Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A)

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A) Page: <<   < prev  91 92 [93] 94 95   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A) - 11/9/2017 2:20:29 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
NF: Myrt isn't bad at all, and seriously over performs from what you would think. Irving-s and -sa can see till they arrrive ok, as long as you make lots and fill out all possible NF squadrons.

Dinah I think is junk. I like Nicks much better early, and still untested for me the Peggy. Randy comes late, their radar never activates till very late. Army NF aren't great because of no radar.

Frances-s is probably the best realistic NF to get....but you really need max Army and Navy NF. Quantity overcomes their poor quality.

--

Sam-J is a bomber killer. Those up mounted cannons are great against B29, but you will be missing the A7M2 on your carriers all of the 2nd half of 44 till the end. But if you lose your KB prior, then no worries just go George! Think if the fuel you will save.

--






(in reply to Mike Solli)
Post #: 2761
RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A) - 11/9/2017 5:51:20 PM   
Mike Solli


Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline
Good idea Michael. Two problems though, there is a US bombardment fleet sitting in Unmak, 3 BB, 1 CA, 3 DD. Second, my bombardment fleet is 1.5 days out of resupply. Then 3 days back to the AO. I will keep it in mind. I might do the sweep to cut down on the enemy fighters. Might scare off his BBs. If not, I might get a shot at them with my carrier DB/TB. About 5 days until Akagi & Kaga reinforce.

Lowpe, you're always full of good news. Still no idea what to do with the NF....

I'm working the turn. In Burma, Akyab is my focus. 139 IJA 2E bombers with 80 escorting fighters preceded by 80 sweeping Tojos. Should be fun.

Much, much more to come.

_____________________________


Created by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 2762
RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A) - 11/9/2017 7:13:29 PM   
ny59giants


Posts: 9869
Joined: 1/10/2005
Status: offline
How much moonlight is there? Maybe a SC TF of just DDs.

(in reply to Mike Solli)
Post #: 2763
RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A) - 11/9/2017 7:40:39 PM   
Mike Solli


Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline
Moonlight is 96%. That's bad for Japanese, right? I've forgotten all about moonlight.

_____________________________


Created by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to ny59giants)
Post #: 2764
RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A) - 11/9/2017 8:56:30 PM   
ny59giants


Posts: 9869
Joined: 1/10/2005
Status: offline
Yes, Japan wants low moonlight. The reason for just DD is you stated he has only 3 DDs in that TF. I would try to go with 6 to 8 DDs, if possible.

(in reply to Mike Solli)
Post #: 2765
RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A) - 11/9/2017 9:03:43 PM   
MakeeLearn


Posts: 4278
Joined: 9/11/2016
Status: offline


36 DD are great in moonlight or no moon... or even at noon.

(in reply to ny59giants)
Post #: 2766
RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A) - 11/9/2017 10:04:44 PM   
Insano

 

Posts: 228
Joined: 7/23/2009
From: Joplin, Missouri
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MakeeLearn



36 DD are great in moonlight or no moon... or even at noon.


You’re not talking about destroyers anymore are you?

(in reply to MakeeLearn)
Post #: 2767
RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A) - 11/9/2017 10:35:48 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
Hey, you have Grace, George and Frank....just need how to figure out Sam.

(in reply to Insano)
Post #: 2768
RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A) - 11/9/2017 11:50:28 PM   
Zorch

 

Posts: 7087
Joined: 3/7/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

Hey, you have Grace, George and Frank....just need how to figure out Sam.

Is Sam short for Samantha?
Why didn't the allies name a plane Ingrid (Bergman) or Greta (Garbo)?

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 2769
RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A) - 11/10/2017 12:04:08 AM   
PaxMondo


Posts: 9750
Joined: 6/6/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

NF: Quantity overcomes their poor quality.


+1



_____________________________

Pax

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 2770
RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A) - 11/10/2017 12:11:37 AM   
PaxMondo


Posts: 9750
Joined: 6/6/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

NF: Myrt isn't bad at all, and seriously over performs from what you would think.


+1

Its a 1E, fast, decent armaments. This is where the quantity can really help. Its cheap to build so easier to keep the air groups full ...


_____________________________

Pax

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 2771
RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A) - 11/10/2017 12:37:53 PM   
BrucePowers


Posts: 12094
Joined: 7/3/2004
Status: offline
Mike I retired from Boeing in July of 2015 after spending four years in the Pacific Northwest. I am home in Florida and I love retirement. I highly recommend it.

(in reply to Mike Solli)
Post #: 2772
RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A) - 11/11/2017 9:09:49 PM   
Mike Solli


Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline
I value your recommendation, Bruce. A few more years and I'll be there with you.

Been reviewing things and I just realized that monsoon started a couple of days ago in Burma. I guess we'll see how the bombing attack goes and then I'll wind down for the floods.

Still waiting for Ted to finish the turn. As I type, he's down south at the Auburn-Georgia game. Pretty good game so far.

_____________________________


Created by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to BrucePowers)
Post #: 2773
RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A) - 11/12/2017 12:09:58 AM   
Bif1961


Posts: 2014
Joined: 6/26/2008
From: Phenix City, Alabama
Status: offline
40-17 Auburn, that means he is in my neck of the of the woods, I live 25 miles from Auburn.

(in reply to Mike Solli)
Post #: 2774
RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A) - 11/12/2017 12:16:54 AM   
Mike Solli


Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline
You could probably almost hear the roar of the crowd after that game. Nothing like mixing up the rankings for the national championship.

_____________________________


Created by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to Bif1961)
Post #: 2775
RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A) - 11/12/2017 7:29:20 PM   
rustysi


Posts: 7472
Joined: 2/21/2012
From: LI, NY
Status: offline
quote:

and I love retirement. I highly recommend it.


Not quite two months for me, but yes, I highly recommend it.

_____________________________

It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once. Hume

In every party there is one member who by his all-too-devout pronouncement of the party principles provokes the others to apostasy. Nietzsche

Cave ab homine unius libri. Ltn Prvb

(in reply to Mike Solli)
Post #: 2776
RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A) - 11/12/2017 7:35:45 PM   
rustysi


Posts: 7472
Joined: 2/21/2012
From: LI, NY
Status: offline
quote:

Been reviewing things and I just realized that monsoon started a couple of days ago in Burma. I guess we'll see how the bombing attack goes and then I'll wind down for the floods.


And now back to our regularly scheduled program... Yes, monsoon May 15th to Nov(?) 15th. While it may impact air ops and supply is restricted as noted in the base 'supply pull', things may still proceed in a pretty normal fashion in my experience. So don't wind down too much, unless you choose to for some other reason .

_____________________________

It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once. Hume

In every party there is one member who by his all-too-devout pronouncement of the party principles provokes the others to apostasy. Nietzsche

Cave ab homine unius libri. Ltn Prvb

(in reply to rustysi)
Post #: 2777
RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A) - 11/13/2017 12:22:25 PM   
Mike Solli


Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline
Congrats on the retirement Rusty. Definitely looking forward to it. And thanks for the info on monsoons. For some reason, that never sticks with me.

_____________________________


Created by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to rustysi)
Post #: 2778
RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A) - 11/13/2017 12:29:37 PM   
Mike Solli


Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline
17 May 43

Sub War

Not a lot of stuff, but it was exciting! First, the I-36 was patrolling to the east of the Aleutians, and caught the Mississippi limping back to the States with 1 DD for escort. She put another torpedo into that tough old bird! I had to hunt through my notes to find the details, but she was the BB that ate 3 sub torps during a bombardment mission to Adak on 30 Apr 43. In retaliation, the sub took a DC. Her damage is currently at 20-27(15)-5(1)-0. Normally, I would send her back for repairs, but the Miss is still afloat and she and another sub in the area are hoping to get another attack to put her down for good.

About 8 hexes east of Japan, the Akagi and Kaga, with a 2 DD escort are headed to the Aleutians. They ran over the Triton, who fired 6 torpedoes at Akagi, but fortunately missed. The DDs hit Triton with a DC, hopefully sending her home. I had made a mistake of not setting their 36 Judy dive bombers to ASW duty (they’re even trained for it!). I’ve rectified that and the TF is continuing on with its mission. Ted is a morning riser like me. He sent me an email. He definitely has a way with words: I ran the replay this morning. About choked on my coffee when I saw it. Six torpedoes too…. That would have left a mark.

5 Fleet

My Sally sentai bombed the American visitors at Adak causing a bit of disruption. Every bit helps! Also, I did my daily bombardment of them. Hopefully, it’s causing their supply to evaporate. When the separate infantry brigades were dropped off, supply had to have been dropped off as well because his AV has been increasing slowly despite my bombing and bombardment.

My bombardment TF is one day out of Etorofu, where it will resupply (I hope) and come back for another visit.

Ted did send 11 SBDs after some of my ships at Adak. Sixteen Oscar IIbs shot them all down! Very nice! Turns out the dive bombers were going after the TF with the artillery and mortar regiment reinforcements. I hope they complete their offload tomorrow and get the heck out of Dodge.

Adak currently has just under 15k supply with another 2700 on the reinforcement TF. They’re working on the forts, which are currently up to 5.08. No infrastructure damage. Two replenishment TFs totaling 56k fuel in support. Akagi and Kaga (72 VF, 36 VB, 45 TB) are 4-5 days out. KB (105 VF, 36 VB, 35 VT) is 6 hexes due south of Adak. Finally, the 71 Division and a medium (15 cm howitzers) artillery regiment is 1.5 days west of Adak along with 8900 additional supply. I also have the 19 Division with another 10k supply about 6 days out as well.

4 Fleet

Working on forts.

SE Fleet

The huge Allied Air Force is rearing its ugly head down here (which is better than anywhere else, I suppose). About 100 (I didn’t even try to count) 2E sorties went after Madang. There’s nothing there worth bombing, actually. He has a unit that has been marching overland and has made it there. Even if it’s got high disruption, it’ll still take the place. All I have there is a construction battalion and an AS unit.

Some Avengers out of Lae sank a couple of xAKLs on a supply run to Talasea. I don’t know why I had bothered sending them. At least the Avengers are here and not in the Aleutians.

His 4E bombers focused primarily on Rabaul, with small visits to Shortland and Lunga as well. After the initial attack at Rabaul of 48 bombers, each squadron after that came in individually about 3 squadrons of 6 each. The defenders were a few Zeros, and partial daitais of Oscars (IIb) and Tojos, totaling 49 aircraft. When it was all said and done, 3 of the beasts were shot down (with a few more lost most likely as op losses) to no fighters lost and about half a dozen planes destroyed on the ground. Damage to Rabaul is 0-29-2, not bad at all.

He also hit Hollandia, where I have some recon, naval search and a sentai of Helens (night bombing Merauke), all defended by a chutai of A6M5 Zeros. He sent two groups of PB4Y-1s, 6 then 7. They did get through to the airfield, but the Zeros shot down 3 of them! Damage to Hollandia is currently 0-38-26.

Ted still has his 3 CV TF, the invasion fleet and an ASW TF sitting in Munda’s hex. KB (126 VF, 54 VB, 72 VT) is still hanging around to the NE, undetected. I have split off the 4 fast BBs, Chikuma and 4 DDs, just in case he moves his carriers out. Ideally, he would begin to load the invasion troops (2 divisions, a combat engineer regiment and a HQ) and move his carriers out. I would love to tear into his APAs, partially (or fully!) loaded with my BBs. I doubt that happens though. The other question I have is, what is the garrison going to be? A full division? I have an airborne regiment sitting at Rabaul. If he pulls everything out, I’ll drop some of them in to take it back. Just for fun, of course…

SRA

Nothing going on here. I do have 2 bombardment TFs headed for Darwin, for purely a social visit. I’m moving some recon to check it out to make sure there are no unwanted surprises. The airfield there is at level 7. I hope to torch some brand new planes Ted may be stockpiling there.

I am trying to slowly build up my defenses there. If Ted knew how sparse the defenses really were, he’d be all over that place.

Burma

The only thing I have going on here is attrition of the RAF. It was wildly successful today! I started it off with a full 42 Tojo sweep of Akyab. They met 24 Hurricane IIcs and 23 P-40Ks and mauled them. I had the height advantage, coming in at 20k feet. For a loss of 4 Tojos (and their pilots), I shot down 7 Hurricanes and 14 P-40s. That sentai also gained 3 new elite pilots! Their commander, LGEN Anma, is a real hotshot with 13 kills, 90 experience and 80 air.

The second Tojo sentai sweep ran into 1 Hurricane which fled.

Only 66 of the 130 bombers flew today, unfortunately, and that was broken up into 3 separate attacks. They did light damage to the airfield, which is at 12% damage. I do see only 33 fighters now, with a few each at Akyab and Cox’s Bazaar and 27 at Chittagong.

China

Not much here, other than bombing Chungking and maneuvering for the next attacks. Some Oscars sweeping Chungking did shoot down 2x P-66 fighters.

Other Stuff

Not much to report here. I am getting back into my normal routine, checking the production front and making tweaks as necessary.


_____________________________


Created by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to Mike Solli)
Post #: 2779
RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A) - 11/13/2017 9:42:58 PM   
rustysi


Posts: 7472
Joined: 2/21/2012
From: LI, NY
Status: offline
quote:

I am trying to slowly build up my defenses there. If Ted knew how sparse the defenses really were, he’d be all over that place.


Impossible for Japan to be strong everywhere.

quote:

For a loss of 4 Tojos (and their pilots), I shot down 7 Hurricanes and 14 P-40s.


Nice shootin' Tex.

_____________________________

It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once. Hume

In every party there is one member who by his all-too-devout pronouncement of the party principles provokes the others to apostasy. Nietzsche

Cave ab homine unius libri. Ltn Prvb

(in reply to Mike Solli)
Post #: 2780
RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A) - 11/14/2017 10:08:14 AM   
GetAssista

 

Posts: 2732
Joined: 9/19/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Mike Solli
Adak currently has just under 15k supply with another 2700 on the reinforcement TF. They’re working on the forts, which are currently up to 5.08. No infrastructure damage...

Do you really want to try push forts to 6 when siege is underway? Those fort levels are already quite expensive in supply, and any engineering -1 during the asssault will make those next level investments void

(in reply to Mike Solli)
Post #: 2781
RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A) - 11/14/2017 4:32:07 PM   
Lokasenna


Posts: 9297
Joined: 3/3/2012
From: Iowan in MD/DC
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: GetAssista

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mike Solli
Adak currently has just under 15k supply with another 2700 on the reinforcement TF. They’re working on the forts, which are currently up to 5.08. No infrastructure damage...

Do you really want to try push forts to 6 when siege is underway? Those fort levels are already quite expensive in supply, and any engineering -1 during the asssault will make those next level investments void


Not entirely. Progress towards the next level of forts is not completely lost when forts are reduced in an attack, or so I've....heard. Somewhere, sometime. Example: 5 + 8%, with forts reduced to 4, might become 4 + 30% on the next day. As opposed to 5 + 0% would be 4 + 0%.

If somebody knows the source of that info, that'd be great .

(in reply to GetAssista)
Post #: 2782
RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A) - 11/14/2017 8:06:42 PM   
Chickenboy


Posts: 24520
Joined: 6/29/2002
From: San Antonio, TX
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lokasenna


quote:

ORIGINAL: GetAssista

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mike Solli
Adak currently has just under 15k supply with another 2700 on the reinforcement TF. They’re working on the forts, which are currently up to 5.08. No infrastructure damage...

Do you really want to try push forts to 6 when siege is underway? Those fort levels are already quite expensive in supply, and any engineering -1 during the asssault will make those next level investments void


Not entirely. Progress towards the next level of forts is not completely lost when forts are reduced in an attack, or so I've....heard. Somewhere, sometime. Example: 5 + 8%, with forts reduced to 4, might become 4 + 30% on the next day. As opposed to 5 + 0% would be 4 + 0%.

If somebody knows the source of that info, that'd be great .


You're right about the partial progress being saved even after fort reduction. I don't have the foggiest notion of where that codified info is, but I've seen it multiple times in cities under siege.

_____________________________


(in reply to Lokasenna)
Post #: 2783
RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A) - 11/14/2017 8:13:22 PM   
Mike Solli


Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline
Yep, I've seen it too. I'll burn the supply to get those forts back up to level 6 if possible. Right now I'm the one doing the siege. Those American troops are simply a self contained POW camp. He has nothing there to support them. Once he's out of supply, a few nice bombardments and bombings, and the attack should do him in.

_____________________________


Created by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to Chickenboy)
Post #: 2784
RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A) - 11/14/2017 8:15:02 PM   
Mike Solli


Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline
18 May 43

Sub War

There was no combat involving subs on either side. I can still see the Mississippi and hope to catch her tomorrow. An Allied supply TF is heading to the Aleutians (just a couple hexes north of the Mississippi) and I put a sub in front of it to try and whittle it down a bit.

Ted mentioned in an email that he doesn’t expect the Mississippi to survive. He said there are plenty more where she came from (which is true, unfortunately).

5 Fleet

The 90 mm mortar regiment and a 15cm artillery regiment both fully landed at Adak, along with the supply, bringing the total supply to 17.3k.

The daily bombing & bombardment of the US troops happened without incident, but the Allied AV is still slowly increasing. It increased from 516 to 518 today. The Japanese AV is at 360. The next Japanese reinforcement TF will arrive tomorrow, composed of 71 division and another 15 cm artillery regiment.

The Japanese BB bombardment fleet didn’t quite make it to Etorofu today to replenish. *Sigh*

The Akagi and Kaga escaped from the US sub yesterday and are still headed toward the Aleutians, now undetected again.

Finally the US BB TF disappeared. It had been sitting at Unmak for a few days but is gone now. I wonder if he was worried about my carriers taking them out.

4 Fleet

Nothing to report.

SE Fleet

Ted’s CV and amph fleets are still sitting at Munda. My carriers are to the NE still hanging out (and still undetected).

Allied bombers pummeled Rabaul, Shortland Islands and Madang losing 10x 2E and 1x 4E bombers to 2x Japanese fighters + about 5 op losses and another 19 or so planes destroyed on the ground. That’s not good. I have moved some non-essential planes out of Rabaul leaving primarily fighters there. There may come a time when they, too, will have to leave. I still have 100+ fighters at Gasmata rested and waiting.

That Allied unit that has been moving to Madang finally attacked. It was the 32 Division! They obviously succeeded. Also, a slice of the 503 Parachute Regiment landed at and took Hansa Bay, the dot hex to the NW of Madang.

Damage to Rabaul is 0-60-56. I hope he targets some other worthless base and allows Rabaul to recover.

SRA

Nothing to report.

Burma

I swept Akyab again. This time the results weren’t as good as yesterday. I believe the Allied fighters were low (6k feet?) so many of my sweeping Tojos (20k feet) didn’t go after them. There were 19 Allied fighters but only 2x P40Ks were destroyed. Many were damaged though.

When the bombers arrived, escorted by Oscars, only 2 Hurricanes and 1 P-40K were still around. They shot down the P-40 but the Hurricanes got through to the bombers and shot down 2 Helens. The bombers did moderate damage to the Akyab’s airfield. Tomorrow I am going to sweep and bomb Cox’s Bazaar. I see no fighters at Akyab, a handful at Cox’s Bazaar and about 3 dozen at Chittagong. Hoping for a nice sweep (Tojos and Zeros this time) tomorrow.

Not much else going on here, with the monsoon in force. I’m pulling beat up units out of the line to rebuild and am moving regiments together to combine into divisions (30 and 31 Divisions). The 1 and 2 Tank Divisions are being pulled into reserve for after the monsoon is over. I believe one has already upgraded its tanks but I’ll upgrade the other division’s tanks as soon as possible.

China

The 3 Tank Division caught up with the Chinese Corps it beat up a couple of days ago. It’s 1 hex east of Chengtu. It’ll push that Corps into Chengtu and follow tomorrow. An army (several infantry divisions and a pile of artillery) is currently on the road 55 miles to the SE of Chengtu and is heading there to team up with the Tank Division to take that base. Chengtu currently has 3 units there (plus the beat up corps that 3 Tank Division will push there tomorrow).

Other Stuff

Reinforcement: TK Takekun Maru – Type 1-TM (8150 capacity)

The A6M5c R&D advanced to 12/43 (estimated completion is 7/43). Finally armor for an IJN fighter!

The Frank R&D finished repairing its 4th factory (of 8). The latest the Ki-84a will become operational is 9/43, but I believe it will be operational in 8/43. (The b model will be available in 12/43 and the r model will be available in 4/44.)


_____________________________


Created by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to Mike Solli)
Post #: 2785
RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A) - 11/15/2017 1:39:05 AM   
ny59giants


Posts: 9869
Joined: 1/10/2005
Status: offline
What is the SL at Adak? How much Naval Support do you have there to speed up unloading?

Burma: any troops at Ramree Island?

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 2786
RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A) - 11/15/2017 2:05:13 AM   
Mike Solli


Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline
SL? What's that? 120 naval support at Adak and I do have troops at Ramree Island.

_____________________________


Created by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to ny59giants)
Post #: 2787
RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A) - 11/15/2017 7:32:49 AM   
ny59giants


Posts: 9869
Joined: 1/10/2005
Status: offline
SL = Stacking Limits

(in reply to Mike Solli)
Post #: 2788
RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A) - 11/15/2017 9:14:24 AM   
Mike Solli


Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline
Of course. It's unlimited. We're playing a straight stock game.

Edit: The troops at Ramree are a paratroop regiment who is marching out and a mixed brigade who's hanging out there for the time being.

< Message edited by Mike Solli -- 11/15/2017 9:15:24 AM >


_____________________________


Created by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to ny59giants)
Post #: 2789
RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A) - 11/15/2017 9:23:31 AM   
ny59giants


Posts: 9869
Joined: 1/10/2005
Status: offline
OK, I had to check on SL as I had three divisions at Adak and that was overstacking. So, I can expect to see ground "Death Stars" in your future.

Ramree Island: This base in Allied hands can significantly aid the flow of supplies into the Irrawaddy River valley. Just want to make sure you have it adequately garrisoned.

(in reply to Mike Solli)
Post #: 2790
Page:   <<   < prev  91 92 [93] 94 95   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A) Page: <<   < prev  91 92 [93] 94 95   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

3.813