Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Mar 24, 1942

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Mar 24, 1942 Page: <<   < prev  13 14 [15] 16 17   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Mar 24, 1942 - 8/30/2018 11:15:32 PM   
Anachro


Posts: 2506
Joined: 11/23/2015
From: The Coastal Elite
Status: offline
Sigint continues to show the Imperial Guard division targeting Vizagapatnum. Let's hope he lands significant forces there. Horn Island in Australia is also a target; might try to prevent that.

quote:

SIG INT REPORT FOR Mar 24, 42

12310 men are based at Chiba (114,61).
63rd Inf Group Brigade is located at Wakayama(109,60).
9th Field Construction Battalion is located at Naga(81,81).
Funauke Fortress is located at Ishigaki(90,66).
Radio transmissions detected at Adak Island (162,52).
Radio transmissions detected at Oita (104,59).
20th JNAF AF Unit is located at Hiroshima/Kure(106,58).
13th/A Division is located at 76,51.
69th JAAF AF Coy is located at Ichang(83,48).
50th JAAF AF Bn is located at Hengchun(84,67).
Radio transmissions detected at Iki-shima (102,57).
Radio transmissions detected at Liuchow (74,55).
10th Border Defense Fortress is located at 113,42.
41st Air Defense AA Regiment is located at Fusan(103,55).
116th Division is located at 80,54.
14/6th Ind.Infantry Brigade is planning for an attack on Horn Island.
Tachiarai JAAF Base Force is located at Fukuoka(103,57).
2nd JAAF AF Bn is located at Nagoya(111,60).
Kitachishima Fortress is located at Paramushiro-jima(137,47).
Radio transmissions detected at Kavieng (106,122).
7th Mongol Cavalry Division is located at 81,35.
23rd Fld AA Gun Co is located at Niigata(114,57).
13th Army is located at Shanghai(92,55).
4/Imperial Guards Division is planning for an attack on Vizagapatnam.
2/32nd Field AA Battalion is loaded on xAP Kasado Maru at Rangoon (54,53).
12th Army is located at Tsinan(93,44).
12th Ind.AA Gun Co is located at Matsue(107,57).
25th Army is located at Colombo(29,48).
2nd Air Division is located at Kaifeng(89,44).

(in reply to Anachro)
Post #: 421
Mar 25, 1942 - 8/31/2018 1:47:33 PM   
Anachro


Posts: 2506
Joined: 11/23/2015
From: The Coastal Elite
Status: offline
Mar 25, 1942

John retakes Canton Island and appears to have ~12-14 ships there. Little does he know, I have a BC-backed surface force nearby, so hopefully I can get a surface intercept next turn there. In other news, John is trying to harry my transports and prevent reinforcement of Umnak. As can be seen from the picture below, I am set to bombard it next turn with a battleship TF and put more mines in the hex. My carriers have moved back east and will cover a transport force heading for Umnak. They will precede the transports as shown below and hopefully sink some destroyers or cruisers he keeps nearby. We look forward to the next turn! Carriers have been unspotted for two turns and we believe he suspects they are heading either to Pearl Harbor or Seattle for refuel, He has never spotted my replenishment tankers.



As part of his harassment, John had destroyers move all the way up to Coldbay where he sank a DMS of mine.

quote:

Day Time Surface Combat, near Cold Bay at 175,48, Range 3,000 Yards

Japanese Ships
DD Kuroshio
DD Usugumo
DD Shirakumo, Shell hits 2

Allied Ships
DMS Humphreys, Shell hits 5, Torpedo hits 1, and is sunk

Reduced visibility due to Thunderstorms
Maximum visibility in Thunderstorms: 5,000 yards
Range closes to 13,000 yards...
Range closes to 7,000 yards...
Range closes to 3,000 yards...
CONTACT: Allied lookouts spot Japanese task force at 3,000 yards
DD Shirakumo engages DMS Humphreys at 3,000 yards
Range closes to 2,000 yards
DD Shirakumo engages DMS Humphreys at 2,000 yards
DD Usugumo engages DMS Humphreys at 2,000 yards
Range increases to 7,000 yards
DD Shirakumo engages DMS Humphreys at 7,000 yards
Range increases to 8,000 yards
DD Usugumo engages DMS Humphreys at 8,000 yards
DMS Humphreys sunk by DD Usugumo at 8,000 yards
Combat ends with last Allied ship sunk...


< Message edited by Anachro -- 8/31/2018 1:55:28 PM >

(in reply to Anachro)
Post #: 422
Mar 26, 1942 - 8/31/2018 3:21:22 PM   
Anachro


Posts: 2506
Joined: 11/23/2015
From: The Coastal Elite
Status: offline
Mar 26, 1942

My carriers move up, but aren't nearly as effective as naval attack as I would like and only belatedly do I realize my sorties numbers are very low and need replenishing. Nonetheless, my carriers sink a destroyer and a few minelayers (and a large number of SBD dauntlesses are unable to find their targets and return home), but where they do real damage is on CAP defense, where they eat into a number of Japanese vals that seem to be set on naval attack from a nearby land base. Given the low sorties remaining, I will pull my carriers back for CAP defense as my transports move in to Umnak. I suspect John will pull back in the night. All we can hope is he does not manage a surface engagement with my carriers or if so, nothing to bad results. My carriers basically need to pull back to Seattle now.

My naval bombardment causes disruption and land bombardments seem to be destroying enemy troops now.



quote:

Night Naval bombardment of Umnak Island at 169,51

Allied Ships
BB Colorado
CA Exeter
CA New Orleans
DD Le Hardi
DD Le Casque
DD Allen
DMS Southard
DMS Elliot
DMS Wasmuth
DMS Barker

Japanese ground losses:
421 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 17 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 28 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled


quote:

Morning Air attack on TF, near Chuginadak Island at 167,54

Weather in hex: Light rain

Raid detected at 71 NM, estimated altitude 12,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 26 minutes

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 6
D3A1 Val x 16

Allied aircraft
Sea Hurricane Ib x 12
F4F-3A Wildcat x 33

Japanese aircraft losses
A6M2 Zero: 1 destroyed
D3A1 Val: 8 destroyed
D3A1 Val: 1 destroyed by flak

No Allied losses

Allied Ships
CV Lexington


quote:

Morning Air attack on TF, near Seguam Island at 166,52

Weather in hex: Light rain

Raid spotted at 10 NM, estimated altitude 7,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 5 minutes

Allied aircraft
F4F-3 Wildcat x 19
TBD-1 Devastator x 11

No Allied losses

Japanese Ships
DD Mikazuki, Bomb hits 3, and is sunk

Aircraft Attacking:
11 x TBD-1 Devastator bombing from 5000 feet
Naval Attack: 2 x 500 lb SAP Bomb


quote:

Morning Air attack on TF, near Chuginadak Island at 167,54

Weather in hex: Light rain

Raid detected at 21 NM, estimated altitude 14,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 7 minutes

Japanese aircraft
D3A1 Val x 24

Allied aircraft
Sea Hurricane Ib x 11
F4F-3A Wildcat x 31

Japanese aircraft losses
D3A1 Val: 8 destroyed

No Allied losses


quote:

Afternoon Air attack on TF, near Ulak Island at 160,54

Weather in hex: Heavy cloud

Raid spotted at 20 NM, estimated altitude 15,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 7 minutes

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 3
A6M5 Zero x 8

Allied aircraft
F4F-3 Wildcat x 35
SBD-3 Dauntless x 11

Japanese aircraft losses
A6M5 Zero: 1 destroyed

Allied aircraft losses
F4F-3 Wildcat: 1 destroyed

Japanese Ships
CM Nasami
CM Kyosai, Bomb hits 1, heavy fires, heavy damage
CM Ukishima, Bomb hits 2, and is sunk
CM Saishu, Bomb hits 1, heavy fires


quote:

Ground combat at Umnak Island (169,51)

Allied Bombardment attack

Attacking force 9285 troops, 112 guns, 19 vehicles, Assault Value = 405

Defending force 16166 troops, 128 guns, 24 vehicles, Assault Value = 415

Japanese ground losses:
127 casualties reported
Squads: 2 destroyed, 7 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Defending units:
Guards Mixed Brigade
7th Division


Total Air Losses for the Day



In India, it seems John is prepping for his Indian invasion. In his last email, John remarked that he doesn't "have enough days prior to the April 1st deadline…"



_____________________________

"Now excuse me while I go polish my balls ..." - BBfanboy

(in reply to Anachro)
Post #: 423
RE: Mar 26, 1942 - 8/31/2018 5:00:18 PM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline
You might want to take a look at Prince Rupert as an alternative to Seattle (unless you need big shipyards). If you have drawn supply to Prince Rupert and is Port size 6 or more you should be able to replenish your carriers no problem. BBs require port size 7 or an AKE size 4200 and up. The benefit is that PR is a couple of days closer to the NorPac action, if you are intending to bring your carriers back soon to contest the region.

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to Anachro)
Post #: 424
Mar 27-28, 1942 - Indian Invasion - 9/2/2018 2:08:30 PM   
Anachro


Posts: 2506
Joined: 11/23/2015
From: The Coastal Elite
Status: offline
Mar 27-28, 1942

India
It seems we were right about the initial target of the Indian invasion based on sigint so long ago. On the 27th, John heavily bombards Diego Garcia. The next day, John lands in strength at an empty Vizagapatnum, but he'll find occupied bases all around it if he eventually tries to use paratrooper landings to quickly move elsewhere by strat move. Warapal, Raipur, and Calcutta with ssmaller garrisons at hexes in between. Moreover, I am beginning to get my American reinforcements in a steady stream at Bombay. The first air units have just arrived and more on their way; land units should arrive piece by piece over the next few weeks.

I suspect John might move east towards Calcutta. That'd make sense as he could then move north in clear hexes up towards Karachi perhaps. However, he might also want to quickly move up to Bombay. We'll see. I can move my forces around accordingly. Is he ready to grind out a land war? Am I?



quote:

Amphibious Assault at Vizagapatnam (42,37)

TF 279 troops unloading over beach at Vizagapatnam, 42,37

Japanese ground losses:
439 casualties reported
Squads: 21 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 1 (1 destroyed, 0 disabled)
Vehicles lost 1 (1 destroyed, 0 disabled)


This landing based on reports seems to consist of the Imperial Guards Division, the 5th Division, and the 3rd Ind. Mountain Gun regiment. There are more units in hex, however.

Aleutians
In the Aleutians, it seems his carriers make a reappearance. Out of an abundance of caution, I will move away with my transports and await till my carriers can re-appear. Umnak is strongly held for now and I do no think he will take it or a while yet. Supply situation is a bit critical, but I will fly in supply and continue to send in by APD when opportunity presents itself. Over the last few days, I was able to raise supply from ~2500 to ~3500.



quote:

Ground combat at Umnak Island (169,51)

Allied Bombardment attack

Attacking force 9434 troops, 123 guns, 22 vehicles, Assault Value = 438

Defending force 15865 troops, 128 guns, 24 vehicles, Assault Value = 384

Japanese ground losses:
152 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 12 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Allied ground losses:
15 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Assaulting units:
201st(Sep) Infantry Regiment
1/153rd Infantry Battalion
3rd Marine Raider Battalion
2/153rd Infantry Bn /1
37th (Sep) Infantry Regiment
2nd/298th Infantry Battalion
2nd Marine Raider Battalion
1st/298th Infantry Bn /1
47th Construction Regiment
141st USN Stn Base Force
116th Base Group
Wake (Det.) Defense Battalion
1st Marine Air Wing
3/250th Cst Art Bn /1

Defending units:
Guards Mixed Brigade
7th Division

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 425
RE: Mar 27-28, 1942 - Indian Invasion - 9/2/2018 2:19:45 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
I have to pinch myself when I see what Japan has here...but

I would think, that if you have concentrated your carriers, you should be able to crush one of those recent landings. India or Aleutians.

However, letting him expand and spread out his attacking forces is another valid tactic. What did Patton say during the battle of blitz...let the Germans get all the way to Paris?

Can you perhaps sneak a brooklyn class destroyer deep behind Japan's perimeter?




(in reply to Anachro)
Post #: 426
RE: Mar 27-28, 1942 - Indian Invasion - 9/2/2018 3:36:06 PM   
Anachro


Posts: 2506
Joined: 11/23/2015
From: The Coastal Elite
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

I have to pinch myself when I see what Japan has here...but

I would think, that if you have concentrated your carriers, you should be able to crush one of those recent landings. India or Aleutians.

However, letting him expand and spread out his attacking forces is another valid tactic. What did Patton say during the battle of blitz...let the Germans get all the way to Paris?


I hope to let him overextend himself in India and give me opportunity to surround and destroy elements of his armies. As for contesting the landings, he has the majority (read: all) of his carriers in the Indian theater, barring the CV Junyo and some CVEs in the Aleutians, so it would have been hard to disrupt. For the last month, his carriers have been covering majority of movements there.

However, I have attempted to disrupt the Aleutians with the carriers I have and will continue to do so. It's a shame I wasn't able to catch his carriers or the Yamato, but perhaps I am better served by sinking a division and more on the way to reinforce Umnak. As it is, he has a division and brigade bottled up there. I believe my plan now might be to fight India with land and air forces inland and use my amphibious might early on in the soft underbelly or rear-end of his SoPac and Aleutian bases. Then cap-off being that a strong push for Ceylon and isolating major forces in India becomes possible if he re-positions some or most of his carriers westward.

quote:


Can you perhaps sneak a brooklyn class destroyer deep behind Japan's perimeter?


This has merit and I might try this.

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 427
RE: Mar 27-28, 1942 - Indian Invasion - 9/2/2018 4:59:27 PM   
GetAssista

 

Posts: 2732
Joined: 9/19/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Anachro
.. The next day, John lands in strength at an empty Vizagapatnum, but he'll find occupied bases all around it if he eventually tries to use paratrooper landings to quickly move elsewhere by strat move. Warapal, Raipur, and Calcutta with ssmaller garrisons at hexes in between.

I see some empty bases in the smaller radius of Viz still and you cut out the eastern part. Tina can do 16 hex paradrop in stock. Apart from bunnyhopping John can use paras to capture empty bases and then move into rail blocking positions to cut off your retreat from eastern India

(in reply to Anachro)
Post #: 428
RE: Mar 27-28, 1942 - Indian Invasion - 9/2/2018 6:20:28 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Anachro


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe


Can you perhaps sneak a brooklyn class destroyer deep behind Japan's perimeter?


This has merit and I might try this.



I mean light cruiser. Oops.

(in reply to Anachro)
Post #: 429
RE: Mar 27-28, 1942 - Indian Invasion - 9/3/2018 2:05:55 AM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: GetAssista

quote:

ORIGINAL: Anachro
.. The next day, John lands in strength at an empty Vizagapatnum, but he'll find occupied bases all around it if he eventually tries to use paratrooper landings to quickly move elsewhere by strat move. Warapal, Raipur, and Calcutta with ssmaller garrisons at hexes in between.

I see some empty bases in the smaller radius of Viz still and you cut out the eastern part. Tina can do 16 hex paradrop in stock. Apart from bunnyhopping John can use paras to capture empty bases and then move into rail blocking positions to cut off your retreat from eastern India


Anachro mentioned that he is going to cover the inland bases behind the invasion zone against paratroops. As long as Anachro has the rail and major roads blocked, it will not matter if John drops some paratroops beyond that. John could take a base and fly in reinforcements but without heavy equipment they should be mopped up fairly easily.

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to GetAssista)
Post #: 430
RE: Mar 27-28, 1942 - Indian Invasion - 9/3/2018 10:50:24 AM   
modrow

 

Posts: 1100
Joined: 8/27/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy


quote:

ORIGINAL: GetAssista

quote:

ORIGINAL: Anachro
.. The next day, John lands in strength at an empty Vizagapatnum, but he'll find occupied bases all around it if he eventually tries to use paratrooper landings to quickly move elsewhere by strat move. Warapal, Raipur, and Calcutta with ssmaller garrisons at hexes in between.

I see some empty bases in the smaller radius of Viz still and you cut out the eastern part. Tina can do 16 hex paradrop in stock. Apart from bunnyhopping John can use paras to capture empty bases and then move into rail blocking positions to cut off your retreat from eastern India


Anachro mentioned that he is going to cover the inland bases behind the invasion zone against paratroops. As long as Anachro has the rail and major roads blocked, it will not matter if John drops some paratroops beyond that. John could take a base and fly in reinforcements but without heavy equipment they should be mopped up fairly easily.


BBfanboy,

I think the original concern of GetAssista is a different type of operation:

a) land limited assets at Viza... to take the base and get a base as a starting place for paradrops
b) do paradrops, but not with the idea to take bases and rail troops from Viza... (e.g. after taking Raipur and Indore or Surat), but to prevent assets used to defend forward (Madras/Calcutta) from railing back quickly to Bombay/Karachi
c) do a second landing on the West coast of India (Bombay or Karachi directly, or, if you fear the direct approach, e.g. at Goa, Surat or 39,14).

Once Viza... is taken, port size limitations make sustaining operations/landing more assets a bit painful, so the above approach may make sense (for 39,14 bear in mind that you keep getting over beach unload rates even if you own the hex IIRC). I *think* I recall some forum discussions about similar approaches, thus avoiding long marching before you get to Bombay/Karachi, but do not know where or when that may have been any more.

Hartwig

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 431
RE: Mar 27-28, 1942 - Indian Invasion - 9/3/2018 11:09:58 AM   
obvert


Posts: 14050
Joined: 1/17/2011
From: PDX (and now) London, UK
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Anachro

I suspect John might move east towards Calcutta. That'd make sense as he could then move north in clear hexes up towards Karachi perhaps. However, he might also want to quickly move up to Bombay. We'll see. I can move my forces around accordingly. Is he ready to grind out a land war? Am I?



Anyone who has played the Allies in India in 42 can answer your last questions for you. Yes. No.

The Japanese have experienced troops, and enough of them to do some damage. The Allies have mostly inexperienced units spread over a large sub-continent, low forts, no air force, and very few quality naval assets.

There is no harm in leaving a skeleton force in major bases like Madras and Calcutta, and simply moving back your strongest units to prep and build forts in Bombay and Karachi.

Having landed here, he has virtually no chance of taking all of India. To do that he'd have to land between Bombay and Karachi. Having Sri Lanka helps, but won't keep you from bringing reinforcements from Aden and Cape Town to Karachi.

You can begin prepping for some nice spots along the Burmese coastline, or Sumatra, now that he's shown you he wants to overextend his forces!

_____________________________

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill

(in reply to Anachro)
Post #: 432
RE: Mar 27-28, 1942 - Indian Invasion - 9/3/2018 12:22:30 PM   
modrow

 

Posts: 1100
Joined: 8/27/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: obvert

Anyone who has played the Allies in India in 42 can answer your last questions for you. Yes. No.



+1.

Do compare your units to your Chinese units in terms of morale and exp.

Also, look at OOB in a detailed way, do not just add up AV. Check the devices in detail. Much of the change in capabilities in this game is brought about by device upgrades.

quote:


You can begin prepping for some nice spots along the Burmese coastline, or Sumatra, now that he's shown you he wants to overextend his forces!


Sumatra may raise (fond?) memories of John's game against Canoerebel.

Just my 2cts.

Hartwig

(in reply to obvert)
Post #: 433
RE: Mar 27-28, 1942 - Indian Invasion - 9/3/2018 12:56:19 PM   
Bearcat2

 

Posts: 577
Joined: 2/14/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: obvert


quote:

ORIGINAL: Anachro

I suspect John might move east towards Calcutta. That'd make sense as he could then move north in clear hexes up towards Karachi perhaps. However, he might also want to quickly move up to Bombay. We'll see. I can move my forces around accordingly. Is he ready to grind out a land war? Am I?



Anyone who has played the Allies in India in 42 can answer your last questions for you. Yes. No.

.................................................................



Is your opinion based on this scenario?


_____________________________

"After eight years as President I have only two regrets: that I have not shot Henry Clay or hanged John C. Calhoun."--1837

(in reply to obvert)
Post #: 434
RE: Mar 27-28, 1942 - Indian Invasion - 9/3/2018 1:05:54 PM   
GetAssista

 

Posts: 2732
Joined: 9/19/2009
Status: offline
quote:

Is your opinion based on this scenario?

John's mod only touched the Navy and Air arms. Land units are same as in stocks (or Babes?), which all feature understrength inexperienced and not upgraded Indians/Brits that just cannot make an effective stand against IJA in 42 and better be evacuated from eastern India if encirclement becomes a possibility. To preserve scarce squads for later use.

< Message edited by GetAssista -- 9/3/2018 1:06:46 PM >

(in reply to Bearcat2)
Post #: 435
RE: Mar 27-28, 1942 - Indian Invasion - 9/3/2018 2:14:39 PM   
Anachro


Posts: 2506
Joined: 11/23/2015
From: The Coastal Elite
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: GetAssista

quote:

Is your opinion based on this scenario?

John's mod only touched the Navy and Air arms. Land units are same as in stocks (or Babes?), which all feature understrength inexperienced and not upgraded Indians/Brits that just cannot make an effective stand against IJA in 42 and better be evacuated from eastern India if encirclement becomes a possibility. To preserve scarce squads for later use.


Large majority of forces are in central India covering the approaches from his landings. ~1000 AV of US troops are on their way to India at the moment.

(in reply to GetAssista)
Post #: 436
RE: Mar 27-28, 1942 - Indian Invasion - 9/3/2018 2:34:09 PM   
Anachro


Posts: 2506
Joined: 11/23/2015
From: The Coastal Elite
Status: offline
Once I have the last of troops fleeing Burma, I will probably retreat north in the east with skeleton crews holding. As for elsewhere, many may not have have seen the picture below. Warangal is at fort 4, Madras is 4-almost 5, Calcutta will soon be 4, Raipur is fort 3, Hyderabad at fort 3, others are at fort 3 too. I am actively building defenses in the interior, in the north.



< Message edited by Anachro -- 9/3/2018 2:37:25 PM >

(in reply to Anachro)
Post #: 437
RE: Mar 27-28, 1942 - Indian Invasion - 9/3/2018 3:07:01 PM   
GetAssista

 

Posts: 2732
Joined: 9/19/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: modrow
BBfanboy,

I think the original concern of GetAssista is a different type of operation:

a) land limited assets at Viza... to take the base and get a base as a starting place for paradrops
b) do paradrops, but not with the idea to take bases and rail troops from Viza... (e.g. after taking Raipur and Indore or Surat), but to prevent assets used to defend forward (Madras/Calcutta) from railing back quickly to Bombay/Karachi
c) do a second landing on the West coast of India (Bombay or Karachi directly, or, if you fear the direct approach, e.g. at Goa, Surat or 39,14).

I was thinking more about Benares/Patna/Nagpur para cutoff and then catching Burma/Calcutta region populace. Anachro then stated most of his units are out of eastern India already, which is good. Don't think even John is ambitious enough to try landing in western India, communications ore too long.

(in reply to modrow)
Post #: 438
RE: Mar 27-28, 1942 - Indian Invasion - 9/3/2018 3:23:24 PM   
obvert


Posts: 14050
Joined: 1/17/2011
From: PDX (and now) London, UK
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: GetAssista

Don't think even John is ambitious enough to try landing in western India, communications ore too long.



He should be!! That is what I'd fear most. If he takes Karachi, ouch. That is the real problem.

He of course has divisions in the Aleutians (and probably heading for Fiji and Midway too!!)

Calcutta is just a good target for trapping the IJA a bit later. As is Ceylon.

You don't necessarily want him to take Ledo and use the oil there and the industry in Calcutta to boost the economy, but there is no guarantee either place will be intact if he gets them either. They can also be bombed out, and keep a large CAP occupied.

Having fought in India once as Allies, against Greyjoy, I though in the end it gave the Allies an advantage by 43. So I'd clear out and let him have the NE and South, but save the troops and devices for later (and avoid losing their VPs as well).

_____________________________

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill

(in reply to GetAssista)
Post #: 439
RE: Mar 27-28, 1942 - Indian Invasion - 9/3/2018 3:54:14 PM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline
I do recognize the weaknesses of the units in India in the early game, but I also know that the morale numbers move up rapidly as the units fill out TOE. Buying decent leaders for some of the best units helps too. But the kicker was when Anachro mentioned he was already bringing in US units. Combined with the British/Australian units arriving in Aden (which include several good armoured, 25 pounder arty, and fighter units), that should create the tar baby that India usually becomes for the Japanese.
As for the Japanese cutting off a mobile defence, I figured Anachro had in mind keeping all the rail lines from the northwest to his anti-paratroop line covered by garrison troops.

Anyway, it will be entertaining to see it play out. John is not known for his love of land combat but he keeps trying and may come up with some strategies that work.


_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to obvert)
Post #: 440
RE: Mar 27-28, 1942 - Indian Invasion - 9/3/2018 4:28:51 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
There are some substantial land changes in this mod, to the best of my memory perhaps the biggest is the Assault Division?.

Naval Guard units can combine into larger Assault Divisions? Their TOE might not be great, but they do have the excellent SNLF 41 and 43 troops in them.

I argued a bit in the mod section for a reduction in the size and strength of Japanese ground units to properly reflect such a strong air and naval buildup -- to no avail.

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 441
RE: Mar 27-28, 1942 - Indian Invasion - 9/3/2018 6:24:36 PM   
Bearcat2

 

Posts: 577
Joined: 2/14/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

There are some substantial land changes in this mod, to the best of my memory perhaps the biggest is the Assault Division?.

Naval Guard units can combine into larger Assault Divisions? Their TOE might not be great, but they do have the excellent SNLF 41 and 43 troops in them.

I argued a bit in the mod section for a reduction in the size and strength of Japanese ground units to properly reflect such a strong air and naval buildup -- to no avail.



The [9?]Assault divisions are in addition to the Naval Guard units, he also get additional Garrison troops as reinforcements.

_____________________________

"After eight years as President I have only two regrets: that I have not shot Henry Clay or hanged John C. Calhoun."--1837

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 442
RE: Mar 27-28, 1942 - Indian Invasion - 9/3/2018 6:28:24 PM   
Anachro


Posts: 2506
Joined: 11/23/2015
From: The Coastal Elite
Status: offline
The mod also ups the garrison requirements in China/India, I believe. I haven't noticed it too much in China, but it is certainly noticeable in India. Double-edged sword maybe. While it makes it hard to concentrate early on, it also forces Japan to leave substantial garrisons behind as they move further North.

(in reply to Bearcat2)
Post #: 443
RE: Mar 27-28, 1942 - Indian Invasion - 9/3/2018 7:20:09 PM   
modrow

 

Posts: 1100
Joined: 8/27/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: GetAssista
Don't think even John is ambitious enough to try landing in western India, communications ore too long.


I have been thinking myself that LOCs limit the possibility for deep thrusts for a long time. But lately, viewing the Allied late war deep thrust invasions, relying on a LOC which leads right through a bunch of enemy bases as reported in several AARs (Canoerebel, but also rio bravo e.g.), I find myself pondering what is possible after all *if* you have a deathstar. And I still believe JohnIII actually has several of those right now.

Actually, the increased garrison requirements make this approach even more tempting IMO.

As always, just my take. I may well be wrong.

Hartwig

< Message edited by modrow -- 9/3/2018 7:23:11 PM >

(in reply to GetAssista)
Post #: 444
RE: Mar 27-28, 1942 - Indian Invasion - 9/3/2018 7:24:46 PM   
Anachro


Posts: 2506
Joined: 11/23/2015
From: The Coastal Elite
Status: offline
There could very well be landings along the western coasts of India in the future. He makes frequent forays up with his carriers and extensively recon's Bombay, which will be reinforced. I am not too worried about it as I'd get ample warning if he does such a thing and can shift my troops accordingly. We'll see.

The US Army 40th Infantry Division arrives at Cape Town next turn. To borrow from wikipedia and change things up a bit:

quote:

The 40th Infantry Division was ordered into federal service on 3 March 1941. It was at the time a National Guard division from the California, Nevada Army National Guard, and Utah Army National Guards. In February 1942, the 40th Infantry Division was reorganized from a 'square', two-brigade, four-regiment division to a three-regiment division without any intermediate brigade headquarters. Thus the 79th and 80th Infantry Brigade were inactivated.

The division departed for overseas service on 8 March 1942. The division's first overseas assignment was the reinforcement and defense of Bombay on the Indian subcontinent, where it arrived in April 1942. With the Japanese invasion of India, the division quickly experienced the fire of combat with little training beyond it's pre-war preparations.


The division is nicknamed the "Sunshine" division. Aptly named, and the mix of men from California, Nevada, and Utah I find appropriate for the new climate the boys will enjoy.

< Message edited by Anachro -- 9/3/2018 7:30:41 PM >

(in reply to modrow)
Post #: 445
RE: Mar 27-28, 1942 - Indian Invasion - 9/3/2018 7:27:37 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
My game with John III was a blast. As I've said elsewhere, my appreciation for his abilities as a player has continued to increase since our game ended. He's experienced and he's good.

But there are holes to his game, as most of us know. When our game ended, I figured there were several important lessons he should learn, that he'd give lip service to all three, and that sooner rather than later he'd fall into old habits with respect to two of the three:

1) Pay attention to China: I believe his learned this lesson, although it may take him awhile to really catch on to the intricacies of handling Japan in China.
2) Don't leave holes deep behind his lines: He's probably already forgotten this lesson. When the time comes for the Allies to move forward, I bet Anachro will find holes here, there, everywhere.
3) Don't steam KB about without adequate information (detection, mainly) on the Allied carriers. I bet he forgot this the moment the game started. He can't help himself.

(in reply to modrow)
Post #: 446
RE: Mar 27-28, 1942 - Indian Invasion - 9/3/2018 7:28:13 PM   
ny59giants


Posts: 9869
Joined: 1/10/2005
Status: offline
John had initially increased garrison requirements in both China and India too high many versions ago. I think it reflected his strong dislike of land combat. I talked him into and then lower them back down to a more reasonable level. They are still higher than stock, but not as bad.

Assault Divisions are three Naval Guards plus devices. They also get an upgrade in '43 that makes them better in defense.

What I'm finding out in early '43 is there are more CD guns available and some invasions are going to be tougher. Thankfully, I haven't lost too many of those old, slow BB as they come in handy.

(in reply to modrow)
Post #: 447
Mar 29-30, 1942 - 9/3/2018 7:54:25 PM   
Anachro


Posts: 2506
Joined: 11/23/2015
From: The Coastal Elite
Status: offline
Mar 29-30, 1942

The two days have relatively little activity, other than John taking Vizagapatnam and seeming to be moving east with some troops towards Calcutta. John does some light bombing runs on Madras; I expect more sweeps and bombing later. The first 2 American fighter wings arrive in Bombay with 25 P-39's apiece and they will move down towards Hyderabad. A few American bomber units, as well as US Army dive bombers, will remain in Bombay for training before seeing front line use. Once I have ready fighters in sufficient numbers, I will begin sweeping Vizagapatnam and then bombing it. I hope to start this tomorrow and try and bring its airfields up to 100 if I can. This might be possible if his carriers keep moving away.

All dot bases are being reinforced with minor units to prevent paratrops. If he does do this, the hope is to quickly contain and destroy them.



In the Aleutians, it seems his bottled up division is finally starting to crack, with bombardments destroying squads over the last few turns. One division sunk and perhaps another soon destroyed or severely degraded? Only time will tell. I do believe there will be gaps in his future defenses in both the South and North Pacific. Airfields in the Aleutians are being built up and being reinforced with fighters and dive bombers. Once this is done, I can more safely bring in reinforcements and supplies.



quote:

Ground combat at Umnak Island (169,51)

Allied Bombardment attack

Attacking force 9434 troops, 123 guns, 22 vehicles, Assault Value = 438

Defending force 15825 troops, 128 guns, 24 vehicles, Assault Value = 376

Japanese ground losses:
193 casualties reported
Squads: 10 destroyed, 5 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled


Assaulting units:
2/153rd Infantry Battalion
1/153rd Infantry Battalion
201st(Sep) Infantry Regiment
3rd Marine Raider Battalion
37th (Sep) Infantry Regiment
2nd Marine Raider Battalion
2nd/298th Infantry Battalion
1st/298th Infantry Bn /1
141st USN Stn Base Force
3/250th Coastal Artillery Battalion
1st Marine Air Wing
47th Construction Regiment
Wake (Det.) Defense Battalion
116th Base Group

Defending units:
Guards Mixed Brigade
7th Division





< Message edited by Anachro -- 9/3/2018 8:00:49 PM >

(in reply to ny59giants)
Post #: 448
RE: Mar 29-30, 1942 - 9/3/2018 10:08:59 PM   
GetAssista

 

Posts: 2732
Joined: 9/19/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Anachro
In the Aleutians, it seems his bottled up division is finally starting to crack, with bombardments destroying squads over the last few turns. One division sunk and perhaps another soon destroyed or severely degraded? Only time will tell.

If you have AKEs and warships to spare this is the place. Short distances mean daily bombardment runs. Those can degrade isolated LCUs pretty fast if you keep DL high. And further provoke John )

(in reply to Anachro)
Post #: 449
RE: Mar 27-28, 1942 - Indian Invasion - 9/3/2018 11:01:18 PM   
JohnDillworth


Posts: 3100
Joined: 3/19/2009
Status: offline

quote:

1) Pay attention to China: I believe his learned this lesson, although it may take him awhile to really catch on to the intricacies of handling Japan in China.


I wonder if his response to the China issue in the last game is to make sure China never gets enough supply for the Chinese troops to become an issue. Once there is enough supply to fill out lots of 1943 Chinese infantry squads the Japanese player is going to have a bad time.

Yes, John has tendencies. He likes to raid. I would watch the wormhole to Karachi very carefully. I expect he will try to raid convoys as soon as they exit. Sending convoys of supplies a few days before valuable troops exit and lots of searches may help

_____________________________

Today I come bearing an olive branch in one hand, and the freedom fighter's gun in the other. Do not let the olive branch fall from my hand. I repeat, do not let the olive branch fall from my hand. - Yasser Arafat Speech to UN General Assembly

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 450
Page:   <<   < prev  13 14 [15] 16 17   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Mar 24, 1942 Page: <<   < prev  13 14 [15] 16 17   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.672