Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Naval and Defense News

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> RE: Naval and Defense News Page: <<   < prev  33 34 [35] 36 37   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Naval and Defense News - 6/27/2016 4:02:18 PM   
xavierv


Posts: 517
Joined: 7/10/2013
Status: offline
Part 1 video coverage from Balt Military Expo in Poland

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3becvi50u_w

- DAMEN new SIGMA 10514PL Coastal Patrol Ship and Patrol Vessel
- Some views of ORP Grom Orkan-class fast attack craft (with SAAB RBS15 anti-ship missile) of the Polish Navy
- HSwMS Södermanland SSK Submarine of the Royal Swedish Navy
- Saab Kockums A26 Submarine
- DCNS Scorpene-class Submarine with MBDA's Naval Cruise Missile
- TKMS 212A Submarine

_____________________________


(in reply to Anathema)
Post #: 1021
RE: Naval and Defense News - 6/28/2016 8:46:04 AM   
xavierv


Posts: 517
Joined: 7/10/2013
Status: offline
Russia’s large amphibious assault ship Ivan Gren LST at sea for first time during trials

quote:

Russia’s Project 11711 large amphibious assault ship Ivan Gren built at the Yantar Shipyard in Kaliningrad in west Russia has gone to the Baltic Sea for the first time during its running trials, shipyard spokesman Sergei Mikhailov told TASS.

"The large amphibious assault ship Ivan Gren went to the Baltic Sea for the first time at 10:30 local time [11:30 Moscow time]. The ship will pass at sea several days," Mikhailov said.

According to the spokesman, "the ship’s propulsion engines and radar, as well as its running characteristics will be tested".

On June 17, the large amphibious assault ship Ivan Gren left the Yantar Shipyard in Kaliningrad to arrive at the acceptance base in Baltiysk and start undergoing shipbuilders’ trials. The trials are expected to last through September. After that, the ship will start undergoing state trials. If they are successful, the ship will join Russia’s Navy.

http://www.navyrecognition.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=4131

Russia's Rubin Design Bureau produces Klavesin-2R-PM UUV demonstrator

quote:

Russia`s Rubin Central Design Bureau for Marine Engineering (a subsidiary of the United Shipbuilding Corporation) produced the demonstrator of Klavesin-2R-PM unmanned underwater vehicle (UUV) in 2015, according to the company`s 2015 annual report.

"In 2015, Rubin finished the production of working construction documentation for Klavesin-2R-PM UUV intended for search operations at depths down to 6,000 m. The Rubin`s research and development (R&D) fabrication line produced the vehicle`s prototype. The special testing equipment with transport-docking module was manufactured to test the vehicle`s algorithms. In late 2016, the UUV`s demonstrator was tested at the Krylov State Research Center`s experimental tank to confirm its meeting to the operational requirements and to define the vehicle`s navigability", the report said.

http://www.navyrecognition.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=4133

Russian Navy Slava-class Cruiser Marshal Ustinov to Start Sea Trials in August - September

quote:

The Russian Navy Northern Fleet’s Project 1164 (NATO reporting name: Slava-class) Marshal Ustinov guided missile cruiser currently being repaired and upgraded at the Zvyozdochka Shipyard in Severodvinsk in north Russia will start undergoing running trials at sea in late August - early September, the shipyard’s press office told TASS.
...
According to various sources, the Marshal Ustinov is being fitted with an advanced missile system, probably, the Kalibr (SS-N-27 Sizzler) or Oniks (SS-N-26 Strobile). The upgrade will provide the cruiser with the Podberyozovik three-dimensional long-range target acquisition radar and Fregat-M2M sea-skimming target acquisition radar. There have been statements that the ship will not receive advanced air defense missile systems.

http://www.navyrecognition.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=4121


_____________________________


(in reply to xavierv)
Post #: 1022
RE: Naval and Defense News - 6/28/2016 11:31:40 AM   
xavierv


Posts: 517
Joined: 7/10/2013
Status: offline
Elbit Systems’ Seagull USV Successfully Completes Torpedo Launch Trials

quote:

Elbit Systems completed recently a trial test torpedo launch from its Seagull multi-mission, autonomous Unmanned Surface Vessel(USV) system. The trial, performed out of Israel's Haifa port,demonstrated the capability of Seagull to install and launch lightweight torpedoes, adding to the advanced capabilities of the USV, which is designed to carry out unmanned maritime missions, such as protection of critical sea areas and high-value assets against submarines and sea mine threats.

http://www.navyrecognition.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=4135

_____________________________


(in reply to xavierv)
Post #: 1023
RE: Naval and Defense News - 6/29/2016 12:15:42 AM   
Hongjian

 

Posts: 834
Joined: 1/2/2015
Status: offline
I dont consider NI to be trustworthy, especially their click-baity titles. But some articles, like this here, do quote some serious official Naval Analysts... Still, articles about submarine noise levels are always to be taken with salt.

http://nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/why-the-us-navy-should-fear-chinas-new-093b-nuclear-attack-16741

quote:


Is China’s new Type 093B nuclear-powered attack submarine on par with the U.S. Navy’s Improved Los Angeles-class boats?

At least some U.S. naval analysts believe so and contend that the introduction of the new People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) submarines is an indication of just how quickly Beijing is catching up to the West.

“The 93B is not to be confused with the 93. It is a transition platform between the 93 and the forthcoming 95,” said Jerry Hendrix, director of the Defense Strategies and Assessments Program at the Center for a New American Security—who is also a former U.S. Navy Captain. “It is quieter and it has a new assortment of weapons to include cruise missiles and a vertical launch capability. The 93B is analogous to our LA improved in quietness and their appearance demonstrates that China is learning quickly about how to build a modern fast attack boat.”

Other sources were not convinced that Beijing could have made such enormous technological strides so quickly—but they noted that the topic of Chinese undersea warfare capability is very classified. Open source analysis is often extremely difficult, if not impossible. “Regarding the question on the Type 093B, I really don’t know, anything is possible I suppose, but I doubt it,” said retired Rear Adm. Mike McDevitt, now an analyst at CNA’s Center for Naval Analyses. “I have no doubt that the PLAN has ambitions to at least achieve that level of capability and quietness.”


Personally, I dont think it is too inconceivable that China achieved a level of quieting technology comparable to the US late 80s, seeing the massive investments and advancements in industrial and technological fields, especially in terms of nuclear reactor design. There must be spill-over effects from the civilian nuclear industy, which made great strides since the last decade, enabling China to compete internationally.

Anyway, it seems that the latest GE images show that 2 more 09IIIBs have been completed in Huludao Shipyard. This makes five 09IIIB (3x in GE image from 2013-14, plus those two now). Measurement shows that they are about 113m long and 11,5 meters in diameter - maybe some measurement errors along the way, but indeed larger than the 100m of the basic 09III and about the size of the 688i as well.




Such a mass-production in such short time frame is very surprising, especially considering that the PLAN operated merely two basic Shang-classes for nearly a decade. The PLAN seems to be satisfied with this new design - And perhaps happy that they can fully replace all Han-class SSNs boat-for-boat now.


< Message edited by Hongjian -- 6/29/2016 12:23:53 AM >

(in reply to xavierv)
Post #: 1024
RE: Naval and Defense News - 6/29/2016 2:14:12 AM   
Dysta


Posts: 1909
Joined: 8/8/2015
Status: offline
Inferior or not, those subs are built by themselves, and they are of course can change and improve the design within their capability and budget. With an aircraft carrier commissioned and sail along the group, SSN is a must to go further and more enduring than conventionals, to protect the fleet and provide offset attacks silently.

The newer 093s might born in the toughest time because the US P-8A and equivant type of MPAs (and autonomous sub-hunters in the future) are exported and commissioned in many countries, squeezing the breathing room for subs even smaller. I don't know if China ended up their new carrier groups are mimicking the Soviet doctrine to protect subs with J-15s, but I think building more nuclear subs is essential because the underwater deterrence is still more flexible than surface warships.

_____________________________


(in reply to Hongjian)
Post #: 1025
RE: Naval and Defense News - 6/29/2016 9:51:27 AM   
xavierv


Posts: 517
Joined: 7/10/2013
Status: offline
New Guided Missile Destroyer Project for ROC Navy Emerges out of Taiwan

quote:

Pictures of a scale model and computer renderings of a new guided-missile destroyer project for the Republic of China (Taiwan) Navy (ROC Navy) emerged last week in the 中国军事中國軍事武器 (China Military Chinese Weapon) magazine. This new destroyer project is in line with Taiwan's new naval acquisition plan which was unveiled late last year. The new plan called for four new destroyers (among other vessels).

http://www.navyrecognition.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=4140

_____________________________


(in reply to Dysta)
Post #: 1026
RE: Naval and Defense News - 6/30/2016 7:55:15 AM   
xavierv


Posts: 517
Joined: 7/10/2013
Status: offline
Part 2

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-OuOS-YqSMk

In this video, coverage of:
- Lacroix Defense Sylena Mk2 multiple decoy launcher
- BAE Systems Bofors 57Mk3 and 40Mk4 naval gun systems
- Thales CAPTAS 2 variable depth sonar
- ECA Group drones and UUV
- PT Pal Indonesia SSV and KCR 60

_____________________________


(in reply to xavierv)
Post #: 1027
RE: Naval and Defense News - 7/1/2016 10:40:23 AM   
Dysta


Posts: 1909
Joined: 8/8/2015
Status: offline
This is a military accident, but why it can lock on the innocent ship, and no self-destruct or disengagement system?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/taiwan-patrol-boat-accidently-fires-anti-ship-missile/2016/07/01/41cbccd6-3f55-11e6-9e16-4cf01a41decb_story.html

quote:

Taiwan misfires anti-ship missile, kills 1 fisherman


TAIPEI, Taiwan — Taiwan’s military said it mistakenly fired a supersonic anti-ship missile Friday that hit a fishing boat, killing one and injuring three people, on the day rival China was celebrating the Communist Party’s anniversary.

The 500-ton patrol boat Chinchiang was undergoing an inspection inside a military base when the Hsiung Feng III missile was fired and landed about 40 nautical miles (75 kilometers) away in waters off the islands of Penghu near Taiwan, the official Central News Agency said.

The Defense Ministry said the missile penetrated a nearby Taiwanese fishing boat, killing its captain and injuring three crew members.

A preliminary investigation showed that missile operators likely failed to follow proper procedures, CNA said.

A full investigation was under way, while the navy sent a helicopter and boats to search for the missile, the report said.


More at link.

EDIT 1: Pictures of the ship, see for the damage.

My opinion: It's fortunate for surviving victims, because the entry is at the frontal bridge, and the missile was 'fast enough' to penetrate it, so the explosive cone did not lumbered the keel. Thus it did not sink.

Still, no explanation why it was engaged.







< Message edited by Dysta -- 7/1/2016 4:15:38 PM >


_____________________________


(in reply to xavierv)
Post #: 1028
RE: Naval and Defense News - 7/1/2016 4:41:15 PM   
Hongjian

 

Posts: 834
Joined: 1/2/2015
Status: offline
Impressive that such a small target like a fishing boat could be hit, at over-the-horizon distance. This tells one about the seeker capabilities of modern anti-ship missiles.

Apparently, this incident was far from being harmless and could have caused a major conflic:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DC_-dO19PXw

Basically says that the PLAN coastal radar and missile brigades immediately turned on their FCS after the launch of that missile, preparing for counter-attack by DF-series ballistic missiles.
But the PLAN radar brigades noticed how it blasted one of Taiwan's own fishing ships instead, and were just lol ok.

Only five seconds more, and we would have had a new Taiwan Strait Crisis going on.

< Message edited by Hongjian -- 7/1/2016 5:12:40 PM >

(in reply to Dysta)
Post #: 1029
RE: Naval and Defense News - 7/1/2016 6:01:37 PM   
Dysta


Posts: 1909
Joined: 8/8/2015
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Hongjian

Only five seconds more, and we would have had a new Taiwan Strait Crisis going on.

Whatever the ultimate intention is, the captain of fishery is dead, and everyone know how powerful the HF-3 is (not entirely, because it's not a warship's superstructure).

Should it be a feature for CMANO like 'over-penetration' or something like that? Because that hit is direct, but not catastrophic to sink, thanks for the explosion came 'too late' from a clean entry. If that's in scenario, the fishing boat below 1000t is definitely a goner.

< Message edited by Dysta -- 7/1/2016 6:28:52 PM >


_____________________________


(in reply to Hongjian)
Post #: 1030
RE: Naval and Defense News - 7/1/2016 6:25:02 PM   
mikmykWS

 

Posts: 11524
Joined: 3/22/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Dysta

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hongjian

Only five seconds more, and we would have had a new Taiwan Strait Crisis going on.

Whatever the ultimate intention is, the captain of fishery is dead, and everyone know how powerful the HF-3 is (not entirely, because it's not a warship's superstructure).

Should it be a feature for CMANO like 'over-penetration' or something like that? Because that hit is direct, but not catastrophic to sink, thanks for the explosion came 'too late' from a clean entry. If that's in scenario, the fishing boat below 1000kt is definitely a goner.


Notice anything in the logs?

Mike

_____________________________


(in reply to Dysta)
Post #: 1031
RE: Naval and Defense News - 7/1/2016 6:35:24 PM   
Dysta


Posts: 1909
Joined: 8/8/2015
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mikmyk

Notice anything in the logs?

Mike

Running test 20 times. Should I make a new thread about it?

_____________________________


(in reply to mikmykWS)
Post #: 1032
RE: Naval and Defense News - 7/1/2016 6:52:33 PM   
mikmykWS

 

Posts: 11524
Joined: 3/22/2005
Status: offline
The logs should have a line about penetration.

Mike

_____________________________


(in reply to Dysta)
Post #: 1033
RE: Naval and Defense News - 7/1/2016 7:38:10 PM   
Dysta


Posts: 1909
Joined: 8/8/2015
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mikmyk

The logs should have a line about penetration.

Mike


I presume I can just post here.

Okay, Running over 10 times already, but all the damage results are mostly same, no matter the hitting direction, or the fishing boat has no fuel. So I only post 5 of them:

quote:

Test 01

12:02:06 - Contact VAMPIRE #1 has been lost.
12:02:06 - Commercial Fishing Boat [35m] damage report: Diesels has suffered additional damage!
12:02:06 - Commercial Fishing Boat [35m] is sinking!!!
12:02:06 - Commercial Fishing Boat [35m] has suffered weapon damage: 436.5 DPs
12:02:06 - 97% penetration achieved
12:02:06 - Weapon: Hsiung Feng III #9 has impacted Commercial Fishing Boat [35m].
12:02:06 - New contact! Designated VAMPIRE #1 - Detected by Commercial Fishing Boat [35m] [Sensors: Mk1 Eyeball] at 189deg - 0.4nm - No Contrail Detected.

Test 02

12:02:03 - Contact VAMPIRE #1 has been lost.
12:02:03 - Commercial Fishing Boat [35m] damage report: Diesels has suffered additional moderate damage.
12:02:03 - Commercial Fishing Boat [35m] is sinking!!!
12:02:03 - Commercial Fishing Boat [35m] has suffered weapon damage: 369 DPs
12:02:03 - 82% penetration achieved
12:02:03 - Weapon: Hsiung Feng III #9 has impacted Commercial Fishing Boat [35m].
12:02:03 - New contact! Designated VAMPIRE #1 - Detected by Commercial Fishing Boat [35m] [Sensors: Mk1 Eyeball] at 180deg - 0.4nm - No Contrail Detected.

Test 03

12:02:15 - Contact GuidedWeapon #1 has been lost.
12:02:15 - Commercial Fishing Boat [35m] damage report: Diesels has suffered additional damage!
12:02:15 - Commercial Fishing Boat [35m] is sinking!!!
12:02:15 - Commercial Fishing Boat [35m] has suffered weapon damage: 441 DPs
12:02:15 - 98% penetration achieved
12:02:15 - Weapon: Hsiung Feng III #9 has impacted Commercial Fishing Boat [35m].
12:02:15 - Contact: VAMPIRE #1 has been type-classified as: GuidedWeapon (Classification by: Commercial Fishing Boat [35m] [Sensor: Mk1 Eyeball] at 0 nm)
12:02:14 - New contact! Designated VAMPIRE #1 - Detected by Commercial Fishing Boat [35m] [Sensors: Mk1 Eyeball] at 201deg - 0.5nm - No Contrail Detected.


Test 04

12:02:04 - Contact GuidedWeapon #1 has been lost.
12:02:04 - Commercial Fishing Boat [35m] damage report: Diesels has suffered additional light damage.
12:02:04 - Commercial Fishing Boat [35m] is sinking!!!
12:02:04 - Commercial Fishing Boat [35m] has suffered weapon damage: 351 DPs
12:02:04 - 78% penetration achieved
12:02:04 - Weapon: Hsiung Feng III #9 has impacted Commercial Fishing Boat [35m].
12:02:04 - Contact: VAMPIRE #1 has been type-classified as: GuidedWeapon (Classification by: Commercial Fishing Boat [35m] [Sensor: Mk1 Eyeball] at 0.1 nm)
12:02:03 - New contact! Designated VAMPIRE #1 - Detected by Commercial Fishing Boat [35m] [Sensors: Mk1 Eyeball] at 180deg - 0.6nm - No Contrail Detected.

Test 05

12:02:03 - Contact VAMPIRE #1 has been lost.
12:02:03 - Commercial Fishing Boat [35m] damage report: Diesels has suffered additional light damage.
12:02:03 - Commercial Fishing Boat [35m] has suffered weapon damage: 450 DPs
12:02:03 - Commercial Fishing Boat [35m] damage report: Diesels has suffered additional damage!
12:02:03 - Commercial Fishing Boat [35m] is sinking!!!
12:02:03 - Commercial Fishing Boat [35m] has suffered blast damage: 56.2 DPs
12:02:03 - 100% penetration achieved
12:02:03 - Weapon: Hsiung Feng III #9 has impacted Commercial Fishing Boat [35m].
12:02:03 - New contact! Designated VAMPIRE #1 - Detected by Commercial Fishing Boat [35m] [Sensors: Mk1 Eyeball] at 180deg - 0.4nm - No Contrail Detected.



Result:

Entry Point: Due North from the Fishing Boat
Target Distance: <55 nm
Weapon Damage: 351-450 DPs (33 DPs for Fishing Boat)
Blast Damage: 56.2 DPs (1/5 of all tests)
Additional Damage(s): Diesels (fuel?) x5
Penetration: 78-100%
Target Result: All is sinking

--------------------------

Does that mean the real-life event that HF-3 did not sink the boat is a luck of lottery, or the penetration percentage has a different meaning than what I thought?

I presumed the missile in CMANO struck the fishing boat wasn't entirely entered the boat (below 100%), and the weapon damage (presumed as kinetic) overwhelmed the boat's DP, thus it's sinking.

If that's 100%, that means the missile is totally going inside the boat, maximunized the weapon damage with an additional blast damage. Well, the fishing boat should be a fragment of scraps already.

But what's the circumstance to achieve the 'hit but not sinking'? Besides the over-penetration (over 100%, like the missile is exiting from inside), I hardly think the others.

< Message edited by Dysta -- 7/1/2016 7:41:42 PM >


_____________________________


(in reply to mikmykWS)
Post #: 1034
RE: Naval and Defense News - 7/1/2016 10:07:07 PM   
mikmykWS

 

Posts: 11524
Joined: 3/22/2005
Status: offline
Ok look at the log to see the hit and then open the scenario editor to see what damaged is caused. You'll also notice also the results of hits that include flooding and fire. Put it all together and you can see how we modeled stuff.

Mike

< Message edited by mikmyk -- 7/1/2016 10:10:01 PM >


_____________________________


(in reply to Dysta)
Post #: 1035
RE: Naval and Defense News - 7/1/2016 10:24:59 PM   
Hongjian

 

Posts: 834
Joined: 1/2/2015
Status: offline
Taiwan doesnt even know themselves, why the HF-III didnt completely shred that small fishing boat. For the crew, aside of the skipper, it was devil's luck.

Here, another substanciation about that PLA radar story. Looks like China's radar surveillance is indeed quite capable in immediately picking up a sea-skimming missile launch even over the horizon.

http://focustaiwan.tw/news/aipl/201607010032.aspx

quote:

No abnormalities detected in Chinese fleets: Taiwan's Navy
2016/07/01 23:49:55
Taipei, July 1 (CNA) No abnormalities have been detected in China's naval or air force fleets after a missile was mistakenly launched by a warship during a testing drill from a military base in southern Taiwan earlier Friday, the Navy said.

"No abnormal deployments of China's warships and war planes have been discovered by us following the incident, and all such news reports are far-fetched speculation," Navy Chief of Staff Vice Adm. Mei Chia-shu (梅家樹) said.

He was referring to local media reports that said shortly after a Hsiung Feng III supersonic anti-ship missile was fired by mistake from one of the Navy's 500-ton Chinchiang-class corvettes during a testing drill at Zuoying Military Harbor in Kaohsiung at 8:15 a.m., it was immediately detected by China's radars and that in less than one second, Taiwan's radars also screened abnormal radar signals from China's Fujian Province.

According to the report, the signals of Chinese radars returned to normal five seconds later only after the Taiwanese missile fell into the sea.

Earlier in the day, Mei said the missile did not cross the median line of the Taiwan Strait before sinking into waters off the Penghu archipelago after striking the boat.

The strait, which divides Taiwan and China, has an average width of 180 kilometers (97 nautical miles).

The missile hit a Taiwanese fishing boat "Hsiang Li Sheng" (翔利昇) about two minutes after it was fired, killing the captain and wounding three others. But it did not immediately explode or cause the vessel to break up.

As to a reporter's question on how the military could convince international society and mainland China that the incident was not orchestrated to coincide with the celebrations to mark the founding of the Communist Party of China in Beijing, Ministry of National Defense spokesman Maj. Gen. Chen Chung-chi (陳中吉) rejected such a link and stressed that it was purely an accident by a soldier who had failed to followed standard operating procedures.

He urged the local media to stop making such speculation and reiterated that it was merely an accident, which carried no political motivation or any aim to escalate tensions in the region.

The Navy said later Friday that the blunder was caused by a Navy sergeant who set off the missile without following procedures and without any superior officers present while the missile was on the wrong combat and launch mode, instead of on the missile drill simulation mode.

(By H.H. Lu and Flor Wang)
enditem/cs

(in reply to mikmykWS)
Post #: 1036
RE: Naval and Defense News - 7/2/2016 12:31:22 AM   
mikmykWS

 

Posts: 11524
Joined: 3/22/2005
Status: offline
Its a wooden or fiberglass ship and a supersonic missile. It went right through!

Does any of this really matter

Mike

< Message edited by mikmyk -- 7/2/2016 12:35:01 AM >


_____________________________


(in reply to Hongjian)
Post #: 1037
RE: Naval and Defense News - 7/2/2016 12:56:58 AM   
CapnDarwin


Posts: 8467
Joined: 2/12/2005
From: Newark, OH
Status: offline
There was no blast as that missile sailed through the ship in less then a tenth of a second. It is also possible the missile was not "attacking" the fishing boat, but was passing through on its way to its target point. Odds are we will never know all the facts.

_____________________________

OTS is looking forward to Southern Storm getting released!

Cap'n Darwin aka Jim Snyder
On Target Simulations LLC

(in reply to mikmykWS)
Post #: 1038
RE: Naval and Defense News - 7/2/2016 1:15:21 AM   
Dysta


Posts: 1909
Joined: 8/8/2015
Status: offline
Missile struck into the engine compartment should be instantly ignited it, but the picture shown only shreds of mess at the stern, and the burnt mark is nearly non-present. But it's the weapon damage, more than 10 times than the boat's DP had sunk it, and it's not a mission-kill (disabled).

I would agree it's the devil's luck, as far as the hull and/or keel isn't punctured to get flooded. You cannot expect only 2 surviving crew in that boat could save themselves if either fire or flood is active.

EDIT: Wait, it's a confirmed missile test intended to target a barge, where a fishing boat was nearby. Is that mean the missile installed the training warhead? It might be an accuracy test rather than the damage test.

< Message edited by Dysta -- 7/2/2016 1:43:39 AM >


_____________________________


(in reply to mikmykWS)
Post #: 1039
RE: Naval and Defense News - 7/2/2016 9:38:04 AM   
xavierv


Posts: 517
Joined: 7/10/2013
Status: offline
Successful M51 Ballistic Missile SLBM Test in Operational Conditions from French Navy SSBN

quote:

The French Ministry of Defense announced that an M51 submarine launched ballistic missile (SLBM) was test launched "in operational conditions" from French Navy (Marine Nationale) ballistic missile submarine (SSBN) Le Triomphant on July 1st 2016.

This test was successful and was carried out without nuclear charge. The missile was monitored throughout its flight phase by means of DGA testing facility and Missile Range Insrumentation Ship Monge (A601). The impact zone is located in the North Atlantic several hundred kilometers from any coast.

The M51 is fitted today on board three of the four new generation SSBNs of the French Navy (Le Triomphant class). The transition of the entire French Navy's strategic oceanic force fleet to the M51 missile is expected by the end of the decade.

http://www.navyrecognition.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=4155

GD NASSCO Awarded Contract to Build Next Generation of U.S. Navy Fleet Oilers TAO(X)

quote:

General Dynamics NASSCO, a subsidiary of General Dynamics, has been awarded a contract by the U.S. Navy for the detailed design and construction of the next generation of fleet oilers, the John Lewis class (TAO-205), previously known as the TAO(X). This contract is for the construction of six ships.

http://www.navyrecognition.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=4154

_____________________________


(in reply to Dysta)
Post #: 1040
RE: Naval and Defense News - 7/3/2016 1:24:37 PM   
Hongjian

 

Posts: 834
Joined: 1/2/2015
Status: offline
J-20 serial production/LRIP #1 has been delivered to the PLAAF, sporting new low-visibility roundels. Sources say that a batch of 4 were delivered on the date coincidating with the Chinese Communist Party's 95th anniversary.



Kinda expected, seeing how the LRIP Prototype #2101 took flight earlier this year, while still in yellow primer. But still, many have expected a handover to be in 2017 or 2018, not so soon and seemingly ahead of schedule.

(in reply to xavierv)
Post #: 1041
RE: Naval and Defense News - 7/4/2016 9:25:40 AM   
AlGrant


Posts: 912
Joined: 8/18/2015
Status: offline

Adm Kuznetsov to head to Eastern Med to conduct airstrikes in support of Syrian govt.
Including Su-33, MiG-29K/KUB, Ka-52K, Ka-27 &Ka-31

http://tass.ru/en/defense/886110

Also reported that "The Admiral Kuznetsov," which will lead the Russian Navy’s permanent grouping in the Mediterranean Sea, will be close to the Syrian shore "



(in reply to Hongjian)
Post #: 1042
RE: Naval and Defense News - 7/4/2016 1:52:01 PM   
xavierv


Posts: 517
Joined: 7/10/2013
Status: offline
Ingalls Shipbuilding Awarded Contract To Build Newest Amphibious Assault Ship, LHA 8

quote:

Huntington Ingalls Industries’ Ingalls Shipbuilding division has been selected to build the U.S. Navy’s next large-deck amphibious assault warship, LHA 8. Today’s contract value, for the planning, advanced engineering and procurement of long-lead material, is $272,467,161. The award includes options that, if exercised, would bring the cumulative value of the contract to $3.1 billion.

http://www.navyrecognition.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=4159

Huntington Ingalls Industries Awarded Contract Design Work For LX(R) Class Of Amphibious Ships

quote:

Huntington Ingalls Industries’ Ingalls Shipbuilding division has been selected to perform the majority of the contract design work for the U.S. Navy’s amphibious warfare ship replacement, known as LX(R). The Department of Defense made the announcement Thursday at the same time Ingalls was awarded a contract to build the next large-deck amphibious assault warship, LHA 8.

LX(R) will replace the Navy’s Harpers Ferry- and Whidbey Island-class dock landing ships and will use the same hull as the San Antonio (LPD 17) class. Ingalls has delivered 10 of the LPD 17 ships to the Navy, is currently building the 11th, Portland (LPD 27), and has received more than $300 million in advance procurement funding for the 12th, Fort Lauderdale (LPD 28).

More (including LPD 28 main features) at: http://www.navyrecognition.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=4161

_____________________________


(in reply to AlGrant)
Post #: 1043
RE: Naval and Defense News - 7/5/2016 6:42:01 PM   
xavierv


Posts: 517
Joined: 7/10/2013
Status: offline
PLAN's Fourth Type 052D Kunming-class Destroyer to be Commissioned Soon

quote:

China's fourth Type 052D guided-missile destroyer (NATO reporting name Luyang III class) with hull number 175 should be commissioned with the People's Liberation Army Navy (PLAN or Chinese Navy) soon said Cao Weidong, a Chinese military expert, in an interview with China Center Television.

http://www.navyrecognition.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=4167

Royal Thai Navy is Procuring Three S26T Submarines based on China's Yuan-class SSK

quote:

According to Xinhua, the official press agency of the People's Republic of China, Thai Deputy Premier Prawit Wongsuwan confirmed on Friday that Thailand will buy three Chinese-built submarines for a combined price of one billion U.S. dollars. The Royal Thai Navy's proposal to procure the three S26T submarines from China has been put on hold since last year by the deputy premier who is concurrently defense minister.

http://www.navyrecognition.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=4166

Russia’s aircraft carrier Admiral Kuznetsov to conduct strikes in Syria this fall & winter
quote:

The air wing of Russia’s aircraft carrier Admiral Kuznetsov will attack militants in Syria from the eastern part of the Mediterranean Sea in October 2016 - January 2017, a military and diplomatic source in Moscow told TASS.

http://www.navyrecognition.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=4163

Russia’s aircraft carrier Admiral Kuznetsov to receive Ka-52K helicopter this year
quote:

Russia’s Project 11435 aircraft carrier Admiral Kuznetsov will receive the Kamov Ka-52K (NATO reporting name: Hokum-B) helicopter this year, Russian Deputy Defense Minister Yuri Borisov said. Borisov made this statement during a visit to the Progress Aircraft-Manufacturing Enterprise in Arsenyev in Russia’s Far East.

http://www.navyrecognition.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=4160

Saab to Sustain Combat Systems Aboard Royal Australian Navy ANZAC-class Frigates
quote:

Defence and security company Saab has received an order from the Australian Government regarding sustainment of the combat system on Australia's ANZAC class frigates. The order value amounts to AUD 37 million (approximately SEK 248 million) and covers services from July 2016 until December 2017.

http://www.navyrecognition.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=4162

Saab to Modify And Upgrade Swedish Navy Koster-class Mine Countermeasures Vessels

quote:

Defence and security company Saab has received an order from the Swedish Defence Material Administration (FMV) to modify and upgrade two Swedish Navy Koster-class mine countermeasures vessels (MCMVs). The order covers the period 2016-2017 and the order value amounts to SEK147 million. Work on the vessels will be undertaken in Karlskrona.

http://www.navyrecognition.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=4164

_____________________________


(in reply to xavierv)
Post #: 1044
RE: Naval and Defense News - 7/5/2016 7:46:38 PM   
Gunner98

 

Posts: 5508
Joined: 4/29/2005
From: The Great White North!
Status: offline
This may be old news but I found it interesting. No idea on the credibility of the authors but it seems they took an reasonable view of the subject:

https://defencyclopedia.com/2016/01/02/top-10-most-powerful-frigates-in-the-world/

B

(in reply to xavierv)
Post #: 1045
RE: Naval and Defense News - 7/5/2016 11:56:18 PM   
Hongjian

 

Posts: 834
Joined: 1/2/2015
Status: offline
Some heavily PS altered photo appeared, suggesting an upgraded Type 09IV (Type 094 Jin-class) SSBN sporting the same sail-modifications as the 09IIIB, called Type 09IVA (Type 094A).



Whether this is legit or fake cant be confirmed at this point, but it is not too unrealistic that the ongoing construction of Type 09IV SSBNs (4 in service, 2 under construction out of 8 planned) will see some modifications in the style of the PLAN's newest SSGN. For the next batch of 4 09IVs, it is conceivable that they might be upgraded variants.

Let's wait and see.

(in reply to Gunner98)
Post #: 1046
RE: Naval and Defense News - 7/6/2016 5:04:21 PM   
Hongjian

 

Posts: 834
Joined: 1/2/2015
Status: offline
Funny how they use the inofficial internet nickname for the Y-20. "Chubby girl" is a creation of Chinese military fans.

https://next.ft.com/content/4dd72950-4340-11e6-9b66-0712b3873ae1

quote:

China’s ‘chubby girl’ transport aircraft enters PLA service
Homegrown air transport marks ‘crucial step’ in projection of power

13 MINUTES AGO by: Charles Clover in Beijing

China’s largest ever military aircraft entered service on Wednesday, a hulking transport capable of sending troops and tanks around the world at a moment’s notice.

The Y-20 Kunpeng, nicknamed “chubby girl”, arrives at a time when Beijing is plotting a new global mission for its 2m-strong People’s Liberation Army, from peacekeeping in Africa to anti-piracy in the Indian Ocean.

The aircraft, which is equipped with Russian engines, has a cargo capacity of 66 tonnes, making it the world’s largest military transport currently in production.

The Y-20 “marks a crucial step for the air force improving its strategic power projection capability,” Shen Jinke, PLA Air Force spokesman, told state news agency Xinhua.

Experts say the Y-20 bears a marked resemblance to the US Boeing C-17 transport, which has not been produced since last year. It can carry a single Type 99 tank, China’s most advanced, which weighs about 50 tonnes, along with troops and other equipment. It has a maximum range of 7,800km partially loaded — roughly the distance between Beijing and Cairo.

Song Zhongping, a Chinese military expert, said about a dozen of the aircraft would be operating within the next year or two, and eventually 200-300 would be produced. The Y-20 will gradually replace the fleet of Chinese Y-8 and Russian Ilyushin 76 cargo aircraft, the current workhorses of China’s military airlift capacity.

The Y-20 makes China only the third nation in the world to design and build its own transport aircraft, along with Russia and the US.

The Russian-Ukrainian Antonov-124 Ruslan is officially the world’s largest transport aircraft, with a payload nearly twice that of the Y-20 but it is out of production and work on upgrading the existing fleet has been frozen since 2014 due to tensions between Moscow and Kiev, according to press reports.

The rollout of the Y-20 takes place amid a rethink of military strategy by China, which sees itself gradually taking on missions farther from its borders. In November China announced the establishment of its first foreign military base, in Djibouti, as a hub to resupply the more than 2,000 Chinese troops taking part in African peacekeeping operations as well as Chinese anti-piracy patrols in the Indian Ocean.

A new counter-terrorism law adopted by Beijing this year allows China to station troops abroad for the first time to participate in counter-terrorism operations.

Last year China’s defence ministry released a white paper on strategy that emphasised the evolution of the country’s security needs away from simple territorial defence towards an offensive capacity overseas.

Additional reporting by Ma Fangjing


Two planes delivered. Six will be handed over by the end of the year, according to the "people in the know". Gradually, they will replace the IL-76s in the PLAAF. At least one IL-76 was spotted via GE recently undergoing conversion to KJ-2000 AWACS. I think this is how most IL-76s will eventually end up with.






(in reply to Hongjian)
Post #: 1047
RE: Naval and Defense News - 7/6/2016 5:31:49 PM   
Dysta


Posts: 1909
Joined: 8/8/2015
Status: offline
State news check,
Photo-grade pictures check,
Official ceremony check,
Serials numbers, visible from numerous pictures.
Scenario opportunity high,
Database readiness, 0%...... Wait what??

Last I checked before SR1, there is no Y-20, and I am still busying to confirm its payload and fuel capacity, as well as its speed at different stages (from loiter to full thrust) before I submit to DB3000 suggestion thread.

But now I know what bother me more, is the 'official' calling-name of it. There is no NATO code of her, while both 'Kunpeng' and 'fat lady/girl' are mostly heard from Internet news and forums. I think it have to be the developers' decision to choose which name suits before the update.

Little trivia:

I also drew Y-20 in Y-8/9's livery 3 years ago, with anthropomorphic Planes style. What a memory when I was excited its maiden flight. Well, she definitely need an update.



< Message edited by Dysta -- 7/6/2016 5:35:24 PM >


_____________________________


(in reply to Hongjian)
Post #: 1048
RE: Naval and Defense News - 7/6/2016 6:33:27 PM   
Hongjian

 

Posts: 834
Joined: 1/2/2015
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Dysta

State news check,
Photo-grade pictures check,
Official ceremony check,
Serials numbers, visible from numerous pictures.
Scenario opportunity high,
Database readiness, 0%...... Wait what??

Last I checked before SR1, there is no Y-20, and I am still busying to confirm its payload and fuel capacity, as well as its speed at different stages (from loiter to full thrust) before I submit to DB3000 suggestion thread.

But now I know what bother me more, is the 'official' calling-name of it. There is no NATO code of her, while both 'Kunpeng' and 'fat lady/girl' are mostly heard from Internet news and forums. I think it have to be the developers' decision to choose which name suits before the update.

Little trivia:

I also drew Y-20 in Y-8/9's livery 3 years ago, with anthropomorphic Planes style. What a memory when I was excited its maiden flight. Well, she definitely need an update.




Patience.

At the moment, I feel, transport aircraft do not bring too many new possibilities in CMANO, since Ground Combat is still not implemented as much. So, you have to transport your Type 99s via other means.

If there is a Y-20 tanker or Y-20 AWACS (or even ABL???), it is another story.

Pretty nice drawing, anyway. Do you have a blog or do you post on some forums?

< Message edited by Hongjian -- 7/6/2016 9:26:19 PM >

(in reply to Dysta)
Post #: 1049
RE: Naval and Defense News - 7/7/2016 3:46:12 PM   
Hongjian

 

Posts: 834
Joined: 1/2/2015
Status: offline
Finally an official number on the WS-10 'Taihang' turbofan engines deployed in China's Airforce. 400 engines would more or less correlate with what we PLA-watchers have counted in the last ten plus years: About 200 J-11B and J-16s should be in service, equipped with the WS-10 instead of the imported AL-31F.

http://en.people.cn/n3/2016/0707/c90000-9082920.html

quote:

AVIC report: China's Taihang engine widely deployed in military

China’s Taihang engines have become a significant, large-scale presence in the military, making China the third country in the world that has mass deployment of domestically-produced high-thrust engines for military use, according to the Aviation Industry Corporation of China (AVIC) annual report.
AVIC's social responsibility report showed that the company is capable of independently conducting research and development on the next generation of high-thrust aerial engines, along with advanced drones such as Wing Loong, which have also been deployed in the military.
The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Air Force has deployed no less than 400 Taihang engines in five air force regiments. Various types of fighter jets are equipped with the engine, including the J-11B and J-15 carrier-based fighter jets, reported China Science Communication, a news site under the Chinese Academy of Sciences. So far there have been no crashes due to engine failure among Taihang engine-equipped fighter jets, the news site also noted.
Some doubts have been voiced about the originality of the Taihang engine, as there are people who believe the Chinese-made engine is a copy of its Western counterparts. However, according to China Science Communication, the development of the Taihang engine was based on accumulated experience and technological advances gathered since 1978. The engine was also based partially on its predecessor, WS-6, which spent some 20 years in development.
Meanwhile, the engine also took inspiration from the control system of Russia's AL-31F aircraft turbofan engine, China Science Communication admitted, calling the Taihang engine a result of “independent development combined with technology from the Soviet Union and the U.S.”
“China has become the fourth country in the world to independently design and produce large transportation aircraft, as well as the third country to independently develop stealth fighter jets,” the AVIC report said, adding that China has advanced its air-to-air and air-to-ground missiles to the fourth generation.


The WS-10 was indeed subject to a very troubled development and testing phase of 20+ years, with horror-stories ranging from mid-air breakdown to 30-hours lifetime etc. But indeed, we PLA-Watchers have never registered a single WS-10 equipped fighter plane crashing down. Of course, much of it is because of the premature grounding of all WS-10 equipped J-11Bs once a single one showed troubles (like a case in 2009, caused by strong vibrations on a J-11B), but still, considering that this is China's first ever high-thrust (100kn+) turbofan project, it is still a considerable feat. For the PLAAF, the now mature WS-10 engine means that they can produce as many Flankers and J-10s as they want (currently, the J-10B is equipped with the WS-10), making them independent of Russian AL-31F imports.
But even though it is a feat for China, the WS-10 is still an ultimately obsolete engine (in the same class as the AL-31F and F-110/F-100) and isnt suitable to power the J-20. Real technological maturity can only be shown when the WS-15 (160kn+) super-cruise capable engine arrives. According to rumors, though, the development of that engine is going very smoothly compared to the WS-10: China's industrial base has gained enough experience through the hard and arduous journey to get the 'Taihang' running.

(in reply to Hongjian)
Post #: 1050
Page:   <<   < prev  33 34 [35] 36 37   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> RE: Naval and Defense News Page: <<   < prev  33 34 [35] 36 37   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.797