Allied or Japanese GC (Closed)

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

Allied or Japanese GC (Closed)

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> Opponents Wanted >> Allied or Japanese GC (Closed)

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

Allied or Japanese GC (Closed) - 11/28/2016 8:06:30 PM

MaxFusion

Posts: 27
Joined: 6/6/2002
From: New Jersey
Status: offline

Let�s remember Pearl Harbor 75th anniversary. How about stock scenario 2 or 8 (Hakko Ichiu) and I�ll play either side? Then try and reach 1944 or beyond (Yes, I know that�s not reality). Historical First Turn is Off. Rest of Realism Options and Game Options to be determined, preferably historical where appropriate. Any takers?

< Message edited by MaxFusion -- 11/30/2016 2:16:16 PM >

Post #: 1

RE: Allied or Japanese GC - 11/29/2016 4:14:11 AM

joliverlay

Posts: 635
Joined: 1/28/2003
Status: offline

Interested in giving it a go as the Allied Player. Have not done a PBM in several years. Would like something with boundary conditions withing historical possibilities. What version of the game are you using? Will need to reinstall everything, and patch up.

(in reply to MaxFusion)

Post #: 2

RE: Allied or Japanese GC - 11/29/2016 12:30:34 PM

MaxFusion

Posts: 27
Joined: 6/6/2002
From: New Jersey
Status: offline

What boundary conditions are you thinking of? I�ve been offline quite a while myself.

I�ve got version 1.7.11.24 pasted on my Main Menu Screen. I think that�s fully updated

(in reply to joliverlay)

Post #: 3

RE: Allied or Japanese GC - 11/29/2016 3:36:50 PM

joliverlay

Posts: 635
Joined: 1/28/2003
Status: offline

No strategic bombing before say 6/43 or no naval bombing by heavy bombers below 10K feet. No invasions with subs. Keeping units inside national boarders unless PPs paid (restricted HQs), that sort of thing. Probably also should ban deliberate use of AKs in one ship task forces as picket ships. There is a post somewhere with good house rules.

I'll check my version tonight.

(in reply to MaxFusion)

Post #: 4

RE: Allied or Japanese GC - 11/30/2016 12:58:19 PM

Bullwinkle58

Posts: 11302
Joined: 2/24/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: joliverlay

No strategic bombing before say 6/43 or no naval bombing by heavy bombers below 10K feet. No invasions with subs. Keeping units inside national boarders unless PPs paid (restricted HQs), that sort of thing. Probably also should ban deliberate use of AKs in one ship task forces as picket ships. There is a post somewhere with good house rules.

I'll check my version tonight.

SSTs are explicitly designed to carry troops and land them. Hardly an "invasion", but useful to the Allies. No reason to HR them away.

_____________________________

The Moose

(in reply to joliverlay)

Post #: 5

RE: Allied or Japanese GC - 11/30/2016 4:25:40 PM

Pentakomo

Posts: 41
Joined: 11/13/2014
Status: offline

How many bases taken with sub invasion?

(in reply to Bullwinkle58)

Post #: 6

RE: Allied or Japanese GC - 11/30/2016 7:54:33 PM

Bullwinkle58

Posts: 11302
Joined: 2/24/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Pentakomo

How many bases taken with sub invasion?

I'm not sure of your question.

If you want to discuss SSTs you should open a thread in the War Room or the main forum. This thread has been closed.

_____________________________

The Moose

(in reply to Pentakomo)

Post #: 7

RE: Allied or Japanese GC - 11/30/2016 11:04:37 PM

Pentakomo

Posts: 41
Joined: 11/13/2014
Status: offline

Nothing to discuss since no one base dont taken and player dont need this trick in PBEM.

(in reply to Bullwinkle58)

Post #: 8