Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: T57

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East 2 >> After Action Reports >> RE: T57 Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: T57 - 1/29/2021 10:00:26 PM   
loki100


Posts: 10920
Joined: 10/20/2012
From: Utlima Thule
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: wpurdom

Tell us more about this Stalingrad fortress - something crafted by the player or appearing automatically?


You can create them in urban or port hexes, essentially it allows overstacking. There are no secondary advantages (ie they don't create better fortifications) and it takes a little bit of advance planning.

To be useful, as the Soviets you need to be able to assign 5/6+ divisions to the hex, as the Germans 4+. The pay off is you make taking such a hex by direct assault a brutal costly business, the flip side is you risk encirclement.

Handy tricks, the city fort counter claims one stacking place in the hex so you can team with a fortified zone (that does build fortifications more quickly) or a couple of formations outside the fort (which can then be used for counter-attacks etc).

For the Germans, v useful come 1944+ when you want to delay the fall of what will be a key rail junction, can really tie up substantial Soviet forces.

_____________________________


(in reply to wpurdom)
Post #: 61
RE: T57 - 1/30/2021 5:07:43 PM   
Mahrgell

 

Posts: 50
Joined: 1/8/2016
Status: offline 		Uhm, so are units in the fortress permanently tied to the fortress? Or can they somehow be released from it again, with a delay or some cost...

(in reply to loki100)
Post #: 62
RE: T57 - 1/30/2021 7:04:34 PM   
DekeFentle

 

Posts: 40
Joined: 3/11/2019
Status: offline 		In loki100's post "T57 - 1/29/2021 8:31:58 AM" The units in the Stalingrad fortress have a <detach> click it looks like. I'm guessing, yes, you can move units in and out of fortress's.

Apologies for no links, I'm too much of a rookie apparently...

< Message edited by DekeFentle -- 1/30/2021 7:07:27 PM >

_____________________________

Cry havoc and let slip the dogs of war!

(in reply to Mahrgell)
Post #: 63
RE: T57 - 1/30/2021 9:33:50 PM   
loki100


Posts: 10920
Joined: 10/20/2012
From: Utlima Thule
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Mahrgell

Uhm, so are units in the fortress permanently tied to the fortress? Or can they somehow be released from it again, with a delay or some cost...


quote:

ORIGINAL: DekeFentle

In loki100's post "T57 - 1/29/2021 8:31:58 AM" The units in the Stalingrad fortress have a <detach> click it looks like. I'm guessing, yes, you can move units in and out of fortress's.

Apologies for no links, I'm too much of a rookie apparently...


DekeFentle is right, you can add/remove as you wish, if you remove the last Combat unit then you can retain the fort as a notional shell or disband it altogether

as above - it has no intrinsic value beyond the units allocated to it as a means to sidestep the usual 3 units in a hex/stacking rule

_____________________________


(in reply to DekeFentle)
Post #: 64
RE: T57 - 1/31/2021 3:56:40 PM   
Mahrgell

 

Posts: 50
Joined: 1/8/2016
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: loki100
Handy tricks, the city fort counter claims one stacking place in the hex so you can team with a fortified zone (that does build fortifications more quickly) or a couple of formations outside the fort (which can then be used for counter-attacks etc).


This is the post that caused my confusion.
Why is it handy to have formations outside the fort to counterattacks, when you can just charge out with everything at any time anyway.

Or: Is there any strategic benefit to ever having a division not being part of the fortress, when there is a fortress in the hex? The quoted post makes it sound like it, but from your clarification I don't see it.

(in reply to loki100)
Post #: 65
RE: T57 - 1/31/2021 4:43:18 PM   
loki100


Posts: 10920
Joined: 10/20/2012
From: Utlima Thule
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Mahrgell


quote:

ORIGINAL: loki100
Handy tricks, the city fort counter claims one stacking place in the hex so you can team with a fortified zone (that does build fortifications more quickly) or a couple of formations outside the fort (which can then be used for counter-attacks etc).


This is the post that caused my confusion.
Why is it handy to have formations outside the fort to counterattacks, when you can just charge out with everything at any time anyway.

Or: Is there any strategic benefit to ever having a division not being part of the fortress, when there is a fortress in the hex? The quoted post makes it sound like it, but from your clarification I don't see it.



To enter a city fort you need all your MP for the turn, so you can't move and then enter you must be in the hex or adjacent. When you exit, its a similar cost.

So you can't come out, attack, return. So one option is the city fort (say with 6 divisions) and a couple in the hex outside the fort. Those 2 are easier to rotate (say if they start to pick up losses) or use for localised counter-attacks.

_____________________________


(in reply to Mahrgell)
Post #: 66
T62 - 2/1/2021 8:38:09 AM   
loki100


Posts: 10920
Joined: 10/20/2012
From: Utlima Thule
Status: offline 		29 August 1942

This update is based on the end of T62

Background

SW Front’s offensive in mid-July had the effect of diverting the German pressure on Stalingrad but the cost was SW Front being forced back to its starting lines by the start of August. Up to 15 August, the Stalingrad sector slipped into a relative stalemate as the Germans probed the defensive lines in the city and traded blows with SW Front.

At the same time, Western Front renewed its offensive around Orel briefly achieving a breakthrough even as AGC renewed its attempts to recapture Vyazma.



Mid-August saw a shift in German tactics as they tried to storm the southern portion of the city



[1]

T62

The end of August saw the German offensive at Stalingrad simplify into a direct assault on the city and an attempt to force the Volga. SW Front was again driven back and lacked the means to intervene in the battle.



Around Orel, Western Front was now engaged in an attempt to reduce the German salient to the west of the city that had been created during their counter-stroke to the mid-August offensive.



In the Caucasus, the Germans increase their pressure on the port of Tuapse but their offensive towards Grozny has stalled.



Overall, I’d characterise these six turns as a mobile stalemate. The AI made small gains around Vyazma and attacks every 3-4 turns looking to gain more but I am strong enough to fend that off. The sector around Orel sees impressive Soviet gains turn into a quick retreat. Even worse, in the turn when I stripped the flanks to reinforce the breakthrough, the AI simply swatted aside my weakened front and generated a very nasty salient.

Stalingrad, as may be clear, has its own pattern. The AI experiments with variants of head on assaults and trying to cross the Volga (it has come close to that a few times). SW Front attacks, is thrown back and then forced to pull out those formations for refit.

What is different is I am now winning the refit battle. They are dependent on a single track rail from around Rostov, I have two sources of replacements. SW Front can send battered formations towards Saratov (an NSS). Stalingrad Front remains reliant on either using the National Reserve or merging Rifle Brigades, but I now have a steady flow of units being pulled out and units returning. I also now have a super-depot functioning NE of Stalingrad - which gives me a limited but local source of capacity to refit weakened units.

My assumption was now that Stalingrad will hold, so started to think about where to counter-attack when the weather turns or the Germans start to weaken.

I’m still paying a high price for this relative stalemate:



Especially for the VVS where my losses in pilots far exceeds my ability to train new ones.



To explore that in more detail, here is one of the actions around Orel. As with the Stalingrad action above, I pay a high price for any contested action, but Ground Support can be a real battle winner (as we will see later in reverse). So I can’t just let the LW have its way.



Few things worth noting in there. If you are used to WiTW, then note that air combat tends to happen at around 9,000’ not the 15,000’+ common in the West. That reflects both sides doctrines and generally the lower concentrations of flak – it also plays to the strength of Soviet fighter design.

Both sides drew their fighters from automatic interceptions (Patrol) not direct escorts, since these are fighters looking for tactical advantage they enter the battlefield much higher than the bombing missions.

Finally, and this you are stuck with, the German fighter pilots have skill ratings in the 90s, my better ones are in the 60s.

The only solution for a Soviet player is to slowly kill off this elite cadre (helped as more and more of the LW is drawn to the West from 1943 onwards).

Even though I won the ground action with some ease, the German bombers destroyed 24 elements and disrupted or damaged 61 more, in a closer action that could have made all the difference.

Finally, the OOB, I am winning (as you would expect) the build up, even if I am not really weakening the Axis numbers.



[1] As mentioned a few times, I find using the Rifle Brigades as SU directly attached to Combat Units by far their best role (when I am not using them as emergency reinforcements). As you can see there from the CV values, they are compensating for my weakened Rifle Corps.







_____________________________


(in reply to loki100)
Post #: 67
RE: T62 - 2/1/2021 9:50:42 AM   
Kronolog

 

Posts: 139
Joined: 3/23/2011
From: Sweden
Status: offline 		In the battle reports, there is a number in parenthesis next to the number of fighters commmitted by the attacker. Is this something new to WitE 2? I can't remember that it was present in WitW.

(in reply to loki100)
Post #: 68
RE: T62 - 2/1/2021 10:26:53 AM   
loki100


Posts: 10920
Joined: 10/20/2012
From: Utlima Thule
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kronolog

In the battle reports, there is a number in parenthesis next to the number of fighters commmitted by the attacker. Is this something new to WitE 2? I can't remember that it was present in WitW.


*hastily runs a search on the draft manual*

If there are possible escorts that could only partly cover the mission then they are shown as say 30(10), so 30 fighters escorted the raid but 10 couldn't actually cover all the way to the target hex. You are more likely to see that crop up around ground attack or strategic bombing style missions (as the battle report lay out is effectively the same for purely air-air or air-ground combats).

Its unlikely to crop up in GS as such as the mission allocation is based on being able to reach the combat hex in the first place (though there is some interaction between air superiority missions and the flight path).

So yes, its been added since WiTW.

_____________________________


(in reply to Kronolog)
Post #: 69
RE: T62 - 2/1/2021 10:31:20 AM   
CapAndGown


Posts: 3206
Joined: 3/6/2001
From: Virginia, USA
Status: offline 		Oh, please don't tell me we are going to be responsible for setting air group altitudes ala WitP. This was something that should have been abstracted.

(in reply to Kronolog)
Post #: 70
RE: T62 - 2/1/2021 10:36:01 AM   
loki100


Posts: 10920
Joined: 10/20/2012
From: Utlima Thule
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: CapAndGown

Oh, please don't tell me we are going to be responsible for setting air group altitudes ala WitP. This was something that should have been abstracted.


as in WiTW you can interact with the air war in lots of ways, at one set broad directions and the AI does it for you at the other fiddle around with the load outs of each air group for that particular mission.

But the 9,000' is set as the default for most missions and works well for most missions.

We'll do a 'showcase' on the various AI assists in the game that can simplify a lot of routines.

I've never played WiTP so don't know the system there, but in the main WiTW gives you a better read across to WiTE2 (& even then there are a lot of differences)

_____________________________


(in reply to CapAndGown)
Post #: 71
RE: T62 - 2/1/2021 11:09:49 AM   
821Bobo


Posts: 2311
Joined: 2/8/2011
From: Slovakia
Status: offline 		No its nothing like WitP. For the most cases you set up at the game start the mission altitude for all types(eg. GS 9000, ground attack 5000, superiority 15000 etc.) and leave it be. You still can change altitude for any air directive if you wish(but you set it per air directive not per group). So yes it is abstracted, at least compared to WitP where you set for every group separately.

(in reply to loki100)
Post #: 72
RE: T62 - 2/1/2021 9:33:03 PM   
dwesolick


Posts: 593
Joined: 6/24/2002
From: Colorado
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: loki100

I've never played WiTP





_____________________________

"The Navy has a moth-eaten tradition that the captain who loses his ship is disgraced. What do they have all those ships for, if not to hurl them at the enemy?" --Douglas MacArthur

(in reply to loki100)
Post #: 73
RE: T62 - 2/1/2021 9:39:54 PM   
loki100


Posts: 10920
Joined: 10/20/2012
From: Utlima Thule
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: dwesolick


quote:

ORIGINAL: loki100

I've never played WiTP






ach. I'm really rubbish at naval operations. I mean I managed to sink the Austrian fleet when playing Rise of Prussia (and it was sailing up the Danube not the Elbe with all those nasty forts).

_____________________________


(in reply to dwesolick)
Post #: 74
T72 - 2/3/2021 8:22:56 AM   
loki100


Posts: 10920
Joined: 10/20/2012
From: Utlima Thule
Status: offline 		7 November 1942

This update is based on the end of T72

Background

September saw the Germans regain the initiative around Orel as the Soviets struggled to stall their renewed offensive.



At the same time, they struck back around Stalingrad eliminating most of the recent Soviet gains north and south of the city.

By 15 September, Western Front managed to bring the offensive to a halt in heavy fighting but the Germans retained the initiative around Stalingrad. In response, SW Front again committed itself to a local offensive and by 26 September had thrown the Germans back from their positions outside Stalingrad itself.



Slowly the initiative started to change hands. By 3 October, Orel was back in Soviet hands and by 10 October the German rail hub at Chir was briefly occupied by Soviet tanks before a counter-attack restored their line of communications.

The start of the autumn rains from 11 October saw the front lines stall until the ground froze on 1 November.

T72

1 November saw the initiative decisively shift at Stalingrad. Fearing the build up of Soviet forces the Germans started to pull back over the Don. At Stalingrad itself, the Don and Stalingrad Fronts followed up while the Voronezh Front attacked along the northern arm of the Don.




In the Caucasus, the Axis forces started to pull back. For the first time in many months, Kalinin and Volkhov Fronts made limited gains as the Axis forces on their respective sectors had been weakened to support the German offensive around Orel.

Of more importance was the decision to shift SW Front from the Stalingrad battles to support an offensive aimed at Kharkov or Stalino.



This is the first big decision I have made in a lot of turns. My logic is the chance for a big Stalingrad pocket has just been lost (in effect E-Adolf can read a map better than his original) so if I used SW Front at Stalingrad I’d end up strangling my offensive with supply problems. As ever it is that single track rail from the Donets to Chir that causes problems for the side trying to use it.

The formations still at Stalingrad have enough combat power and mobility to take advantage of the AI’s retreat and surround a few slower moving units.

The advantage on the middle Don around Voronezh is that there are 2 dual track lines running to that sector and then a number of lines (mostly N-S but some E-W) to support my most powerful formation (at least in terms of armour). I wasn’t sure at this stage if I was going to attack west towards Kursk-Belgorod-Kharkov or south towards Stalino.

Moving an entire front is a costly business.



In effect, all those red rail lines mean I have maxed out both rail line usage and local rail yard capacity. I’ve moved the armour by rail, the bulk of the infantry have to march (easier done with frozen ground than once the snow builds up).

Even worse, that excess rail usage does not clear in one turn. It will disrupt my supplies for 3-4 turns, especially as it will take me a while to complete the redeployment. Now I’d been thinking of this redeployment since August so have been developing the depot network on this sector for some turns. Not shown but the sector directly behind and to the north of Voronezh is particularly depot rich. So while I am now making a mess of bringing in fresh freight, I have ensured the local network is well stocked.

In part to allow it to recover from the recent fighting around Orel, and in part so as not to place any more stress on my rail network, Western Front is firmly on the defensive for now.

A slightly different view on the OOB.



Here, you can see how many men and guns I have at my various airbases and this allocation is all done automatically, no need (as in WiTW) to worry about setting airbase TOEs, how many are being moved between Theatres and my commitment to the other theatres (I have sent a few extra units to the Northern Theatre).

The more conventional view reinforces just how tank heavy SW Front is.



You can break that down even more, so:



Click on say 12 Guards Tank Corps and that will take you to the map and the detailed unit tab.



One reason for using rails to move these units is to avoid fatigue and damaged elements.
And losses to this stage:



Note the Germans are seeing a substantial flow of disabled men returning to their units.

_____________________________


(in reply to loki100)
Post #: 75
T79 - 2/5/2021 8:15:49 AM   
loki100


Posts: 10920
Joined: 10/20/2012
From: Utlima Thule
Status: offline 		27 December 1942

This update is based on the end of T79

Background

Up to the middle of November, a degree of calm settled over the front. The Germans managed a careful retreat in the south, fending off Soviet attempts to cut off their rearguards. Central and Voronezh Fronts made small gains over the Don and by 28 November had advanced 30 miles west, creating a deployment zone for SW Front [1].

In the far south, elements of the Trans-Caucasus Front had reached the outskirts of Novorossiysk.

Perhaps under-estimating Soviet intentions, the Germans struck back around Orel disrupting the build up on that sector but also drawing off their own reserves to the south.




Lacking local reserves, and mostly reliant on Italian, Hungarian and Rumanian formations, between 6 and 13 December, the German defence fell apart as SW Front exploited up to 50 miles into the rear.




The situation steadily worsened as the Germans tried to slow the Soviet offensive with forces drawn from other sectors. By 19 December, Soviet spearheads were on the outskirts of Kharkov and the Axis forces fighting Stalingrad and Don Fronts were at risk of being encircled.



[2]

T79

The whole of the front from Voronezh to Leningrad has been static during those events. In the far north, this reflects that the two sides are evenly matched. For Western and Bryansk Front it is due to a build up. I don’t want to put too many demands on what is still a fragile supply net and equally I am prepared to wait for the Germans to respond to the breakthrough at Kharkov.


[3]

Anyway, lets skip to the far south.



I have massive supply problems. The Caucasus Front has 1 more army left well to the rear and has just sent another army to the National Reserve.
Things are not much better approaching Rostov.



As with the other formations, both Don and Stalingrad Fronts have armies held back in deep reserve. The situation won’t radically improve till I link up the N-S dual rails. One good thing though is that the AI has similar problems.

In turn, SW Front is running out of steam. A German counter-attack cut off the 2 advanced Tank Corps, so decided to let them sit still this turn. I really need to pull the tanks out of the line to rest but lack infantry as Voronezh Front is caught up on the northern flank of Stalingrad Front.



Comments

As mentioned before, the cost and what you can build varies across the game. As does the limit for certain unit types (so the start of 1943 will close off the option to build more Rifle Divisions or Brigades).



I’ve been in no hurry to created Mechanized Corps. I find late 1942-mid 1943 a period when the Soviets hit a truck shortage till the benefits of the increased LL supply make a difference. My units on average have 85% of the trucks they need and a Mech Corps demands around 2,800 trucks to be fully mobile.

This is down to 2 problems. First, I do have (and need) far more armour than I had in early 1942 and second, my supply lines in the south are horribly stretched. That in turn is why all the northern and central sector of the front is sat still with full depots only a few miles behind the front line. Even on my static sectors, my mobile formations are stuck with MP in the mid-30s.



Especially as the snow levels build up that is not enough to really exploit a breakthrough.

I am also (and many of you will recognise this issue from WiTE1) being cautious about building Corps. I still need a lot of divisions to fill out the long front lines.

So either on-map or in the reserve I currently have 69 Corps. 24 Tank (13 are Guards), 1 Mech, 14 Cavalry (12 Guards) and 30 Rifle (29 are Guards).

On the subject of Guards status:



The maximum % in each category will increase in 1943.

[1] Its not just the time to move, its letting my supply net recover from being pushed to the limits. Want the local depots to fill up so that my armour regain their MP as opposed to losing a lot as their trucks are scattered around trying to find supply and ammunition. If I had attacked immediately, I would have struggled to exploit the breakthrough and would almost immediately be in supply problems.

[2] Pushing that deep was a huge gamble, but I decided I had the brigades to rebuild those two Corps if I lost them. The reward is that has made a huge mess in the Axis rail net and effectively split the formations around Orel from those in the south.

[3] One thing to note there is even at this stage how powerful well rested Gds Rifle Corps are. It is relatively easy to get them to 40-45 CV so a stack can be well over 100. With the 1943 TOE this becomes even more impressive, with the 1944 TOE (& on average higher Soviet morale), you can stack near 200 CV if they are fully rested. That, plus artillery divisions and air support, will dismantle any defensive line.


_____________________________


(in reply to loki100)
Post #: 76
RE: T79 - 2/5/2021 10:55:12 AM   
Nix77

 

Posts: 561
Joined: 10/2/2016
From: Finland
Status: offline 		I'm guessing the snowflakes are the weather overlay, they can be turned off too?

Seems like unique snowflakes are not allowed in Soviet Russia, the background seems a bit monotonous :D

(in reply to loki100)
Post #: 77
RE: T79 - 2/5/2021 11:09:13 AM   
loki100


Posts: 10920
Joined: 10/20/2012
From: Utlima Thule
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Nix77

I'm guessing the snowflakes are the weather overlay, they can be turned off too?

Seems like unique snowflakes are not allowed in Soviet Russia, the background seems a bit monotonous :D


yes, you have air/ground shown (my usual choice), air only (prob not much use as most of your air commitment is to GS), ground only or neither (so you have the summer map on display).

As with so much else it becomes a matter of choice. If the conditions are regular blizzards I sometimes just have ground simply to keep an eye on a few things. Towards the end of winter I may flip it off when planning, so that I am sure where the rivers are when I'm thinking of what sort of logistics network I want/can sustain in the spring muds but also where I might be able to create a useful bridgehead


_____________________________


(in reply to Nix77)
Post #: 78
RE: T79 - 2/5/2021 11:16:29 AM   
Sammy5IsAlive

 

Posts: 514
Joined: 8/4/2014
Status: offline 		Just going back to the previous update - that pre-emptive retreat in front of Stalingrad is a big step forward for the AI I think? The WITE AI in particular has a habit of waiting for everything to go wrong before bolting the stable door and retreating. Is the Soviet AI in 41/42 similarly able to keep itself out of the worst trouble?

< Message edited by Sammy5IsAlive -- 2/5/2021 11:19:43 AM >

(in reply to Nix77)
Post #: 79
RE: T79 - 2/5/2021 11:52:21 AM   
loki100


Posts: 10920
Joined: 10/20/2012
From: Utlima Thule
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Sammy5IsAlive

Just going back to the previous update - that pre-emptive retreat in front of Stalingrad is a big step forward for the AI I think? The WITE AI in particular has a habit of waiting for everything to go wrong before bolting the stable door and retreating. Is the Soviet AI in 41/42 similarly able to keep itself out of the worst trouble?


agree - overall the AI now is good. This game picked up a number of issues that were easy to miss in the AI-AI games (these are what we've mostly relied on for complete game balance information for obvious reasons) and have been sorted out now. But overall, my view was it played the big decisions pretty well, and it puts together reasonably effective operations (it attacks at spots not randomly along the front, it is more flank aware etc), its still not great at individual placement/use of terrain/HQ structures but all that is very hard in a game of this complexity and with what makes sense shifting across the game.

It also helps having 2 good mid/late war scenarios in Stalingrad-Berlin and Vistula-Berlin, that is useful to explore how it responds to that sort of situation



_____________________________


(in reply to Sammy5IsAlive)
Post #: 80
RE: T79 - 2/5/2021 5:25:54 PM   
ncc1701e


Posts: 7380
Joined: 10/29/2013
From: Utopia Planitia Fleet Yards
Status: offline 		Thanks for the AAR. On average, how long to play a turn?

_____________________________

Chancellor Gorkon to Captain James T. Kirk:
You don't trust me, do you? I don't blame you. If there is to be a brave new world, our generation is going to have the hardest time living in it.

(in reply to loki100)
Post #: 81
RE: T79 - 2/5/2021 6:48:46 PM   
loki100


Posts: 10920
Joined: 10/20/2012
From: Utlima Thule
Status: offline 		I could say it depends. ...

but that is not much use. I have a fair tolerance for detail and this stage of the game I am having to juggle wrecked VVS formations a lot. Low morale I can sort out on map, low experience (mainly due to a lack of trained pilots) need to go to the reserve.

I'd say 90-120 minutes, more on the turns when I rework my logistics system (say every 4 turns). The main real variable is how much the front has shifted shape, so these turns I spent ages counting and recounting MP and CV for SW Front and the related formations but to the south was fairly mechanistic, move to occupy what the AI had abandoned and the north is just a lot of staring at each other.

_____________________________


(in reply to ncc1701e)
Post #: 82
RE: T79 - 2/5/2021 7:03:53 PM   
ncc1701e


Posts: 7380
Joined: 10/29/2013
From: Utopia Planitia Fleet Yards
Status: offline 		Thanks

_____________________________

Chancellor Gorkon to Captain James T. Kirk:
You don't trust me, do you? I don't blame you. If there is to be a brave new world, our generation is going to have the hardest time living in it.

(in reply to loki100)
Post #: 83
RE: T79 - 2/6/2021 6:56:42 AM   
Nix77

 

Posts: 561
Joined: 10/2/2016
From: Finland
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: loki100


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sammy5IsAlive

Just going back to the previous update - that pre-emptive retreat in front of Stalingrad is a big step forward for the AI I think? The WITE AI in particular has a habit of waiting for everything to go wrong before bolting the stable door and retreating. Is the Soviet AI in 41/42 similarly able to keep itself out of the worst trouble?


agree - overall the AI now is good. This game picked up a number of issues that were easy to miss in the AI-AI games (these are what we've mostly relied on for complete game balance information for obvious reasons) and have been sorted out now. But overall, my view was it played the big decisions pretty well, and it puts together reasonably effective operations (it attacks at spots not randomly along the front, it is more flank aware etc), its still not great at individual placement/use of terrain/HQ structures but all that is very hard in a game of this complexity and with what makes sense shifting across the game.

It also helps having 2 good mid/late war scenarios in Stalingrad-Berlin and Vistula-Berlin, that is useful to explore how it responds to that sort of situation




Have you yet ran into any catastrophic AI terrain selection failures?

I recall a phase in my Soviet WitE1 campaign vs the AI where in -42 the German panzers main offensives were concentrated mostly in the middle Pripyat swamps... that really finalized their loss, and no logistics or combat handicap could've saved the AI from that mistake.

(in reply to loki100)
Post #: 84
RE: T79 - 2/6/2021 10:44:17 AM   
loki100


Posts: 10920
Joined: 10/20/2012
From: Utlima Thule
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Nix77


quote:

ORIGINAL: loki100


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sammy5IsAlive

Just going back to the previous update - that pre-emptive retreat in front of Stalingrad is a big step forward for the AI I think? The WITE AI in particular has a habit of waiting for everything to go wrong before bolting the stable door and retreating. Is the Soviet AI in 41/42 similarly able to keep itself out of the worst trouble?


agree - overall the AI now is good. This game picked up a number of issues that were easy to miss in the AI-AI games (these are what we've mostly relied on for complete game balance information for obvious reasons) and have been sorted out now. But overall, my view was it played the big decisions pretty well, and it puts together reasonably effective operations (it attacks at spots not randomly along the front, it is more flank aware etc), its still not great at individual placement/use of terrain/HQ structures but all that is very hard in a game of this complexity and with what makes sense shifting across the game.

It also helps having 2 good mid/late war scenarios in Stalingrad-Berlin and Vistula-Berlin, that is useful to explore how it responds to that sort of situation




Have you yet ran into any catastrophic AI terrain selection failures?

I recall a phase in my Soviet WitE1 campaign vs the AI where in -42 the German panzers main offensives were concentrated mostly in the middle Pripyat swamps... that really finalized their loss, and no logistics or combat handicap could've saved the AI from that mistake.



No. its basically ok. The criticism is it doesn't really recognise why a particular hex is really important in the current configuration of the front line. So that is one reason to give it a hand up in terms of the morale setting.

For the summer of 1942 it picks either Moscow or the South - for VP reasons alone those are good choices. So you don't get the issue that happened in WiTE1 of a determined drive from the Volkhov to Cherepovets for eg.

In the course of this test I uncovered 3 instances where it wasn't using its forces where they were needed - all of which got resolved by addressing the underlying issues.

So accepting it is an AI, trying to cope with a complex game (both the rules and reading how the situation is changing) I think it'll give you a good experience. Beating the Soviet AI in 1941 is not easy (at least once you move to morale of 110+), even if you have a really good grasp of the logistics system

_____________________________


(in reply to Nix77)
Post #: 85
RE: T79 - 2/6/2021 1:54:56 PM   
DekeFentle

 

Posts: 40
Joined: 3/11/2019
Status: offline
quote:

We'll come back to discuss that 'W' next to the unit name in one of Red Lancer's post - its a really neat addition to the game


Did I miss the discussion?

_____________________________

Cry havoc and let slip the dogs of war!

(in reply to loki100)
Post #: 86
RE: T79 - 2/6/2021 2:10:48 PM   
loki100


Posts: 10920
Joined: 10/20/2012
From: Utlima Thule
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DekeFentle

quote:

We'll come back to discuss that 'W' next to the unit name in one of Red Lancer's post - its a really neat addition to the game


Did I miss the discussion?


still to come ...

_____________________________


(in reply to DekeFentle)
Post #: 87
T90 - 2/7/2021 9:48:13 AM   
loki100


Posts: 10920
Joined: 10/20/2012
From: Utlima Thule
Status: offline 		13 March 1943

This update is based on the end of T90

Background

The start of 1943 saw the Soviet offensive stall apart from a small breakthrough by Central Front towards Kursk. However, by 17 January even this had been stopped as the Germans created a strong defensive line along the Donets.

By the end of January, the Soviets had reached Rostov and had completed the build up of Western and Bryansk Fronts. The offensive on this sector opened on 31 January with the goal of reaching Bryansk and Yelnya.



By 27 February, Western Front had made limited gains and was re-organising to renew the offensive while Bryansk Front was still caught up in fighting to reduce the German salient west of Orel. These battles were to stretch over the next 3 weeks badly delaying the Soviet advance.



T90

As maybe clear from that brief overview this has been a frustrating phase. SW Front is over-extended and I still have too much of its assault formations locked into the front line. My real hope on this sector is for Stalingrad Front to reach Stalino and shorten the front. That will allow me to use Voronezh Front to shorten the sector held by SW Front and renew that offensive.

In the image below, you can see part of the problem. Even remaining static, and with 100 CPP, my Tank Corps have MP in the mid-20s.



Which leaves this sector as my main hope. I am using the two Moscow MD to give command to the armies holding the flank (they can dig in over level 1 and that helps deter German attacks). Bryansk Front has finally reduced that salient and Western Front is fully rested. The small attacks to to the south of its salient are to give me ZoC free movement up to the front line.

It also has most of my artillery divisions.



Losses over that phase. Am over-running a few axis formations but nothing really significant – certainly not the equivalent of capturing 6 Army at Stalingrad.



Air losses remain one-sided. Most of my LB are off map (no point flying long distances in poor weather) but my fighters take heavy losses escorting the Sturmoviks into action. As before, there is no point worrying about this. You can't solve the gap in experience between the two sides (even careful use of the National Reserve only really brings Soviet pilots up to their notional NM value for experience) and while Soviet planes are improving they are still mostly out-classed.

But the reward for large scale GS makes taking these losses worth it.



OOB. My numbers are staying pretty much static though I have a lot in the reserve training up. I now have 4 Assault Fronts (you gain +1 each year) and they are basically grouped into pairs.

As mentioned, I am using the Moscow MD commands to control the secondary armies in the central sector. I lack the manpower/combat power to hold the flanks particularly well so the ability to generate better defensive positions is useful. As I gain more dominance – and less fear of counter-attacks – I'll bring these back into the Assault Fronts (as the CPP gain is very useful).



_____________________________


(in reply to loki100)
Post #: 88
RE: T90 - 2/7/2021 11:42:33 AM   
Headshotkill

 

Posts: 5
Joined: 1/18/2021
Status: offline 		So far the pre-emptive retreat from Stalingrad has to be the most advanced AI-behaviour yet witnessed in this AAR, what exactly triggered it?
Is it a timer, like at a certain turn if the Axis doesn't capture the city they automatically start retreating or does it actually analyse the soviet buildup and determine the risk?
Does it look further than that and also consider your breakout from Voronezh to Kharkov?
Is this behaviour also possible in other sectors like for example a historical Rhzev/Vyazma salient?

(in reply to loki100)
Post #: 89
RE: T90 - 2/7/2021 12:05:10 PM   
loki100


Posts: 10920
Joined: 10/20/2012
From: Utlima Thule
Status: offline 		I think it has a few preset triggers where it is made aware of wider risks. One is around Stalingrad if it is exposed, another is for AGN if the Soviets push along the Dauga. This is part of how it plays the game, it recognises a situation (say with the Axis the chance to move into the Crimea) and then carries out the necessary moves. So it has a core set of criteria and a degree of situational awareness and specific options.

We have Operation Mars as one of the scenarios and that has been really good for seeing how the AI handles that type of situation - which is tricky enough for human axis players to judge in the wider Stalingrad-Berlin campaign.

In general, you will get more small pockets vs the AI than in HtH but equally it is much more aware of the threat of operational encirclement. It also mostly makes good choices about attacking in to release units as opposed to writing them off given the wider strategic position on a given sector.

You can see something of that in the second map image, where it attacked to push me back from the base of its salient (the hex where it has 23-93)

_____________________________


(in reply to Headshotkill)
Post #: 90
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East 2 >> After Action Reports >> RE: T57 Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

3.141