Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

At Sea "Replenishment" of Planes Torpedoes ?

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> At Sea "Replenishment" of Planes Torpedoes ? Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
At Sea "Replenishment" of Planes Torpedoes ? - 12/12/2016 11:04:26 AM   
pavel01

 

Posts: 81
Joined: 12/4/2016
Status: offline

I seem to understand (but I could be wrong..) that "in Port", in order to fully re-supply Airplanes' Torpedoes 2 full days are necessary as on the first day fuel and general supplies get replenished and on the first day Airplanes' Torpedoes get replenished. And, I understand as well, an Air HQ needs be present in that Port in order to get those Torpedoes replenished.

But what about with "At Sea" replenishment in between 2 separate Task forces an Air combat one like for example that which attacked Pearl Harbour on Dec 7th and a secondary Replenishment Task Force ?

Is it necessary to keep both Task Forces, in enemy waters, as stationary, doing nothing for 2 full days but the replenishment needed in order to re-supply all Airplanes of their full Torpedoes loads ?

Thank you for clarifing this to me.
Post #: 1
RE: At Sea "Replenishment" of Planes Torpedoes ? - 12/12/2016 11:13:47 AM   
HansBolter


Posts: 7704
Joined: 7/6/2006
From: United States
Status: offline
There is no 'full two days' as a set requirement.
The time necessary for replenishment is a function of the size of the task force and the amount of replenishment.
Port, like task forces have 1000 OPs point to use per turn.

You also do NOT need an air HQ to replenish torpedoes for a TF. This is done by having either the necessary threshold level of port size or AEs and/or AKEs loaded with supplies at the port.
You are confusing air squadrons and TFs.

Land based air squadrons get torpedoes from air HQs.
Carrier based air squadrons get torpedoes from the carrier stockpile.
The carrier stockpile acts like an AIR HQ for carrier based squadrons.
The carrier stockpile is replenished from a port, not an AIR HQ.

There is no at seas replenishment of ammunition until 1945 when AEs become capable of this function.
At sea replacement of air frames can be accomplished by having replacement air squadrons in range of your carriers.
These come in on some of the CVEs.

< Message edited by HansBolter -- 12/12/2016 1:46:03 PM >


_____________________________

Hans


(in reply to pavel01)
Post #: 2
RE: At Sea "Replenishment" of Planes Torpedoes ? - 12/12/2016 11:47:32 AM   
pavel01

 

Posts: 81
Joined: 12/4/2016
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: HansBolter

There is no 'full two days' as a set requirement.
The time necessary for replenishment is a function of the size of the task force and the amount of replenishment.
Port, like task forces have 1000 OPs point to use per turn.

You also do BOT need an air HQ to replenish torpedoes for a TF. This is done by having either the necessary threshold level of port size or AEs and/or AKEs loaded with supplies at the port.
You are confusing air squadrons and TFs.

Land based air squadrons get torpedoes from air HQs.
Carrier based air squadrons get torpedoes from the carrier stockpile.
The carrier stockpile acts like an AIR HQ for carrier based squadrons.
The carrier stockpile is replenished from a port, not an AIR HQ.

There is no at seas replenishment of ammunition until 1945 when AEs become capable of this function.
At sea replacement of air frames can be accomplished by having replacement air squadrons in range of your carriers.
These come in on some of the CVEs.


Thank you very much for the kind reply. Let me see if I understood that well.

It is "not" necessary to replenish ammunitions for a Task force that is "At Sea" ?
That is, in the example of Torpedoes, as soon as on December 7th the Torpedo Bombers get back to their Carriers and land on the flattop they get "automatically" replenished ?

If so, why at the start of turn 2 (Dec 8th) the torpedo bombers have in RED the writing Use Torpedoes and I have to select "Bombs" if I want to have a 2nd, December 8th Attack on Pearl Harbour ?

If their re-loading of Torpedoes from their Carrier was to be automatic, shouldn't they be capable of launching a second attack on Dec 8th using Torpedoes by default ?
And, yes, I did select Naval Attack which should automatically switch the ammo to be used to Torpedoes, I would imagine...

Also, how do I check the status of ammunitions supplies for my Carriers ? And should they be low on ammunitions, this would mean that I could only and solely re-plenish them at a Port, never "At Sea" using a Replenishment, seperate Task Force ?
That is, "At Sea" Replenishment Task Forces only resupply Fuel ?
Because, I seemed to understand that "supplies" meant also ammunitions.....

Lastly, a question about Pearl Harbour's "flak" effectiveness....

My understanding is, that in order to reproduce the unpreparedness of Pearl Harbour to the Japanese attack on Dec 7th, it's Flak's value is severely reduced for that first day of Attack.
If the Attack is endured over the subsequent days, the Flak effectiveness rating in Pearl Harbour goes back up a whole lot from the 2nd day onwards causing heavy losses to Japanese attacking planes.

My Question is, is there a way, and in such case what would this way be, on the very 1st day of attack, Dec 7th, to conduct the Attack in a way that would severely penalize and hinder, also for those subsequent days, Pearl Harbour's Flak so as to minimize Japanese Airplanes' losses to the least possible over a course of, say, 3 days of attacks (so as to try to actualy sink more BBs as possible) ?

Thanks !

< Message edited by pavel01 -- 12/12/2016 11:50:58 AM >

(in reply to HansBolter)
Post #: 3
RE: At Sea "Replenishment" of Planes Torpedoes ? - 12/12/2016 1:52:09 PM   
HansBolter


Posts: 7704
Joined: 7/6/2006
From: United States
Status: offline
I didn't say not 'necessary'. I said not 'possible'.

Yes the squadrons torps will be automatically replenished from the carrier stockpile.
The stockpile is limited.
Different classes of carriers have different torpedo capacities.
The likely reason you can't fly with torps on day 2 is the carriers have exhausted their stockpiles.
US Fleet CV have a capacity of 36. This can be exhausted in one day with a morning and an afternoon sortie.
Not sure of capacities for torps on Jap carriers. Need a JFB to answer that.

Only way to suppress flak is to attack ground targets.
You don't get to pick which ground targets your pilots attack so there is no practical way to reduce the flak.

The Peal attack was a long shot at the end of a very long logistical thread.
You can't morph it into more than is possible.

< Message edited by HansBolter -- 12/12/2016 2:05:22 PM >


_____________________________

Hans


(in reply to pavel01)
Post #: 4
RE: At Sea "Replenishment" of Planes Torpedoes ? - 12/12/2016 2:07:26 PM   
Bullwinkle58


Posts: 11302
Joined: 2/24/2009
Status: offline
Also, the Japanese never get underway replenishment of ammunition. The Allies get it from AEs in January 1945.

_____________________________

The Moose

(in reply to pavel01)
Post #: 5
RE: At Sea "Replenishment" of Planes Torpedoes ? - 12/12/2016 2:16:58 PM   
BillBrown


Posts: 2335
Joined: 6/15/2002
Status: offline
Also note that if you have Port Attack orders the torpedo line will be red. It will only be yellow if you have Naval Attack selected and your CV has enough torpedoes.

(in reply to Bullwinkle58)
Post #: 6
RE: At Sea "Replenishment" of Planes Torpedoes ? - 12/12/2016 2:33:56 PM   
crsutton


Posts: 9590
Joined: 12/6/2002
From: Maryland
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bullwinkle58

Also, the Japanese never get underway replenishment of ammunition. The Allies get it from AEs in January 1945.



But nothing greater than five inch ammo. Heavier guns need to be resupplied from ports.

_____________________________

I am the Holy Roman Emperor and am above grammar.

Sigismund of Luxemburg

(in reply to Bullwinkle58)
Post #: 7
RE: At Sea "Replenishment" of Planes Torpedoes ? - 12/12/2016 3:00:52 PM   
Bullwinkle58


Posts: 11302
Joined: 2/24/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: crsutton


quote:

ORIGINAL: Bullwinkle58

Also, the Japanese never get underway replenishment of ammunition. The Allies get it from AEs in January 1945.



But nothing greater than five inch ammo. Heavier guns need to be resupplied from ports.


This was patched to correct.

_____________________________

The Moose

(in reply to crsutton)
Post #: 8
RE: At Sea "Replenishment" of Planes Torpedoes ? - 12/12/2016 4:06:41 PM   
bradfordkay

 

Posts: 8683
Joined: 3/24/2002
From: Olympia, WA
Status: offline
Another way to replenish your carriers is to bring a Replenishment TF with at least one AE of sufficient size into a port (it can even be a 'dot' hex port) and use "At Sea" replenishment. AEs are capable of replenishing carrier torpedoes and even battleships when in the safe confines of a harbor. Neither TF needs to be docked or disbanded.

_____________________________

fair winds,
Brad

(in reply to Bullwinkle58)
Post #: 9
RE: At Sea "Replenishment" of Planes Torpedoes ? - 12/12/2016 4:17:48 PM   
Lokasenna


Posts: 9297
Joined: 3/3/2012
From: Iowan in MD/DC
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bullwinkle58


quote:

ORIGINAL: crsutton


quote:

ORIGINAL: Bullwinkle58

Also, the Japanese never get underway replenishment of ammunition. The Allies get it from AEs in January 1945.



But nothing greater than five inch ammo. Heavier guns need to be resupplied from ports.


This was patched to correct.


I'm not convinced that the patch corrected the upper limit on 5". I think it simply corrected a logic error that was causing the replenishment loop to stop if it reached a device it couldn't replenish, instead of moving to the next device in the line and checking it (and so on down the line until Ops/Supplies were gone).

(in reply to Bullwinkle58)
Post #: 10
RE: At Sea "Replenishment" of Planes Torpedoes ? - 12/12/2016 4:33:34 PM   
pavel01

 

Posts: 81
Joined: 12/4/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BillBrown

Also note that if you have Port Attack orders the torpedo line will be red. It will only be yellow if you have Naval Attack selected and your CV has enough torpedoes.


So with a Port Attack only Bombs are used and it ain't possible to use Torpedoes against the Ships anchored in that Port ?


(in reply to BillBrown)
Post #: 11
RE: At Sea "Replenishment" of Planes Torpedoes ? - 12/12/2016 5:07:08 PM   
BillBrown


Posts: 2335
Joined: 6/15/2002
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: pavel01


quote:

ORIGINAL: BillBrown

Also note that if you have Port Attack orders the torpedo line will be red. It will only be yellow if you have Naval Attack selected and your CV has enough torpedoes.


So with a Port Attack only Bombs are used and it ain't possible to use Torpedoes against the Ships anchored in that Port ?



I did not say that. Please read section 7.2.1.7 of the manual.

(in reply to pavel01)
Post #: 12
RE: At Sea "Replenishment" of Planes Torpedoes ? - 12/12/2016 6:01:15 PM   
GetAssista

 

Posts: 2732
Joined: 9/19/2009
Status: offline
WRT 7.2.1.7, I personally never ever saw torpedoes in port attacks, although the manual mentions a small chance.

Except initial PH strike. When planning the attack Japanese extensively researched the harbour, depths, attack runs for Kates, and modified their torpedoes to not dive too deep in shallow water.

All other port attacks by TBs in my games are done either with standard bomb load, or with 800kg bombs if xp checks are made successfully, with all the huge to-hit bonuses against disbanded ships. No torps.

Edit: maybe I never tried, hm..

< Message edited by GetAssista -- 12/12/2016 6:02:40 PM >

(in reply to BillBrown)
Post #: 13
RE: At Sea "Replenishment" of Planes Torpedoes ? - 12/12/2016 6:13:19 PM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: GetAssista

WRT 7.2.1.7, I personally never ever saw torpedoes in port attacks, although the manual mentions a small chance.

Except initial PH strike. When planning the attack Japanese extensively researched the harbour, depths, attack runs for Kates, and modified their torpedoes to not dive too deep in shallow water.

All other port attacks by TBs in my games are done either with standard bomb load, or with 800kg bombs if xp checks are made successfully, with all the huge to-hit bonuses against disbanded ships. No torps.

Edit: maybe I never tried, hm..

I ordered a port strike from my Allied carriers and tried to switch the weapons to torpedoes. I got a message saying "invalid weapon".

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to GetAssista)
Post #: 14
RE: At Sea "Replenishment" of Planes Torpedoes ? - 12/12/2016 6:38:44 PM   
pavel01

 

Posts: 81
Joined: 12/4/2016
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BillBrown


quote:

ORIGINAL: pavel01


quote:

ORIGINAL: BillBrown

Also note that if you have Port Attack orders the torpedo line will be red. It will only be yellow if you have Naval Attack selected and your CV has enough torpedoes.


So with a Port Attack only Bombs are used and it ain't possible to use Torpedoes against the Ships anchored in that Port ?



I did not say that. Please read section 7.2.1.7 of the manual.


I assume that the relevant part of that Section might be where it says :

quote:

Bombers attacking ports will attack any ships at anchor 50% of the time, however, TF’s docked
in port will not be attacked. These attacks use bombs with only a small percentage of torpedo
bombers using torpedoes (as it is assumed these ships may be in dry dock or protected by
torpedo nets). If there are less than 10 ships at port, the chance of bombers attacking ships
lessens with each number less than 10 (so, bombers would be more likely to attack ships if 9
were in port as opposed to 4)


The way I understand it, is that therefore, a Port Attack "if" only enemy's Task Forces are docked will result in no attack to Ships.
If there is Anchored Ships (not TFs) only 50% of those Attacks will result in an attack against those Ships and the likeliness of torpedoes being used will be very small and the smaller the number of Ships in Port below 10 the lesser the likeliness of an Attack against those Ships.

Bottom line is, to my understanding, that if one wanted to have those Ships in Port be sunk, Port Attack would be a very poor Combat choice as opposed to a Naval Attack.....

Or did I get it all wrong ?

< Message edited by pavel01 -- 12/12/2016 6:39:27 PM >

(in reply to BillBrown)
Post #: 15
RE: At Sea "Replenishment" of Planes Torpedoes ? - 12/12/2016 6:59:37 PM   
Bullwinkle58


Posts: 11302
Joined: 2/24/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lokasenna


quote:

ORIGINAL: Bullwinkle58


quote:

ORIGINAL: crsutton


quote:

ORIGINAL: Bullwinkle58

Also, the Japanese never get underway replenishment of ammunition. The Allies get it from AEs in January 1945.



But nothing greater than five inch ammo. Heavier guns need to be resupplied from ports.


This was patched to correct.


I'm not convinced that the patch corrected the upper limit on 5". I think it simply corrected a logic error that was causing the replenishment loop to stop if it reached a device it couldn't replenish, instead of moving to the next device in the line and checking it (and so on down the line until Ops/Supplies were gone).


To be clear, you're right. This is the text of the patch:

[10.07.2016] 1126a
Fix underway replenishment not working if total rearm cost too big

But there never was a 5in. limit. The tests I did in the June 2016 thread showed that. I was able to re-load 8in. CA ammo, for example, so long as the depletion was not extreme. Michael looked at the logic and found an error. Now AEs after 1/1/45 in underway Replenishment TFs should reload everything so long as relevant limits have not been exceeded. I'll let you know in five months.


< Message edited by Bullwinkle58 -- 12/12/2016 7:00:00 PM >


_____________________________

The Moose

(in reply to Lokasenna)
Post #: 16
RE: At Sea "Replenishment" of Planes Torpedoes ? - 12/12/2016 10:16:50 PM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: pavel01

quote:

ORIGINAL: BillBrown


quote:

ORIGINAL: pavel01


quote:

ORIGINAL: BillBrown

Also note that if you have Port Attack orders the torpedo line will be red. It will only be yellow if you have Naval Attack selected and your CV has enough torpedoes.


So with a Port Attack only Bombs are used and it ain't possible to use Torpedoes against the Ships anchored in that Port ?



I did not say that. Please read section 7.2.1.7 of the manual.


I assume that the relevant part of that Section might be where it says :

quote:

Bombers attacking ports will attack any ships at anchor 50% of the time, however, TF’s docked
in port will not be attacked. These attacks use bombs with only a small percentage of torpedo
bombers using torpedoes (as it is assumed these ships may be in dry dock or protected by
torpedo nets). If there are less than 10 ships at port, the chance of bombers attacking ships
lessens with each number less than 10 (so, bombers would be more likely to attack ships if 9
were in port as opposed to 4)


The way I understand it, is that therefore, a Port Attack "if" only enemy's Task Forces are docked will result in no attack to Ships.
If there is Anchored Ships (not TFs) only 50% of those Attacks will result in an attack against those Ships and the likeliness of torpedoes being used will be very small and the smaller the number of Ships in Port below 10 the lesser the likeliness of an Attack against those Ships.

Bottom line is, to my understanding, that if one wanted to have those Ships in Port be sunk, Port Attack would be a very poor Combat choice as opposed to a Naval Attack.....

Or did I get it all wrong ?

Docked ships are in a TF, therefore only Naval Attack can go after them, not Port Attack. But in port, torpedoes may not work on Naval Attack while bombs can be used. After the first turn IJN strikes, the model seems to be that ports are too shallow to drop torpedoes (even though CA Kumano was sunk by aerial torps while anchored in a port.
But a TF that is not docked is called "At Sea" so it can be attacked with torpedoes. The hex is 40 NM across so the port itself only occupies a portion of that and the TF is considered somewhere in the approaches.
Port Attack is for ships that are stood down or in the shipyard.

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to pavel01)
Post #: 17
RE: At Sea "Replenishment" of Planes Torpedoes ? - 12/13/2016 8:00:01 AM   
pavel01

 

Posts: 81
Joined: 12/4/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy


quote:

ORIGINAL: pavel01

quote:

ORIGINAL: BillBrown


quote:

ORIGINAL: pavel01


quote:

ORIGINAL: BillBrown

Also note that if you have Port Attack orders the torpedo line will be red. It will only be yellow if you have Naval Attack selected and your CV has enough torpedoes.


So with a Port Attack only Bombs are used and it ain't possible to use Torpedoes against the Ships anchored in that Port ?



I did not say that. Please read section 7.2.1.7 of the manual.


I assume that the relevant part of that Section might be where it says :

quote:

Bombers attacking ports will attack any ships at anchor 50% of the time, however, TF’s docked
in port will not be attacked. These attacks use bombs with only a small percentage of torpedo
bombers using torpedoes (as it is assumed these ships may be in dry dock or protected by
torpedo nets). If there are less than 10 ships at port, the chance of bombers attacking ships
lessens with each number less than 10 (so, bombers would be more likely to attack ships if 9
were in port as opposed to 4)


The way I understand it, is that therefore, a Port Attack "if" only enemy's Task Forces are docked will result in no attack to Ships.
If there is Anchored Ships (not TFs) only 50% of those Attacks will result in an attack against those Ships and the likeliness of torpedoes being used will be very small and the smaller the number of Ships in Port below 10 the lesser the likeliness of an Attack against those Ships.

Bottom line is, to my understanding, that if one wanted to have those Ships in Port be sunk, Port Attack would be a very poor Combat choice as opposed to a Naval Attack.....

Or did I get it all wrong ?

Docked ships are in a TF, therefore only Naval Attack can go after them, not Port Attack. But in port, torpedoes may not work on Naval Attack while bombs can be used. After the first turn IJN strikes, the model seems to be that ports are too shallow to drop torpedoes (even though CA Kumano was sunk by aerial torps while anchored in a port.
But a TF that is not docked is called "At Sea" so it can be attacked with torpedoes. The hex is 40 NM across so the port itself only occupies a portion of that and the TF is considered somewhere in the approaches.
Port Attack is for ships that are stood down or in the shipyard.


I am not sure whether I understand correctly that.

Does that mean that the very 1st Turn of December 7th, mainly the attack on Pearl Harbour is an "exception" to game mechanics ?

That is, on Dec 7th and specifically for the attack to Pearl Harbour a "Port Attack" order will mainly be handled with torpedoes on the Allies Ships docked there regardless of what the Manual says that Bombs would be used instead for that type of Attack ?

If so, then, there would be no point of selecting "Naval Attack" for the Japanese Torpedo Bombers attacking Pearl Harbour on Dec 7th as, because of the "exception" to game mechanics, they would still use mainly Torpedoes on that day even when the Order of Battle is for a "Port Attack".

Yet, for a second or third attack on the 8th or the 9th the Order of Battle should be changed to "Naval Attack" in order to mainly use Torpedoes "if" that exception is only valid for the very first turn of Dec 7th.

Did I get it right or wrong ?

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 18
RE: At Sea "Replenishment" of Planes Torpedoes ? - 12/13/2016 8:19:35 AM   
obvert


Posts: 14050
Joined: 1/17/2011
From: PDX (and now) London, UK
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: pavel01

I am not sure whether I understand correctly that.

Does that mean that the very 1st Turn of December 7th, mainly the attack on Pearl Harbour is an "exception" to game mechanics ?

That is, on Dec 7th and specifically for the attack to Pearl Harbour a "Port Attack" order will mainly be handled with torpedoes on the Allies Ships docked there regardless of what the Manual says that Bombs would be used instead for that type of Attack ?

If so, then, there would be no point of selecting "Naval Attack" for the Japanese Torpedo Bombers attacking Pearl Harbour on Dec 7th as, because of the "exception" to game mechanics, they would still use mainly Torpedoes on that day even when the Order of Battle is for a "Port Attack".

Yet, for a second or third attack on the 8th or the 9th the Order of Battle should be changed to "Naval Attack" in order to mainly use Torpedoes "if" that exception is only valid for the very first turn of Dec 7th.

Did I get it right or wrong ?


Dec 7 PH attack:

Use port attack. The Kates will drop torpedoes. BBs will be hit by them.

Also, if you want to use bombs the Kates they will drop 800kg AP (in RL converted from artillery, like the one that hit the Arizona). They penetrate BB amor and generally cause mayhem.

Torpedoes are generally a better choice though.

All Vals still carry only the 250kg AP bombs.


Dec 8, 1941 > onward:

You have a choice.

1. Use naval attack if you think the ships will be in TFs.
2. Use port attack if you know you want to definitely hit ships in port.
3. Use naval with secondary priority port attack. This method works to ensure you have a chance to hit ships in TFs or in port, but you run the risk of CAP traps and targeting smaller ships (PT boats later in the war especially) when you're aiming for something else. It's a good option though for Dec 8 at PH if you want a second PH strike, as some healthy ships may run. Just be careful, as they can run at you too.

Both TBs and other torpedo capable 2E bombers may carry 800kg bombs in port attacks at any time if pilot experience is over 80 and die rolls are passed.

< Message edited by obvert -- 12/13/2016 8:20:54 AM >


_____________________________

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill

(in reply to pavel01)
Post #: 19
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> At Sea "Replenishment" of Planes Torpedoes ? Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.891