RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> After Action Report >> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Page: << < prev 19 20 [21] 22 23 next > >>

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/8/2016 12:30:31 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

Axis Builds:

Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 601

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/8/2016 12:58:55 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

MJ40. End of Turn. Allied Builds.

(1) China (5 BPs): INF(3), GAR(2)

(2) CW (17 BPs): MIL(2), TERR(2), INF HQ (5), Pilot(2), CVP(0), FTR(3), TRS 2nd (3)

(3) France (10 BPs): INF(3) x 3, Sub 2nd (1)

(4) USA (10 BPs): Pilot(2), CVP(1), AMPH 2nd (3), TRS 2nd (3), CP(1)

(5) USSR (14 BPs): INF(3) x 4, CP(1) x 2

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 602

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/8/2016 12:59:47 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

MJ40. End of Turn. Surrender China to Japan?

I don't think so.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 603

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/8/2016 1:00:23 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

MJ40. End of Turn. Global Map.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 604

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/8/2016 2:07:05 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

Axis Reinforcements.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 605

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/8/2016 2:35:40 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

[b]JA40. Initiative.

Both sides wanted to move first. The allies won the first roll, the axis requested a re-roll, the allies won the second roll too and elected to move first.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 606

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/8/2016 2:37:23 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

[b]JA40. Allied #1. Weather.

As I emailed Pat, I need some time to think about my move and don't plan to start my impulse until tomorrow evening.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 607

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/8/2016 3:32:52 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

JA40. Offer to Extend of Japanese-Soviet Non-Aggression Pact.

To: Vyacheslav Mikhailovich Molotov, Chairman of the Council of People's Commissars and People's Commissar of Foreign Affairs of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics

From: Yosuke Matsuoka, Minister of Foreign Affairs, Jusanmin, Cavalier of the Order of the Sacred Treasure of the First Class

Re: Extension of Japanese-Soviet Non-Aggression Pact

I'm opening discussions on an extension of the JP/RU treaty. If we can conclude to continue the same agreement now, I'll agree to a 2 year extension (through J/A 42), if we wait through the end of this turn, I'll only extend it through J/A 41.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 608

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/8/2016 3:34:55 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

JA40. Clarification on Offer to Extend.

Interesting offer. It sounds like I have until before this turn ends before I have to give my answer? Well, before this turn ends to get the two year deal?

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by rkr1958 -- 8/8/2016 4:01:37 AM >

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 609

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/8/2016 11:05:46 PM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

To: Yosuke Matsuoka, Minister of Foreign Affairs, Jusanmin, Cavalier of the Order of the Sacred Treasure of the First Class

From: Vyacheslav Mikhailovich Molotov, Chairman of the Council of People's Commissars and People's Commissar of Foreign Affairs of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics

Re: Offer to Extend Out Mutual Non-Aggression Pact.

Comrade Stalin agrees to the 2-year extension with the stipulation that the Soviet Union is free to attack any other power at any time during the period of the extension. And with the additional stipulation that Japan would not intervene in any country attacked by the Soviet Union during this time.

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 610

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/8/2016 11:41:14 PM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

To: Vyacheslav Mikhailovich Molotov, Chairman of the Council of People's Commissars and People's Commissar of Foreign Affairs of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics
From: Yosuke Matsuoka, Minister of Foreign Affairs, Jusanmin, Cavalier of the Order of the Sacred Treasure of the First Class

Re: Offer to Extend Out Mutual Non-Aggression Pact.

Your conditions seem fair and should be applied to both powers not just the Soviet Union. So, Japan can also attack any other power at any time during the 2-year extension and the Soviet Union will not intervene in any country attacked by Japan.

Is this further addition acceptable?

Sincerely,

Pat,
Administrative Secretary for Yosuke Matsuoka

quote:

To: Yosuke Matsuoka, Minister of Foreign Affairs, Jusanmin, Cavalier of the Order of the Sacred Treasure of the First Class

From: Vyacheslav Mikhailovich Molotov, Chairman of the Council of People's Commissars and People's Commissar of Foreign Affairs of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics

Re: Offer to Extend Out Mutual Non-Aggression Pact.

Comrade Stalin agrees to the 2-year extension with the stipulation that the Soviet Union is free to attack any other power at any time during the period of the extension. And with the additional stipulation that Japan would not intervene in any country attacked by the Soviet Union during this time.

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 611

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/9/2016 12:36:44 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Comrade Stalin agrees to the offer. Considered it signed and in effect from Sep/Oct 1940 through Jul/Aug 1942.

Of course, Comrade Stalin recognizes that the terms and conditions of our current non-aggression pact will remain in effect until the end of this turn (Jul/Aug 1940). After which the terms and conditions of our modified pact takes effect.

Sincerely, Vyacheslav Mikhailovich Molotov, Chairman of the Council of People's Commissars and People's Commissar of Foreign Affairs of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics

quote:

ORIGINAL: ashkpa

To: Vyacheslav Mikhailovich Molotov, Chairman of the Council of People's Commissars and People's Commissar of Foreign Affairs of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics
From: Yosuke Matsuoka, Minister of Foreign Affairs, Jusanmin, Cavalier of the Order of the Sacred Treasure of the First Class

Re: Offer to Extend Out Mutual Non-Aggression Pact.

Your conditions seem fair and should be applied to both powers not just the Soviet Union. So, Japan can also attack any other power at any time during the 2-year extension and the Soviet Union will not intervene in any country attacked by Japan.

Is this further addition acceptable?

Sincerely,

Pat,
Administrative Secretary for Yosuke Matsuoka

quote:

To: Yosuke Matsuoka, Minister of Foreign Affairs, Jusanmin, Cavalier of the Order of the Sacred Treasure of the First Class

From: Vyacheslav Mikhailovich Molotov, Chairman of the Council of People's Commissars and People's Commissar of Foreign Affairs of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics

Re: Offer to Extend Out Mutual Non-Aggression Pact.

Comrade Stalin agrees to the 2-year extension with the stipulation that the Soviet Union is free to attack any other power at any time during the period of the extension. And with the additional stipulation that Japan would not intervene in any country attacked by the Soviet Union during this time.

A second signing of a non-aggression pact between the USSR and the Empire of Japan. Looks remarkable similar to the first signing doesn't it.

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by rkr1958 -- 8/9/2016 12:38:26 AM >

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 612

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/9/2016 12:39:00 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

JA40. Allied #1. Actions.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 613

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/9/2016 12:41:12 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

JA40. Allied #1. China.

Post movement, no air or land combat.

Mao is not very happy with his communist ally, Comrade Stalin who just agreed to a 2-year extension to the USSR-Japan non-aggression pact. But such is the world of politics and war.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 614

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/9/2016 12:41:46 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

JA40. Allied #1. France.

Post movement, no naval, air or land combat.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 615

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/9/2016 12:44:38 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

JA40. Allied #1. Antwerp.

I'm learning ... we're playing with limited oversea supply. I returned all TRSs in the North Sea at the end of last turn and without any CPs at sea there this put my forces in Antwerp out of supply. This move prevent me from reorganizing the fighter unit there.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 616

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/9/2016 4:08:59 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

Axis actions:
{forgot to note, Germany is expended extra supplies on Rundstedt - sorry for any confusion}

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by ashkpa -- 8/9/2016 4:29:09 AM >

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 617

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/9/2016 4:47:48 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

Here are the results of one Strat Bombing and 5 ground strikes. Better than my normal. Hope my attack rolls are as high as the 4 die rolls in the second ground strike (artillery all missed).

Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 618

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/9/2016 5:44:26 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

Here are the results of the 3 attacks (nothing for the allies to do in any of them - I assumed the Chinese would choose assault in Kunming). I did roll another 3 on a +16 attack (the weakest of the three attacks). The net will be on ART will not be reorganized and the FR units are shattered not destroyed.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 619

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/9/2016 6:02:28 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

Here is the situation in Europe. I did use Rundstedt and Von Bock to reorganize, so all of the land units (including both ART) and two Stuka's were reorganized.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 620

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/9/2016 6:05:04 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

And here is the situation in China. It is now time for the southern army to turn North. No need to worry about closing the Burma road via politics. Now, if I could just strat bomb the saved oil that is deep in China :-).

Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 621

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/9/2016 6:21:46 AM

brian brian

Posts: 3191
Joined: 11/16/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ashkpa

Here are the results of one Strat Bombing and 5 ground strikes. Better than my normal. Hope my attack rolls are as high as the 4 die rolls in the second ground strike (artillery all missed).

That Nell is the most dangerous unit the Chinese face...until/if/when the Sallys come along.

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 622

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/10/2016 12:11:23 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Jul/Aug 1940. Allied #3. Weather.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to brian brian)

Post #: 623

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/10/2016 12:11:51 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Jul/Aug 1940. Allied #3. Actions.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 624

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/10/2016 12:12:35 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Jul/Aug 1940. Allied #3. China.

Post movement, no air or land combat.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 625

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/10/2016 12:15:09 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Jul/Aug 1940. Allied #3. Soviet Deescalation of Manchuria Theater.

due to the Soviet-Japanese non-aggression pact enforce until the end of Jul-Aug 1942 (i.e., 2 years from now).

With only 1 rail per impulse it's going to take the Soviets a while to move their units in Asia to more important theaters but they will.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 626

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/10/2016 12:16:02 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Jul/Aug 1940. Allied #3. Egypt, Eastern Libya, East Med.

Post movement, no air or land combat.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 627

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/10/2016 12:17:48 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Jul/Aug 1940. Allied #3. RAF, France. Ground Strike.

The RAF puts maximum effort into slowing down the spearhead of the Nazi breakthrough in France. The results are mixed. Better than missing both units but not as good as getting them both.

Note: The RAF ground strike was out of the intercept range of all axis fighter units.

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by rkr1958 -- 8/10/2016 12:18:54 AM >

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 628

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/10/2016 12:20:02 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Jul/Aug 1940. Allied #3. Western Allies, France.

Post movement, no land combat.

This ends the allied impulse. Back to Pat for more carnage inflicted to the peace loving allies.