Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Notes from a Small Island

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Notes from a Small Island Page: <<   < prev  91 92 [93] 94 95   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Notes from a Small Island - 9/20/2018 3:26:10 AM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline 		1/23/45 and 1/24/45

Shimishura-jima: D-Day is tomorrow - at least, in part. A tank regiment aboard LSTs will hit the beach tomorrow. An APA/AKA TF carrying two divisions and arty will load at Ketoi tomorrow - load troops only - and may have enough to also handle landing ops tomorrow. Erik has drawn down his garrison to about 27k, so it's vulnerable. But I am leery of the Cold Zone conditions. If the landings don't go well, ships carrying a larger contingent are already loaded at Shikuka, and ready to sail.

The two ARDs, steaming "naked and afraid," arrived at Ketoi without incident today.

The egressing herd is now mostly east of Dutch Harbor. I still fret over Erik getting clever, but he'd have to bypass alot of picket ships and subs to make it that far without being seen. A few more days and TFs begin arriving at West Coast destinations.









Attachment (2)

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 2761
RE: Notes from a Small Island - 9/20/2018 10:12:55 AM   
Mike Solli


Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline 		Why is it that at this point in the war you're still sending TFs around unescorted? (Remember, I'm just a dumb JFB that doesn't really know much about the Allied side.)


_____________________________


Created by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 2762
RE: Notes from a Small Island - 9/20/2018 12:35:34 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline 		They have to come either heavily escorted (meaning full Death Star) or with no escort at all. There's no in between, for small or medium-sized escort is subject to being overwhelmed. So most TFs wait at Adak Island and come in escorted by Death Star, but occasionally I try to slip small TFs in. That becomes more and more viable as Erik's presence in the upper Kuriles diminishes.

With the Allies present in the Home Islands now, so close to Japanese naval and air bases that Erik has to defend and wants to defend, math determines how to do things. The Allies outnumber the Japanese. For purposes of example, say that the dispartiy favors the Allies 100 to 70. That means there is no possible way I can divide forces without at least one of the divisions being smaller than what the Japanese can bring to bear. If I divide my forces in two at 50/50, either can be outnumbered at a single point. If I go with a 70/30 division, one can be seriously outclassed and the other is at parity. Etc.

So I have to keep DS together, and it's sometimes worthwhile to take a calculated risk by sending in small, unescorted TFs.

(in reply to Mike Solli)
Post #: 2763
RE: Notes from a Small Island - 9/20/2018 12:52:01 PM   
Mike Solli


Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline 		Very interesting. When you say escort, I automatically think defense against subs. You're talking surface raiders (which you mention often). It finally sunk in here. Thanks.


_____________________________


Created by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 2764
RE: Notes from a Small Island - 9/20/2018 12:54:46 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline 		The primary threat is combat TFs, carriers and/or LBA.

Erik has lost so many subs that they currently don't pose a threat to transport TFs in a meaningful way (he's probably hording them for more major action). But the TFs I am referring to do have ASW escorts (DEs).

(in reply to Mike Solli)
Post #: 2765
RE: Notes from a Small Island - 9/21/2018 11:48:54 AM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline 		1/25/45

The focus today is the invasion of a Cold Zone island. Weeks ago, Loka offered from his experience that these landings should be possible, under the right conditions. I don't have an Amphib Force HQ this time, but the troops are 100% prepped, Erik has been steadily withdrawing (weakening) his garrison...and there's a behind-the-curtains purpose for this particular action.

Shimishura: Good bombardment to open the show.






Attachment (2)

< Message edited by Canoerebel -- 9/21/2018 11:49:09 AM >

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 2766
RE: Notes from a Small Island - 9/21/2018 11:51:15 AM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline 		1/25/45

Shimishura: The amphibious assault stats look decent - it looks like the Allied infantry divisions may be taking roughly 15% disablements in landing. If true, that's acceptable.

Little fire from enemy shore guns, again leading me to wonder if Erik stands down his CD units early in an invasion, when the Allied combat ship escorts have lots of ammo, and then unleashes them on turns two or three.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 2767
RE: Notes from a Small Island - 9/21/2018 11:53:22 AM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline 		1/25/45

Shimishura: The AV disparity looks good. I started with two divisions purposefully, as I want this campaign to drag out a few weeks.

It appears that Erik has pulled out most of his fighting power. This is 2x terrain with probably six forts. I need to boost supply.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 2768
RE: Notes from a Small Island - 9/21/2018 11:55:30 AM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline 		1/25/45

Shimishura: Both Allied divisions incurred roughly 15% disablements. They're in good fighting shape. The armored unit and arty unit are both pristine - 0/4 fatigue/disruption with almost no disablements.

I'll be out of town this weekend to visit family, so no further reports until Sunday or Monday. Y'all have a good one.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 2769
RE: Notes from a Small Island - 9/21/2018 12:48:01 PM   
jwolf

 

Posts: 2493
Joined: 12/3/2013
Status: offline 		Very interesting psy ops behind the scenes. I am curious to find out if, in the end, they will have had significant effect on your opponent.

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 2770
RE: Notes from a Small Island - 9/24/2018 5:23:37 AM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline 		Late-game deciption/psy ops may be radically different from early game. In the latter, deception may be essential. In the former (late-game) it is often icing on the cake and can sometimes be detrimental, if the Allied player tip-toes around instead of moving fast with a powerful punch.

Right now, I have about two or three weeks before my next major undertaking is ready. So the question I asked was, "What can I do during this interval to advance the Allied cause and/or possibly mislead Erik?" I came up with a few ideas that are synergistic. Basically, the invasion of Shimishura (and possibly other Kuriles) is meant to create a narrative that isn't quite true. It might not work, but it's not costing me anything nor delaying anything, so it's worth trying.

In the game thus far, I think Allied deception worked twice - the first was meant to give Erik a thought that I was feinting towards NoPac. He picked up on a CVE or two north of the Aleutians and other scattered stuff that looked like bogus material. Perhaps that helped sell him on notions he was already working. For whatever reason, he didn't have NoPac garrisoned well and I think KB was posted far away.

The second was the elaborate misdirection play during the last ingress movement, which I think left Erik thinking "all is normal" when, in fact, the Allies pulled a quick, complicated, and successful invasion of Wakkanai. I can't prove that my deciption contributed one bit, but I do know that Erik wasn't able to bring in reinforcements and that the base wasn't adequately defended.

Erik has gotten me too. He's used his knowledge of my plat to launch a couple of surprise attacks on an egressing DS/Herd and a second egressing Herd. So I try to mix things up, but he's good enought o catch me from time to time.



(in reply to jwolf)
Post #: 2771
RE: Notes from a Small Island - 9/25/2018 1:55:19 AM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline 		1/27/45

Preparation: The graphic shows preparation percentages for units at Shikuka. The real key is the amphib force HQ, currently at 57%. I'd like it to be at least 75%, but under a particular set of circumstances, I'd be willing to go at 60%.

The plan is to "go" in about two weeks. That time should be sufficient to wrap up Shimishura and to retrieve target-prepped units that are currently at forward bases like Etorofu and Wakkanai. The fortnight of additional prep will bring most units into the acceptable range.

I'm watching Erik's moves carefully, mainly via recon. I think I understand what he perceives as the most likely vector of attack and how he's setting up his defenses to guard against it. What he's doing fits within my plan paramaters, so at this point I see no reason to alter the timetable.

But there is at least one contingency in which I'd immediately proceed with the invasion.

THere is also at least one contingency in which I'd scrub it and reconfigure entirely (IE, if I thought he had sniffed out my plan and distributed his forces in such a way as to make it too difficult).







Attachment (1)

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 2772
RE: Notes from a Small Island - 9/25/2018 11:55:13 AM   
Bearcat2

 

Posts: 577
Joined: 2/14/2004
Status: offline 		There is not enough whiteout on your Allied Ground unit target column or is that a Pysch Op ?

_____________________________

"After eight years as President I have only two regrets: that I have not shot Henry Clay or hanged John C. Calhoun."--1837

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 2773
RE: Notes from a Small Island - 9/25/2018 1:13:43 PM   
jwolf

 

Posts: 2493
Joined: 12/3/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bearcat2

There is not enough whiteout on your Allied Ground unit target column or is that a Pysch Op ?


Against his readers?

(in reply to Bearcat2)
Post #: 2774
RE: Notes from a Small Island - 9/25/2018 3:29:30 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline 		Here's the truth about that. You'll have to figure out later whether it's the whole truth.

When the Allies invaded Sikhalin Island in June 1944, half of my units were prepped for Korea. I was "preparing for success" - on the possibility that the expedition would result in a decisive naval clash that would cripple the Japanese, so that the Allies could then move deeper quickly. That didn't happen, and I came to regret that I didn't instead prep those units for Kuriles targets.

So that particular unit (an engineer) is a relic of the earliest prep targets. Whether that's a future target or not.....

< Message edited by Canoerebel -- 9/25/2018 3:30:59 PM >

(in reply to jwolf)
Post #: 2775
RE: Notes from a Small Island - 9/25/2018 3:56:26 PM   
JohnDillworth


Posts: 3100
Joined: 3/19/2009
Status: offline 		“Prepping for success”
I think that has to be the name of you next AAR!
It also describes your evolving play style. No longer are you the humble “Dot Base Dan” we all know and love, you now Prep for Sucsess.


_____________________________

Today I come bearing an olive branch in one hand, and the freedom fighter's gun in the other. Do not let the olive branch fall from my hand. I repeat, do not let the olive branch fall from my hand. - Yasser Arafat Speech to UN General Assembly

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 2776
RE: Notes from a Small Island - 9/25/2018 4:10:21 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline 		There's a memorable scene in the movie Facing the Giants. In the scene, an old gentleman tells a story about two farmers who are praying for rain. One of them waited for the rain to come, the other one went out and prepared his fields to receive it. The old man asks, "Which one do you think trusted God to send the rain?"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WAxwS8KyMQQ

(in reply to JohnDillworth)
Post #: 2777
RE: Notes from a Small Island - 9/25/2018 4:21:22 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline 		1/26/45 and 1/27/45

As the turn of the 27th opens, the things I'm keying on: (1) reinforcing landings at Shimishura, and (2) keeping tabs on enemy movement in the next area of interest.

NoPac: The turn opens with enemy PB TF far out in the Pacific. There was a similar sighting four or five days back. Erik is working an angle out here. I'm allowing for a number of possibilities, ranging from deception to him testing for detection in advance of a combat TF raid or carrier raid.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 2778
RE: Notes from a Small Island - 9/25/2018 4:28:45 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline 		1/27/45

Shimishura: Fast BB bombardment TF. The combat report says only "29" casualties, but the number of squads destroyed or disables is much higher than that. It was a decent bombardment run.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 2779
RE: Notes from a Small Island - 9/25/2018 4:41:58 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline 		1/27/45

Shimishura: LCI gunships do good work, preparatory to 3rd Australian Div. and 10th USMC Artillery coming ashore.

The reinforcing landings go well and will trigger an enemy auto-bombardment.

There are two more divisions, tanks and more arty aboard ship. There's already enough ashore to handle the base, but reinforcing landings trigger those bombardments so self-destructive to the Japanese. I think I'm going to send the remaining two divisions back to Shikuka to swtich prep to future targets, keeping at least one tank unit for another reinforcing landing.

I'm in no hurry for Shimi to fall, for reasons I've mentioned previously. If it does end up falling "too early," I might have to orchestrate another quick Kuriles invasion prior to the next big thing.







Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Canoerebel -- 9/25/2018 4:42:59 PM >

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 2780
RE: Notes from a Small Island - 9/25/2018 5:01:11 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline 		1/27/45

Shimishura: Japanese auto-bombardment and Allied bombardment result in few casualties, but the AV totals show the Allies with a 4:1 advantage (I really can't figure out how Japan has 300+ raw AV here, given the AVs shown in the bombardment results for each unit).






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 2781
RE: Notes from a Small Island - 9/25/2018 5:38:55 PM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline 		I wonder if he has some units in Reserve mode to prevent them taking part in combat? You might only find them during a bombing or naval bombardment if it happens to hit a unit that is not on the Ground Combat list.

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 2782
RE: Notes from a Small Island - 9/25/2018 6:13:01 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline 		I always thought all units are displayed in the combat boxes, even those that might be in reserve or rest mode. If that's what I always thought, I'd better prepare to get schooled.

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 2783
RE: Notes from a Small Island - 9/25/2018 7:07:32 PM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline 		I can cite no examples for my speculation, only an attempt to guess what might be happening and hoping others can say for certain - yea or nay!




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 2784
RE: Notes from a Small Island - 9/25/2018 9:29:49 PM   
Lokasenna


Posts: 9297
Joined: 3/3/2012
From: Iowan in MD/DC
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Canoerebel

I always thought all units are displayed in the combat boxes, even those that might be in reserve or rest mode. If that's what I always thought, I'd better prepare to get schooled.


No, they are displayed even if in Reserve/Rest. You are correct.

The AV's shown in the "box" (as opposed to the raw AV shown in the top level of the combat report) are the unit's adjusted AV and takes into account things like supplies, disruption, and fatigue. Or perhaps some function of the unit's adjusted AV.

< Message edited by Lokasenna -- 9/25/2018 9:30:43 PM >

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 2785
RE: Notes from a Small Island - 9/25/2018 10:02:21 PM   
Itdepends

 

Posts: 937
Joined: 12/12/2005
Status: offline 		Support devices provide AV when defending but not when attacking. Could that be part of the difference?

(in reply to Lokasenna)
Post #: 2786
RE: Notes from a Small Island - 9/25/2018 10:05:49 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline 		I think Lokasenna's answer must be it. So when the Combat Report shows the Japanese AV at 316, that's raw AV. Then the combat boxes that show each unit along with AV shows the net AV, after adjustments for lack of supply, fatigue, disruption, leaders, etc.

(in reply to Itdepends)
Post #: 2787
RE: Notes from a Small Island - 9/26/2018 7:09:28 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline 		Erik and I picked up this game March 1, 1944. We're now at the end of January 1945. The game should go into late '45 or early '46. So we're probably nearing the halfway point.

When we started, the Allies were "behind" the historical timeline, but had suffered few losses. Ditto for Japan - few losses. Both sides were very strong. The most daunting things, to me, were Erik's reputation as a player and the challenge of closing on the Home Islands within a reasonable amount of time.

Eleven months later, the Allies are now ahead of the historical timeline (that's not unusual) and appear to be poised to efficiently prosecute the war against the Homeland. There's a chance the Allies could prevail at or near the historical end-of-war, though I think late '45 is more likely. From a gaming standpoint, I don't think I've "outperformed" Erik. Nor do I think he's outperformed me. Both sides have gotten in good licks and both sides have suffered blows. The outcome of the game, as far as winning and losing, is probably up in the air, still to be determined.

I'm enjoying the game very much. It's been quite a ride.

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 2788
RE: Notes from a Small Island - 9/27/2018 3:04:37 PM   
Lokasenna


Posts: 9297
Joined: 3/3/2012
From: Iowan in MD/DC
Status: offline 		Without looking back for your most recent score screen... I'll beg to differ.

You'll win this with an AV later in 1945, precisely because:

quote:

but had suffered few losses.


Without that bank of permanent VPs, Japan simply can't delay the inevitable long enough to matter. You'll have 4E bases from Hokkaido in a few months and then you can harvest VPs wherever you want simply because of the threat of strategic bombing over the entirety of Japan.


Don't forget to bomb the industry on Hokkaido before you capture it. You do not get points for anything that is damaged/destroyed when it falls into your hands (I'm 90% sure on that).

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 2789
RE: Notes from a Small Island - 9/27/2018 4:05:48 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline 		That's the master plan - bombing industry before taking a Home Island base.

I believe you're correct that no points are awarded for taking a base that has industry, whether undamaged, damaged or destroyed.

(in reply to Lokasenna)
Post #: 2790
Page:   <<   < prev  91 92 [93] 94 95   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Notes from a Small Island Page: <<   < prev  91 92 [93] 94 95   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.469