Lokasenna
Posts: 9297
Joined: 3/3/2012 From: Iowan in MD/DC Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: MakeeLearn quote:
ORIGINAL: Lokasenna quote:
ORIGINAL: MakeeLearn A Federal Ban on Making Lethal Viruses Is Lifted Dec. 19, 2017 https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/19/health/lethal-viruses-nih.html "Federal officials on Tuesday ended a moratorium imposed three years ago on funding research that alters germs to make them more lethal. Such work can now proceed, said Dr. Francis S. Collins, the head of the National Institutes of Health, but only if a scientific panel decides that the benefits justify the risks. Some scientists are eager to pursue these studies because they may show, for example, how a bird flu could mutate to more easily infect humans, or could yield clues to making a better vaccine." "When the moratorium was imposed, it effectively halted 21 projects, Dr. Collins said. In the three years since, the N.I.H. created exceptions that funded ten of those projects. Five were flu-related, and five concerned the MERS virus. That virus is a coronavirus carried by camels that has infected about 2,100 people since it was discovered in 2012, and has killed about a third of them, according to the World Health Organization." Mildly concerning, but we know that this coronavirus wasn't made in a lab. Is "the scientific panel" the institutional review board process? If so, that is rather stringent and any risk of harm to humans has to be mitigated or conclusively shown to be worth it. It's worth noting that "compassionate use" falls outside of this process specifically because treatments that haven't yet met the stringent "prove it doesn't have negative side effects" part of the process would not pass. How does one know it is not made in a lab? With a Blister agent that attacks the lungs it is easy. Designer label? Made in ? RNA sequence? Surface proteins... the keys it uses to enter cells thus attacking parts of the body it's type normally does not attack? A month ago I read reports that HIV drugs were used with success in treating CV19 patients. It made me think Hmmmm! In the past few days I've read several reports that researchers are saying that CV19 is attacking and destroying T cells, just like HIV. Now they also claim it is causing heart inflammation, acute kidney disease, neurological malfunction, blood clots, intestinal damage and liver problems. Because they map its genome and trace it through the environment. We know it came from bats originally, but contrary to talk in this thread about "bat soup" and guano and so on, we know that it "jumped" to another animal (we just don't know which animal) and then jumped to humans. So: bats -> mystery animal -> humans. https:/www.livescience.com/did-coronavirus-evolve-in-dogs-after-bats.html quote:
SARS-CoV passed through civets and MERS-CoV through camels, and the molecular structure of SARS-CoV-2 suggests that the virus also passed through an intermediate animal, but scientists don't yet know which one. More: https://www.livescience.com/coronavirus-not-human-made-in-lab.html Sure, there's the editor's note at the top (from today!) - I do think we should be exploring all avenues, but more attention should be given to the more likely scenarios first.
|