Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent Page: <<   < prev  311 312 [313] 314 315   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 3/1/2017 7:46:51 PM   
Grfin Zeppelin


Posts: 1515
Joined: 12/3/2007
From: Germany
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: JohnDillworth

quote:

If you keep pressing his fuel sources I bet he will get local shortages soon.
He burned helluvalot fuel.
He has more ships than historical.
You even kept a fuel center, occupied in your Sumatra campaign.
He lost the Burma fuel.

His stocks simply cant be ample.

He has a gazillion of those small tankers (if he didnt stop merchant ship production) but he will feel the loss of fuel.

John might have local fuel shortages but Dan's prefers his subs with the fleet so I don't think he has sunk a lot of merchant tonnage. I don't know Johns HI resources but I be he is not hurting for oil or resources. not so sure about fuel. As you say, there are a million of these tiny tankers. It's not the loss of these little tankers but now John probably has to increase escorts. I doubt he has the warships to dedicate but maybe some old Cl's

BTW Dan, when is the last time you has a bonafide 100% sighting of the KB?

I think you misread what I said.

_____________________________



(in reply to JohnDillworth)
Post #: 9361
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 3/1/2017 8:13:56 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
One of John's fleet CVs (Zuikaku?) took a torp from a sub about ten days or two weeks back, just NW of Pagan. That was probably KB, though it might've been only a portion. Prior to that, full KB was confirmed on the New Guinea northwest coast about a month ago, when John raided Sabang.

(in reply to MakeeLearn)
Post #: 9362
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 3/1/2017 9:08:11 PM   
MakeeLearn


Posts: 4278
Joined: 9/11/2016
Status: offline
Somewhere on the horizon.......




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by MakeeLearn -- 3/1/2017 9:11:51 PM >

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 9363
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 3/2/2017 3:42:59 AM   
Capt. Harlock


Posts: 5358
Joined: 9/15/2001
From: Los Angeles
Status: offline
quote:

Those TKs were worth two points apiece, the PBs one each.

The horses looked good on the track but didn't pay off at the window.


A two-point tanker took 13 shells and 3 torpedoes?? There shouldn't have been anything left to hit after the first fish.

_____________________________

Civil war? What does that mean? Is there any foreign war? Isn't every war fought between men, between brothers?

--Victor Hugo

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 9364
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 3/2/2017 6:25:07 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
A certain fraulein with a ponderously stomping Teddy Bear avatar is not going to be pleased.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Capt. Harlock)
Post #: 9365
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 3/2/2017 6:44:23 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
5/18/44

See map for details.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 9366
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 3/2/2017 10:02:52 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
With the use of a modestly-sized army, no ships, and a large contingent of fighters, 2EB and 4EB, the Allies have pushed Japan out of Burma (well, almost).

This modest investment yielded a nice return: the near-destruction of a Japanese army. This, in turn, has forced John to scramble to establish a new MLR. I want to keep up the pressure, or the appearance of pressure. Who knows, more cracks might appear.

Supply is an issue for my troops, now, so my air force can't rampage like it has since January 1. If I find that I simply can't make beneficial use of them, though, they can report for duty at the twin level 9 airfields on Luzon.

In fact, now that I've put that down in writing, it sounds like a great idea. But I'll have to watch supply levels on Luzon carefully, lest I burn through stockpiles at an unsustainable rate.





Attachment (1)

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 9367
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 3/2/2017 10:32:31 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
Can you elaborate a little on China? I have often wondered what it would be like to not take China as Japan. You lose a huge source of possible VPs, but then on the other hand if Japan is relatively quiet in China they have the opportunity to bank all that supply.

Does cutting the Burma Road handicap all of the China's offensive options so far for lack of supply?


(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 9368
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 3/3/2017 1:47:27 AM   
CaptBeefheart


Posts: 2301
Joined: 7/4/2003
From: Seoul, Korea
Status: offline
You've probably noticed this, but just in case you haven't, I've had luck with supply moving from Ramree to Rangoon. Ramree with a naval base force or two works pretty well as a supply convoy destination.

Cheers,
CC

_____________________________

Beer, because barley makes lousy bread.

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 9369
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 3/3/2017 5:51:55 AM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

Can you elaborate a little on China? I have often wondered what it would be like to not take China as Japan. You lose a huge source of possible VPs, but then on the other hand if Japan is relatively quiet in China they have the opportunity to bank all that supply.

Does cutting the Burma Road handicap all of the China's offensive options so far for lack of supply?


Yes, it's hard for the Allies to engage in meaningful offensives when the Burma Road is cut. Supply, at least for me, has always been meager. Even when I loaded up Ramree and Akyab with supply it didn't flow into China since John held Lashoi, Meiktila, etc.

The Burma Road has been open for a few days now. Too soon to tell what effect that will have on the pace of operations in China. I have a handful of Chinese units set to take replacements and a few Allies units moving into the theater.

I can't mount any real air campaign. But when I load Rangoon up with supply one of these days, we'll see if it flows into China.

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 9370
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 3/3/2017 7:08:03 AM   
GetAssista

 

Posts: 2732
Joined: 9/19/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Canoerebel
The Burma Road has been open for a few days now. Too soon to tell what effect that will have on the pace of operations in China. I have a handful of Chinese units set to take replacements and a few Allies units moving into the theater.

I can't mount any real air campaign. But when I load Rangoon up with supply one of these days, we'll see if it flows into China.

Burma Road openness adds 500 supply a day to Tsuyung, nothing else. So supply flow from the coast to Tsuyung and beyond is needed, and road network after Lashio is sketchy. Building up the bases on the route would help but I don't know if it would be enough to open way to meaningful flow.
I wonder if anyone has tried some proactive usage of command HQs to draw supply through. Like place HQ at Paoshan, wait for it to draw supply from Burma, then march it out of the base to free up the pile and let it flow further. Rince and repeat. Setting nearby Burma bases on stockpile can prevent the flowback

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 9371
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 3/3/2017 9:24:24 AM   
JohnDillworth


Posts: 3100
Joined: 3/19/2009
Status: offline
Once the Burma road is open new supply will to China will be sucked up upgrading the China to 1943 infantry. I believe if you move HQ units into China you will pull increasing amounts from Ramaree or Rangoon. You can gets enough supply to support multiple Allied armies this way

_____________________________

Today I come bearing an olive branch in one hand, and the freedom fighter's gun in the other. Do not let the olive branch fall from my hand. I repeat, do not let the olive branch fall from my hand. - Yasser Arafat Speech to UN General Assembly

(in reply to GetAssista)
Post #: 9372
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 3/3/2017 3:36:16 PM   
Lokasenna


Posts: 9297
Joined: 3/3/2012
From: Iowan in MD/DC
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: GetAssista

quote:

ORIGINAL: Canoerebel
The Burma Road has been open for a few days now. Too soon to tell what effect that will have on the pace of operations in China. I have a handful of Chinese units set to take replacements and a few Allies units moving into the theater.

I can't mount any real air campaign. But when I load Rangoon up with supply one of these days, we'll see if it flows into China.

Burma Road openness adds 500 supply a day to Tsuyung, nothing else. So supply flow from the coast to Tsuyung and beyond is needed, and road network after Lashio is sketchy. Building up the bases on the route would help but I don't know if it would be enough to open way to meaningful flow.
I wonder if anyone has tried some proactive usage of command HQs to draw supply through. Like place HQ at Paoshan, wait for it to draw supply from Burma, then march it out of the base to free up the pile and let it flow further. Rince and repeat. Setting nearby Burma bases on stockpile can prevent the flowback



You can accomplish the same thing with the supply spinner.

As Japan, I have had supply flow west through this area so I don't know why it wouldn't be able to flow east.

Building up the bases helps for supply to those bases only. The maximum draw can come from anywhere, and is not stopped along the way by a lower draw base. For example, Mandalay might have a maximum draw of only 500 but Lashio might be built higher to have a maximum draw of 1200. A supply route to Lashio traced through Mandalay will not be limited to 500 - it only takes into account the base of origination and the destination that needs the supplies.

Likewise, a ton of supply might flow through to Paoshan and beyond, but given the terrain and road categories, it is unlikely.


That's my understanding, anyway.

(in reply to GetAssista)
Post #: 9373
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 3/3/2017 3:57:44 PM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lokasenna


quote:

ORIGINAL: GetAssista

quote:

ORIGINAL: Canoerebel
The Burma Road has been open for a few days now. Too soon to tell what effect that will have on the pace of operations in China. I have a handful of Chinese units set to take replacements and a few Allies units moving into the theater.

I can't mount any real air campaign. But when I load Rangoon up with supply one of these days, we'll see if it flows into China.

Burma Road openness adds 500 supply a day to Tsuyung, nothing else. So supply flow from the coast to Tsuyung and beyond is needed, and road network after Lashio is sketchy. Building up the bases on the route would help but I don't know if it would be enough to open way to meaningful flow.
I wonder if anyone has tried some proactive usage of command HQs to draw supply through. Like place HQ at Paoshan, wait for it to draw supply from Burma, then march it out of the base to free up the pile and let it flow further. Rince and repeat. Setting nearby Burma bases on stockpile can prevent the flowback



You can accomplish the same thing with the supply spinner.

As Japan, I have had supply flow west through this area so I don't know why it wouldn't be able to flow east.

Building up the bases helps for supply to those bases only. The maximum draw can come from anywhere, and is not stopped along the way by a lower draw base. For example, Mandalay might have a maximum draw of only 500 but Lashio might be built higher to have a maximum draw of 1200. A supply route to Lashio traced through Mandalay will not be limited to 500 - it only takes into account the base of origination and the destination that needs the supplies.

Likewise, a ton of supply might flow through to Paoshan and beyond, but given the terrain and road categories, it is unlikely.


That's my understanding, anyway.

Building up those bases will help increase supply flow, but it still won't be enough to supply the LARGE force required to crack all the way through those mountain defenses in any reasonable time frame.

_____________________________


(in reply to Lokasenna)
Post #: 9374
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 3/3/2017 5:25:44 PM   
crsutton


Posts: 9590
Joined: 12/6/2002
From: Maryland
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

Can you elaborate a little on China? I have often wondered what it would be like to not take China as Japan. You lose a huge source of possible VPs, but then on the other hand if Japan is relatively quiet in China they have the opportunity to bank all that supply.

Does cutting the Burma Road handicap all of the China's offensive options so far for lack of supply?




Having completed a full campaign as the Allies, as long as the road is open and the Allied player floods Rangoon with supply the supply will flow easily into China. Likewise it drives me crazy that the Japanese player can attack out of China and supply a massive force in interior Burma. This just should not happen either way. For this reason I think the Japanese player must drive China out of the war. With the easy flow of supply and if there are no restrictions on moving other Allied units into China it is simply too easy for the Allies to build up major airbases. In addition, it is really easy for the Allies to invade China and with a viable Chinese force intact to assist, the open terrain in Southern China just devour the Japanese Army. Not to mention the drain on supply. Soooo....I think John is in a fairly poor position in China if Dan finds a way to exploit it. But then again John has a few problems in the PI as well. The only consolation is that it is a long walk into China from Burma and this might dampen any Allied player's enthusiasm.

So, unless the Japanese player is going for an auto victory elsewhere, taking out China is a must.

_____________________________

I am the Holy Roman Emperor and am above grammar.

Sigismund of Luxemburg

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 9375
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 3/3/2017 5:30:31 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
+1

(in reply to crsutton)
Post #: 9376
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 3/3/2017 5:33:42 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
5/19/44

Burma: Unclear still whether John intends to make a stand at Moulmein. 41k troops there today, after two beat up units are driven back into the city. Let's see what it looks like tomorrow.

The Sam made its first appearance there today, but Allied fighters (especially the Spit VIII) seemed to handle it well.

Fun House: Important rendezvous at and near Talaud-eilanden tomorrow, when Death Star and the Herd meet up with a big reinforcing TF from the DEI. After that, lots of TFs go both ways.

Tacloban should fall on the next attack (unless the dice roll is a bad one).




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Canoerebel -- 3/3/2017 5:35:04 PM >

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 9377
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 3/3/2017 9:08:49 PM   
Lokasenna


Posts: 9297
Joined: 3/3/2012
From: Iowan in MD/DC
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: crsutton


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

Can you elaborate a little on China? I have often wondered what it would be like to not take China as Japan. You lose a huge source of possible VPs, but then on the other hand if Japan is relatively quiet in China they have the opportunity to bank all that supply.

Does cutting the Burma Road handicap all of the China's offensive options so far for lack of supply?




Having completed a full campaign as the Allies, as long as the road is open and the Allied player floods Rangoon with supply the supply will flow easily into China. Likewise it drives me crazy that the Japanese player can attack out of China and supply a massive force in interior Burma. This just should not happen either way. For this reason I think the Japanese player must drive China out of the war. With the easy flow of supply and if there are no restrictions on moving other Allied units into China it is simply too easy for the Allies to build up major airbases. In addition, it is really easy for the Allies to invade China and with a viable Chinese force intact to assist, the open terrain in Southern China just devour the Japanese Army. Not to mention the drain on supply. Soooo....I think John is in a fairly poor position in China if Dan finds a way to exploit it. But then again John has a few problems in the PI as well. The only consolation is that it is a long walk into China from Burma and this might dampen any Allied player's enthusiasm.

So, unless the Japanese player is going for an auto victory elsewhere, taking out China is a must.


Yes, +10 to all points.

(in reply to crsutton)
Post #: 9378
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 3/3/2017 9:11:36 PM   
Lokasenna


Posts: 9297
Joined: 3/3/2012
From: Iowan in MD/DC
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: witpqs


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lokasenna


quote:

ORIGINAL: GetAssista

quote:

ORIGINAL: Canoerebel
The Burma Road has been open for a few days now. Too soon to tell what effect that will have on the pace of operations in China. I have a handful of Chinese units set to take replacements and a few Allies units moving into the theater.

I can't mount any real air campaign. But when I load Rangoon up with supply one of these days, we'll see if it flows into China.

Burma Road openness adds 500 supply a day to Tsuyung, nothing else. So supply flow from the coast to Tsuyung and beyond is needed, and road network after Lashio is sketchy. Building up the bases on the route would help but I don't know if it would be enough to open way to meaningful flow.
I wonder if anyone has tried some proactive usage of command HQs to draw supply through. Like place HQ at Paoshan, wait for it to draw supply from Burma, then march it out of the base to free up the pile and let it flow further. Rince and repeat. Setting nearby Burma bases on stockpile can prevent the flowback



You can accomplish the same thing with the supply spinner.

As Japan, I have had supply flow west through this area so I don't know why it wouldn't be able to flow east.

Building up the bases helps for supply to those bases only. The maximum draw can come from anywhere, and is not stopped along the way by a lower draw base. For example, Mandalay might have a maximum draw of only 500 but Lashio might be built higher to have a maximum draw of 1200. A supply route to Lashio traced through Mandalay will not be limited to 500 - it only takes into account the base of origination and the destination that needs the supplies.

Likewise, a ton of supply might flow through to Paoshan and beyond, but given the terrain and road categories, it is unlikely.


That's my understanding, anyway.

Building up those bases will help increase supply flow, but it still won't be enough to supply the LARGE force required to crack all the way through those mountain defenses in any reasonable time frame.


It will help increase supply flow... to the bases being built up .

But yes, in a short period of time not enough supply will flow through to China to supply the large force necessary of breaking apart strongholds, particularly in mountain terrain. You could reasonably anticipate being able to conduct a modest campaign of aerial harassment from Chinese airfields using USAAF aircraft, however. In fact, once longer range models are available, you could base relatively few units at a relatively large number of bases - transfer them between bases to avoid being bombed on the airfields in between your harassing air raids. There are several somewhat self sufficient places where this would be viable: Changsha, Chungking, Sian, etc.

(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 9379
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 3/3/2017 11:46:12 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
1. I have 365k supply at Legaspi and Naga, with another 125k inbound. That sounds like a lot, but those 4EB eat through it at a big clip. I'm going to have to monitor that carefully.

2. As long as the 4EB have enough supply to operate, Luzon should be as bad as, or even worse than, Burma for John. In some ways the recipe is the same: big Allied airfields and lots of fighters and bombers in close proximity to enemy units in a variety of terrain and lacking air parity. John is closer to his supply sources. But the Allied army is far, far stronger. And, in Burma, I didn't have a navy in play. Unless something in the equation changes, Luzon should be a great debacle for John, as soon as I turn my attention fully to its conquest.

3. NavSearch reported at least two enemy combat TFs in the Bay of Bengal, and closing on Rangoon or Pegu rather than Akyab, as best I can tell. I even received a "send main body" message. I'm interested in seeing if this TF tries to sweep the new Allied ports of supply ships or if it bombards the Allied stack near Moulmein.


(in reply to Lokasenna)
Post #: 9380
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 3/4/2017 1:02:37 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
Strategic map with analysis.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 9381
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 3/4/2017 1:16:19 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
Intelligence display.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 9382
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 3/4/2017 5:42:56 PM   
obvert


Posts: 14050
Joined: 1/17/2011
From: PDX (and now) London, UK
Status: offline
By the end there is virtually nothing to play for but point and pride for the Japanese side. I used to play thinking the game was simply about winning strategic campaigns and tactical battles, but in the end, where for the Japanese 90% of the engagements are won by the Allies, VPs offer a way to measure success.

After having played late once it will never be too early to start thinking of VPs as a driving factor in game.

_____________________________

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 9383
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 3/4/2017 6:24:18 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
I've never played Japan, but I can understand using points as a legitimate measure of success or failure.

The Allied player eventually has to mold strategy towards victory points too. In an indirect way, that's what I've been doing all along.

But to this point, and for some time yet to come, I'm willing to trade victory points (the troops on Celebes, the value of xAP and 4EB, etc.) for ground. It's still too early to let points directly guide operational and strategic planning.

If points were my chief objective, I'd be more focused on making progress towards Rabaul and Port Moresby; Batavia, Soerabaja and Singapore. But the driving force has been to take the high ground ( Assam, Sumatra, Aleutians, Marshalls, DEI, Luzon), force John to commit his combat ships, and chew at them. That forumula worked, sometimes expensively and sometimes cheaply, until John simply stopped committing his navy in recent months.

The victory points come easier when the Kaigun collapses.

(in reply to obvert)
Post #: 9384
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 3/4/2017 6:26:29 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
I should add: The Kaigun hasn't collapsed yet. It's leaning, I'm trying to find ways to push it, and John's holding back so that he doesn't lose ships fruitlessly.

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 9385
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 3/4/2017 9:27:53 PM   
obvert


Posts: 14050
Joined: 1/17/2011
From: PDX (and now) London, UK
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Canoerebel

I've never played Japan, but I can understand using points as a legitimate measure of success or failure.

The Allied player eventually has to mold strategy towards victory points too. In an indirect way, that's what I've been doing all along.

But to this point, and for some time yet to come, I'm willing to trade victory points (the troops on Celebes, the value of xAP and 4EB, etc.) for ground. It's still too early to let points directly guide operational and strategic planning.

If points were my chief objective, I'd be more focused on making progress towards Rabaul and Port Moresby; Batavia, Soerabaja and Singapore. But the driving force has been to take the high ground ( Assam, Sumatra, Aleutians, Marshalls, DEI, Luzon), force John to commit his combat ships, and chew at them. That forumula worked, sometimes expensively and sometimes cheaply, until John simply stopped committing his navy in recent months.

The victory points come easier when the Kaigun collapses.


Actually, if you were really focused on VPs, you'd forget about the Kaigun, and you'd concentrate on getting in range of the HI with your B-29 beasts!

Nothing adds VPs faster than bombing the HI, hitting all of those stranded merchies in port, and torching the training groups on the ground in the overstocked airfields of Honshu.

You're obsessed with the his navy almost as much as he is! (Or maybe because he is)


< Message edited by obvert -- 3/4/2017 9:28:36 PM >


_____________________________

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 9386
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 3/4/2017 9:39:11 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
Well, that's an incomplete understanding of what I'm doing, why I'm doing it, and why knowing my opponent made doing it the surest route to victory.

(in reply to obvert)
Post #: 9387
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 3/4/2017 10:33:44 PM   
MakeeLearn


Posts: 4278
Joined: 9/11/2016
Status: offline
[Chorus]
Ooh, it makes me wonder...


Why now you don't focus on the Home Islands, air, sea and ground wise. Strike at the heart.

quote:

But the driving force has been to take the high ground ( Assam, Sumatra, Aleutians, Marshalls, DEI, Luzon), force John to commit his combat ships, and chew at them. That forumula worked, sometimes expensively and sometimes cheaply, until John simply stopped committing his navy in recent months.


You have a long since thought-out plan to call the tune of Japan's defeat, it seems. And it has played out very well.

< Message edited by MakeeLearn -- 3/4/2017 10:34:52 PM >

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 9388
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 3/4/2017 11:17:54 PM   
Bif1961


Posts: 2014
Joined: 6/26/2008
From: Phenix City, Alabama
Status: offline
Skippin the Solomons and NG is a new way to victory. It is still May 1944, so points will be coming much faster as his empire is cut in two and he has a decision to to finally come to the last major naval battle.

(in reply to MakeeLearn)
Post #: 9389
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 3/5/2017 1:01:38 AM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
5/20/44

Fun House: The Australians take Tacloban, meaning Leyte is Allied territory. It'll take a few more days to extinguish the remnant of 56th Div.

7th Australian Div. came into the PI with the most recent group of ships (the convoy that saw CV Sumatra torpedoed and CVE Chenango sunk). 7th Div. took Baybay and then split. 7th/A took Beaufort, West Borneo, and 7th/B and 7th/C took Tacloban. I'm not sure yet where they go after they wrap things up there.

Lots of ships and TFs rendezvoused today at and near Talaud-eilanden. Tomorrow ships begin scattering, with cripples and empties bound for the DEI and eventually the Pacific, and reinforcing and resupply ships inbound to the PI.

Burma: I think an enemy carrier TF is SW of Rangoon. The Allied army commences its march on Moulmein tomorrow. With 900 AV 100% prepped, perhaps it has a chance even if John doesn't withdraw his army.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Bif1961)
Post #: 9390
Page:   <<   < prev  311 312 [313] 314 315   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent Page: <<   < prev  311 312 [313] 314 315   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.594