Chaff success 100% ?

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

Chaff success 100% ?

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> Tech Support >> Chaff success 100% ?

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

Chaff success 100% ? - 5/16/2017 10:13:28 PM

chrispman

Posts: 117
Joined: 3/28/2010
Status: offline

Just played the Battle of Latakia, is the final probability of 100% normal ?

quote:

06.10.1973 22:28:13 - Decoy (SRCR Chaff; Tech: N/A) from 311 Mivtach is attempting to seduce sensor: Active Radar Seeker (Tech: Early 1960s)(Guiding weapon: SS-N-2a Styx [P-15] #143). Final probability: 100%. Result: 2 - SUCCESS
...
06.10.1973 22:28:23 - Decoy (SRCR Chaff; Tech: N/A) from 311 Mivtach is attempting to seduce sensor: Active Radar Seeker (Tech: Early 1960s)(Guiding weapon: SS-N-2a Styx [P-15] #144). Final probability: 100%. Result: 93 - SUCCESS

regards

Post #: 1

RE: Chaff success 100% ? - 5/16/2017 10:16:05 PM

mikmykWS

Posts: 11524
Joined: 3/22/2005
Status: offline

Yeah chaff was the clincher during that battle. What do you think it should be given how may Styx were fired and spoofed during the battle?

Mike

_____________________________

(in reply to chrispman)

Post #: 2

RE: Chaff success 100% ? - 5/16/2017 10:20:51 PM

mikmykWS

Posts: 11524
Joined: 3/22/2005
Status: offline

Read here

http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=3399194&mpage=1&key=Latakia�

Thanks

Mike

_____________________________

(in reply to mikmykWS)

Post #: 3

RE: Chaff success 100% ? - 5/16/2017 10:22:28 PM

chrispman

Posts: 117
Joined: 3/28/2010
Status: offline

I didn't know that - it just felt strange that chaff gave them the absolute guarantee of splashing the Styxs.

Only two Styx were fired in this encounter.

Thanks for the insight!

(in reply to mikmykWS)

Post #: 4