Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: New Dunkirk Trailer

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [General] >> General Discussion >> RE: New Dunkirk Trailer Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: New Dunkirk Trailer - 7/20/2017 2:01:23 AM   
danlongman

 

Posts: 586
Joined: 3/27/2012
From: Over the hills and far away
Status: offline 		Do you think it might be better than "Mrs. Miniver?"

_____________________________

"Patriotism: Your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." - George Bernard Shaw

(in reply to balto)
Post #: 31
RE: New Dunkirk Trailer - 7/20/2017 3:46:28 AM   
Hentzau


Posts: 161
Joined: 8/31/2004
Status: offline 		Oh man, I'm jonesing to see this.

(in reply to danlongman)
Post #: 32
RE: New Dunkirk Trailer - 7/20/2017 4:09:56 AM   
warspite1


Posts: 41353
Joined: 2/2/2008
From: England
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: danlongman

Do you think it might be better than "Mrs. Miniver?"
warspite1

Ah Mrs Miniver. That was a nice little film - and all the better for not having Harry Styles in it


_____________________________

England expects that every man will do his duty. Horatio Nelson October 1805



(in reply to danlongman)
Post #: 33
RE: New Dunkirk Trailer - 7/20/2017 4:35:10 AM   
Neilster


Posts: 2890
Joined: 10/27/2003
From: Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
Status: offline 		I still think Dunkirk would have been better if, in traditional Hollywood fashion, all those Limeys, who were too busy brewing tea to fight, were rescued by U.S. Marines flying P-51 Mustangs. Also, there should be a ridiculous love triangle and all the women in it are ahistorically "fast", as my Mother would say

Cheers, Neilster

(in reply to warspite1)
Post #: 34
RE: New Dunkirk Trailer - 7/20/2017 6:27:35 AM   
JamesM

 

Posts: 1017
Joined: 8/28/2000
From: QLD, Australia
Status: offline 		Saw the film this morning, not what I expected. Timeline was hard to follow, it centered around a small core of original characters and their experiences. A naval commander, a little boat and its crew, a few privates, 2 RAF fighter pilots (those Merlin engines sounded really great in the cinema) and a army colonel. There was no moralizing in the film which was a nice change. Overall it was a okay watch and most certainly worth watching again.

(in reply to Neilster)
Post #: 35
RE: New Dunkirk Trailer - 7/20/2017 8:59:54 AM   
Crossroads


Posts: 17372
Joined: 7/5/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: jamesm

Saw the film this morning, not what I expected. Timeline was hard to follow, it centered around a small core of original characters and their experiences. A naval commander, a little boat and its crew, a few privates, 2 RAF fighter pilots (those Merlin engines sounded really great in the cinema) and a army colonel. There was no moralizing in the film which was a nice change. Overall it was a okay watch and most certainly worth watching again.


The aerial scenes were truly top notch keeping in mind next to no CGI was used there. What you see is how it was! Something to keep in mind when watching.

Spitfires were truly gorgeous, and a special mention for the Blenheim MkI cameo somewhere in between too

_____________________________

Visit us at: Campaign Series Legion
---
CS: Vietnam 1948-1967 <-- Jan 20th, 2022! --
CS: Middle East 1948-1985 2.0

(in reply to JamesM)
Post #: 36
RE: New Dunkirk Trailer - 7/20/2017 9:58:54 AM   
goodwoodrw


Posts: 2661
Joined: 2/14/2005
Status: offline 		My son and I have decided to head off to city next week to watch in Melbourne's Imax theatre. never been to an Imax before looking forward to it.

_____________________________

Formerly Goodwood


(in reply to Crossroads)
Post #: 37
RE: New Dunkirk Trailer - 7/20/2017 1:21:33 PM   
wodin


Posts: 10762
Joined: 4/20/2003
From: England
Status: offline 		I had faith in Nolan turning his back on love triangles/love story and any moralising like the usual Hollywood War films of recent years.


Have yet to see this but I do recommend an old black and white film called Dunkirk. Well worth a watch. Also considering when it was made was pretty raw with no propaganda taint either.


quote:

ORIGINAL: jamesm

Saw the film this morning, not what I expected. Timeline was hard to follow, it centered around a small core of original characters and their experiences. A naval commander, a little boat and its crew, a few privates, 2 RAF fighter pilots (those Merlin engines sounded really great in the cinema) and a army colonel. There was no moralizing in the film which was a nice change. Overall it was a okay watch and most certainly worth watching again.



_____________________________

My website


https://www.awargamersneedfulthings.co.uk/

(in reply to JamesM)
Post #: 38
RE: New Dunkirk Trailer - 7/20/2017 3:42:12 PM   
Crossroads


Posts: 17372
Joined: 7/5/2009
Status: offline 		Timeline admittedly made watching a bit more difficult, but I think it worked quite nicely as an alternative to a linear storytelling. Especially as the historical evacuation was a well-known end.

_____________________________

Visit us at: Campaign Series Legion
---
CS: Vietnam 1948-1967 <-- Jan 20th, 2022! --
CS: Middle East 1948-1985 2.0

(in reply to wodin)
Post #: 39
RE: New Dunkirk Trailer - 7/20/2017 5:02:14 PM   
Crossroads


Posts: 17372
Joined: 7/5/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Crossroads

Timeline admittedly made watching a bit more difficult, but I think it worked quite nicely as an alternative to a linear storytelling. Especially as the historical evacuation was a well-known end.


A mild spoiler warning:

In fact, maybe worth repeating about the timeline,

  • the soldiers are pictured spending a week there, trying to get out,
  • the father and son in their boat are depicted as how their one day there and back went, and finally,
  • the pilots are there for one hour, as that was all they had gasoline for.

    This being a Nolan movie, the timeline then evolves around this, flashbacks and all, bringing all them together to same locations at times, then taking them apart again. I guess knowing this beforehand would have made it a bit easier to grasp all of it. Although it was sort of said in the film that this is how it goes. I didn't completely get it at the time though

    _____________________________

    Visit us at: Campaign Series Legion
    ---
    CS: Vietnam 1948-1967 <-- Jan 20th, 2022! --
    CS: Middle East 1948-1985 2.0

    (in reply to Crossroads)
    • Post #: 40
    RE: New Dunkirk Trailer - 7/20/2017 10:22:33 PM   
    JamesM

     

    Posts: 1017
    Joined: 8/28/2000
    From: QLD, Australia
    Status: offline     		In the film there were female nurses on the hospital ship (no surprises there). My question is were female UK personnel in WW2 allowed to be on a ship that sailed into a combat zone?

    (in reply to Crossroads)
    Post #: 41
    RE: New Dunkirk Trailer - 7/20/2017 10:33:03 PM   
    CJMello63


    Posts: 349
    Joined: 7/15/2004
    From: Raynham, Massachusetts
    Status: offline     		Hope to see it this weekend

    _____________________________


    (in reply to balto)
    Post #: 42
    RE: New Dunkirk Trailer - 7/21/2017 3:48:05 AM   
    warspite1


    Posts: 41353
    Joined: 2/2/2008
    From: England
    Status: offline
    quote:

    ORIGINAL: jamesm

    In the film there were female nurses on the hospital ship (no surprises there). My question is were female UK personnel in WW2 allowed to be on a ship that sailed into a combat zone?
    warspite1

    It appears that there was one hospital ship lost off Dunkirk - the Paris or Parris (spelling varies). At least one other was lost earlier off Dieppe.

    I cannot seem to get any information on whether there were females aboard. The link below refers to nurses but of course that could be male or female.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/ww2peopleswar/stories/83/a2749683.shtml

    There is this from the Queen Alexandra's Imperial Military Nursing Service website but this seems to refer only to nurses in France - not serving on board ship.

    Dunkirk Evacuation

    Many QAs made their way to Dunkirk to await evacuation. One of the last nursing sisters to leave France was Lillian Gutteridge who bravely defended her patients. A German SS officer tried to take over her ambulance and ordered his men to throw out the stretcher bound patients. Lillian Gutteridge was so outraged that she slapped the SS Officer's face. He stabbed her in the thigh with his dagger and he was killed by passing Black Watch soldiers before he could hurt her anymore. Despite her wound she drove the ambulance and her wounded patients to the railway siding and persuaded the French driver to take on board her patients. They went to Cherbourg and during their journey took on board another 600 French and British wounded troops. Several days later Lillian and her patients arrived safely in England.

    No QAs were left behind during the Dunkirk Evacuation and all returned to England (cited in the book Queen Alexandra's Royal Army Nursing Corps (Famous Regts. S) by Juliet Piggott).

    But then there is this from the same website (he doesn't say which ship):

    Grey and Scarlet : letters from the war areas by army sisters on active service has extracts of the writings of a Captain of a Hospital Ship of what he witnessed during the evacuation of Dunkirk. He wrote:

    As Captain of this ship I should like to give expression to my admiration and deep regard for the Nursing Sisters aboard. We recently made two trips to Dunkirk and two to Cherbourg, in each case being the last Hospital Carrier to enter and leave the ports. Our second trip to Dunkirk was under extremely severe conditions, bombs and shells dropping all about us and men being wounded and killed alongside our ship on the pier. We had numerous narrow escapes and a nerve racking experience. During all this our Sisters were really splendid. Never a sign of excitement or panic of any kind. They just carried on under the able leadership of our Matron, calmly and efficiently. I feel quite sure that their magnificent behaviour was an important factor in steadying the members of the RAMC personnel with whom they worked.


    _____________________________

    England expects that every man will do his duty. Horatio Nelson October 1805



    (in reply to JamesM)
    Post #: 43
    RE: New Dunkirk Trailer - 7/21/2017 5:16:27 AM   
    Neilster


    Posts: 2890
    Joined: 10/27/2003
    From: Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
    Status: offline     		Hospital ships were clearly marked and lit. Attacking them is a war crime (although it happened). Hence I assume that British hospital ships had female nurses on them. I know for a fact that Australian ones did. I'm also assuming that male nurses were either very rare or non-existent at the time.

    Cheers, Neilster

    (in reply to warspite1)
    Post #: 44
    RE: New Dunkirk Trailer - 7/21/2017 4:53:32 PM   
    Yogi the Great


    Posts: 1948
    Joined: 4/10/2007
    From: Wisconsin
    Status: offline     		Just got back from the movie. Similar comments to some of the others, not as spectacular as originally thought it would be, but glad I did go to it and it is worth our time to do so. A few scenes make it worth it as well. I was able to follow it (timeline) a bit better as well because of jamesm's post on this forum. It is always remarkable and inspiring to see and remember what people have gone through with strength and resolve.



    _____________________________

    Hooked Since AH Gettysburg

    (in reply to Neilster)
    Post #: 45
    RE: New Dunkirk Trailer - 7/21/2017 9:35:48 PM   
    warspite1


    Posts: 41353
    Joined: 2/2/2008
    From: England
    Status: offline     		Dunkirk – Spoiler Alert

    I have just got back from seeing the film. What can I say? It was intense and lived up to the hype.

    The film has no frills, no character development, no backstory, there is no love interest and indeed there is very little dialogue. It’s simply a story of essentially four small groups of people – one from the Army, RN/Army officers on the Dunkirk mole, a Royal Air Force fighter patrol and men aboard one of the little ships. I guess the Royal Navy is a fifth group as they are naturally pretty much ever present, invariably adding something to each of the stories – largely as a result of their ships getting sunk having repeatedly put themselves in harm’s way to try and get the Army home.

    One immediate thing I noticed was at the very start when a few lines were used to explain what was happening; it was not the Germans attacking and surrounding the French and British – it was ‘the enemy’. Okay…. that seems a little silly but I guess we are all friends now so….

    I was a little confused near the start as one minute it was daytime and the next it was dark or heading that way. However, it quickly became apparent that the action is not strictly chronological (I forgot what one of the posters said above about this). By the way this way of telling the story makes it look like the RAF patrol shoots down half the Luftwaffe, but one sees some of the scenes more than once from different viewpoints. This jumbled timeline idea actually works well.

    The film doesn’t seek to tell the story of Dunkirk. The French are acknowledged - holding the perimeter along with a British rear-guard. Amongst the limited dialogue, there is reference to the German tanks being halted, the Luftwaffe being given the job of destroying the BEF and their French Allies, expectation that 30-45,000 British troops only are expected to be rescued, and that the RAF are trying to conserve aircraft and pilots for the battle still to come. But enough of the story is told through the trials and tribulations of the individual groups and the brief dialogue to make clear what is going on even if one knows nothing about this episode in history.

    I was expecting some sort of soundtrack what with Hans Zimmer being involved but instead, during the action, there was a sort of noise as opposed to a dramatic music score. This worked really well too and added to the intensity.

    How did the film fare on the trembling bottom lip front? Well there were a couple of occasions on which it was a good job I had the Kleenex on hand – I wasn’t emotional you understand, I just had something in my eye….

    In summary – a great job Mr Nolan!











    Attachment (3)

    < Message edited by warspite1 -- 7/21/2017 9:44:55 PM >

    _____________________________

    England expects that every man will do his duty. Horatio Nelson October 1805



    (in reply to Yogi the Great)
    Post #: 46
    RE: New Dunkirk Trailer - 7/22/2017 7:05:04 AM   
    Crossroads


    Posts: 17372
    Joined: 7/5/2009
    Status: offline
    quote:

    ORIGINAL: warspite1

    In summary – a great job Mr Nolan!



    Indeed! I may need to go watch it a second time, so much to take in during the first time


    _____________________________

    Visit us at: Campaign Series Legion
    ---
    CS: Vietnam 1948-1967 <-- Jan 20th, 2022! --
    CS: Middle East 1948-1985 2.0

    (in reply to warspite1)
    Post #: 47
    RE: New Dunkirk Trailer - 7/22/2017 7:09:26 AM   
    warspite1


    Posts: 41353
    Joined: 2/2/2008
    From: England
    Status: offline
    quote:

    ORIGINAL: Crossroads


    quote:

    ORIGINAL: warspite1

    In summary – a great job Mr Nolan!



    Indeed! I may need to go watch it a second time, so much to take in during the first time

    warspite1

    IMAX for me next week! I will be taking my little cruisers along too next time



    _____________________________

    England expects that every man will do his duty. Horatio Nelson October 1805



    (in reply to Crossroads)
    Post #: 48
    RE: New Dunkirk Trailer - 7/22/2017 6:23:23 PM   
    RFalvo69


    Posts: 1380
    Joined: 7/11/2013
    From: Lamezia Terme (Italy)
    Status: offline     		I'll repost my review here, too.

    I watched it here in Paris on iMax 70mm, and I found it amazing.

    I won't spoil, but let's say than Nolan, again, plays with the concept of "time" in an unique way. The movie intercuts between the soldiers stranded on the beaches, the small fleet of civilians coming to the rescue, and the RAF battling the Luftwaffe. However, as we are clearly told, the land scenes cover one week, the sea ones one day, and the air battles one hour. Nolan, though, intercuts between them like if they were on the same timeline. The effect is disorienting, at the beginning, but the way everything comes together is, IMHO, totally unique.

    There is no gore in the movie, but be warned that this is a very hard PG13 (here in Europe we have different rating systems, but the concept is basically the same): the anguish and the tension are relentless, and soldiers die in dire ways. You really don't need blood and flying limbs when certain... things do happen to people.

    A word of warning: there are no real characters in the movie, something, I feel, that many people will not like. I think that Nolan cast some recognisable faces just for that reason ("Hey, Kenneth Branagh looks worried! He must be an English high-up or stuff!" "Wait a minute... they are not going to kill Mad Max, do they??) - because the only connection you have is with the actors. Characters are defined by what they do, not by speeches about the wife at home expecting their first baby. The movie can be defined as a single, uninterrupted sequence that never lets go: there is simply no time for sad sing-alongs.

    Zimmer's score is fantastic. Let's say that it doesn't "accompany" the movie, but it is an integral part of the soundscape.

    Watch it on the biggest screen around. The air battles alone had the whole audience banking...

    My vote: 9 out of 10

    quote:

    ORIGINAL: warspite1
    By the way this way of telling the story makes it look like the RAF patrol shoots down half the Luftwaffe, but one sees some of the scenes more than once from different viewpoints. This jumbled timeline idea actually works well.


    It is, however, also true that Tom Hardy's Spitfire carries more ammo than all that was produced for the whole RAF during the war

    _____________________________

    "Yes darling, I served in the Navy for eight years. I was a cook..."
    "Oh dad... so you were a God-damned cook?"

    (My 10 years old daughter after watching "The Hunt for Red October")

    (in reply to warspite1)
    Post #: 49
    RE: New Dunkirk Trailer - 7/22/2017 6:30:25 PM   
    warspite1


    Posts: 41353
    Joined: 2/2/2008
    From: England
    Status: offline
    quote:

    ORIGINAL: RFalvo69

    I'll repost my review here, too.

    I watched it here in Paris on iMax 70mm, and I found it amazing.

    I won't spoil, but let's say than Nolan, again, plays with the concept of "time" in an unique way. The movie intercuts between the soldiers stranded on the beaches, the small fleet of civilians coming to the rescue, and the RAF battling the Luftwaffe. However, as we are clearly told, the land scenes cover one week, the sea ones one day, and the air battles one hour. Nolan, though, intercuts between them like if they were on the same timeline. The effect is disorienting, at the beginning, but the way everything comes together is, IMHO, totally unique.

    There is no gore in the movie, but be warned that this is a very hard PG13 (here in Europe we have different rating systems, but the concept is basically the same): the anguish and the tension are relentless, and soldiers die in dire ways. You really don't need blood and flying limbs when certain... things do happen to people.

    A word of warning: there are no real characters in the movie, something, I feel, that many people will not like. I think that Nolan cast some recognisable faces just for that reason ("Hey, Kenneth Branagh looks worried! He must be an English high-up or stuff!" "Wait a minute... they are not going to kill Mad Max, do they??) - because the only connection you have is with the actors. Characters are defined by what they do, not by speeches about the wife at home expecting their first baby. The movie can be defined as a single, uninterrupted sequence that never lets go: there is simply no time for sad sing-alongs.

    Zimmer's score is fantastic. Let's say that it doesn't "accompany" the movie, but it is an integral part of the soundscape.

    Watch it on the biggest screen around. The air battles alone had the whole audience banking...

    My vote: 9 out of 10

    quote:

    ORIGINAL: warspite1
    By the way this way of telling the story makes it look like the RAF patrol shoots down half the Luftwaffe, but one sees some of the scenes more than once from different viewpoints. This jumbled timeline idea actually works well.


    It is, however, also true that Tom Hardy's Spitfire carries more ammo than all that was produced for the whole RAF during the war
    warspite1

    DUNKIRK SPOILER ALERT

    Yes, the (err...optimistic) ammo situation was not lost on me! I suspect that the reason he ran out of fuel was that he filled one of his fuel reservoirs with .303 rounds instead of aviation fuel .


    _____________________________

    England expects that every man will do his duty. Horatio Nelson October 1805



    (in reply to RFalvo69)
    Post #: 50
    RE: New Dunkirk Trailer - 7/22/2017 6:37:38 PM   
    Curtis Lemay


    Posts: 12969
    Joined: 9/17/2004
    From: Houston, TX
    Status: offline     		Hmm. I'm having some trouble with whether the individual plot sequences were based on historical events or just the whims of screenwriters. One at the end in particular bothered me:

    Thomas Hardy's spitfire, out of gas and gliding - maybe 200 feet off the ground, shoots down a diving stuka before it can release its bombs.

    _____________________________

    My TOAW web site:

    Bob Cross's TOAW Site

    (in reply to warspite1)
    Post #: 51
    RE: New Dunkirk Trailer - 7/22/2017 6:38:07 PM   
    Zorch

     

    Posts: 7087
    Joined: 3/7/2010
    Status: offline     		Sounds worth seeing.
    What will Nolan do for an encore? D-Day from the British beaches?

    But wait - 'wars are not won by evacuations'. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B8KGhwtYcgU

    (in reply to warspite1)
    Post #: 52
    RE: New Dunkirk Trailer - 7/22/2017 6:54:18 PM   
    RFalvo69


    Posts: 1380
    Joined: 7/11/2013
    From: Lamezia Terme (Italy)
    Status: offline
    quote:

    ORIGINAL: warspite1

    DUNKIRK SPOILER ALERT

















    Yes, the (err...optimistic) ammo situation was not lost on me! I suspect that the reason he ran out of fuel was that he filled one of his fuel reservoirs with .303 rounds instead of aviation fuel .


    The thing that I didn't understood, however, is why Tom Hardy didn't ditch his Spitfire in the water after that last pass. The scene made clear that there were still many boats near the beach, saving soldiers: he could slowly bank and glide down.

    It seemed, to me, an arbitrary excuse to show Tom Hardy's "sacrifice" (even if only becoming a POW) when there was no need for him to make this choice.


    _____________________________

    "Yes darling, I served in the Navy for eight years. I was a cook..."
    "Oh dad... so you were a God-damned cook?"

    (My 10 years old daughter after watching "The Hunt for Red October")

    (in reply to warspite1)
    Post #: 53
    RE: New Dunkirk Trailer - 7/22/2017 7:06:30 PM   
    warspite1


    Posts: 41353
    Joined: 2/2/2008
    From: England
    Status: offline
    quote:

    ORIGINAL: RFalvo69


    quote:

    ORIGINAL: warspite1

    DUNKIRK SPOILER ALERT

















    Yes, the (err...optimistic) ammo situation was not lost on me! I suspect that the reason he ran out of fuel was that he filled one of his fuel reservoirs with .303 rounds instead of aviation fuel .


    The thing that I didn't understood, however, is why Tom Hardy didn't ditch his Spitfire in the water after that last pass. The scene made clear that there were still many boats near the beach, saving soldiers: he could slowly bank and glide down.

    It seemed, to me, an arbitrary excuse to show Tom Hardy's "sacrifice" (even if only becoming a POW) when there was no need for him to make this choice.

    warspite1

    From a realistic and self preservation perspective - what is safer - to land on water or, out of fuel on a clear sandy beach? No idea but I don't suppose either choice is exactly guaranteed to leave one alive

    From a film and dramatic perspective, they already had one ditching - did they need another? Also it gave the opportunity to show a British serviceman getting taken prisoner (a fate of many of course - and not something seen to that point) and also we had the symbolic burning of the Spitfire during the speech.

    In short then, I don't know but guess it was likely to be a combination of those factors perhaps.

    < Message edited by warspite1 -- 7/22/2017 7:26:57 PM >

    _____________________________

    England expects that every man will do his duty. Horatio Nelson October 1805



    (in reply to RFalvo69)
    Post #: 54
    RE: New Dunkirk Trailer - 7/22/2017 10:09:56 PM   
    Chickenboy


    Posts: 24520
    Joined: 6/29/2002
    From: San Antonio, TX
    Status: offline     		Saw the movie last night and enjoyed it. It wasn't what I was expecting and, really, wasn't what I was hoping for. While the multiple vignettes were well done and well acted, they lacked the necessary scale to convey the weight of numbers that was Dunkirk. The evacuation wasn't about a few dramatic rescues and individual heroism. It was that en masse. Leaving out the mind-boggling scale of the evacuation or glossing over its import belied the nature of the event in my opinion.

    A good movie. Well done. But it assumed a point of view that will deny it 'greatness' in my opinion.

    _____________________________


    (in reply to warspite1)
    Post #: 55
    RE: New Dunkirk Trailer - 7/23/2017 3:53:49 AM   
    balto

     

    Posts: 1123
    Joined: 3/4/2006
    From: Maryland
    Status: offline     		I give it 3 out of 10 stars. Wait for it to come on TV or rental. I thought the few and far between combat scenes were also not good. The first 4 minutes I thought were great with the "small arms fire" but that was it. I do not understand the reviews above. I am not saying anyone is incorrect, but man, I thought this was mediocre at best. Popcorn and Fajitas were great though.

    (in reply to Chickenboy)
    Post #: 56
    RE: New Dunkirk Trailer - 7/23/2017 6:00:54 PM   
    warspite1


    Posts: 41353
    Joined: 2/2/2008
    From: England
    Status: offline     		Some colour pictures from the Dunkirk episode

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4717534/The-miracle-Dunkirk-colour.html

    _____________________________

    England expects that every man will do his duty. Horatio Nelson October 1805



    (in reply to balto)
    Post #: 57
    RE: New Dunkirk Trailer - 7/23/2017 6:58:04 PM   
    Canoerebel


    Posts: 21100
    Joined: 12/14/2002
    From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
    Status: offline     		+1 to Chickenboy's comments. I was disappointed. I'd give it a 5 out of 10 or maybe 4 out of 10.

    (in reply to warspite1)
    Post #: 58
    RE: New Dunkirk Trailer - 7/23/2017 9:15:34 PM   
    Challerain

     

    Posts: 270
    Joined: 6/16/2001
    From: Mansfield, Texas
    Status: offline     		I really enjoyed it. Incredible movie.

    (in reply to Canoerebel)
    Post #: 59
    RE: New Dunkirk Trailer - 7/23/2017 9:26:57 PM   
    pkpowers

     

    Posts: 412
    Joined: 12/12/2000
    From: midland,TX
    Status: offline     		Really enjoyed it ; Give it 8 out 0f 10 ; All aircraft and equipment was historically accurate ; was intense from start to finish ; Saw it in an IMAX cinema , it was very loud!!! I would call it a horror movie crossed with a loud rock concert

    (in reply to Challerain)
    Post #: 60
    Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
    All Forums >> [General] >> General Discussion >> RE: New Dunkirk Trailer Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
    Jump to:





    New Messages No New Messages
    Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
    Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
     Post New Thread
     Reply to Message
     Post New Poll
     Submit Vote
     Delete My Own Post
     Delete My Own Thread
     Rate Posts


    Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

    1.063