Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> After Action Report >> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR Page: <<   < prev  37 38 [39] 40 41   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/3/2016 11:39:14 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 11. May/June 1941. Place Units. CW.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 1141
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/3/2016 11:39:45 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 11. May/June 1941. Place Units. USA. USSR.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1142
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/3/2016 11:40:23 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 11. May/June 1941. Resource Lending. Allied (no changes).

Pat, back to you for axis resource lending.

Initiative: The allies will move first if they win. However, they will NOT request a re-roll if they lose the first roll.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by rkr1958 -- 10/3/2016 11:42:13 PM >

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1143
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/4/2016 2:36:29 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 11. May/June 1941. Initiative.

The axis win the first roll, the allies elect NOT to re-roll and the axis choose to move first.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1144
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/4/2016 2:36:57 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 11. May/June 1941. Axis #1. Weather.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1145
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/6/2016 1:17:25 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		MJ41 i1:
Italy and Japan take combined actions, while Germany takes a land.
There are fighter flown to the 2-box of the W. Med and an Italian sub moved to CSV 3-box.

The Italians initiate combat in the W. Med with the IT fighter in the 1-box. Axis reacted out 2 NAV's to the 2-box.
The CW can react out several planes (shown in the attached image). Will you react any aircraft?




Attachment (1)

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1146
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/6/2016 5:20:06 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		P-40 Tomahawk to 0-box. The allies will choose to avoid combat if they can.

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 1147
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/6/2016 6:09:54 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		Successfully avoided on rolls of 8/3. The Axis did not initiate combat in CSV.

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1148
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/6/2016 6:14:52 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		MJ41 i1: Ground Strikes
The Axis are back to pamphlet warfare.





Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 1149
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/6/2016 6:54:18 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		MJ41 i1:
CW can support the Spanish defenders with air support (current odds are 62:10 with 18 more German GS factors to be applied). Do they wish to? Germans could intercept the allied bombers.
There is only one other attack in Yugo versus the partisan (it is automatic).




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by ashkpa -- 10/6/2016 6:55:41 AM >

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 1150
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/6/2016 12:39:18 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		No to CW providing ground support.

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 1151
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/6/2016 9:50:46 PM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		MJ41 i1: Land Attacks.





Attachment (1)

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1152
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/8/2016 3:17:53 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 11. May/June 1941. Allied #2. Actions.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 1153
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/8/2016 3:18:55 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 11. May/June 1941. Allied #2. Naval, Cape St. Vincent.

The allies elect NOT to try to initiate combat in Cape St. Vincent.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1154
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/8/2016 3:19:29 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 11. May/June 1941. Allied #2. Naval, Western Med.

The allies also elect NOT to try to initiate combat in the Western Med.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1155
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/8/2016 3:21:18 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 11. May/June 1941. Allied #2. Naval, Axis Initiate Combat?

1. Do the axis wish to try to initiate a naval combat in either or both these sea area?

2. If so, what additional air units (if any) do you wish to add? And which sea box?




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1156
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/8/2016 5:48:25 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline
quote:

1. Do the axis wish to try to initiate a naval combat in either or both these sea area?

2. If so, what additional air units (if any) do you wish to add? And which sea box?

Only initiate in the W. Med. Use the GE fighter in the 0-box. No other axis reaction flights.

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1157
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/8/2016 5:54:54 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ashkpa

quote:

1. Do the axis wish to try to initiate a naval combat in either or both these sea area?

2. If so, what additional air units (if any) do you wish to add? And which sea box?

Only initiate in the W. Med. Use the GE fighter in the 0-box. No other axis reaction flights.
Search rolls, axis 3, allies 6. The axis surprise the allies. How do you wish to proceed?





Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 1158
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/8/2016 10:15:48 PM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		I will engage the 4-box only. I believe I will have 2 surprise points.
Make it a naval air. Fly both of my fighters as fighters and the two NAV's as bombers.
Use my 2 SP to reduce the AA to ne.
Result versus the allies should be 2D 3A
1st D versus the transport
1st A versus the Liverpool (unless it was impacted by your choice on the 2nd D - which I think highly unlikely).
3rd A Liverpool if it has a 1/2A otherwise versus the Norfolk or Exeter (which ever has not been impacted yet).

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1159
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/8/2016 10:41:49 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 11. May/June 1941. Allied #2. West Med. Round 1.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 1160
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/8/2016 10:45:06 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 11. May/June 1941. Allied #2. West Med, Search. Round 2.

Both sides stay. The axis once again find and surprise the allies.

How do you wish to proceed?




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1161
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/8/2016 11:22:22 PM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		This time I will engage the 1-box only with 6 surprise points. If I see it right you have two CA's there, one of which is transporting a division and a sub, which I assume is not committed.
Make it a naval air. fighters fly as fighters, NAV as bombers.
Use 2 SP to reduce AA to ne.
Use 4 SP to increase damage two columns, to X 2A
Place the X on the CA caring the division.
2nd A on non-loaded CA if possible.

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1162
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/8/2016 11:34:44 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 11. May/June 1941. Allied #2. West Med. Round 2.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 1163
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/8/2016 11:37:35 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 11. May/June 1941. Allied #3. West Med, Search. Round 3.

Both sides stay. The axis, again, find and surprise the allies.

How would you like to proceed? The Allies did NOT commit their subs this time.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1164
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/8/2016 11:46:12 PM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		This time, I'll engage the 0-box only, with 8 surprise points.
I'll make it a naval air.
The Emil, Freccia, and Falco will fly as fighters (in that order).
The other 4 planes will fly as bombers.
I will use no surprise points in the Air-Air.
I will use enough SP to reduce the AA to ne.
I will use remaining SP to increase columns. If there is an X the first X will go against the FR transport.

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1165
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/8/2016 11:59:26 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 11. May/June 1941. Allied #2. West Med. Round 3.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 1166
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/9/2016 12:17:31 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		Let me look. for the next round, I want to fly another fighter out to the 0-box.

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1167
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/9/2016 12:19:45 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		Fly the Bf109 in Toulon out to the 0-box.

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 1168
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/9/2016 12:25:08 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		Heading out shortly. Be back in about 3 hours.

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 1169
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/9/2016 3:39:14 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 11. May/June 1941. Allied #2. West Med. Round 4. Search.

Finally, the RN and French navies are able to break off contact and end what is another rough exchange with the axis in the Western Med.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by rkr1958 -- 10/9/2016 3:51:56 PM >

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1170
Page:   <<   < prev  37 38 [39] 40 41   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> After Action Report >> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR Page: <<   < prev  37 38 [39] 40 41   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.891