EUBanana
Posts: 4552
Joined: 9/30/2003 From: Little England Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Courtenay What was missing on the attack on Naples was sufficient shore bombardment. Five points of naval bombardment is pitiful. Twenty five would have been more like it. They already used most of it in the landing by Rome. So 5 was what was left. Late in the turn, the final few bullets in the gun, etc. That said this turn a lot of the BBS are in these low boxes due to the Curse of Malta so I imagine there won't be a big attack on Naples this turn, either. Plus some BBs went to the Eastern Med to help an invasion of Libya. quote:
Also, Wavell could have been in the attack. That would have given an automatic +1 for HQ on city, and another +1 for HQ support. That combined with adequate NGS would have given you +9, which would have given you a chance. +5 really was not very good odds. Yeah I just read about the HQ bonus against cities this morning, will bear that in mind in future. Probably matter more for Kharkov as two HQs are pretty close so disaster will be limited if it fails. Wavell was actually having a spot of trouble getting over the mountains without getting disrupted or in the way, as its very packed there. But at the time i was not aware of just how important he was at attacking cities, so didn't bother. I was more trying to get more artillery to the front line to bombard Naples and disrupt more stuff. quote:
Convoy points should not be alone near the enemy. So I noticed! If they are completely unguarded surface raiders are deadly. That's why the arctic convoy route got nixed, 2 CAs to an unguarded Norwegian Sea that I forgot about and that was that. I should've extrapolated that to the entire Pacific as thats more or less what happened. I guess maybe it might be worth building a supply unit and sending it to the Philippines to buy a turn potentially. I did ponder buying a supply for the CW and sending it to Italy in case of disaster too but it's fairly expensive for a small bonus, and units seem to always be in demand. quote:
Neither side should ever do this. It gives a free hand to the enemy. Keep a substantial reserve naval force that can react to the enemy with superior numbers. Then when the enemy commits, jump on him. Yup, that's happening from now on (kinda... maybe after this turn). it was just that the carriers were on the west coast so moving in, so half the USN wasn't even there. Probably should've waited a turn before declaring war. quote:
You are playing with limited supply across straights. The Japanese navy cut off supply to the notional unit, so its strength was zero. Aha, so that explains that. As mentioned, the notional unit business seems to be very much black art. Like the odds can be worse if you include it sometimes? what gives there?? I assume it counts as a division and hits the unit cap of 3, or something? quote:
Timoshenko gets railed to Stavropol. quote:
Why Stavropol? Timeshenko is an HQ, so can rail to any rail hex, and closer to the front looks better. I didn't know they could end up anywhere as well? I know they count as a city when you rail TO them. Well, something to bear in mind, but he's at the front now.
< Message edited by EUBanana -- 7/18/2021 11:08:53 PM >
_____________________________
|