Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> After Action Report >> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR Page: <<   < prev  22 23 [24] 25 26   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/18/2016 12:51:11 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Jul-Aug 1940. Netherlands Conquered.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 691
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/18/2016 12:51:49 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Jul-Aug 1940. Surrender China?.

No.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 692
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/18/2016 12:52:17 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Jul-Aug 1940. Surrender France.

No.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 693
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/18/2016 12:53:16 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Sep-Oct 1940. France.

Post place units.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 694
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/18/2016 1:15:27 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline
Below are the axis reinforcements.
Germany increased their lending to Italy by 1 resources (2 regular and 1 oil are now going to Italy).
No other changes in lending by the axis or allies.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 695
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/18/2016 1:17:48 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline
Axis won the initiative.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 696
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/18/2016 1:22:28 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline
Axis will move first. Weather rolled a 9, with the modifiers from last turn it becomes a 10. Looks like another long wet winter with a +2 modifier already applied. Going to take a bit to figure out my plans. Worse case France could hold out till '41. Yikes




Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 697
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/18/2016 1:36:17 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ashkpa

Axis will move first. Weather rolled a 9, with the modifiers from last turn it becomes a 10. Looks like another long wet winter with a +2 modifier already applied. Going to take a bit to figure out my plans.
In my opinion I think the best course for the axis is unconditional surrender.


_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 698
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/18/2016 3:55:54 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline
Axis actions: GE - Land, IT and JP - combines

IT moves three subs to CSV 2 and 3 box and initiates combat. I am assuming that you will fly the Hampden to the 0-box based on past reaction flights.

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 699
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/18/2016 4:13:51 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline
Search rolls of 6 / 3 (axis / allies) resulted in no contact.

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 700
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/18/2016 4:32:52 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline
Attacking the 5-5 MOT SE of Paris at +14.4. Does the FR HQ wish to provide HQ support?




Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 701
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/18/2016 4:55:21 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
No to the HQ support.

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 702
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/18/2016 5:18:56 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline
Here is the result. (Good call on the HQ support).




Attachment (1)

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 703
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/18/2016 5:31:37 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline
W. European situation




Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 704
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/20/2016 6:27:17 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Sep-Oct 1940. Allied #3. Actions.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 705
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/20/2016 6:54:26 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Sep-Oct 1940. Allied #3. Cape St. Vincent.

1. The RN declines the opportunity to try to initiate naval combat in Cape St. Vincent.

2. Do the Italians wish to try?




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 706
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/20/2016 7:17:05 PM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline
We will pass at the moment.

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 707
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/20/2016 8:34:09 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Sep-Oct 1940. Allied #3. China.

Post movement, no air or land combat.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 708
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/20/2016 8:34:40 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Sep-Oct 1940. Allied #3. France.

Post movement, no air or land combat.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 709
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/20/2016 8:35:13 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Sep-Oct 1940. Axis #5. Weather.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 710
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/21/2016 1:09:10 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline
Axis actions: GE - comb, IT and JP take lands.

Germany moves BB S-H moves to the one box of the North Sea. I will not initiate combat here, but you may.

In the West Med: The Germans fly both fighters to the 2-box and then initiate combat. The IT and GE both react out their NAV's. Your Blenheim in Malta could react. Will you?




Attachment (1)

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 711
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/21/2016 1:17:55 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
1. No to Blenheim in Malta flying to the West Med.

2. In the North Sea, the RN will try to initiate combat. RAF albacore will fly to the 0-box and French DB-7 will fly to the highest box it can reach.

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 712
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/21/2016 2:35:40 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline
Round 1 we both find. Allies cleared an axis bomber and the Axis shoot down an Allied plane (CW choice).
Stay for another round of air to air?





Attachment (1)

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 713
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/21/2016 2:58:02 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Destroy the French NAV. The allies stay and will stay until Germany NAV is cleared, aborted or shot down.

< Message edited by rkr1958 -- 8/21/2016 2:59:18 AM >


_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 714
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/21/2016 3:43:08 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline
Half time of my football game now. Forgot to save picture of the 2nd round air-air, but results were another cleared NAV and an aborted CW fighter (I'm sending it back to Malta, where it came from).

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 715
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/21/2016 3:46:59 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline
Good AA, nearly stopped all the bombs. Did abort the Liverpool.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 716
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/21/2016 3:49:18 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline
The allies now have no air coverage. Will they stay for a second round of naval combat and if they do, will the Blenheim fly now?

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 717
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/21/2016 4:02:12 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
The allies stay and the Blenheim remains on the ground.

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 718
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/21/2016 5:09:36 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline
Round two axis search is a 2, allies a 7 (forgot to save direct screen shot, but can be inferred from surprise points in first screen shot below). Used 4 surprise to avoid all AA, result versus ships is X 3A. First X versus CW convoys. You choose first and last A.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 719
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/21/2016 5:30:02 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
3-2 rn ca, 6-6 rn ca, Allies stay.

< Message edited by rkr1958 -- 8/21/2016 5:40:16 AM >


_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 720
Page:   <<   < prev  22 23 [24] 25 26   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> After Action Report >> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR Page: <<   < prev  22 23 [24] 25 26   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.282