Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> After Action Report >> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR Page: <<   < prev  36 37 [38] 39 40   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/23/2016 5:17:50 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 10. Mar/Apr 1941. Allied #12. China.

Post movement. No air or land combat.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1111
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/23/2016 5:18:25 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 10. Mar/Apr 1941. Allied #12. End of Turn Check.

This turn continues.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1112
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/23/2016 5:18:57 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 10. Mar/Apr 1941. Axis #15. Weather.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1113
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/24/2016 1:58:27 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		MA41 i15:
IT and GE take combined actions, while JP takes a land.
Germany moves a sub to CVB and Italy makes no naval moves. Neither fly any naval air missions.
In CVB the sub finds the Allied convoys sleeping (3/9 split) and have 8 SP.
I use it all to increase the subs attack and let them take an A (which the fail and abort).
I destroy 3 CP and abort another (to Gibraltar, Plymouth would have required them to flee through BoB with active axis subs.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1114
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/24/2016 2:09:56 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		MA41 i15:
Germans initiate searches in the N. Atlantic, but no contact on rolls of 8/6.
In the Bay of Biscay, the subs try to catch the allies napping, but it does not work. Both find on rolls of 2/1.
I made a command decision for the allies and used their two SP to increase the axis damage from an X D 2A to an X 2D. I am also, placing the allied D on the Polish destroyer flotilla. Nobody made a damage control roll resulting in a CW damaged CA and two sunk subs.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 1115
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/24/2016 2:26:26 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		MA41 i15: Land Attacks
Mao could provide HQ support, will you have him do so?




Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 1116
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/24/2016 3:26:19 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		No to Mao providing HQ support.

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 1117
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/24/2016 3:35:17 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		Achieved the dreaded 14.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1118
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/24/2016 3:43:20 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		MA41 i15:Turn Ended




Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 1119
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/24/2016 6:24:14 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 10. Mar/Apr 1941. End of Turn. Destroyed Pool.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 1120
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/24/2016 6:24:58 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 10. Mar/Apr 1941. End of Turn. Partisans. Yugoslavia.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1121
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/24/2016 6:26:32 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 10. Mar/Apr 1941. End of Turn. USA Entry Pool.

USA selects option 22, "Gear up production".




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1122
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/24/2016 6:28:06 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 10. Mar/Apr 1941. Nazi-Soviet Pact Chits.

"Garrison Chits: First chit to defensive. If value of defensive chits < 14, place second in defensive pool as well. At end if, defensive pool is greater than 14, move a 1-chit to the offensive pool." -- both chits go into the defensive pool.

The Soviets put their first chit into the offensive pool and move a second chit from their defensive pool to their offensive pool.

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1123
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/24/2016 6:29:02 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 10. Mar/Apr 1941. End of Turn. Preliminary Production. China.






Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1124
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/25/2016 10:34:39 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 10. Mar/Apr 1941. End of Turn. Use Oil. Allies.

The Soviet Union had no units requiring oil to reorganize. France had no units reachable by and requiring oil to reorganize.

Notice anything else interesting?




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by rkr1958 -- 9/25/2016 10:36:28 PM >

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1125
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/26/2016 11:15:22 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 10. Mar/Apr 1941. End of Turn. Final Production. Allies (1 of 2).




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1126
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/26/2016 11:15:52 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 10. Mar/Apr 1941. End of Turn. Final Production. Allies (2 of 2).




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1127
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/27/2016 2:55:20 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		MA41: Axis Production
No axis units were scrapped.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1128
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/29/2016 3:29:52 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		MA41: Axis Builds




Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 1129
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/30/2016 12:42:31 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Mar/Apr 1941. End of Turn. Allied Builds.

China (1 BP): CP

CW (24 BPs): FTR(3), NAV(3), Pilot(2) x 2, CA Repair(0) x 2, CA Repair (1), BB Repair (1) x 2, CP(1) x 2, MAR(5), INF Div(2), GAR(2)

France (0 BPs):

USA (20 BPs): FTR(3), FTR(2), CVP(1), Pilot(2) x 2, Amph 2nd (4), CV 1st (2), CA 1st(1) x 2, Inf Div(2)

USSR (17 BPs): Pilot(2) x 2, LND(2), FTR(3), MOT(4), INF(3), GAR(2)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 1130
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/30/2016 12:43:23 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Mar/Apr 1941. End of Turn. Conquest. Yugoslavia Conquered by Germany.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1131
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/30/2016 12:44:21 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Mar/Apr 1941. End of Turn. Conquest. China Surrenders to Japan.

The USA reacts unfavorably to this by rolling a 1 and adding 2 chits to the Japanese Entry pool.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by rkr1958 -- 9/30/2016 12:45:28 AM >

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1132
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/30/2016 12:46:14 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Mar/Apr 1941. End of Turn. Conquest. Chinese CP.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1133
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/30/2016 12:47:02 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Mar/Apr 1941. End of Turn. Global Map.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1134
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/30/2016 12:48:03 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Mar/Apr 1941. End of Turn. Active Allied and Axis Convoys.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1135
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/2/2016 11:14:05 AM   
Centuur


Posts: 8802
Joined: 6/3/2011
From: Hoorn (NED).
Status: offline 		Is Japan now neutral? If so can you check if the following did happen on the Japanese side:

If you are now a neutral major power, remove any MIL units you have
on the map (including MIL not marked as ‘Res’) and place them in the reserve pool.
Remove all your remaining MIL units from the game until you are
next at war (see 4.1.2).

If not, can you make a bug report in the tech forum please with a gamesave from just before the surrender (or conquest) phase?

< Message edited by Centuur -- 10/2/2016 11:16:13 AM >

_____________________________

Peter

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1136
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/2/2016 4:00:26 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Centuur

Is Japan now neutral? If so can you check if the following did happen on the Japanese side:

If you are now a neutral major power, remove any MIL units you have
on the map (including MIL not marked as ‘Res’) and place them in the reserve pool.
Remove all your remaining MIL units from the game until you are
next at war (see 4.1.2).

If not, can you make a bug report in the tech forum please with a gamesave from just before the surrender (or conquest) phase?

Japan is indeed neutral and all MIL units appears to be either removed or in the reserve pool with the exception of the 5-3 Hiroshima MIL which is a "Future Force Pool Addition". And the year it's added is "war". So I assume all this is correct?




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by rkr1958 -- 10/2/2016 4:01:32 PM >

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to Centuur)
Post #: 1137
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/3/2016 12:02:48 AM   
Courtenay


Posts: 4003
Joined: 11/12/2008
Status: offline 		It looks right, if the top eight units were on the map when China surrendered, and the Hiroshima MIL was not.

_____________________________

I thought I knew how to play this game....

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1138
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/3/2016 2:58:19 PM   
Centuur


Posts: 8802
Joined: 6/3/2011
From: Hoorn (NED).
Status: offline 		It's right. Thanks for checking.

_____________________________

Peter

(in reply to Courtenay)
Post #: 1139
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/3/2016 10:49:39 PM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		MJ41: Axis Reinforcements shown below.
What will Japan now do? I've never been here before.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Centuur)
Post #: 1140
Page:   <<   < prev  36 37 [38] 39 40   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> After Action Report >> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR Page: <<   < prev  36 37 [38] 39 40   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.688