obvert
Posts: 14050
Joined: 1/17/2011 From: PDX (and now) London, UK Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Canoerebel But I wonder if he is making his mark as a wildly aggressive player who often throws his opponents into consternation early on at the expense of his ability to sustain the war effort. If so, then his ability as a player is justifiably called into question. If his early successes are at the expense of the ships, supply, and fuel necessary to successfully defend the Empire in '44 and '45, then the kudos he gets and the Banzais! he yells in May '42 may not be justified. I agree wholeheartedly with this statement. I'd love to get your game into tracker on the Japanese side and have a look around. quote:
Second, there's been the interesting discussion in here about the impact Sumatra had in this game. Here's how it had the greatest impact. When I realized that the jig was up in Sumatra in January '43, I cast about for some way to take advantage of John's need to focus there. I found the gaping hole in his defenses in NoPac. Because I had played John before, and because I knew he was involved in three games with precious little time to do his homework and attend to messy details like defense in depth, I knew it was almost certain that the holes were genuine. So I spent four months of game time shifting the entire Allied army and navy from the Indian Ocean to San Francisco and Seattle. And I felt pretty sure that the Allied suprise attack in NoPac would prompt a frantic response by John that would allow me to then invade in CenPac. Beyond that, I couldn't see for certain. If you remember, I figured the next invasion would be Amchitka. 5th Indian was in Prince Rupert for many months fully prepped for that op, but it ended up in Morotai 56% prepped. Had I been playing certain other players - hypothetically, let's say it was Nemo and that somehow I managed to configure that massed landing in Sumatra - the situation would have been totally differnt. When I realized that Sumatra was a losing battle and cast around for some other place to invade, one of two things would have happened: (1) I would have found obvious indications that NoPac was defended in depth, or (2) NoPac would have been clearly undefended but I would have figured that Nemo had orchestrated just such a deception to suck me in. So what happened in this game happened precisely because John and I have been frequent opponents. I knew there was a good chance that Sumatra would work out in favor of the Allies. I wouldn't have known that against many other players. Your knowledge of his style has informed everything you've done, and it's working. You're always very good at shifting to take advantage of what your opponent gives. In my only Allied game against GreyJoy, sadly unfinished and suspended in late 43, I remember thinking of an entire strategy of how I wanted to play, but in the game I began to realize what he was neglecting, or letting me have, and I took more than he would have thought much more quickly than I'd planned to do it in my original designs. This game is so much about psychology, and reading your opponent's style, quirks and tendencies. I have said all along I hope this goes into 45, but if he opts out, there will be plenty of takers to continue the game. My question is, would you want to do that given your lpay being so directed at his style?
_____________________________
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill
|