Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> After Action Report >> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR Page: <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/8/2016 6:06:49 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Pat allows the claim.

Next question.

The RAF and French are attempting three ground strikes.

1. RAF Swordfish CVP.

2. RAF Wellesley bomber escorted by Gladiator CVP.

3. French Boston bomber and P-36 A fighter flying as a bomber.

Do you wish to intercept and if so how? You have two fighter units (BF 109 E-2 and Br 109 E-4) that can intercept.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 121
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/8/2016 6:18:40 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Also, I need your "standing orders" on how any aborts or shoot downs of the allied aircraft would be handle in any air to air combat resolution.

< Message edited by rkr1958 -- 7/8/2016 6:22:05 AM >

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 122
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/8/2016 3:26:32 PM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		The e-4 will intercept the FR group. take out the bomber first if it is my option. No intercept else where.

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 123
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/8/2016 3:57:43 PM   
Courtenay


Posts: 4003
Joined: 11/12/2008
Status: offline 		I am curious why you are bombing the German units in the forest, where it is less likely you will do something, rather than the hex southeast of Brussels, which is clear, and where flipped German units will foul up German attacks. Also, If the Hawk was where I think it was, it could have stayed on the ground and intercepted if the Germans intercepted.

_____________________________

I thought I knew how to play this game....

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 124
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/8/2016 11:44:08 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Courtenay

I am curious why you are bombing the German units in the forest, where it is less likely you will do something, rather than the hex southeast of Brussels, which is clear, and where flipped German units will foul up German attacks. Also, If the Hawk was where I think it was, it could have stayed on the ground and intercepted if the Germans intercepted.

As it turns out that was the only ground strike that was effective.

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to Courtenay)
Post #: 125
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/8/2016 11:46:37 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		SO39, Allied #8. Ground Strike 1.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 126
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/8/2016 11:47:03 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		SO39, Allied #8. Ground Strike 2.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 127
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/8/2016 11:47:24 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		SO39, Allied #8. Ground Strike 3.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 128
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/8/2016 11:50:17 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		SO39. Allied #8. Actions.

Forgot to post this at the beginning of my impulse.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 129
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/9/2016 12:26:05 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		SO39. Allied #8. France.

I was sorely tempted to attack the exposed 6-3 Germany corps with the French. However, in the end I didn't because the risk far outweighed the gain. In fact, a bad roll would have been disastrous for the allies in France.

Rules question. Do pick circle artillery units allow the attacker to pick the Blitz table, assuming the defending units have no armor units?




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 130
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/9/2016 12:26:47 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		SO39. Allied #8. Poland. Western USSR.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 131
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/9/2016 12:27:13 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		SO39. Allied #8. China.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 132
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/9/2016 5:14:10 AM   
Courtenay


Posts: 4003
Joined: 11/12/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: rkr1958


Rules question. Do pick circle artillery units allow the attacker to pick the Blitz table, assuming the defending units have no armor units?


No. They count as ARM corps on defense only.

_____________________________

I thought I knew how to play this game....

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 133
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/9/2016 1:35:42 PM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		Well, forgot to get a screen shot, but the turn ended after the allies turn. No partisans. Two chits for Germany went to defensive. Game is asking for the location of the Ru chit (offensive or defensive), I cannot save the game at this point. Where do you want it?

(in reply to Courtenay)
Post #: 134
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/9/2016 5:56:40 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ashkpa

Well, forgot to get a screen shot, but the turn ended after the allies turn. No partisans. Two chits for Germany went to defensive. Game is asking for the location of the Ru chit (offensive or defensive), I cannot save the game at this point. Where do you want it?
defensive pool is fine.

1. The USA adds a 3rd chit to the Germany/Italy Entry Pool. (The Japanese pools contains 1 chit).

2. Option (4), "Intern French CV" is selected. This causes one chit from the Germany/Italy entry pool to be moved to the tension pool (2 in entry, 1 in tension).

3. I elect to replace the Berm (French CV) with a US transport.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 135
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/9/2016 5:57:20 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		SO39. End of Turn. Destroyed & Repair Pools.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 136
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/9/2016 5:59:35 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Breakdown Pool.

I have yet to make use of unlimited breakdown. Does that work like "regular" breakdown of a corps where you can only breakdown between turns and only one corps per power per turn?




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 137
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/9/2016 6:00:19 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		SO39. End of Turn. Preliminary Production. China & USSR.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by rkr1958 -- 7/9/2016 6:07:03 PM >

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 138
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/9/2016 6:05:09 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		SO39. End of Turn. Preliminary Production. CW, France & USA.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 139
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/9/2016 11:06:37 PM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		Currently held up by a JP convoy issue (see the Tech Folder for details).

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 140
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/9/2016 11:42:17 PM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		Axis Production Prelim





Attachment (1)

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 141
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/9/2016 11:44:29 PM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline
quote:

Breakdown Pool.

I have yet to make use of unlimited breakdown. Does that work like "regular" breakdown of a corps where you can only breakdown between turns and only one corps per power per turn?


Yes, it only occurs during the inter-turn activities after final reorganization. I'm not sure if there is a limit on how many units can be broken down. They cannot be in a ZOC.

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 142
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/10/2016 1:08:44 AM   
Courtenay


Posts: 4003
Joined: 11/12/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ashkpa

quote:

Breakdown Pool.

I have yet to make use of unlimited breakdown. Does that work like "regular" breakdown of a corps where you can only breakdown between turns and only one corps per power per turn?


Yes, it only occurs during the inter-turn activities after final reorganization. I'm not sure if there is a limit on how many units can be broken down. They cannot be in a ZOC.

In regular breakdown, there is no limit to how many units you can break down in a turn. You can break down all the units one has units to break down into.

_____________________________

I thought I knew how to play this game....

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 143
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/10/2016 1:51:25 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		SO39. End of Turn. Use Oil, Allies.

The French! Why is it always the French?!




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 144
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/10/2016 4:42:13 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		SO39. End of Turn. Production Planning, Final. Allies.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 145
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/10/2016 2:22:48 PM   
Courtenay


Posts: 4003
Joined: 11/12/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: rkr1958

SO39. End of Turn. Use Oil, Allies.

The French! Why is it always the French?!


Something looks buggy here. Most of those units should have been able to trace to CW oil. Is there a reason they couldn't?

There is a known, mysterious bug where some units of a country can't trace to oil they should be able to, while other units can. It looks to me like you may have been hit by this. Or were things right, and the French just in really strange places?


_____________________________

I thought I knew how to play this game....

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 146
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/10/2016 3:06:34 PM   
brian brian

 

Posts: 3191
Joined: 11/16/2005
Status: offline 		The French don't have a co-operating Major Power currently.

It looks more like they already did re-org, correctly prioritizing the HQs, air, and TRS first. But I can't tell for sure.

(in reply to Courtenay)
Post #: 147
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/10/2016 5:57:07 PM   
Courtenay


Posts: 4003
Joined: 11/12/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: brian brian

The French don't have a co-operating Major Power currently.

It looks more like they already did re-org, correctly prioritizing the HQs, air, and TRS first. But I can't tell for sure.

Oh, that's right. The French and the English still aren't talking to each other. I had forgotten that.

_____________________________

I thought I knew how to play this game....

(in reply to brian brian)
Post #: 148
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/10/2016 7:27:52 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Courtenay


quote:

ORIGINAL: brian brian

The French don't have a co-operating Major Power currently.

It looks more like they already did re-org, correctly prioritizing the HQs, air, and TRS first. But I can't tell for sure.

Oh, that's right. The French and the English still aren't talking to each other. I had forgotten that.

I did try to use the cooperating power button to let the French reorg with CW oil but no oil showed up. I don't see any other way than the CW giving the French oil through trade. I plan to establish 1 oil point per turn up to the time it looks like France may fall. However, given the fact that pact is attacking France with Italy through "Vichy" territory and that Pat put both German pact chits in the defensive pool, I feel confident that Pat will not establish Vichy and will invade Spain to go after Gibraltar.

To say the least it's frustrating not to be able to reorg all French units especially when the Germans attack West on turn 1.

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to Courtenay)
Post #: 149
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 7/10/2016 7:33:40 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		SO39. Allied Builds.

China (5 BPs): Cav Div(1), Cav(2), MIL(2)

CW (11 BPs): MIL(2), Terr(2), CP(1)x2, CA Repair(1), CVP(0)x2, FTR(2), Pilot(2)

France (6 BPs): MIL(2)x3

USA (11 BPs): CV Repair(2), CV 1st(2), AMPH 1st (2), TRS 1st (2), Terr(2)

USSR (8 BPs): Ski Div(2), INF(3) x 2

The USA liked that the CW aligned and was fighting with Belgium against the Germans. The USA added a chit to the German/Italy pool.

German/Italy: Entry pool contains 3 chits & tension pool 1.

Japan: Entry pool contains 1 chit & tension pool 0.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 150
Page:   <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> After Action Report >> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR Page: <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.078