Any ex-INF scenario/campaign?

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

Any ex-INF scenario/campaign?

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> Any ex-INF scenario/campaign?

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

Any ex-INF scenario/campaign? - 1/24/2019 2:26:48 AM

Dysta

Posts: 1909
Joined: 8/8/2015
Status: offline

Inspired from this news: http://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/26138/russia-shows-off-parts-of-its-controversial-cruise-missile-system-but-not-the-missile-itself

All I know is there are some pre-INF scenarios about IRBM and GLCM exchanges during Cold War, and I am not talking about rising countries who aren't INF signators trying those new toys after Y2K. I am thinking if INF becomes history, how US, Russia and other IRBM-capable countries will rearm those weapons for 2019-202x war scenarios?

My expectation would be close to Northern Inferno, but with 2010s techs, stealth, and much complicated capaign than the Cold War situation. Nuclear exchange is also likely but vastly dwarfen and less likely to use by mere angers. Though, I may beg to differ and like to see how ex-INF wars turn out in CMANO.

_____________________________

Post #: 1

RE: Any ex-INF scenario/campaign? - 1/24/2019 2:35:53 AM

Primarchx

Posts: 3102
Joined: 1/20/2013
Status: offline

I think the US should stick with INF but 'cooperate' with Japan to develop their own AA/AD ballistic weapons.

(in reply to Dysta)

Post #: 2

RE: Any ex-INF scenario/campaign? - 1/24/2019 9:14:46 AM

Dysta

Posts: 1909
Joined: 8/8/2015
Status: offline

It isn't easy to make a new scenario with DB3000 weapons because those are 80s designs before the treaty.

Though, I can suggest some new ground-based SSMs based on the RAND's PDF report few weeks ago. I know many of them are still in development stage before the ex-INF, but it's not difficult to think of range extensions and some upgrades to be applied. US Army may be happy to have new missiles and doing their parts other than sitting idle.

https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/research_reports/RR900/RR945/RAND_RR945.pdf

< Message edited by Dysta -- 1/24/2019 9:16:13 AM >

_____________________________

(in reply to Primarchx)

Post #: 3