RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> After Action Report >> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Page: << < prev 90 91 [92] 93 94 next > >>

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/16/2017 6:50:13 PM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 22. Mar/Apr 1943. Allied #1. Arabian Sea. Potential Naval Combat.

The RN will not attempt to initiate, but the IJN can. If they do try, one Japanese fighter unit is in position to react.

Instructions?

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by rkr1958 -- 9/16/2017 6:57:42 PM >

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 2731

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/16/2017 6:51:20 PM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 22. Mar/Apr 1943. Allied #1. West Med. Potential Sub Combat.

The RN will attempt to initiate a sub combat in the Western Med. Shown are the planes that can react.

Instructions?

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 2732

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/16/2017 6:52:24 PM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 22. Mar/Apr 1943. Allied #1. East Med. No Combat.

The RN will not attempt to initiate combat in the Eastern Med. The axis can't.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 2733

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/16/2017 6:53:58 PM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 22. Mar/Apr 1943. Allied #1. The Solomons. Potential Naval Combat.

The USN/RN will not attempt to initiate combat in the Solomons; however the Japanese can if they wish. Shown are the planes that can react if an attempt is made.

Instructions?

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by rkr1958 -- 9/16/2017 6:58:10 PM >

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 2734

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/16/2017 6:55:10 PM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 22. Mar/Apr 1943. Allied #1. Coral Sea. Potential Naval Combat.

The USN/RN will not attempt to initiate combat the Coral Sea; however the Japanese can if they wish. No planes are in position to react if an attempt is made.

Instructions?

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 2735

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/16/2017 10:10:23 PM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

quote:

A USN Carrier Task force originating from Peal and headed to the Coral Sea passes though the Solomons Sea, which contains an IJN I-boat flotilla on the prowl for allied convoys and supply ships. Without consulting his higher naval command the local commander of the Japanese flotilla decides not to order his I-boats to search from this task force. This local commander hopes that his actions do not bring shame to himself; otherwise he'll be obliged to open his sub hatch and do the honorable thing.

In other words, I made the decision for the Japanese sub not to attempt to intercept. I do hope that was ok.

The commander gets to keep is head. I would have done the same.

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 2736

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/16/2017 10:12:28 PM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

quote:

Turn 22. Mar/Apr 1943. Allied #1. South China Sea. Potential Sub Combat.

The RN sub group will attempt to initiate a sub combat in the South China Sea. One IJN NAV unit is in position to react.

Instructions?

React NAV to the 0-box.

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 2737

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/16/2017 10:14:50 PM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

quote:

Turn 22. Mar/Apr 1943. Allied #1. Arabian Sea. Potential Naval Combat.

The RN will not attempt to initiate, but the IJN can. If they do try, one Japanese fighter unit is in position to react.

Instructions?

React the Zero to the highest box it can reach. Then sink the CP, please.

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 2738

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/16/2017 10:20:00 PM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

quote:

Turn 22. Mar/Apr 1943. Allied #1. West Med. Potential Sub Combat.

The RN will attempt to initiate a sub combat in the Western Med. Shown are the planes that can react.

Instructions?

The Sparviero will react to the 2-box (or as high as it can reach).
The 6pt Macchi (in Libya) will react to the 0-box. Hurt the subs if there is enough surprise to get them out of the area, otherwise avoid combat.

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 2739

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/16/2017 10:21:12 PM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

quote:

Turn 22. Mar/Apr 1943. Allied #1. The Solomons. Potential Naval Combat.

The USN/RN will not attempt to initiate combat in the Solomons; however the Japanese can if they wish. Shown are the planes that can react if an attempt is made.

Instructions?

I will hold back for now.

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 2740

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/16/2017 10:22:01 PM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

quote:

Turn 22. Mar/Apr 1943. Allied #1. Coral Sea. Potential Naval Combat.

The USN/RN will not attempt to initiate combat the Coral Sea; however the Japanese can if they wish. No planes are in position to react if an attempt is made.

Instructions?

I will not search at this time.

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 2741

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/17/2017 4:12:50 PM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 22. Mar/Apr 1940. Allied #1. RN, South China Sea. Round 1.

The RN sub group rolls well, however, the IJN roll just as well.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 2742

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/17/2017 4:14:34 PM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 22. Mar/Apr 1940. Allied #1. RN, West Med. Round 1.

Another very good roll by the RN, but again one that is matched by their opponent, which is the Italians in this case.

Round 2.

Both sides stay for a second round. However, with search rolls of 10 (allies) and 3 (axis), combat ends.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 2743

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/17/2017 4:15:24 PM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 22. Mar/Apr 1940. Allied #1. IJN, The Arabian Sea. Round 1.

Both search rolls fail ... no contact.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 2744

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/17/2017 4:30:37 PM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 22. Mar/Apr 1943. Allied #1. US Air Reorg.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 2745

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/19/2017 4:22:48 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

MA43 i3 Axis Actions

Attachment (1)

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 2746

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/19/2017 4:28:02 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

MA43 i3 Possible Axis Naval Search Options shown.
Polynesia rolls 5/1 -> nc
Tasman Sea rolls 9/9 -> nc
The Solomons, no search initiated
SE Indian Ocean rolls 8/8 -> nc
Cape Naturliste (see following post)
Bay of Bengal, no searches initiated
Arabian Sea (see following post)
North Atlantic (see following post)
East Coast rolls of 7/6 -> nc
W. Med, no searches initiated
E. Med rolls of 9/10 -> nc
BoB (see following post)

Attachment (1)

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 2747

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/19/2017 4:29:02 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

Cape Naturaliste rolls of 1/4 resulted in Axis finding and sinking the CP.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 2748

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/19/2017 4:30:19 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

Arabian Sea rolls of 4/3 resulted in both sides finding. I made it a Naval air. CA was damaged.
Second round rolls (assumed you would stay) of 9/7 resulted in no further contact.

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by ashkpa -- 9/19/2017 4:32:06 AM >

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 2749

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/19/2017 4:35:25 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

In the North Atlantic rolls of 9/3 resulted in you finding with 6 surprise points. I made the surprise use decision for you. You could guarantee the sub was out of the zone and only take 1 aborted. Potentially sinking the sub (which you did). It worked out well for you with the aborted ship making it's saving throw and staying in the sub free area.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 2750

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/19/2017 4:36:33 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

Last BoB where rolls of 7/1 results in you finding me with 6 surprise points. Options here are a little closer, so I'll let you decide.
Note, storms means it cannot be a naval air combat.

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by ashkpa -- 9/19/2017 4:37:22 AM >

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 2751

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/19/2017 12:32:27 PM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ashkpa

Last BoB where rolls of 7/1 results in you finding me with 6 surprise points. Options here are a little closer, so I'll let you decide.
Note, storms means it cannot be a naval air combat.

With no allied battleships present and unable to use my carrier air I think the better part of valor is to avoid combat. So, use 4 of the 6 SP's to avoid combat please.

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 2752

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/19/2017 9:07:02 PM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

Avoided.
Only 1 ground strike, ART on Lisbon. Very successful.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 2753

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/19/2017 9:08:33 PM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

Only 1 land attack, on the Partisan in China. It was automatic (for those interested the combat roll was 15)

Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 2754

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/19/2017 9:09:16 PM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

MA43 i5 weather roll of 3.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 2755

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/21/2017 11:15:46 PM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 22. Mar/Apr 1943. Allied #5. Actions. Weather Map.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 2756

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/21/2017 11:47:25 PM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 22. Mar/Apr 1943. Allied #5. RN Naval Moves (Combine Action).

(1) 2 CP's from Cape Town, South Africa to Southeastern Indian Ocean.

(2) 1 CP from Adelaide, Australia to Cape Naturaliste.

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 2757

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/21/2017 11:48:37 PM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 22. Mar/Apr 1943. Allied #5. RN. US East Cast. No Combat.

RN chooses not to attempt to initiate and the axis cannot try.