Naval combat - a shame...

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

Naval combat - a shame...

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Strategic Command Series >> Strategic Command WWII War in Europe >> Naval combat - a shame...

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

Naval combat - a shame... - 11/26/2016 10:03:24 PM

The Land

Posts: 857
Joined: 2/19/2010
Status: offline

I am really liking this game, but naval combat really isn't working at all. It's too similar to ground combat. In reality;

1) Naval combat was far more compressed into space. You could fit a 200-ship fleet into one of this game's hexes. Was it too much to ask to have naval units be task forces rather than "ships"?

2) Detection was a bigger problem than the game thinks - it's far too easy to find and sink convoy raiders - and in the brief moments that your submarines or raiders aren't detected it's far too easy to attrite convoys.

3) The mechanics for surprise encounters might work for land warfare but frankly they are a joke for naval combat. If a submarine unexpectedly encountered a destroyer, it's very probable that the sub would see the destroyer without being seen - not end its turn in surprise and be pinned in place while the destroyer summoned 5 friends to finish off the submarine.

Any chance of this being improved in a patch....?

Post #: 1

RE: Naval combat - a shame... - 11/26/2016 10:31:16 PM

sPzAbt653

Posts: 9511
Joined: 5/3/2007
From: east coast, usa
Status: offline

quote:

not end its turn in surprise and be pinned in place

This part really bothers me, too. The same for land combat, at this scale positions were known, look at any SHAEF or German Lage situation maps and they knew where units were. Maybe not exact positions and compositions, but enough to know not to blunder aimlessly forward and then stop dead.

(in reply to The Land)

Post #: 2

RE: Naval combat - a shame... - 11/27/2016 2:32:28 AM

ILCK

Posts: 422
Joined: 6/26/2004
Status: offline

Well and the price of being stuck especially in naval combat usually results in death.

The ship speeds are way too high in the end and it is crazy easy to get abused by the carousel of death as ships hit and flee back to port.

(in reply to sPzAbt653)

Post #: 3

RE: Naval combat - a shame... - 11/27/2016 3:14:34 AM

sPzAbt653

Posts: 9511
Joined: 5/3/2007
From: east coast, usa
Status: offline

There is also this type of situation that bugs me [screenshot]. Turn after turn I have tons of German assets not able to get rid of that pesky French sub [it's a good idea to conquer France if you don't want to see this happen].

I attack, it dives [yet stays in place] .. I attack, I take 3 losses he takes 1 ... I attack it dives ... I rotate units all the way back to Germany to get repaired ... I attack, it dives ... I picture all this activity in a fjord trying to find a sub.

Maybe I am overreacting, or maybe it is Saturday night

but maybe subs in these situations should actually dive and get the heck out of there [or maybe by attempting to dive run into the fjord and sink].

It's not just the fjord, we can surround subs in the open sea and they never dive away, they just stay put.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to ILCK)

Post #: 4

RE: Naval combat - a shame... - 11/27/2016 9:44:32 AM

Hartmann

Posts: 888
Joined: 11/28/2000
Status: offline

Naval combat may not be very realistic, especially scale-wise, but after 15 years or so, Hubert finally managed to actually make it fun and that's what counts for me in the end.

About the subs not diving under enemies when they're surrounded, I have no problem seeing this as a rational abstraction. Sonar would track them when in the same hex as an enemy so they avoid that. And if there's no other way to go, they rather stay in place waiting instead of suicidally diving directly "under" enemy ships. The fjord then would be a deathtrap for a sub - IF you brought destroyers.

(in reply to sPzAbt653)

Post #: 5

RE: Naval combat - a shame... - 11/27/2016 12:10:00 PM

TheBattlefield

Posts: 507
Joined: 6/11/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: sPzAbt653

It's not just the fjord, we can surround subs in the open sea and they never dive away, they just stay put.

Yep. We have discussed this subject already in another thread.

http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=4185949&mpage=1&key=�

I think that Hubert and Bill have made already a suitable note in this matter.

(in reply to sPzAbt653)

Post #: 6

RE: Naval combat - a shame... - 11/27/2016 9:06:56 PM

sPzAbt653

Posts: 9511
Joined: 5/3/2007
From: east coast, usa
Status: offline

quote:

We have discussed this subject already in another thread.

Ah, I see. Thank you.

quote:

The fjord then would be a deathtrap for a sub - IF you brought destroyers.

In this mod my BB's and PB's include DD's [as they have the same anti-sub capabilities]. At least I think it works that way.

< Message edited by sPzAbt653 -- 11/27/2016 9:07:09 PM >

(in reply to TheBattlefield)

Post #: 7

RE: Naval combat - a shame... - 11/28/2016 7:54:10 AM

TheBattlefield

Posts: 507
Joined: 6/11/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: sPzAbt653

quote:

We have discussed this subject already in another thread.

Ah, I see. Thank you.

quote:

The fjord then would be a deathtrap for a sub - IF you brought destroyers.

In this mod my BB's and PB's include DD's [as they have the same anti-sub capabilities]. At least I think it works that way.

Oh well. The longer I think about the naval warfare the more I become convinced that the naval units are more likely to be represented as a task force, mixed group, flotilla or wolf pack. And as a logical consequence these units should also be designated in this manner. If the battleship has become a battle group some sub-hunt ability seems logical. But I think it is even more important in these circumstances to allow a surrounded U-boat to have at least a chance-based probability of an outbreak.

(in reply to sPzAbt653)

Post #: 8

RE: Naval combat - a shame... - 11/28/2016 2:34:51 PM

Grotius

Posts: 5798
Joined: 10/18/2002
From: The Imperial Palace.
Status: offline

I already do think of naval units as task forces. As for surrounded subs, do they have no chance to "dive" and escape a couple hexes away?

_____________________________

(in reply to TheBattlefield)

Post #: 9

RE: Naval combat - a shame... - 11/28/2016 2:42:53 PM

Goodmongo

Posts: 346
Joined: 9/22/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: sPzAbt653

There is also this type of situation that bugs me [screenshot]. Turn after turn I have tons of German assets not able to get rid of that pesky French sub [it's a good idea to conquer France if you don't want to see this happen].

You do realize that BB's and other subs have terrible anti-sub statistics don't you? These are the worst ships to use when trying to sink an enemy sub.

(in reply to sPzAbt653)

Post #: 10

RE: Naval combat - a shame... - 11/29/2016 5:47:53 PM

DeriKuk

Posts: 359
Joined: 8/2/2005
From: Alberta
Status: offline

One word: SCALE

This is a STRATEGIC level game. Do not see combat as a tactical contest. That's for other games.

(in reply to Goodmongo)

Post #: 11

RE: Naval combat - a shame... - 11/29/2016 6:34:28 PM

Altermann

Posts: 9
Joined: 11/5/2011
Status: offline

Having just purchased this, I was originally quite impressed and pleased with it, however, ``Enemy Contact`` has put a slight damper on my excitement. Nothing more frustrating (on the sea AND on the land) than stopping in a hex, only to find out (with an Enemy Contact msg and partial destruction of your unit) that you have stopped NEXT to an enemy. I can see this if you drive right into the hex containing the enemy unit, ( but if you happen to stop beside I think there should be an opportunity for you to 1) withdraw, or 2) engage (possibly with a lower attack value) the unit. As The Land said, IRL, and especially in winter on the North Atlantic, the sub would likely not have engaged and could have passed unseen even within 2 miles of a Destroyer! I suppose when playing against the AI it does need some advantage, so I guess it can`t be helped, but when MP gets implemented, it would be nice if Enemy Contact were modified somehow

(in reply to DeriKuk)

Post #: 12

RE: Naval combat - a shame... - 11/29/2016 6:51:00 PM

Hartmann

Posts: 888
Joined: 11/28/2000
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Alermann

Having just purchased this, I was originally quite impressed and pleased with it, however, ``Enemy Contact`` has put a slight damper on my excitement. Nothing more frustrating (on the sea AND on the land) than stopping in a hex, only to find out (with an Enemy Contact msg and partial destruction of your unit) that you have stopped NEXT to an enemy. I can see this if you drive right into the hex containing the enemy unit, ( but if you happen to stop beside I think there should be an opportunity for you to 1) withdraw, or 2) engage (possibly with a lower attack value) the unit. As The Land said, IRL, and especially in winter on the North Atlantic, the sub would likely not have engaged and could have passed unseen even within 2 miles of a Destroyer! I suppose when playing against the AI it does need some advantage, so I guess it can`t be helped, but when MP gets implemented, it would be nice if Enemy Contact were modified somehow

"Enemy contact" has cost me alot of ships when I was still learning the game. The good thing about it, though, is that it really forces us to do reconnaissance with planes and subs or at least keep our task force close by while moving into the unknown with a single ship.

(in reply to Altermann)

Post #: 13

RE: Naval combat - a shame... - 11/29/2016 6:51:22 PM

Ohf

Posts: 29
Joined: 11/22/2016
Status: offline

I agree its maybe too powerful. Right now the best way to win naval combat is to use a bait and then deploy a net of ships for the ennemy to run into. Very effective with subs + kriegsmarine

(in reply to Altermann)

Post #: 14

RE: Naval combat - a shame... - 11/29/2016 7:42:37 PM

n0kn0k

Posts: 564
Joined: 6/23/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ohf

I agree its maybe too powerful. Right now the best way to win naval combat is to use a bait and then deploy a net of ships for the ennemy to run into. Very effective with subs + kriegsmarine

Yes vs AI. No vs human players.

(in reply to Ohf)

Post #: 15

RE: Naval combat - a shame... - 12/1/2016 1:07:53 PM

The Land

Posts: 857
Joined: 2/19/2010
Status: offline

How moddable is the game? Might it be possible to make naval units stack as a mod...?

(in reply to n0kn0k)

Post #: 16

RE: Naval combat - a shame... - 12/1/2016 3:11:06 PM

Goodmongo

Posts: 346
Joined: 9/22/2011
Status: offline

Naval is fine IMO.

(in reply to The Land)

Post #: 17

RE: Naval combat - a shame... - 12/1/2016 3:16:42 PM

wie201

Posts: 793
Joined: 11/9/2002
From: Fairfax, VA, USA
Status: offline

I really like this game. But . . . I wouldn't mind an option to have naval combat abstracted. You can build what you want, and have options and/or a sliding scale for how aggressive you wish to be, and possibly zones (not hexes) you wish to concentrate in. Not being a programmer for decades, I understand that this probably is impossible. But arguments about how the status quo is fine given the scale of the game I think fall flat. Just my opinion. Still love it though! And love the comments on the forum.

(in reply to Goodmongo)

Post #: 18