General Mayhem
Posts: 180
Joined: 6/13/2001 From: Country of six thousand lakes and one truth Status: offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Paul Goodman:
It is the Nazi information that seems to be a crock. In particular, I really have a hard time comprehending Kursk. It seems a concensus that the Germans destroyed thousands of Red Army tanks, lost virtually nothing (well, maybe a handfull of PzIII and PzIV), virtually no Tigers or Panthers.
Paul
I agree I think we have had bit one sided
image from Germans about Eastern Front.
Based on German view mostly.
To me it seems early success of Germans on
Eastern Front
hides what they didn't succeed well on.
Infact, even the early success wasn't success
it looks like as it didn't go as well Germans though.
I have say this before and will say this
again, my person views is that I think German army is overly overrated. I also
think both Soviets and German wanted
portray Eastern Front for propaganda
reasons way that they actually helped
each other.
I think Stalin wanted to prove Soviet system could defeat vastly superior force and
that it was big losses were fault of German
brilliance not his errors or weakness of Soviet system.
On the other hand German propaganda propably wanted to prove they fought like superhumans
against impossible odds.
I also suspect that because Stalin, long
time getting reliable information from Russian on Eastern Front battles have been difficult, thus the image of Eastern front is propably based mostly German version.
_____________________________
-----------------------------
Sex, rags and and rock'n roll!
------------------------------
|