Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat)

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat) Page: <<   < prev  17 18 [19] 20 21   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat) - 10/19/2018 2:08:15 PM   
John B.


Posts: 3909
Joined: 9/25/2011
From: Virginia
Status: offline
Tarkalak,

There is always, well almost always, hope!

(in reply to tarkalak)
Post #: 541
RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat) - 10/21/2018 9:31:56 PM   
John B.


Posts: 3909
Joined: 9/25/2011
From: Virginia
Status: offline
No rest for the weary. Vicious fights continue on land and air in burma and at sea in the DEI. I outscored Scott in the air this time. I wonder what is fighter situation in Burma is because he had A-36's on CAP and flew P-40Es in for sweeps (plus a squadron of P-38Hs). Still, it's nice to get turns where I"m not wiped out.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to John B.)
Post #: 542
RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat) - 10/21/2018 9:35:37 PM   
John B.


Posts: 3909
Joined: 9/25/2011
From: Virginia
Status: offline
As for Burma proper. At A I pushed a tank division and an infantry division across the river and pushed the Brits out of Shewbo and roughed up a Chindit bridage and a couple of support units in the process. I'm heading back, that was just for VP.

At B there is an Aussie division at Magwe. All I have is a Thai division defending with Level 3 forts. It won't last long. I did get in a good series of bombing raids on the Aussie and I wonder what his supply situation is like. But, I'm not repeating the bombing raid this turn. Because,

At C I have two well trained fully supplied divisions with high morale going against a flank guard Indian division. So, I think Scott will fly his cap over Magwe and thus my bombers will go after the Indian division. Then, a shock attak with the two IJA divisions. We'll see what happens, I hope he's a bit down in supply/moral since he's away from his supply line

(in reply to John B.)
Post #: 543
RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat) - 10/21/2018 9:36:04 PM   
John B.


Posts: 3909
Joined: 9/25/2011
From: Virginia
Status: offline
Ooops, here is the Burma situation.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to John B.)
Post #: 544
RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat) - 10/21/2018 9:39:55 PM   
John B.


Posts: 3909
Joined: 9/25/2011
From: Virginia
Status: offline
And, down in the DEI at A Ambon is not long for this world. No supplies and he's attacked me twice in a row. I think he has a BB bombardment TF coming in and then a shock attack. But, I've held him up there for more than a month so that counts as a win. My Emilys can fly in and pick up troops and I"ve just started doing that to have remnants that I can rebuild.

At B Scott has landed at Kendari and I think he is putting base forces ashore. I can actually get a CA TF there this turn from Soerabaja at full speed so maybe I'll catch him napping.

At C, he sent in a CA TF to bombard Tarakan. Not too much damage but my BB TF has not found him. I have a slight chance this turn to catch him so we'll see. Otherwise, I'll base this TF at Tarakan to get him in any future raid.





Attachment (1)

(in reply to John B.)
Post #: 545
RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat) - 10/21/2018 11:44:11 PM   
John B.


Posts: 3909
Joined: 9/25/2011
From: Virginia
Status: offline
Well that sucked, but not a complete catastrophe!

The bad was that he shot down 75! planes. He got into the bomber stream with a long range cap that just did not quit. My long range cap disappears after about two fights. How do you make it stronger? Also, Scott got some B-24s to bomb my port in Soerebaja. Of course he was unescorted and of course I had TojoBs that intercepted and of course there was no damage done to his bombers (just like the 20 Nicks did not shoot down any of Scott's unescorted heavies over China). He lost 20 planes or so. :(

But, the attack went very well! The Indian division was roughly handled and retreated losing 150 or so squads and devices. And, it showed up as being in low supply. Recon shows the Australians running away from Magwe so he may be pulling back. News as it develops.

(in reply to John B.)
Post #: 546
RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat) - 10/22/2018 2:08:36 AM   
John B.


Posts: 3909
Joined: 9/25/2011
From: Virginia
Status: offline
Well, the naval war went well this turn. I lost a TK to his sea pirates but Scott lost a CL TF that was covering Kendari and I took no losses. He has A BB TF heading towards Ternate so I wonder if my CVs can intercept it by heading north. Or the BB TF in Ternate.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to John B.)
Post #: 547
RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat) - 10/22/2018 2:10:06 AM   
John B.


Posts: 3909
Joined: 9/25/2011
From: Virginia
Status: offline
No really vicious air battles this turn. I did actually shoot down 4 heavies with TojoIIbs. I did not guess right where his CAP was so my sweeps came up empty. I'm giving everyone a rest and letting Scott bomb the poor Thai division in Magwe.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to John B.)
Post #: 548
RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat) - 10/23/2018 9:44:35 PM   
John B.


Posts: 3909
Joined: 9/25/2011
From: Virginia
Status: offline
I FINALLY got into Scott's bomber stream in Burma. I got 24 of his B-25s (someone told me that the detail report is more accurate than this general one) and that would make sense since they flew in unescorted and I had LCAP over the hex with a lot of planes. And, I got 7 of his P-40Ks in some sweeps in the area. I'm going to say this is an operation Japanese victory for now. Scott is pulling back from Magwe and Myitkyina. I also kicked him out so Shewbo and roughed up two brigades and an Indian inf. division. He's established next to Prome and will be able to push in after he builds up a base when he takes Ramree island but for now I think he's stymied.

In the DEI he continues to build up and Ambon is on the cusp of falling. I have been using Emilys to fly out troops to save on VP and to be able to rebuild the units without paying political points. One of my subs did put two torpedos into a CVE with a fuel explosion. It did not sink but it is only moving two hexes per turn so it must have pretty bad damage. The sub that sank it may be able to catch it outside of Moresby for one more shot at it.

Meanwhile the KB is wandering around keeping the sea lanes to Balikpappan open for now.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to John B.)
Post #: 549
RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat) - 10/26/2018 8:59:24 PM   
John B.


Posts: 3909
Joined: 9/25/2011
From: Virginia
Status: offline
Things are continuing in the DEI while the attack in Burma is stalled. Scott did take Ramree island and I expect that sooner or later he'll build that up, but it's always nice to slow the allies down.

As for the DEI, I've managed to get some local superiority and hopefully I'll be able to shut down Kendari for awhile. That's the level 4 airbase withing fighter range of Balikpappan. I moved out a majority of the entire IJN and had three TFs bombard the island under cover of the KB last night. The surface TFs are on their way back to refuel and (more importantly) reload at Soerebaja. The KB is going to send another BB TF to Kendari this evening and swing around to the south in an attempt to keep avoiding allied subs. Currently there is no sign of the American carriers.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to John B.)
Post #: 550
RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat) - 10/26/2018 9:00:43 PM   
John B.


Posts: 3909
Joined: 9/25/2011
From: Virginia
Status: offline
Not a whole lot of damage from bombardments at Kendari but 11 planes dead including a few p-47s and any day that you're killing P-47s is a good day indeed. Scott did lose unescorted SBDs attacking form a land base but he also hit a DD.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to John B.)
Post #: 551
RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat) - 10/26/2018 9:02:31 PM   
John B.


Posts: 3909
Joined: 9/25/2011
From: Virginia
Status: offline
One way Scott put a damper on my bombardment TFs was to have clouds of PT boats. I think I sank about 25 or so and there were another 25 in TFs that got away. They don't have much fuel and hopefully their torpedos are shot off so that tonight's bombardment has more success. My hope is to get these ships rearmed and to get in another round at Kendari to keep it down as long as possible.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to John B.)
Post #: 552
RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat) - 10/27/2018 2:21:47 PM   
Bif1961


Posts: 2014
Joined: 6/26/2008
From: Phenix City, Alabama
Status: offline
In my game we have an HR of 6 PT boats x port size. That helps reduced the over use of 90+ PT boats to defend a 2-3 level port or base. However, if you sink them they may be rebuilt if you have the supplies and facilities to do so, but just up to the current port level times 6.

(in reply to John B.)
Post #: 553
RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat) - 10/27/2018 4:58:37 PM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bif1961

In my game we have an HR of 6 PT boats x port size. That helps reduced the over use of 90+ PT boats to defend a 2-3 level port or base. However, if you sink them they may be rebuilt if you have the supplies and facilities to do so, but just up to the current port level times 6.

PT Boats are not so much rebuilt immediately as drawn from the pools. There is a limit of something like 64 PT boats at game start but that increases later. There is still a max number in the game though, and if PTs are sunk it takes a period of time before a replacement is available in the pools. So sinking a bunch of them will reduce numbers for a while (assuming pools are very low), but they will be rebuilt and available in a month or three. AFAIK, the British MTB pool is separate from the USN PT pool.

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to Bif1961)
Post #: 554
RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat) - 10/27/2018 9:57:17 PM   
John B.


Posts: 3909
Joined: 9/25/2011
From: Virginia
Status: offline
That's an interesting house rule but we don't have it so it is what it is. It is interfering with my bombardments (I guess by draining away ops points) but at a cost in VP. At some point the PT boats won't really matter when I'm not strong enough for local counter offensives like this. This one is just to delay his using Kendari to shut down Balikpappan and Soerebaja. The more I can get out of there the better!

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 555
RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat) - 10/28/2018 10:16:13 AM   
GetAssista

 

Posts: 2732
Joined: 9/19/2009
Status: offline
PT boat production is limited for the Allies at some predetermined monthly figures, so if you kill a lot you can deplete the pool for some time.
My last AI game had ~170 US PT boats in pool/TFs/lost in May 43

(in reply to John B.)
Post #: 556
RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat) - 10/28/2018 9:31:29 PM   
John B.


Posts: 3909
Joined: 9/25/2011
From: Virginia
Status: offline
He's down 10 more or so. Not too much action this time. I moved the KB north and Scott lost about 20 SBDs from a land based attack and an AKL and AVD to my KB. Four surface TF's have rearmed at Soerebaja and are heading back to bombard Kendari. At some point he'll run out of PT boats and the bombardments will be more effective. The US carriers are no where to be seen! I wonder where they are.

(in reply to GetAssista)
Post #: 557
RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat) - 10/29/2018 10:17:32 PM   
John B.


Posts: 3909
Joined: 9/25/2011
From: Virginia
Status: offline
Apparently there are two secrets to a long and happy life. 1. Don't be a Japanese carrier pilot. 2. Don't serve on a US PT boat. The air results here speak for themselves. I lost 19 zeros (model 5) and a bunch of torpedo bombers and shot down 1 (one) P-47 that was over Kendari. What the screen does not show you is that, thus far, Scott has lost 63 PT boats defending Kendari and all he has to show for it is a torpedo in the Hiei. Still, I"m not despondent about these air losses. With the ground losses and tossing in a couple of heavy bombers, Scott had me at less than 2-1 and that's what he needs to win.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to John B.)
Post #: 558
RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat) - 10/29/2018 10:21:16 PM   
John B.


Posts: 3909
Joined: 9/25/2011
From: Virginia
Status: offline
And, I'm making progress on my goal to keep Kendari shut down as long as possible. It's been getting at least one bombardment per day from a BB TF and I did just put in an air raid (which did a lot of damage but cost me a lot of planes). Two more BBs should go in tonight for another bombardment and then the KB will head back to port to refuel. I am getting another load of fuel and oil out of Balikpapan so that's helpful.

The big question is, just where are the American carriers? They have not been spotted for a long time. Is Scott going to head to the HI? Burma has gone quiet, are the Carriers heading up there? Too Sumatra? It's making me paranoid.

But, otherwise, given his push into the DEI and the stalemate in Burma, he's still a long way from the HI and all the VP cities/islands up there and no strat bombing until he gets a lot closer.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to John B.)
Post #: 559
RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat) - 11/1/2018 9:42:24 PM   
John B.


Posts: 3909
Joined: 9/25/2011
From: Virginia
Status: offline
Another slow day (and each slow day is a victory for Japan). The Betties showed up but the fighter sweep did not. American CVEs may be east of Ambon.

does it make sense to put Georges on CVs or just leave the Zeros for that?

Why is the Matrix game site not secure?




Attachment (1)

(in reply to John B.)
Post #: 560
RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat) - 11/3/2018 1:13:35 PM   
John B.


Posts: 3909
Joined: 9/25/2011
From: Virginia
Status: offline
In today's lesson boys and girls, we learn to never send a CL to do a DD's job. I thought that if I did a fast transport mission to resupply Koepeng then would run in, dump the supply barrels into the harbor and run away. Badaboom badabing. But, no they lingered and got to see American airpower up close and personal. Scratch two CLs.

In other news, there is an American CV TF near New Guinea and other scouting reports make me think he's making a push for Ternate. The IJN is just south of Makassar. The KB is going to try to avoid his subs and to not get into an accidental CV battle. So, I'm bringing everyone south to see what develops and to leave my bombardment/surface action options open.

Allied assault on Darwin failed. He lost 16 squads and I lost 1. My Emilys can reach Darwin from Soerebaja so I've been evacuating support troops to reduce his eventual VP haul. But, that's a long flight in a big slow transport.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to John B.)
Post #: 561
RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat) - 11/3/2018 5:20:11 PM   
Capt. Harlock


Posts: 5358
Joined: 9/15/2001
From: Los Angeles
Status: offline
quote:

In today's lesson boys and girls, we learn to never send a CL to do a DD's job. I thought that if I did a fast transport mission to resupply Koepeng then would run in, dump the supply barrels into the harbor and run away. Badaboom badabing. But, no they lingered and got to see American airpower up close and personal. Scratch two CLs


Out of curiousity, which two CL's? (On the other hand, if a CL had decent AA abilities, I wouldn't want to risk it -- there aren't enough of those to go around.)

_____________________________

Civil war? What does that mean? Is there any foreign war? Isn't every war fought between men, between brothers?

--Victor Hugo

(in reply to John B.)
Post #: 562
RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat) - 11/3/2018 5:51:54 PM   
John B.


Posts: 3909
Joined: 9/25/2011
From: Virginia
Status: offline
Naka and Oi. Naka does not seem like too much of a loss but Oi had nice AA!

(in reply to Capt. Harlock)
Post #: 563
RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat) - 11/3/2018 9:22:37 PM   
GetAssista

 

Posts: 2732
Joined: 9/19/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: John B.
Naka and Oi. Naka does not seem like too much of a loss but Oi had nice AA!

Kitakami and Oi are real gas guzzlers though, so you can take consolation in that

(in reply to John B.)
Post #: 564
RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat) - 11/4/2018 11:02:53 AM   
John B.


Posts: 3909
Joined: 9/25/2011
From: Virginia
Status: offline
Lol, that's right, it's all part of my long term plan to reduce Japanese fuel consumption. :)

(in reply to GetAssista)
Post #: 565
RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat) - 11/4/2018 12:05:38 PM   
John B.


Posts: 3909
Joined: 9/25/2011
From: Virginia
Status: offline
Well, at least the SBD pilots who sank my CLs did not get too much time to gloat. The KB moved in closer to Lauten and they were still on anti- ship duty. Got some of those VP back.

Tonight's mission is sending in two BB TFs to bombard Lauten. It's not a strategically important base since he can only use it to send heavies at long range against Soerobaja but I suspect that it is crammed full of planes so I might take out some of his P-47s with a good bombardment roll. And, no signs of the PT boat swarms that Scott has used. It looks like Kandari is still badly damaged so I'll set it aside for now and see if I can do some damage to his airpower.

There is a TF south of Timor heading west and the KB is heading down to investigate. In the meantime, his CV/AK TFs retreated to the east. I wonder where his fleet CVs are?

Resupply convoy at Saipan. And, he has not been contesting me over burma.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to John B.)
Post #: 566
RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat) - 11/4/2018 3:42:31 PM   
John B.


Posts: 3909
Joined: 9/25/2011
From: Virginia
Status: offline
Here's something you don't see everyday, the P-47s being bested in the air by Zeros! I got in my shore bombardments on Lauten and did not do too much damage but I suspect it shook up these fighter boys so they weren't on their best when they flew a sweep near my CVs. And, I actually got a few heavies that were bombing the docks at Rangoon. I'm not sure why Scott was doing that. I do have a SC laid up for repair so perhaps he thought there were bigger fish there.

I'm also making him come up to play over Burma. I figure British fighter production is not huge and I think my George's have an edge right now, so I"m trying to attrit him down while the balance is in my favor.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to John B.)
Post #: 567
RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat) - 11/4/2018 3:46:22 PM   
John B.


Posts: 3909
Joined: 9/25/2011
From: Virginia
Status: offline
A few planes here or there in Burma are not going to matter (besides making me feel better). the real action is here in the DEI. Scott has come out of his shell. I still don't see any fleet CVs in his TFs. He's either going to land at Ternate or he is going to start building up Taluad-eilanden. If he's at Ternate I may be within strike range tommorrow. If he's going to Talud it will take another turn. The KB will be a bit more exposed in its new position but it can swing west and refuel at Tarakan and Balikpapan if it needs to.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to John B.)
Post #: 568
RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat) - 11/4/2018 5:37:10 PM   
John B.


Posts: 3909
Joined: 9/25/2011
From: Virginia
Status: offline
Another nice turn in the air for the IJN.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to John B.)
Post #: 569
RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat) - 11/4/2018 5:41:49 PM   
John B.


Posts: 3909
Joined: 9/25/2011
From: Virginia
Status: offline
It's offical. Scott is bypassing Ternate (at least for now) in favor of building up the base at Talud. It can get up to a level 8 airfield and a level 5 port so it's another danger. But, it is away from the Palembang so that's a good thing. Even better is that now I see his main carrier force. The KB, having done some minor damage to his ground based air, is going to play is safe and head back to soerebaja to refuel and rearm. I'll let the american CVs patrol around Talud for a few days to burn up fuel and then we'll see what we can do to rectify this situation. Given how tough it is to make it through allied fighters, I'm tempted to cram my cvs full of fighters and shoot down his SBDs and TBFs giving cover to my surface fleet that can then sail into Talud without real fear of retribution from the air.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to John B.)
Post #: 570
Page:   <<   < prev  17 18 [19] 20 21   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat) Page: <<   < prev  17 18 [19] 20 21   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.922