Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Naval and Defense News

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> RE: Naval and Defense News Page: <<   < prev  70 71 [72] 73 74   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Naval and Defense News - 5/3/2017 8:25:55 PM   
Hongjian

 

Posts: 834
Joined: 1/2/2015
Status: offline
quote:

A leaked photo of CH-? (censored) UAV designed for sea-skimming anti-ship operation, with one specially designed Anti-ship torpedo. Unlike a cruise missile or kamikaze drone, it can be returned and to reuse.

quote:

translation:

CH-? (Censored) ground effect UAV

Purpose: Engage large sea-surface target with fast torpedo strike, sea area denial

Features:
High Loadout weight
Effectively penetrate area defense
Highly concealable

Targeted specification (not yet confirmed):
Max takeoff weight: 3000KG
Max loadout weight: 1000KG
Max duration of flight: 1.5 hours
Max height: >3 kilometers
Cruise height: 1-6 meters


Quite an innovative design. Makes me think of discussions in military forums whether one could use the ASW-variant of the Klub (that one armed with a LWT) for anti-surface attacks.

Kinda like a modern day unmanned Torpedo Bomber, Pearl Harbour style.

(in reply to Gunner98)
Post #: 2131
RE: Naval and Defense News - 5/3/2017 10:02:04 PM   
redcoat


Posts: 1035
Joined: 8/31/2005
From: UK
Status: offline

It looks different from the other Cai Hong UCAVs. But I suppose it would look different if it is able to use 'ground effect'.

< Message edited by redcoat -- 5/3/2017 10:19:57 PM >


_____________________________

“‘Who controls the past,’ ran the Party slogan, ‘controls the future: who controls the present controls the past.’”

George Orwell, 1984

(in reply to Hongjian)
Post #: 2132
RE: Naval and Defense News - 5/4/2017 10:22:33 AM   
redcoat


Posts: 1035
Joined: 8/31/2005
From: UK
Status: offline

Izvestia has reported that the Sukhoi T-50 PAK-FA fighter is able to use the Kh-35UE anti-ship missile – giving it another capability

https://sputniknews.com/military/201705031053239603-sukhoi-t50-ship-slayer/


_____________________________

“‘Who controls the past,’ ran the Party slogan, ‘controls the future: who controls the present controls the past.’”

George Orwell, 1984

(in reply to redcoat)
Post #: 2133
RE: Naval and Defense News - 5/4/2017 10:27:00 AM   
xavierv


Posts: 517
Joined: 7/10/2013
Status: offline
Waiting for DCNS / French Navy to give me more details on the sonar etc...

DCNS Wins French Navy La Fayette-class Frigate Upgrade Program

quote:

The French Procurement Agency (DGA) awarded to French shipbuilding group DCNS the upgrade contract for three of the five La Fayette-class Frigates in service with the French Navy (Marine Nationale).

http://www.navyrecognition.com/index.php/news/defence-news/2017/may-2017-navy-naval-forces-defense-industry-technology-maritime-security-global-news/5180-dcns-wins-french-navy-la-fayette-class-frigate-upgrade-program.html

_____________________________


(in reply to redcoat)
Post #: 2134
RE: Naval and Defense News - 5/4/2017 11:44:56 PM   
redcoat


Posts: 1035
Joined: 8/31/2005
From: UK
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Dysta




This article suggests that the new ‘Cai Hong’ could be a drone-missile hybrid rather than an elaborate UCAV

http://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/9974/whats-the-deal-with-chinas-surface-skimming-anti-ship-drone-missile-hybrid

Time will tell. It will be interesting to see if anyone shows an interest in buying it either way.



_____________________________

“‘Who controls the past,’ ran the Party slogan, ‘controls the future: who controls the present controls the past.’”

George Orwell, 1984

(in reply to Dysta)
Post #: 2135
RE: Naval and Defense News - 5/5/2017 12:58:40 AM   
Dysta


Posts: 1909
Joined: 8/8/2015
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: redcoat

This article suggests that the new ‘Cai Hong’ could be a drone-missile hybrid rather than an elaborate UCAV

http://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/9974/whats-the-deal-with-chinas-surface-skimming-anti-ship-drone-missile-hybrid

Time will tell. It will be interesting to see if anyone shows an interest in buying it either way.


If they sell it as a missile, it will violate MTCR (even China didn't sign it, but as a UAV like CH-4 they just sell them regardless) . 1.5 hours duration for subsonic speed can easily break through 300km limit. Also for offensive sea skimming altitude, it cannot be slower for lifting over 2 tons of vehicle.

Under the category of 'reusable missile' is no different than a drone, but still not a product China is willing to sell if it got the whopping 750nm (1389km !!) ferry range and still being labeled as a missile.

For a rough calculation, a legal max radius of this thing is 290km, not include the 10km for torpedo drop. If it flys for 40 minutes, it will has 435 km/h of cruise speed. With the 50 minutes of return stage, it can have 650km of total ferry range. That is not counting with weight factor of course.

< Message edited by Dysta -- 5/5/2017 2:52:11 AM >


_____________________________


(in reply to redcoat)
Post #: 2136
RE: Naval and Defense News - 5/5/2017 11:30:12 AM   
Hongjian

 

Posts: 834
Joined: 1/2/2015
Status: offline
Well, the article misunderstands quite a bit.
If they actually had anyone to translate it, they would know that this UAV isnt a missile, but carries a "long range, high speed torpedo" (远程快速鱼雷) to attack large surface targets.

The drone itself might also crash into the surface target, but it's not the main job. Dropping a, presumably heavy weight (1000kg), torpedo is.

(in reply to Dysta)
Post #: 2137
RE: Naval and Defense News - 5/6/2017 5:41:40 AM   
Dysta


Posts: 1909
Joined: 8/8/2015
Status: offline
SY-400 is an opaque weapon: be it called an universal rocket, or a ballistic missile, it did involved with many strange purposes like firing it straight into an eye of typhoon, or its tremendous range above the width of Taiwan strait.

But now, Myanmar media reported that they are ordering SY-400 system, including the tactical missile BP-12A, which has much greater range than standard quad-pack rockets.

http://defence-blog.com/news/myanmar-looks-to-buy-chinese-sy-400-ballistic-missile-systems.html

_____________________________


(in reply to Hongjian)
Post #: 2138
RE: Naval and Defense News - 5/6/2017 11:21:50 AM   
redcoat


Posts: 1035
Joined: 8/31/2005
From: UK
Status: offline

MQ-9 Reapers add to arsenal with first GBU-38 drop

http://www.acc.af.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/1175159/mq-9-reapers-add-to-arsenal-with-first-gbu-38-drop/

_____________________________

“‘Who controls the past,’ ran the Party slogan, ‘controls the future: who controls the present controls the past.’”

George Orwell, 1984

(in reply to Dysta)
Post #: 2139
RE: Naval and Defense News - 5/7/2017 5:19:11 AM   
Dysta


Posts: 1909
Joined: 8/8/2015
Status: offline
Non-military news.

We know that Wi-Fi signal can do the room-scanning tricks to locate persons inside the broadcasting room, acting it like a 2D radar. Today researcher also find out Wi-Fi can go holographic, which is included the altitude. Making the room scanning totally 3D, indicating the benefit for rescue op and privacy awareness in working areas.

However, it also raised some sensational concerns about public surveillance, and the risk of military purposes:

http://newatlas.com/wifi-router-holography-microwave-radiation/49396/
http://gizmodo.com/scientists-are-turning-wifi-routers-into-creepy-radar-c-1794961990

< Message edited by Dysta -- 5/7/2017 5:28:37 AM >


_____________________________


(in reply to redcoat)
Post #: 2140
RE: Naval and Defense News - 5/7/2017 12:13:48 PM   
kevinkins


Posts: 2257
Joined: 3/8/2006
Status: offline
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4479842/US-military-drone-footage-streamed-internet.html

Not sure if I am all that surprised nor alarmed by this.

Kevin

(in reply to Dysta)
Post #: 2141
RE: Naval and Defense News - 5/7/2017 4:50:04 PM   
ExNusquam

 

Posts: 513
Joined: 3/4/2014
From: Washington, D.C.
Status: offline
quote:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4479842/US-military-drone-footage-streamed-internet.html

Not sure if I am all that surprised nor alarmed by this.

Kevin



That article is cancerous. "This often right before a missile is fired or a bomb is dropped on some suspected terrorist." Because the US government flies UAS constantly and only turns the sensors on when they're about to kill someone. The advantage of UAS is their persistence as intel collectors - not the fact that they can carry PGMs. I looked up the target coordinates, and it's right next to Eglin AFB in Restricted Airspace - exactly the spot you'd expect UAS to be training. As long as the feed isn't used for Intel or LE it's completely legal and normal operations.

Also "Dynamic content up to NOT SET"; apparently the IT guys forgot how to set classification levels, or pull it from the feed metadata. Idiots.

I eagerly await the article about how the US Army is invading south Texas by practicing convoy operations on public highways.

(in reply to kevinkins)
Post #: 2142
RE: Naval and Defense News - 5/8/2017 6:37:27 PM   
Hongjian

 

Posts: 834
Joined: 1/2/2015
Status: offline
http://www.eastpendulum.com/df-26b-une-nouvelle-variante-de-lasbm-longue-portee-chinois

A previously unknown variant of the DF-26 ASBM/IRBM was identified. The E/ADF-26B, or DF-26B booster stage crashed in western China after a successful full-range launch test near North Korea.

Henri.K thinks that the DF-26B might be the designation for the ASBM variant. The A-variant might then be the conventional surface-to-surface missile. A third version (C?) could be the nuclear variant. Lastly, there should be an extended range variant as well (D?).



The acronym is interesting:

The letter E here means Er ( 二 in Chinese) which stands for 二炮 (Second Artillery), former name of the Chinese rocket force. And the letter A signifies "Missile".






(in reply to ExNusquam)
Post #: 2143
RE: Naval and Defense News - 5/8/2017 7:28:26 PM   
Zaslon

 

Posts: 283
Joined: 6/14/2015
Status: offline
Impressive OODA. Only 2 secons between launchs in the Shtil-1 SAM system.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MJQ05pkdNFA

< Message edited by Zaslon -- 5/8/2017 7:29:11 PM >


_____________________________


Kids think about Iran and Amateurs think about Russia, but professionals think about China

(in reply to Hongjian)
Post #: 2144
RE: Naval and Defense News - 5/8/2017 9:58:32 PM   
Broncepulido

 

Posts: 385
Joined: 9/26/2013
Status: offline
USS Essex LHD-2 returns to sea on May 3, 2017, with added F-35B capability, the third big-deck ship with that capability (The others are very probably USS America LHA-6 and USS Wasp LHD-1, to be deployed this year first time operationally with 6, 10 or 16xF-35B):
http://navaltoday.com/2017/05/08/f-35b-ready-uss-essex-returns-to-sea/

< Message edited by Broncepulido -- 5/8/2017 10:00:10 PM >

(in reply to Zaslon)
Post #: 2145
RE: Naval and Defense News - 5/9/2017 12:52:23 AM   
Dysta


Posts: 1909
Joined: 8/8/2015
Status: offline
quote:

DF-26B


I thought it has the size of a monstrousity, given by the range it has from DF-21 family already. It looks having between 1.2-1.5m or diameter, so it could have bit of an extra range, but we still yet to see the warhead.

It clearly see PLA doesn't give up on ASBM, even the advance ABM system and ships are around the sea already.

-----

Some medias start to over-analyze what is the E/A meant. One referred journal wrote stands for 'Electronic Attack', signaling the purpose to countering ABM radar including THAAD. But it's highly unlikely given by Chinese weapon systems doesn't use English-based Alphabets, except for few export variant's names.

http://3g.china.com/act/military/11132797/20170509/30502517.html (Simplified Chinese)

< Message edited by Dysta -- 5/9/2017 2:10:56 AM >


_____________________________


(in reply to Broncepulido)
Post #: 2146
RE: Naval and Defense News - 5/9/2017 3:04:19 PM   
Hongjian

 

Posts: 834
Joined: 1/2/2015
Status: offline
http://www.eastpendulum.com/le-vrai-visage-du-drone-de-combat-sharp-sword

Henri.K reports that there are indications that the PLAAF might introduce the stealthy Sharp Sword UCAV soon.



According to rumors, it will be powered by a WS-13 engine (Chinese RD-33/93 derivative). I wonder if they removed the afterburner stage and modified the nozzle not to stick out of the stealthy airframe, though.

(in reply to Dysta)
Post #: 2147
RE: Naval and Defense News - 5/9/2017 3:10:27 PM   
Hongjian

 

Posts: 834
Joined: 1/2/2015
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Dysta

quote:

DF-26B


I thought it has the size of a monstrousity, given by the range it has from DF-21 family already. It looks having between 1.2-1.5m or diameter, so it could have bit of an extra range, but we still yet to see the warhead.

It clearly see PLA doesn't give up on ASBM, even the advance ABM system and ships are around the sea already.

-----

Some medias start to over-analyze what is the E/A meant. One referred journal wrote stands for 'Electronic Attack', signaling the purpose to countering ABM radar including THAAD. But it's highly unlikely given by Chinese weapon systems doesn't use English-based Alphabets, except for few export variant's names.

http://3g.china.com/act/military/11132797/20170509/30502517.html (Simplified Chinese)



Seems like the official side has responded.

China's PLA Rocket Force conducts missile test, defense ministry confirms

quote:

China recently conducted a missile test in the Bohai Sea, according to a statement on Tuesday posted by the Ministry of National Defense on its official website.
The People's Liberation Army Rocket Force carried out a mission in the Bohai Sea to test its new missile based on annual training program, read the statement. It also said the test had "achieved an expected result."
The ministry has not released any further information about the missile. The Bohai Sea is a body of water off the coasts of Tianjin municipality, Shandong, Hebei and Liaoning provinces.


https://news.cgtn.com/news/3d55444d78677a4d/share_p.html



Henri.K says that this test was a submarine launched missile. He has registered two undersea ejections.
In his own words; "the submarine belongs to the navy, but not the missile"

If the E/ADF-26B was indeed launched from the Bohai Sea and not north of Korea as previously thought, it might indicate an entirely new SLBM variant of the DF-26 series.

Maybe this is the rumored sea-based variant of the ASBM?

< Message edited by Hongjian -- 5/9/2017 3:11:01 PM >

(in reply to Dysta)
Post #: 2148
RE: Naval and Defense News - 5/10/2017 7:55:20 PM   
Broncepulido

 

Posts: 385
Joined: 9/26/2013
Status: offline
A very interesting site, not very updated, but with many very in-deep articles (In Brazilian Portuguese):
http://sistemasdearmas.com.br/
As example, towed decoy systems:
http://sistemasdearmas.com.br/ge/der1rebocados.html

(in reply to Hongjian)
Post #: 2149
RE: Naval and Defense News - 5/12/2017 3:00:53 AM   
Dysta


Posts: 1909
Joined: 8/8/2015
Status: offline
The debate of CH-? Ground effect drone, continues:

Most Western medias are still focusing its sea-skimming stealthiness, and countermeasures against it. Meanwhile, Russia is now paying interest to this drone too -- Sputnik mentioned that it can be used with a Shkval rocket torpedo (China bought them with Kilos before), which is the only source of foreign news saying it is a torpedo-dropping drone, not a cruise missile. The rest of article is the possible applications.

Also here is the artist's impression based on the photo:



https://sputniknews.com/military/201705101053474606-china-new-drone/

-----------------------------

The Diplomat also take three guesses of the recent test fire of Chinese missile from Bohai sea by PLARF: DF-26B, DF-21D and JL-3

http://thediplomat.com/2017/05/china-tests-new-missile-close-to-korean-peninsula/

< Message edited by Dysta -- 5/12/2017 3:22:42 AM >


_____________________________


(in reply to Broncepulido)
Post #: 2150
RE: Naval and Defense News - 5/12/2017 12:32:45 PM   
Hongjian

 

Posts: 834
Joined: 1/2/2015
Status: offline
Original source picture of the CH-X WIG drone.



That this is a torpedo dropping drone should already be confirmed, since the exhibition posters clearly state that. But Western defense press has chosen to ignore it.

On the other hand, this drone would also be suitable to carry a Klub-styled rocket boosted warhead with supersonic terminal speed.

(in reply to Dysta)
Post #: 2151
RE: Naval and Defense News - 5/12/2017 3:37:32 PM   
tomrlutong2

 

Posts: 11
Joined: 12/5/2016
Status: offline
So could we be seeing the (IMHO neglected) ASW component of China's area-denial emerging? Hunter-killer UAVs cued by passive diesel-electric boats? Certainly helps the "they're great until they move" problem with AEP subs.

Or if they want to really get fancy, combine these with a seabed sensor network? Sure would be handy to have a bunch of scattered islands to act as sensor network hubs and drone bases...

I haven't explored the game editor enough to know, would it be possible to build a South China Sea seafloor sensor network + torpedo firing drones vs. US subs scenario? Would love to see if the concept works.

(in reply to Hongjian)
Post #: 2152
RE: Naval and Defense News - 5/12/2017 7:31:57 PM   
Broncepulido

 

Posts: 385
Joined: 9/26/2013
Status: offline
For CH-? you will need a container/launcher a lot bigger than for Klub or similar missiles.

(in reply to tomrlutong2)
Post #: 2153
RE: Naval and Defense News - 5/12/2017 7:43:29 PM   
tomrlutong2

 

Posts: 11
Joined: 12/5/2016
Status: offline
Wouldn't it use a runway?

(in reply to Broncepulido)
Post #: 2154
RE: Naval and Defense News - 5/13/2017 1:31:35 AM   
Dysta


Posts: 1909
Joined: 8/8/2015
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tomrlutong2

Wouldn't it use a runway?

Well, the article said it can be take off from a rocket-boosted launcher and calm sea surface (amphibious?), but yet to be revealed.

The closest thing I can think of is also came from China -- the WJ-600 attack drone, it looks more like a proper cruise missile with bigger wings and external pylons than the mysterious ground effect drone. It must launch with rocket booster, and recover with built-in parachute.

http://www.militaryfactory.com/aircraft/detail.asp?aircraft_id=1031

_____________________________


(in reply to tomrlutong2)
Post #: 2155
RE: Naval and Defense News - 5/14/2017 10:47:03 AM   
redcoat


Posts: 1035
Joined: 8/31/2005
From: UK
Status: offline

It looks like Japan is opting for Aegis Ashore for missile defence rather than THAAD

http://www.the-japan-news.com/news/article/0003696092

_____________________________

“‘Who controls the past,’ ran the Party slogan, ‘controls the future: who controls the present controls the past.’”

George Orwell, 1984

(in reply to Dysta)
Post #: 2156
RE: Naval and Defense News - 5/14/2017 3:27:51 PM   
Hongjian

 

Posts: 834
Joined: 1/2/2015
Status: offline
Couple of PLAN news:

Second 45k ton Type 901 AOE was launched recently at GSI:



Hull 1 has docked in Zhanjiang Naval Base, South Sea Fleet. Indicating that the lead ship will serve in the SCS.
One can see the size of that ship, when compared to the Type 071 LPD.








< Message edited by Hongjian -- 5/14/2017 3:29:42 PM >

(in reply to redcoat)
Post #: 2157
RE: Naval and Defense News - 5/14/2017 5:58:28 PM   
Hongjian

 

Posts: 834
Joined: 1/2/2015
Status: offline
Continuing:

A model was discovered, showing what appears to be the long rumored H-6KH (H = Sea/Navy) naval strike bomber variant of the PLAAF H-6K "God of War".
This model would confirm an earlier satellite picture indicating this variant.
As one can see, it carries a pair of KG800 OECM pods on additional hardpoints near the wing-tips and a KG600 self-defense jamming pod on a fuselage hardpoint. The satellite image could confirm the KG800s at the wingtip pylons.
Weapons includes the YJ-12 supersonic AShM and YJ-83K/H anti ship missiles on its six weapon pylons, among other things.






This variant has been long awaited, since it made no sense for the PLANAF to have mere two regiments of aging H-6Gs (converted from the old H-6D fleet) to carry the new YJ-12 AShM. The H-6K was always thought to be the perfect platform for maritime strike.

(in reply to Hongjian)
Post #: 2158
RE: Naval and Defense News - 5/14/2017 6:08:48 PM   
Hongjian

 

Posts: 834
Joined: 1/2/2015
Status: offline
And finally, a new article by Henri K.

http://www.eastpendulum.com/debut-de-lindustrialisation-du-canon-electromagnetique-naval

In short; lots of very big-shots, Prof. Ma Weiming (called "father of Chinese EMALS") included, have visited the CSIC Institute 713 that is responsible for China's naval railgun research.
In this case, it appears that they were attending some gathering or ceremony that had something to do with China's railgun project and/or its ETC (Electrothermal-chemical) gun research.



In any case, such a visit by bigshots is usually a sign that the project has reached a certain milestone and the field tests arent far off anymore.

(in reply to Hongjian)
Post #: 2159
RE: Naval and Defense News - 5/14/2017 11:07:50 PM   
redcoat


Posts: 1035
Joined: 8/31/2005
From: UK
Status: offline

The Japan Times has looked at today's North Korean missile test: Link


_____________________________

“‘Who controls the past,’ ran the Party slogan, ‘controls the future: who controls the present controls the past.’”

George Orwell, 1984

(in reply to Hongjian)
Post #: 2160
Page:   <<   < prev  70 71 [72] 73 74   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> RE: Naval and Defense News Page: <<   < prev  70 71 [72] 73 74   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.063