Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Naval and Defense News

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> RE: Naval and Defense News Page: <<   < prev  60 61 [62] 63 64   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Naval and Defense News - 2/9/2017 3:58:18 AM   
Dysta


Posts: 1909
Joined: 8/8/2015
Status: offline
quote:

The two first vehicles, AVE-D and AVE-C, are scale model 1/100 (50kg) and 1/10 (500kg) stealth "tactical drones" (UAV), while the final version was to be a full-scale (5,000kg) prototype stealth "combat drone" (UCAV).


Even bigger than Barracuda. Well, French and Germany doesn't like short lifespan and smaller combat drones. In such degree, the bigger flying wings design like nEUROn, Taranis and Ray are more beneficial if they need substantial payload and endurance, as well as focusing on maintenance instead of making more new drones.

Am I missing something about the miniature UCAV?

_____________________________


(in reply to FoxZz)
Post #: 1831
RE: Naval and Defense News - 2/9/2017 2:48:32 PM   
Vici Supreme

 

Posts: 558
Joined: 12/4/2013
From: Southern Germany
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Dysta

Well, French and Germany doesn't like short lifespan and smaller combat drones.

Why should a country like Germany invest in short lifespan combat drones? Terrorists were the biggest security threat for Europe in the last decade (and still are to this day) and therefore dictated requirements and capabilities for an army. The economic feasibility of using expandable UCAVs, one million apiece, to fight cavemen with AKs is self-explanatory I think. Only until very recently, the focus started to shift back towards having a credible conventional warfare capability.

_____________________________


(in reply to Dysta)
Post #: 1832
RE: Naval and Defense News - 2/9/2017 2:52:41 PM   
mikmykWS

 

Posts: 11524
Joined: 3/22/2005
Status: offline
Hat trick!

Assume the design is good if they're all using it..

Mike

_____________________________


(in reply to FoxZz)
Post #: 1833
RE: Naval and Defense News - 2/10/2017 12:38:41 AM   
Dysta


Posts: 1909
Joined: 8/8/2015
Status: offline
Scenario opportunity: China's second superfamine in near-future because of the over-reliant of food import, and global repercussions against Chinese illegal fishing activities in the globe.

It is more likely causing military actions by agricultural disasters, than the recent economic shock when food import was barred by export countries, especially US and other western countries with proper regulations. If food production and safety in China cannot ensure more than a billion lives out of protein shortage and poisoned guts, then the Chinese authority will be the first and last thing to blame with.

Hence the SCS, ECS disputes, as well as illegal fishing worldwides:

http://chinapower.csis.org/china-food-security/



< Message edited by Dysta -- 2/10/2017 12:45:20 AM >


_____________________________


(in reply to mikmykWS)
Post #: 1834
RE: Naval and Defense News - 2/10/2017 7:59:43 AM   
Zaslon

 

Posts: 283
Joined: 6/14/2015
Status: offline
AEGIS capability – categorised as International AEGIS Fire Control Loop (IAFCL)
quote:

The F-110 Frigate is the Spanish Navy’s next generation, multi-mission surface vessel due to see operation in the next decade. While Navantia will build the frigates, Lockheed Martin and Indra are among the industry team members supporting the programme’s combat system. Mönch's US correspondent Marty Kauchak gained insights on Lockheed Martin’s role in the F-110 programme from Mike Koch, the company’s Business Development Manager for International Programmes. Highlights of their discussion are provided.


More, here.

_____________________________


Kids think about Iran and Amateurs think about Russia, but professionals think about China

(in reply to Dysta)
Post #: 1835
RE: Naval and Defense News - 2/10/2017 11:07:04 AM   
kevinkins


Posts: 2257
Joined: 3/8/2006
Status: offline
In the news this morning.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/u-china-military-planes-come-inadvertently-close-over-225515624.html

(in reply to Zaslon)
Post #: 1836
RE: Naval and Defense News - 2/10/2017 11:26:59 AM   
Dysta


Posts: 1909
Joined: 8/8/2015
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: kevinkin

In the news this morning.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/u-china-military-planes-come-inadvertently-close-over-225515624.html



The usual China-US aircraft escalations keep reminds me: what if there's no 9/11, and US decided to launch the attack against China because of her belligerence?

Maybe US fares better chance to fight in 2001 than 2017, as well as avoided the Afghanistan deathtrap? Wish there's a grand scenario of US-China WW3 in 2001 to find out. Back in the day, the 'Raptor killer' J-10 and 'Carrier killer' DF-21D aren't in service yet.

< Message edited by Dysta -- 2/10/2017 11:29:29 AM >


_____________________________


(in reply to kevinkins)
Post #: 1837
RE: Naval and Defense News - 2/10/2017 12:41:03 PM   
Hongjian

 

Posts: 834
Joined: 1/2/2015
Status: offline
KJ-200 intercepting a P-3?
I don't think so. Probably just a coincidence.

(in reply to Dysta)
Post #: 1838
RE: Naval and Defense News - 2/10/2017 12:59:13 PM   
Dysta


Posts: 1909
Joined: 8/8/2015
Status: offline
Yea, I said escalations, not confrontations.

-----------

Chinese media found both WSJ and NI are making contradictive reports in 2 days regarding Chinese shipbuilding industry, and never address the main issue of US shipbuilding for better comparison:

http://military.china.com/important/11132797/20170210/30245537.html (Simplified Chinese)

Originals:

https://www.wsj.com/articles/chinas-shipbuilders-go-from-boom-to-rust-1486552896 (Need subscription to read)
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/wall-street-journal/chinas-shipbuilders-go-from-boom-to-rust/news-story/798ab706b2717e24b89093d743f56552

quote:

The government has warned that almost one-third of the country’s remaining shipyards must close as Beijing wrestles with overcapacity in a range of heavy industries.

Shipbuilding became a symbol of China’s industrial might in the early 2000s, when Beijing vowed to transform its modest shipbuilding sector into the world’s largest producer by 2015 — then did it five years ahead of plan.

But China’s rise to pre-eminence coincided with a slump in global trade that gutted demand for new container ships, oil tankers and bulk carriers used for transporting commodities, just as a glut of new orders placed by over-bullish shipping lines was flooding the market.

In 2015, Premier Li Keqiang identified shipbuilding as one of the heavy industries on which he said China must “ruthlessly bring down the knife” to eliminate overcapacity.

The result is that China’s private sector shipyards have been virtually wiped from the map, while Beijing is keeping only the most viable state-run yards alive with subsidies.


http://nationalinterest.org/feature/chinas-naval-shipbuilding-sets-sail-19371?page=show

quote:

In part through this fast follower approach—building on a massive economy—China has or is developing formidable capabilities and capacities in all shipbuilding-relevant areas (including steel, aluminum, structural and dynamic engineering, electronics, electrical power systems, engines—albeit with European licensing and Russian and Ukrainian assistance, and civilian nuclear technologies). Moreover, in entering industries, China tends to destroy pricing and introduce deflation. While potentially counterproductive regarding profitability and wealth in commercial shipbuilding itself, such “bending the curve” might allow Beijing to continue to afford a massive fleet buildout in ways that earlier shipbuilding powers never managed. If a Chinese juggernaut can truly succeed in changing the structural cost of sea power and naval warfare in a way that places the United States on the wrong end of a costly capabilities competition, the ramifications for the USN will be serious indeed.


< Message edited by Dysta -- 2/10/2017 1:07:52 PM >


_____________________________


(in reply to Hongjian)
Post #: 1839
RE: Naval and Defense News - 2/11/2017 5:21:59 AM   
Dysta


Posts: 1909
Joined: 8/8/2015
Status: offline
On the tangent, shipyards themselves are also battlegrounds, but more for workers than soldiers. They are also important just as the US Navy.

http://foxtrotalpha.jalopnik.com/the-human-toll-of-naval-shipbuilding-is-staggering-1792237803

quote:

-snip-

OSHA has the power to fine companies that are negligent in upholding safety, but another branch of government can award them contracts worth millions of dollars at the same time. We all love to discuss the nuances of how ships are built and what they can do, but we rarely discuss the dangers involved in putting one together. Seventy-six people have died in the private shipbuilding and repair industry between 2005 and 2015, according to the report. And shipbuilders face an 80 percent higher chance of injury and illness than construction workers.



_____________________________


(in reply to Dysta)
Post #: 1840
RE: Naval and Defense News - 2/11/2017 3:38:51 PM   
Hongjian

 

Posts: 834
Joined: 1/2/2015
Status: offline
Seriously maddening speed of the Type 055 construction:

Google Earth update of Dalian Shipyard, China, taken on December 1st 2016 shows what could only be the 4th hull of the Type 055 Heavy Destroyer/Cruiser.
From a GE picture from November 20th 2016, the 3rd Type 055 hull was spotted, and it showed a considerably higher grade of completion (most hull modules already welded together, one module of deck-plating already mounted, prow to be added etc.) compared to the 11 days newer shot, which shows seperate Type 055 modules still not welded together. If Dalian Shipyard didnt disassemble the 1st hull again, which would be pretty dumb, this new satellite image shows the 2nd hull. And that only 11 days after the last satellite image.

December 1st:

November 20th


What does this mean? That Dalian seemingly has finished up the 1st hull at a certain stage of completion and moved it into a different place, only to immediately start with another hull. Eleven. Days.

And recent heavily censored images indeed show the seperate modules of the 4th Type 055, with a major leaker (who has posted these shots) claiming that the 1st batch will have more than 8 ships, contrary to earlier estimates.

https://picload.org/image/roprdgar/014851r9bfwl4pnnwlaf9n.jpg

I can only guess, but it seems that China wants to make the Type 055 basically China's Ticonderoga, both in displacement/weaponry and numbers. The years old estimate that China would probably build 24 of these 12.000 ton Destroyers/Cruisers might be true, after all.



(in reply to Dysta)
Post #: 1841
RE: Naval and Defense News - 2/12/2017 2:36:58 AM   
KungPao


Posts: 333
Joined: 4/25/2016
From: Red China
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Dysta

quote:

ORIGINAL: kevinkin

In the news this morning.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/u-china-military-planes-come-inadvertently-close-over-225515624.html



The usual China-US aircraft escalations keep reminds me: what if there's no 9/11, and US decided to launch the attack against China because of her belligerence?

Maybe US fares better chance to fight in 2001 than 2017, as well as avoided the Afghanistan deathtrap? Wish there's a grand scenario of US-China WW3 in 2001 to find out. Back in the day, the 'Raptor killer' J-10 and 'Carrier killer' DF-21D aren't in service yet.

Hey, who needs a J-20? We have the "RAPTOR KILLER" J-8. Just joking, just joking.
I don't think 911 is a game changer for Sino-US relationship.Joining WTO is, and President Bush did cleared most of the obstacles in early of 2001.

_____________________________

Sir? Do you want to order a Kung Pao Chicken or a Kung Fu Chicken?

(in reply to Dysta)
Post #: 1842
RE: Naval and Defense News - 2/12/2017 3:01:49 AM   
Dysta


Posts: 1909
Joined: 8/8/2015
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: KungPao

Hey, who needs a J-10? We have the "RAPTOR KILLER" J-8. Just joking, just joking.
I don't think 911 is a game changer for Sino-US relationship.Joining WTO is, and President Bush did cleared most of the obstacles in early of 2001.

Fixed for you. China did said J-10 can stop F-22 before 2009, when still in rumors.

What I said is technological difference:

Could 1950 US best 1950 China? -- Could be, since USSR doesn't help NK, then China is expectable to be alone too.
Could 1962 US best 1962 China? -- Also could be, right at Sino-USSR conflict, and China need one more year to make nukes.
Could 1983 US best 1983 China? -- Still likely, Tomahawks will turn mainland upside down, while China still don't have good SAM systems.
Could 1996 US best 1996 China? -- Possible as well. Because US Navy have more than 4 Nimitzs, all fully loaded with Hornets and Tomcats.
Could 2001 US best 2001 China? -- WTO cannot make China instantly rich in a year, so no advance weapons yet, same fate as 1996.
Could 2012 US best 2012 China? -- It gets way more challenging, and becomes a mere possibility. Chinese stealth fighter & carrier just having trials.
Could 2017 US best 2017 China? -- internet still says yes, but US think-tanks said no. What happens?

There are numerous opportunity to make US victorious by stopping the 'Biggest threat of the East' before letting them stronger while being weakened by other affairs.

Did I mention nuclear holocaust will destroy both countries? Not before 1963, of course.

_____________________________


(in reply to KungPao)
Post #: 1843
RE: Naval and Defense News - 2/12/2017 11:57:55 PM   
Dysta


Posts: 1909
Joined: 8/8/2015
Status: offline
DRDO's PDV ABM test succeeded.

http://www.dnaindia.com/scitech/report-india-successfully-test-fires-pdv-interceptor-missile-2319579



quote:

India successfully test-fired its interceptor missile off the Odisha coast on Saturday, achieving a significant milestone in the direction of developing a two-layered Ballistic Missile Defence system.

The interceptor was launched from Abdul Kalam Island (Wheeler Island) of ITR at about 7.45 am. This mission, termed as "PDV mission is for engaging the targets in the exo-atmosphere region at an altitude above 50 km of earth's atmosphere", said a Defence Research Development Organisation (DRDO) official. "Both, the PDV interceptor and the two stage target missile, were successfully engaged," he said.

The target was developed for mimicking a hostile Ballistic Missile approaching from more than 2000 km away was launched from a ship anchored in the Bay of Bengal. In an automated operation, radar based detection and tracking system detected and tracked the enemy's ballistic missile. The computer network with the help of data received from radars predicted the trajectory of the incoming Ballistic Missile.

PDV that was kept fully ready, took-off once the computer system gave the necessary command for lift-off. The Interceptor guided by high accuracy Inertial Navigation System (INS) supported by a Redundant Micro Navigation System moved towards the estimated point of the interception.

Once the missile crossed the atmosphere, the Heat Shield ejected and the IR Seeker dome opened to look at the Target location as designated by the Mission Computer. With the help of Inertial Guidance and IR Seeker the missile moved for interception. All events were monitored in real-time by the Telemetry/Range Stations, at various other locations.


< Message edited by Dysta -- 2/12/2017 11:58:45 PM >


_____________________________


(in reply to Dysta)
Post #: 1844
RE: Naval and Defense News - 2/13/2017 7:32:56 AM   
Dysta


Posts: 1909
Joined: 8/8/2015
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SASR

This is insane. 104 swarming drones from only 3 Super Hornets.


What about 1000?

(I know, these are civilian toys, but they did in flight formation as Guinness recorded it)

https://www.rt.com/in-motion/377133-lantern-festival-guinness-record/ (Video)
https://qz.com/908927/watch-a-guinness-record-setting-1000-drone-show-in-guangzhou-china-celebrating-lantern-festival-and-end-of-chinese-new-year/

Previous world record is 500 drones in Australia, by Intel developers.

< Message edited by Dysta -- 2/13/2017 12:28:23 PM >


_____________________________


(in reply to SASR)
Post #: 1845
RE: Naval and Defense News - 2/13/2017 4:05:41 PM   
Tailhook

 

Posts: 293
Joined: 1/18/2015
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Dysta

quote:

ORIGINAL: SASR

This is insane. 104 swarming drones from only 3 Super Hornets.


What about 1000?

(I know, these are civilian toys, but they did in flight formation as Guinness recorded it)

Do you have any setting besides "China does everything better 110% of the time"? This isn't even remotely comparable.

(in reply to Dysta)
Post #: 1846
RE: Naval and Defense News - 2/13/2017 5:35:34 PM   
hellfish6


Posts: 843
Joined: 6/15/2008
Status: offline
Some interesting articles about a potential future for the USN and USMC. Lots of unmanned stuff, light carriers, distributed ops, etc. Some task force organizations for scenarios. Slides and/or PDF format.

Restoring American Seapower: A New Fleet Architecture for the United States Navy:
http://csbaonline.org/research/publications/restoring-american-seapower-a-new-fleet-architecture-for-the-united-states-

Will the U.S. Navy Build ‘Light’ Aircraft Carriers (Armed with Stealth Fighters)?
http://nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/will-the-us-navy-build-light-aircraft-carriers-armed-stealth-19413

_____________________________


(in reply to Tailhook)
Post #: 1847
RE: Naval and Defense News - 2/13/2017 10:23:13 PM   
Dysta


Posts: 1909
Joined: 8/8/2015
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tailhook

Do you have any setting besides "China does everything better 110% of the time"? This isn't even remotely comparable.

Exactly what I've meant. What else could do besides showing off by adding numbers?

_____________________________


(in reply to Tailhook)
Post #: 1848
RE: Naval and Defense News - 2/14/2017 10:49:13 AM   
Dysta


Posts: 1909
Joined: 8/8/2015
Status: offline
Scenario opportunity: Kim-directed decap-strike overseas.

Numerous countries wants Kim's head to ends his regime, but he have one from his closest 'rivals' first.

http://www.teletrader.com/reports-kim-jong-uns-half-brother-assassinated/news/details/37709124?culture=hu-HU

_____________________________


(in reply to Dysta)
Post #: 1849
RE: Naval and Defense News - 2/14/2017 3:10:45 PM   
Hongjian

 

Posts: 834
Joined: 1/2/2015
Status: offline
Remember that rumor about the Air-Launched ASBM carried by a modified H-6K posted by me several month ago?



It seems like the H-6K launched ASBM project was real, after all, and a new IFR-capable variant specifically made for carrying an air-launched ASBM has conducted its maiden flight in December 2016.



So far, no real pictures exist. But the leaker has proven to be pretty reliable in the past.

Stay tuned for more leaks in the following weeks. Maybe we will even have a grainy photo this time ;)

(in reply to Dysta)
Post #: 1850
RE: Naval and Defense News - 2/14/2017 4:06:59 PM   
xavierv


Posts: 517
Joined: 7/10/2013
Status: offline
French Navy Rafale M Fighter Launched ASMPA Missile During Simulated Nuclear Strike Mission

quote:

The French Ministry of Defence announced that a French Navy (Marine Nationale) Rafale M carrier-borne multirole fighter successfully launched an ASMPA missile during a simulated nuclear strike mission.
During the test which took place on Tuesday, February 14, 2017, a Rafale M took off from the Avord Air Force Base and completed a flight of more than four hours. The flight involved all the phases of an airborne deterrent mission: transit flight, successive refuelings, low-altitude penetration, very low altitude phase with terrain following radar and precision launch of the ASMPA missile on a test area at the DGA missile test center of Biscarrosse (South West of France).

This assessment and evaluation of the Rafale / ASMPA missile combo is representative of a real mission of the French airborne nuclear component.

http://www.navyrecognition.com/index.php/news/defence-news/2017/february-2017-navy-naval-forces-defense-industry-technology-maritime-security-global-news/4893-french-navy-rafale-m-figther-launched-asmpa-missile-during-simulated-nuclear-strike-mission.html

French Navy Aircraft Carrier Charles de Gaulle in Dry Dock for Mid-Life Refit & Upgrade

quote:

Charles de Gaulle, the French Navy's (Marine Nationale) sole nuclear-powered aircraft carrier, entered a dry dock this week at Toulon naval base following 15 years of operational deployments during which it was involved in most of the international conflicts in which France took part (Afghanistan, Libya, Levant) and in particular three times since January 2015.

http://www.navyrecognition.com/index.php/news/defence-news/2017/february-2017-navy-naval-forces-defense-industry-technology-maritime-security-global-news/4883-french-navy-aircraft-carrier-charles-de-gaulle-in-dry-dock-for-mid-life-refit-upgrade.html

_____________________________


(in reply to Hongjian)
Post #: 1851
RE: Naval and Defense News - 2/15/2017 3:07:56 AM   
Hongjian

 

Posts: 834
Joined: 1/2/2015
Status: offline
https://www.iiss.org/en/militarybalanceblog/blogsections/2017-edcc/february-7849/chinas-very-long-range-missile-development-4aa5

IISS on the new very long range anti air missile.

(in reply to xavierv)
Post #: 1852
RE: Naval and Defense News - 2/15/2017 4:49:32 AM   
Dysta


Posts: 1909
Joined: 8/8/2015
Status: offline
A 360-footage of Kuznetsov deck operation. Use your mouse or wear VR goggle to look around:

https://youtu.be/S3P3wTLb3AE

_____________________________


(in reply to Hongjian)
Post #: 1853
RE: Naval and Defense News - 2/15/2017 7:37:15 AM   
AlGrant


Posts: 912
Joined: 8/18/2015
Status: offline

Seen on Twitter:
Brazil abandons modernisation plans and decides to decommission its aircraft carrier.
Not seen another source for this yet, but if true then no great surprise.

https://twitter.com/jrvianney/status/831652917635596290




(in reply to Dysta)
Post #: 1854
RE: Naval and Defense News - 2/15/2017 8:05:30 AM   
xavierv


Posts: 517
Joined: 7/10/2013
Status: offline
More details:

Brazil Gives Up Modernization Plans for Aircraft Carrier Sao Paulo, Prepares for Decommissioning
quote:

According to Brazilian daily newspaper Estado, the Brazilian Navy (Marinha do Brasil) has just decided to decommission its sole aircraft carrier Sao Paulo (hull number A12) acquired from France in 2000. Brazil has long been considering a modernization plan for the aircraft carrier with French naval shipbuilding group DCNS, but according to Estado, "modernization costs were considered excessive by the admiralty".

http://www.navyrecognition.com/index.php/news/defence-news/2017/february-2017-navy-naval-forces-defense-industry-technology-maritime-security-global-news/4895-brazil-gives-up-modernization-plans-for-aircraft-carrier-sao-paulo-prepares-for-decommissioning.html

_____________________________


(in reply to AlGrant)
Post #: 1855
RE: Naval and Defense News - 2/15/2017 10:40:45 AM   
Dysta


Posts: 1909
Joined: 8/8/2015
Status: offline
Retooled old military vehicles, especially tanks, could possibly very cost-saving and efficient to develop engineering machines.

Like this snowdragon, for example:





_____________________________


(in reply to xavierv)
Post #: 1856
RE: Naval and Defense News - 2/15/2017 4:18:42 PM   
bradinggs


Posts: 362
Joined: 7/17/2013
Status: offline
Brilliant! Would certainly repaint it a brighter colour if used in civilian zones.

(in reply to Dysta)
Post #: 1857
RE: Naval and Defense News - 2/15/2017 8:51:45 PM   
DeSade

 

Posts: 156
Joined: 3/1/2004
Status: offline
Soon no more force feeding ice cream and apple pie:

http://www.defensenews.com/articles/air-force-removal-of-f-35-flight-restrictions-could-occur-as-early-as-april


< Message edited by DeSade -- 2/15/2017 8:52:18 PM >

(in reply to bradinggs)
Post #: 1858
RE: Naval and Defense News - 2/16/2017 8:56:11 AM   
wild_Willie2


Posts: 2934
Joined: 10/8/2004
From: Arnhem (holland) yes a bridge to far...
Status: offline
MARTE ER missile to be integrated on the Typhoon (Its already in service with the Italians but not in the database yet).

MARTE ER represents the 3rd generation within the MARTE family of missile systems and is derived from MARTE MK2/S which is already in service with the Italian Navy on its NFH90 and AW101 helicopters. The main difference between the two lies in the introduction of a turbo engine in place of the rocket motor. MARTE ER missile is going to be integrated on Eurofighter TYPHOON and other fast jets. MARTE ER’s design takes into account that MARTE MK2/S is already qualified and installed on these two platforms. This offers the following advantages:

Same mechanical, functional & electrical helicopter interfaces
No platform hardware changes required to manage the MARTE ER missile, only software changes to the Store Management System (SMS) are required to manage longer range performance
The helicopter, with the new version of SMS software, is able to operate both MARTE MK2/S and MARTE ER missiles
Same logistic support, in terms of benches, trolley and most handling & maintenance tools and schedule

http://www.mbda-systems.com/product/marte-er/

CHARACTERISTICS

Weight : 315 kg
Length : 3.60 m
Diameter : Max body diameter : 316 mm
Range : Well beyond 100 km
Speed : High subsonic

_____________________________

In vinum illic est sapientia , in matera illic est vires , in aqua illic es bacteria.

In wine there is wisdom, in beer there is strength, in water there are bacteria.

(in reply to DeSade)
Post #: 1859
RE: Naval and Defense News - 2/17/2017 3:01:49 AM   
Dysta


Posts: 1909
Joined: 8/8/2015
Status: offline
A wide spreading news in both China and Taiwan, that Wendell suggested to sell 150 F-35A and 60 F-35B to Taiwan for replace the old F-5 and Mirage 2000, as well as to equalize the Chinese expanding stealth assets. This article however ended up into major debate because of steep price and potential technology espionage:

https://www.shephardmedia.com/news/defence-notes/ten-recommendations-taiwan-us-military-relations/

quote:

Though these ten recommendations might enrage Beijing, there are other more upsetting items on the horizon that would drive China over the edge.

One is the prospect that Taiwan will request procurement of the F-35 fighter. Taiwanese military sources indicate that the air force will soon have a requirement to procure 60 F-35B short take-off/vertical landing fighters and 150 F-35A conventional fighters to replace ageing Mirage 2000s, Indigenous Defence Fighters and F-5 Tigers.

The US released a $3.4 billion upgrade programme for Taiwan’s 144 remaining F-16A/B Block 20 fighters, but withheld its request for 66 new F-16C/D Block 50/52 fighters, citing Beijing’s threats that the sale would be a red line.


_____________________________


(in reply to wild_Willie2)
Post #: 1860
Page:   <<   < prev  60 61 [62] 63 64   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> RE: Naval and Defense News Page: <<   < prev  60 61 [62] 63 64   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.844