Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Notes from a Small Island

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Notes from a Small Island Page: <<   < prev  92 93 [94] 95 96   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Notes from a Small Island - 9/27/2018 7:37:02 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
1/28/45

With a new turn in, I'm looking at three things: (1) For the first time in a month, a major Allied raid will take place against Kushiro, with the primary target being enemy fighters; (2) I've got to decide whether to drag things out at Shimishura or expedite them while moving on to another island; and (3) it's time to execute the extraction of units at forward islands that are destined for other targets.

Shimishura: A fairly effective bombardment. This, with what follows during the bombardment phases, makes me lean towards proceeding with the conquest of this island while initiating another invasion. I think I might be able to more effectively sell Erik on that than I can by loitering at Shimishura, playing too loosely.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 2791
RE: Notes from a Small Island - 9/27/2018 7:53:08 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
1/28/45

Shimishura: Screen capture shows unit AVs at the start of the Japanese auto-bombardment phase (I messed up the second screen capture that would have showed the AVs near the end of the Allied bombardment phase).

The Japanese army seems to be gassed, here. I think I'll try a probing deliberate attack tomorrow or the day after and see how that goes, before making a final decision as to how to handle Shimishura.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 2792
RE: Notes from a Small Island - 9/27/2018 8:15:32 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
1/28/45

Air Losses: Sync bug really messed up the air action during the turn.

I set up large sweeps of Bangkok, where Erik has 150 fighters, and large sweeps followed by escorted bombers at Kushiro, where he has 250 fighters. The primary objective was enemy fighters; a secondary objective was to work on industry at the latter.

The result was surprising. The individual sweep altercations went in favor of the Allies, until ops losses were factored in. Then the escorting bombing raids got chewed on pretty badly. By the end of the turn, the Japanese had scored a 200 to 150 victory. Since victory points are more important than ever, I need to give this alot of thought.

Digging a bit deeper, the fighter tallies were acceptable, with Erik losing 157 and me 117. That's not bad.

Digging deeper, I lost 16 Superforts and a bunch of Venturas. It's okay to spread losses around, so that my fighters don't take the brunt of things. The next month or two is really going to be about fighters, so trading some of my bombers for some of his fighters will be necessary. But I need to tweak my approach. The Liberators hold up much better than the Superforts do. The 2EB are somewhat expendable, but pools are low, so throwing them away isn't an option.







Attachment (1)

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 2793
RE: Notes from a Small Island - 9/28/2018 2:33:08 AM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline
In the earlier part of the game B-17s are much more durable and they shoot down more enemy fighters. I always took that as the heavier defensive armament of the B-17s vs the B-24s (which sacrificed armament for range).
Do you have enough B-17s to have them stand in for the Superforts?

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 2794
RE: Notes from a Small Island - 9/28/2018 11:00:32 AM   
HansBolter


Posts: 7704
Joined: 7/6/2006
From: United States
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

In the earlier part of the game B-17s are much more durable and they shoot down more enemy fighters. I always took that as the heavier defensive armament of the B-17s vs the B-24s (which sacrificed armament for range).
Do you have enough B-17s to have them stand in for the Superforts?



B17s are almost non existent at this point in the game.

Production and replacement stopped long ago.

A new wave of them will come from Europe after the Germans fall, but that is a ways out.

_____________________________

Hans


(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 2795
RE: Notes from a Small Island - 9/28/2018 12:38:52 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
Hans is right.

I did inherit a goodly and surprising number of B-17s from SqzMyLemon. They were all located in Burma and India, so that's where I've used them. I still have a handful left, but they don't seem to be any more immune to good enemy fighters than my other 4EB are.

The new model B-17 comes online in big numbers sometime in the second half of 1945.

(in reply to HansBolter)
Post #: 2796
RE: Notes from a Small Island - 9/28/2018 3:16:42 PM   
Bullwinkle58


Posts: 11302
Joined: 2/24/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Canoerebel


The new model B-17 comes online in big numbers sometime in the second half of 1945.


It's been a long time since I saw those (AI game), but I always thought of them as the Big Silver Birds. They're not magical, but you get so damn many of them. The monthly production is just beautiful.

_____________________________

The Moose

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 2797
RE: Notes from a Small Island - 9/28/2018 3:20:54 PM   
Lokasenna


Posts: 9297
Joined: 3/3/2012
From: Iowan in MD/DC
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bullwinkle58


quote:

ORIGINAL: Canoerebel


The new model B-17 comes online in big numbers sometime in the second half of 1945.


It's been a long time since I saw those (AI game), but I always thought of them as the Big Silver Birds. They're not magical, but you get so damn many of them. The monthly production is just beautiful.


Not to mention that you get a bajillion groups arriving at Eastern US with 16 planes already in them. And 60-Exp pilots.

(in reply to Bullwinkle58)
Post #: 2798
RE: Notes from a Small Island - 9/28/2018 4:04:04 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
1/29/45

This turn opens with my attention focused on Shimishura, where the Allies are to attack for the first time. The attack is preceded by another tank battalion coming ashore (to trigger a Japanese auto-bombardment). There's no ship bombardment today, because DS is too far away to provide adequate cover. I don't think the risk is worth it.

Shimishura: The attack goes very well for the Allies. The only break on taking this base is the need to overcome the remaining five forts. Shimishura will likely fall inside 10 days.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lokasenna)
Post #: 2799
RE: Notes from a Small Island - 9/28/2018 4:26:23 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
1/29/45

NoPac: The op going on right now is mostly "below the surface" but is incredibly complex. It's far more complex than the next invasion will be. I can't wait until it's time for that, just so I don't have to deal with the tediousness and tension of the complex but decidedly unsexy things I'm dealing with to prepare.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 2800
RE: Notes from a Small Island - 9/28/2018 8:11:41 PM   
jwolf

 

Posts: 2493
Joined: 12/3/2013
Status: offline
I wonder if Shikuka has more supply than Japan.

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 2801
RE: Notes from a Small Island - 9/29/2018 6:32:06 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
1/30/45

NoPac: Tomorrow is a critical day. Death Star will move further west to provide protection for assault shipping moving to Etorofu to extract major units.

There is some risk here. Erik had another good day with fighters. He's growing bolder and more confident. There is a chance he could try something major tomorrow. While trying to cover all contingencies, my main concern is DS and the ships at Etorofu. My best guess is that he won't try for an all-out attack there - not quite yet. I think he's more likely to look for a likely target to overwhelm. Toyohara, with 120 fighters, is my guess.

So I dispersed Toyohara's fighters - moving most to Etorofu and Uruppu to bolster protection there. I moved the remaining 2EB to Shikuka.

I need one or two more turns to extract my units. Then I can begin shifting from a largely defensive posture to a more aggressive offensive posture.

Enemy dispositions continues to be favorable for "the next big thing." The timetable remains the same, with the possibility of expediting, if necessary, once the Etorofu units are extracted. Alot is gonna happen in about ten days.

In the meantime, though, how bold will Erik get?





Attachment (1)

(in reply to jwolf)
Post #: 2802
RE: Notes from a Small Island - 10/2/2018 5:30:38 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
1/31/45 and 2/1/45

NoPac: The Japanese caved at Shimishura today, far sooner than expected. This is a good thing but means I'll have to tinker a bit with the Allied "activity" meant to give Erik something to pay attention to.

The critical loading of units at Etorofu continues without opposition. I hope this will wrap up tomorrow. If it doesn't, only mechanical support will be left, so I'll probably order the TFs to move out anyhow. It's time to get them back to Shikuka.

At that point, a quick mission to retrieve units at Wakkanai will take place.

Then it will be time for "the next big thing."




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 2803
RE: Notes from a Small Island - 10/2/2018 6:10:27 PM   
Lecivius


Posts: 4845
Joined: 8/5/2007
From: Denver
Status: offline
I am really curious as to if I have sleuthed the "Next Big Thing". I am really enjoying this.

_____________________________

If it ain't broke, don't fix it!

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 2804
RE: Notes from a Small Island - 10/4/2018 7:21:19 AM   
CaptBeefheart


Posts: 2301
Joined: 7/4/2003
From: Seoul, Korea
Status: offline
I'm thinking it's Korea.

Cheers,
CB

_____________________________

Beer, because barley makes lousy bread.

(in reply to Lecivius)
Post #: 2805
RE: Notes from a Small Island - 10/4/2018 9:19:04 AM   
tolsdorff

 

Posts: 204
Joined: 12/12/2016
Status: offline
Judging by the prep table a couple of posts back, a lot of unit are prepping for a base with a name 6 or less characters long.

I am just wildly guessing it's going to be Sendai. That would be in CR's spirit and if succesful a crushing blow to the Japanese. The approach to Korea seems somewhat vulnerable compared to the approach to the japanese east coast.

(in reply to CaptBeefheart)
Post #: 2806
RE: Notes from a Small Island - 10/4/2018 11:01:57 AM   
paullus99


Posts: 1985
Joined: 1/23/2002
Status: offline
Well, it is open terrain & close enough to support with those "millions" of points in supply which CR has been shuttling in.

It certainly would also be the largest, most intensive & probably final battle of the war. Obvert would have no choice to commit everything in its defense & CR brings the Kitchen Sink as well.

It would be incredibly bloody, but it should end things on a bang....if that's where he's going.

_____________________________

Never Underestimate the Power of a Small Tactical Nuclear Weapon...

(in reply to tolsdorff)
Post #: 2807
RE: Notes from a Small Island - 10/4/2018 2:36:55 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
2/2/45

NoPac: It's fun reading your guesses and analysis. Some good thinking there. It's also fun monitoring Erik's thinking, as best I can cobble together from SigInt, garrison levels, movement dots, and the other little things that help paint a picture. He's thinking. He's making logical deductions. He has a problem, I believe.

The Next Big Thing will be a massive attack. I think Erik has to respond violently. There is a chance he will prevail, primarily because of his potent air force. There is a chance he'll fail, primarily because they Allies are very strong and well-organized, I think. If Erik loses (or somehow fails to contest strongly) this next move, it'll be fatal to his chances. I now have the base of operations and force allocation to prosecute the war non-stop in and around his heartland. There shouldn't be any further major downtimes.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to paullus99)
Post #: 2808
RE: Notes from a Small Island - 10/4/2018 2:54:46 PM   
Mike Solli


Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline
Instead of calling your next operation "the next big thing", why not give it an operation codename? Something like Operation Big Thang?

_____________________________


Created by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 2809
RE: Notes from a Small Island - 10/4/2018 2:57:18 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
I've always used code names. Readers of my last AAR got endless versions of circus and fair names: Big Tent, Third Ring, Strong Man, Carrousel, etc. etc. etc.

Somehow, I didn't feel right using code names in this game, since I stepped in on March 1, 1944, for Joseph, who had previously stepped in for Historiker. Perhaps Joseph's choice of names for carrier suppressed any inclination to be creative. :)

(in reply to Mike Solli)
Post #: 2810
RE: Notes from a Small Island - 10/4/2018 2:59:01 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
2/2/45

Next Big Thing Units at Wakkanai: These guys have the prep levels needed to go into harm's way.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 2811
RE: Notes from a Small Island - 10/4/2018 3:04:08 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
2/2/45

Next Big Thing Units at Shikuka: 1st Cav. Division prep is illustrative of the reason more prep time is useful; III Amphib Force HQ prep is illustrative of why I will pull the trigger ASAP, if development warrant.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 2812
RE: Notes from a Small Island - 10/4/2018 3:10:28 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
In addition to the three divisions in the prior posts, other divisions and preps (these units are mostly aboard ship returning to Shikuka to combat load):

25th - 58%
96th - 34%
38th - 53%
37th - 43%
31st - 41%
43rd - 53%

That's nine entire divisions (not eight, as I had stated above). You can see that another six or eight days of prep would get a couple more units over 50%, but speed will probably outweigh that consideration.

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 2813
RE: Notes from a Small Island - 10/4/2018 3:15:51 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
The command HQ is 100% prepped for the target. The lower HQs are low-prepped and won't be of much help.

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 2814
RE: Notes from a Small Island - 10/4/2018 3:23:10 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
Well, that last post wasn't quite right. Tenth Army HQ is 46% prepped, which may help. But III Amphib Corps is 0%. That's not going to help. (Why, you ask, is it 0%? Well, on the day I switched it's prep at Pearl Harbor many, many moons ago, it embarked on transports to come to the scene. But it's group of transports got hung up several times and is still at sea with Death Star. It's been prepping for perhaps 30-40 days. A failure, but one I can excuse because there's so much going on that things like this will usually happen.)

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 2815
RE: Notes from a Small Island - 10/4/2018 3:35:00 PM   
Lokasenna


Posts: 9297
Joined: 3/3/2012
From: Iowan in MD/DC
Status: offline
GetAssista did some testing on the presence of HQs before.

Just having them in the hex (or within range I imagine) will help. Yours are redundant, assuming Tenth Army HQ is one of the non-command HQs.

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 2816
RE: Notes from a Small Island - 10/4/2018 3:39:58 PM   
Lokasenna


Posts: 9297
Joined: 3/3/2012
From: Iowan in MD/DC
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Canoerebel

It's fun reading your guesses and analysis. Some good thinking there. It's also fun monitoring Erik's thinking, as best I can cobble together from SigInt, garrison levels, movement dots, and the other little things that help paint a picture. He's thinking. He's making logical deductions. He has a problem, I believe.




His problem is that it's 1945 and he doesn't have much of a fleet anymore because he just used it.


I'll put my nonexistent chips on Genzan.

I don't think you'd do Sendai or Iwaki, even though it's open terrain, simply because the risk is too great given that Erik still has strong air forces. Korea, on the other hand, is harder for him to interdict both by sea (there are no good ports on the north side of Japan, really, so presumably his navy is on the south side which will take an additional day or two of transit) and by air (fewer interlocking high-level airfields).

Rashin, the base right next to Russia, doesn't really get you much. Neither does Kanko.

Genzan, on the other hand, opens up splitting the Korean peninsula in a matter of days if it's weakly-held. At minimum, you may end up triggering the Soviets early or keeping that possibility in his mind - especially if you can land paratroops to help block the rails from China and prevent AV from moving into the garrison area, such as at Jehol or points west.

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 2817
RE: Notes from a Small Island - 10/4/2018 5:29:41 PM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lokasenna


quote:

ORIGINAL: Canoerebel

It's fun reading your guesses and analysis. Some good thinking there. It's also fun monitoring Erik's thinking, as best I can cobble together from SigInt, garrison levels, movement dots, and the other little things that help paint a picture. He's thinking. He's making logical deductions. He has a problem, I believe.




His problem is that it's 1945 and he doesn't have much of a fleet anymore because he just used it.


I'll put my nonexistent chips on Genzan.

I don't think you'd do Sendai or Iwaki, even though it's open terrain, simply because the risk is too great given that Erik still has strong air forces. Korea, on the other hand, is harder for him to interdict both by sea (there are no good ports on the north side of Japan, really, so presumably his navy is on the south side which will take an additional day or two of transit) and by air (fewer interlocking high-level airfields).

Rashin, the base right next to Russia, doesn't really get you much. Neither does Kanko.

Genzan, on the other hand, opens up splitting the Korean peninsula in a matter of days if it's weakly-held. At minimum, you may end up triggering the Soviets early or keeping that possibility in his mind - especially if you can land paratroops to help block the rails from China and prevent AV from moving into the garrison area, such as at Jehol or points west.

My cyber-chips are on Akita and Hachinohe, to sever the end of Honshu from the rest and isolate all the troops at Aomori, Ominato and on Hokkaido.

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to Lokasenna)
Post #: 2818
RE: Notes from a Small Island - 10/4/2018 7:27:39 PM   
Lokasenna


Posts: 9297
Joined: 3/3/2012
From: Iowan in MD/DC
Status: offline
Ah, I forgot Akita had a name short enough. That's also a possibility.

I might be on that wagon before Genzan, but since I said Genzan I'll stay there.

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 2819
RE: Notes from a Small Island - 10/4/2018 7:56:11 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
Genzan and Kanko were two of the original targets to follow the invasion of Sikhalin Island. It seems crazy now (and probably seemed crazy to all of you then) that I prepped armies for Korea. I really thought the invasion might be so successful that I might need to be prepared to leap forward quickly. That was pure crazy sauce. It's good to think and plan for success, but it's better if that's built on a realistic understanding of the initial assault. I wish I'd prepped those units for the Kuriles instead of Korea. :)

(in reply to Lokasenna)
Post #: 2820
Page:   <<   < prev  92 93 [94] 95 96   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Notes from a Small Island Page: <<   < prev  92 93 [94] 95 96   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.875