-France First game, a loan from the CW on turn two can build the third French AT/AA if not drawn at set-up - very handy in spring of 40.


My only real complaint with your ideas here is with abandoning the Maginot line. That frees up too many German units and makes it easier for them to gain multiple hexes against French units in Clear terrain. It also simplifies supply for them. The benefit of abandoning the Maginot line to France (a few extra land units between Belgium and Paris) is minimal. Of course this is all: in my opinion.


_____________________________

Steve

Perfection is an elusive goal.

(in reply to brian brian)
Post #: 823
RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR - 5/12/2016 5:07:31 AM   
brian brian

 

Posts: 3191
Joined: 11/16/2005
Status: offline
I rarely pull the French INF from Algeria, unless the Italians DOW early and don't invade on the surprise impulse. I use the TRS for the Syrian INF first and the Senegal MIL second.

Lately I like the knock-on effects of an instant Italian amphibious invasion of Syria though, very interesting for the Axis.


There is only one hex that matters in France in 1939 - Paris. The Maginot is quite far away and the French always need a double line to prevent German Breakthrough results from going anywhere.



How did the USSR get 10 BP on turn 2? Save 2 on turn 1?

(in reply to Shannon V. OKeets)
Post #: 824
RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR - 5/12/2016 5:16:35 AM   
brian brian

 

Posts: 3191
Joined: 11/16/2005
Status: offline
I think that is a purely historical result on the Vichy / Free France colonies?

(in reply to Orm)
Post #: 825
RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR - 5/12/2016 5:20:26 AM   
Jagdtiger14


Posts: 1686
Joined: 1/22/2008
From: Miami Beach
Status: offline
quote:

I rarely pull the French INF from Algeria, unless the Italians DOW early and don't invade on the surprise impulse. I use the TRS for the Syrian INF first and the Senegal MIL second. Lately I like the knock-on effects of an instant Italian amphibious invasion of Syria though, very interesting for the Axis.


Oran needs defended (Gibraltar).

Nice one Brian! I'll have to look into that Syrian gambit!

_____________________________

Conflict with the unexpected: two qualities are indispensable; first, an intellect which, even in the midst of this obscurity, is not without some traces of inner light which lead to the truth; second, the courage to follow this faint light. KvC

(in reply to brian brian)
Post #: 826
RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR - 5/12/2016 7:33:29 AM   
Orm


Posts: 22154
Joined: 5/3/2008
From: Sweden
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Shannon V. OKeets


quote:

ORIGINAL: Orm

Nov/Dec 1939

Production:
China (5):
INF
GARR

CW (13):
INF
FTR2
2 x Pilot
TRS (1st)
CP
CVP0
CVP1

USA(11):
GARR
BB (1st)
TRS (1st)
NAV3
Pilot

USSR (10):
GARR
2 x INF
Pilot

For what it's worth, ...

I agree completely with the China and Commonwealth builds.

But not for the USA and USSR builds. Early in the war I prefer to build carriers for the USA. They take a long time and will be needed against Japan. I do not build anything that take only a short time to come in for the USA. They will not have any use for them until they are in the war. If desperate for something to build, I'll build the marine units. The CVP0 builds are okay as fillers. AMPH and TRS are my other preferred builds. My idea is to plan on the USA entering the war sometime in 1941 and having the ships to fight Japan and the sea lift to get stuff over to Europe or out to the Pacific. The air, land, and pilots can be delayed until mid-1940 and still arrive in time for spring 1941. ATRs and paratroops are always useful too, so I sometimes put them into production fairly early.

For the USSR, I like to get in one or two MECH and stay away from building the GARR until things look threatening on the western front. I'm not real keen on pilots or air units either. If the USSR husbands it air units early in the conflict with Germany, they shouldn't be desperate for air cover. My experience is that the Germans outrun their best air units so the USSR doesn't have to defend against a whole lot of German air missions. Now, if the Axis is bringing every air unit Italy can build to the fight - then that is a different story. But the decision to build pilots and air units can be delayed for a bit. Getting as many land units on the map as possible is my goal as the USSR.

- Again, for what it is worth.

Thank you for your comments. They are appreciated.

This turn I am responsible for both the US and Soviet builds.

And in general I do not disagree with you. However, I have some reasons to do it differently although my reasons might be dumb ones.

The main reason for USSR to build pilots is that it is a cheap way to get garrison points as long as USSR has aircraft in the reserve pool. And the aircraft can fast be transferred from the Japanese garrison to the West if the need arises. Then they might even get new shiny toys to fly.

As for USA they do not have that many carriers in the force pool. Not many other ships either. I do not see the need to empty the construction pool yet. And I like to get some land and aircraft units out early that I like to have around when US go to war. But the main reason might be because I do not want to have the exact same US build plan in every game, because that makes US more fun to play. And fun, for me, is an important reason although it might be a bad one.





Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Orm -- 5/12/2016 7:36:15 AM >


_____________________________

Have a bit more patience with newbies. Of course some of them act dumb -- they're often students, for heaven's sake. - Terry Pratchett

(in reply to Shannon V. OKeets)
Post #: 827
RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR - 5/12/2016 7:41:20 AM   
Orm


Posts: 22154
Joined: 5/3/2008
From: Sweden
Status: offline
quote:

How did the USSR get 10 BP on turn 2? Save 2 on turn 1?

1 BP saved on turn one. One extra oil form Persia that goes to production, Bessarabia is claimed, and Germany has aligned Bulgaria, and that is enough for the second BP.

Note that, last turn, USSR used one of the saved oil instead of the Persian oil to get that extra build point.

_____________________________

Have a bit more patience with newbies. Of course some of them act dumb -- they're often students, for heaven's sake. - Terry Pratchett

(in reply to brian brian)
Post #: 828
RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR - 5/12/2016 7:42:22 AM   
Orm


Posts: 22154
Joined: 5/3/2008
From: Sweden
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: brian brian

I think that is a purely historical result on the Vichy / Free France colonies?

Sad. Isn't it.

_____________________________

Have a bit more patience with newbies. Of course some of them act dumb -- they're often students, for heaven's sake. - Terry Pratchett

(in reply to brian brian)
Post #: 829
RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR - 5/12/2016 8:18:34 PM   
Centuur


Posts: 8802
Joined: 6/3/2011
From: Hoorn (NED).
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Jagdtiger14

quote:

I rarely pull the French INF from Algeria, unless the Italians DOW early and don't invade on the surprise impulse. I use the TRS for the Syrian INF first and the Senegal MIL second. Lately I like the knock-on effects of an instant Italian amphibious invasion of Syria though, very interesting for the Axis.


Oran needs defended (Gibraltar).

Nice one Brian! I'll have to look into that Syrian gambit!


I want to get a unit out of Syria and one out of Algeria to France in the first two Allied impulses. So I always set up the French TRS in Syria, move it with the INF into Marseilles, reorganise the ship with a French HQ. Next impulse, the French take a combined, move the TRS into the zero box of the Western Med, picks up a unit in Algeria and that unloads in Marseilles too. During the RTB phase, the French move the TRS into Senegal. That's to say: if the TRS survives his stay in the Western Med...

The defense of the USSR starts in the west. Defend Oran? Let the CW take care of the defense of that port. Every unit counts against Germany.

_____________________________

Peter

(in reply to Jagdtiger14)
Post #: 830
RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR - 5/12/2016 8:24:05 PM   
warspite1


Posts: 41353
Joined: 2/2/2008
From: England
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Centuur


quote:

ORIGINAL: Jagdtiger14

quote:

I rarely pull the French INF from Algeria, unless the Italians DOW early and don't invade on the surprise impulse. I use the TRS for the Syrian INF first and the Senegal MIL second. Lately I like the knock-on effects of an instant Italian amphibious invasion of Syria though, very interesting for the Axis.


Oran needs defended (Gibraltar).

Nice one Brian! I'll have to look into that Syrian gambit!


I want to get a unit out of Syria and one out of Algeria to France in the first two Allied impulses. So I always set up the French TRS in Syria, move it with the INF into Marseilles, reorganise the ship with a French HQ. Next impulse, the French take a combined, move the TRS into the zero box of the Western Med, picks up a unit in Algeria and that unloads in Marseilles too. During the RTB phase, the French move the TRS into Senegal. That's to say: if the TRS survives his stay in the Western Med...

The defense of the USSR starts in the west. Defend Oran? Let the CW take care of the defense of that port. Every unit counts against Germany.
warspite1

Well that was not possible in this game as the HQ was needed to reorganise the French infantry......


_____________________________

England expects that every man will do his duty. Horatio Nelson October 1805



(in reply to Centuur)
Post #: 831
RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR - 5/12/2016 8:40:03 PM   
Centuur


Posts: 8802
Joined: 6/3/2011
From: Hoorn (NED).
Status: offline
Well, it depends on your setup, doesn't it? There are choices to be made by players, which will influence the decisions players make during the game. There are downsides to almost every choice a player makes. Do I put the two French HQ's up north, or not? How do I defend the Maginot line and with how many units? How many units will I put in a position to race into Belgium if Germany is bold enough to attack it the second Axis impulse of the game? And on, and on, and on. WiF isn't an easy game to play at all for any player. Choices and choices...

And there is always the major problem: during this game, any plan might fall apart at any moment.

I was simply stating the opening moves I tend to do with the French. Other players have other openings which might or might not be as good as any other opening sequence of this game. The choices a player makes are his own, they might turn out to be good choices, or simply lead to disaster. What worked in one game, might not work in another game, due to the dice rolled...



_____________________________

Peter

(in reply to warspite1)
Post #: 832
RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR - 5/12/2016 8:43:31 PM   
Orm


Posts: 22154
Joined: 5/3/2008
From: Sweden
Status: offline
quote:

The choices a player makes are his own, they might turn out to be good choices, or simply lead to disaster.

My choices seldom turn out to be good, so I am happy if I somehow manage to avoid the disasters.

_____________________________

Have a bit more patience with newbies. Of course some of them act dumb -- they're often students, for heaven's sake. - Terry Pratchett

(in reply to Centuur)
Post #: 833
RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR - 5/12/2016 9:03:41 PM   
Orm


Posts: 22154
Joined: 5/3/2008
From: Sweden
Status: offline
There will be no Allied actions this evening.

_____________________________

Have a bit more patience with newbies. Of course some of them act dumb -- they're often students, for heaven's sake. - Terry Pratchett

(in reply to Orm)
Post #: 834
RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR - 5/12/2016 11:28:07 PM   
Courtenay


Posts: 4003
Joined: 11/12/2008
Status: offline
The US builds for carriers are all about the five Essex class they get in the 1941 force pool. Everything the US builds should be to get those as quickly as possible. Thus one must build one naval unit (at least) M/J 40, two J/A, 3 S/O, and 4 N/D. Then one must be able to pay for five CVs J/F 41. Then one must be able to build finish them N/D 41; again one must pay strict attention to gearing limits. Plan out the whole US build schedule until early 1942. See how many build points you need. You won't know when you get gear up; be pessimistic in your assumptions.

Those carriers are what you need to win the the naval war in the Pacific. (You will also need AMPHS and TRSs, too, off course.) Plan for the stuff that takes a long time to build. After that, HQs. After that, if you want BB's, those come next (they take a long time, too.) Stuff that takes a short time can wait until the war.

_____________________________

I thought I knew how to play this game....

(in reply to Orm)
Post #: 835
RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR - 5/13/2016 6:48:34 AM   
peskpesk


Posts: 2347
Joined: 7/17/2003
From: Stockholm, Sweden
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Orm

Nov/Dec 1939

Production:
China (5):
INF
GARR

CW (13):
INF
FTR2
2 x Pilot
TRS (1st)
CP
CVP0
CVP1

USA(11):
GARR
BB (1st)
TRS (1st)
NAV3
Pilot

USSR (10):
GARR
2 x INF
Pilot


What did the axis build?

_____________________________

"'Malta - The Thorn in Rommel's Side"

(in reply to Orm)
Post #: 836
RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR - 5/13/2016 9:06:36 AM   
Orm


Posts: 22154
Joined: 5/3/2008
From: Sweden
Status: offline
quote:

What did the axis build?


Production:
Germany (12):
2 x INF
2 x MIL
Pilot

Italy (6):
Pilot
Save 4 BPs

Japan (7):
2 x MIL
Pilot
CP

_____________________________

Have a bit more patience with newbies. Of course some of them act dumb -- they're often students, for heaven's sake. - Terry Pratchett

(in reply to peskpesk)
Post #: 837
RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR - 5/13/2016 7:02:34 PM   
Centuur


Posts: 8802
Joined: 6/3/2011
From: Hoorn (NED).
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Courtenay

The US builds for carriers are all about the five Essex class they get in the 1941 force pool. Everything the US builds should be to get those as quickly as possible. Thus one must build one naval unit (at least) M/J 40, two J/A, 3 S/O, and 4 N/D. Then one must be able to pay for five CVs J/F 41. Then one must be able to build finish them N/D 41; again one must pay strict attention to gearing limits. Plan out the whole US build schedule until early 1942. See how many build points you need. You won't know when you get gear up; be pessimistic in your assumptions.

Those carriers are what you need to win the the naval war in the Pacific. (You will also need AMPHS and TRSs, too, off course.) Plan for the stuff that takes a long time to build. After that, HQs. After that, if you want BB's, those come next (they take a long time, too.) Stuff that takes a short time can wait until the war.


It's true that the US needs the Essex CV's soon. It's true that it is good to start building naval units before land units. However, it is perfectly OK with me, if one builds three Essex CV's in the first turn of availability and two in the turn after that. One turn isn't going to make a lot of difference. I like the US to have at least 3 land units in each of Pago Pago and Honolulu at the end of 1940, to prevent certain Japanese exploits. And the Pearl Harbor fleet needs a reasonable FTR 2 for protection at that stage too. And there are of course the 5 oil resources which one should send soon to the CW and a resource for the USSR before it goes to war too. I would even send 5 build points to the CW if the US is still neutral and the land lease option is chosen (provided they can be transported of course).

2 CV's which arrive one turn later isn't going to make a lot of difference, especially since one needs to have the planes and pilots to crew them too...


_____________________________

Peter

(in reply to Courtenay)
Post #: 838
RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR - 5/13/2016 8:53:14 PM   
AlbertN

 

Posts: 3693
Joined: 10/5/2010
From: Italy
Status: offline
Which are the planes in the respective reserve pools?
And Japan producing 7 is -ugly-!

(in reply to Centuur)
Post #: 839
RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR - 5/13/2016 9:16:10 PM   
Orm


Posts: 22154
Joined: 5/3/2008
From: Sweden
Status: offline
quote:

Which are the planes in the respective reserve pools?





Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Have a bit more patience with newbies. Of course some of them act dumb -- they're often students, for heaven's sake. - Terry Pratchett

(in reply to AlbertN)
Post #: 840
Page:   <<   < prev  26 27 [28] 29 30   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> After Action Report >> RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR Page: <<   < prev  26 27 [28] 29 30   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.703