RE: OH-58 Data Base Error?

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

RE: OH-58 Data Base Error?

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> Mods and Scenarios >> RE: OH-58 Data Base Error?

Page: << < prev 239 240 [241] 242 243 next > >>

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: OH-58 Data Base Error? - 11/15/2021 10:44:12 PM

Boagrius

Posts: 67
Joined: 7/21/2020
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Blast33

<type>UPDATE</type>
<summary>Generic IR camera sees F-35 at a very high distance.</summary>
<detail> The SA-22 Pantsir has a Generic IR camera attached to the system. The IR camera still sees a F-35 from more than 100Nm from behind (cruise setting). And around 51 Nm in frontal aspect. Compared to the data in the evidence link (which IR camera is in the same class) these figures are exponentially higher than the graphics.
</detail>
<evidence>
https://twitter.com/gunner_schmulke/status/1459327066739036168
</evidence>

I believe this is currently being worked on as part of a broader effort regarding IR-based VLO. The game doesn't really model it in its current form.

https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=5017039

(in reply to Blast33)

Post #: 7201

RE: OH-58 Data Base Error? - 11/16/2021 8:33:04 PM

Blast33

Posts: 404
Joined: 12/31/2018
From: Above and beyond
Status: offline

Thank you, you spotted it already, good!

(in reply to Boagrius)

Post #: 7202

RE: OH-58 Data Base Error? - 11/19/2021 9:28:41 AM

14yellow14

Posts: 117
Joined: 12/8/2019
Status: offline

<type>UPDATE</type>
<summary>Su-35S L-Band Wing Radar it's not a radar</summary>
<detail>

Su-35S L-Band Wing Radar (sensor_5714) is too powerful (even more than ground-based L-Band radars xD) and it's a mistake, that antenna on the Su-35 works more like IFF or ESM than anything else. I think it's not a radar. Same with the Su-57.

quote:

The Su-57 is also said to incorporate L-band radar arrays blended inside its large maneuvering leading edge extensions. These radars are more for target discrimination and identification than anything else.

This has been previously discussed on the forum:

https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=4373897

I think it's the Type 4283 IFF:

quote:

ON-BOARD MULTIFUNCTIONAL
DIGITAL INTERROGATOR WITH ACTIVE
PHASED ANTENNA GRILLE (AFAR)

</detail>
<evidence>
https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=4373897
https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/20434/no-the-su-57-isnt-junk-six-features-we-like-on-russias-new-fighter
https://www.key.aero/article/sukhoi-su-35-ultimate-flanker
</evidence>

Thanks! :)

< Message edited by 14yellow14 -- 11/19/2021 4:25:52 PM >

(in reply to Blast33)

Post #: 7203

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 11/20/2021 1:43:53 AM

Fido81

Posts: 129
Joined: 7/14/2019
Status: offline

<type>ADD</type>
<summary>PL-19/A-235 "Nudol" Direct Ascent ASAT/ABM System</summary>
<detail>
2 missiles/TEL (road-mobile)
Immobile radar (perhaps the radar should not be included with the unit and should be a separate unit)
Max target altitude at least 485 km (demonstrated 11/2021), may be as high as 1000 km
Max target range 200-1500 km
Max interception velocity Mach 10
2 stage solid motor
Rear-aspect ASAT profile (minimizes relative velocity at intercept)
Anti-HGV capability
Conventional or kinetic warhead
</detail>
<evidence>
https://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/world/russia/a-235-asat.htm
https://swfound.org/media/207162/swf_global_counterspace_capabilities_2021.pdf pg 2-15
https://swfound.org/media/207181/swf_russian_da-asat_fact_sheet_apr2021.pdf
https://spacenews.com/russia-destroys-satellite-in-asat-test/
https://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2021/11/russia-anti-satellite-missile-debris/
https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/43140/russian-anti-satellite-test-produces-dangerous-debris-cloud-in-orbit-reports
http://militaryrussia.ru/blog/topic-806.html
</evidence>

(in reply to Parel803)

Post #: 7204

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 11/20/2021 9:33:16 AM

14yellow14

Posts: 117
Joined: 12/8/2019
Status: offline

<type>UPDATE</type>
<summary>The F-35C Block 4 (aircraft_4874) ESM system is wrong, the AN/ASQ-239 Barracuda is missing.</summary>
<detail>
The F-35C Block 4 ESM system is wrong, the AN/ASQ-239 Barracuda is missing. The ESM system seems to have been replaced by the Band 2/5 ESM Reciever (just RWR) sensor and has lost capabilities.

Actually in Block 4 (from Lot 17 onwards) the EW Barracuda system gets more apertures in Bands 2 (UHF/VHF) and 5 (above Ku-band) and this new sensor should complement the existing Barracuda by simply adding ESM (not just RWR) capability in those bands.

With this upgrade and more processing power it is supposed to be able to intercept early warning radar signals such as Nebo M (VHF) and even LPI radars.

AN/ASQ-239 Barracuda is an EW suite including ESM, RWR, OECM and DECM (at least in the frontal arc with the APG-81).
The same applies to the other F-35 versions in Block 4.

</detail>

<evidence>
https://twitter.com/alexgarcialonso/status/1461441028817362959
https://twitter.com/MIL_STD/status/1392470186477953031
https://twitter.com/TheDEWLine/status/1210215579065421825
https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/aircraft/systems/an-asq-239.htm

</evidence>

Thanks! :)

< Message edited by 14yellow14 -- 11/20/2021 2:19:21 PM >

(in reply to Fido81)

Post #: 7205

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 11/21/2021 5:49:51 PM

CV60

Posts: 992
Joined: 10/1/2012
Status: offline

I'm posting this at the request of "Stanley_The_Rolmate", who is a new member, and is having trouble posting. This post refers to CWDB, not the DB3K database:

All US CA's and CAG's seem to have way too high fuel consumption values. This means they have about 13-19 hours endurance at cruise speed.

Below are the units and their fuel consumption. They all have 40 tons of oil fuel.

Creep: 44,55kg per minute
Cruise: 49,5kg per minute
Full: 94,04kg per minute
Flank 185,62kg per minute
All versions of CA Rochester
All versions of CA Macon
All versions of CA Toledo
All versions of CA Des Moines
All versions of CA Los Angeles
All Versions of CA Newport News
CA Boston
CA Saint Paul
All versions of CA Helena

Creep: 30,72kg per minute
Cruise: 34,13kg per minute
Full: 64,86kg per minute
Flank: 128,01kg per minute
All versions of CA and CAG Canbrerra
All versions of CAG and CAG Boston

In comparison CG Albany which is a conversion of a ship that's part of the same class as the CA Rochester, Has the following fuel consumption values(also carries 40 tons of oil fuel):
Creep: 0,9kg per minute
Cruise: 1kg per minute
Full: 1,89kg per minute
Flank: 3,75kg per minute

[Note from CV 60]: Looking at these numbers, it appears "Stanley_The_Rolmate" is correct. Ship _1624 shows 40 tons of fuel. I'll try to dig around a bit and see what kind of numbers I can dig up for these cruisers, but the current fuel load is wrong.

(in reply to 14yellow14)

Post #: 7206

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 11/21/2021 9:26:45 PM

14yellow14

Posts: 117
Joined: 12/8/2019
Status: offline

<type>Update</type>
<summary>Rename AGM-88E AARGM ER (weapon_3588) to AGM-88G AARGM-ER</summary>
<detail>

Right now it is misnamed AGM-88E and is the G version.

Also, it would be nice if they added the AARGM-ER based SIAW missile for the USAF F-35A (Block 4)
From what is known initially it will be a missile based on the US Navy's AGM-88G, perhaps with a new warhead for a more varied target set. A more advanced missile will be developed later.

quote:

"SiAW is intended to "strike rapidly relocatable targets that create the anti-access/area denial environment..Targets include ballistic and cruise missile launchers, GPS jammers, anti-satellite systems and IADS.
Initial fielding by the mid-2020s"

quote:

USAF's FY22 request states that the Navy's AARGM-ER based solution (with improved warhead) will be an interim capability for its Stand In Attack Weapon program. The Air Force has requested $166 Million for #SiAW in FY-22 and has indicated plans to compete the enduring solution.

</detail>
<evidence>
https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/27022/air-force-to-turn-navy-air-defense-busting-missile-into-high-speed-critical-strike-weapon
https://twitter.com/MIL_STD/status/1230893012013678592
https://twitter.com/MIL_STD/status/1403477008257007625
</evidence>

Thanks! :)

< Message edited by 14yellow14 -- 11/21/2021 9:33:26 PM >

(in reply to CV60)

Post #: 7207

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 11/22/2021 12:43:53 AM

Scorpion86

Posts: 239
Joined: 2/26/2017
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: CV60
I'm posting this at the request of "Stanley_The_Rolmate", who is a new member, and is having trouble posting. This post refers to CWDB, not the DB3K database:

[...]

Hey, could you post this in the CWDB thread too?

(in reply to CV60)

Post #: 7208

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 11/22/2021 1:02:25 AM

CV60

Posts: 992
Joined: 10/1/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Scorpion86

quote:

ORIGINAL: CV60
I'm posting this at the request of "Stanley_The_Rolmate", who is a new member, and is having trouble posting. This post refers to CWDB, not the DB3K database:

[...]

Hey, could you post this in the CWDB thread too?

quote:

quote:

ORIGINAL: CV60
I'm posting this at the request of "Stanley_The_Rolmate", who is a new member, and is having trouble posting. This post refers to CWDB, not the DB3K database:

[...]

Hey, could you post this in the CWDB thread too?

Where is the CWDB thread? I couldn't fine it, and it didn't show up in my search

(in reply to Scorpion86)

Post #: 7209

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 11/22/2021 8:21:57 AM

KLAB

Posts: 355
Joined: 2/27/2007
Status: offline

https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=3436158
it is the thread below this one?

(in reply to CV60)

Post #: 7210

RE: OH-58 Data Base Error? - 11/22/2021 8:40:04 AM

KLAB

Posts: 355
Joined: 2/27/2007
Status: offline

https://rg.ru/2021/11/22/reg-cfo/u-su-35-nashli-dva-dopolnitelnyh-radara-protiv-stesls-celej.html

It may be something to do with terminology and translation but this article is unequivocal that it's three L band phased array "radars".
K

quote:

ORIGINAL: 14yellow14

<type>UPDATE</type>
<summary>Su-35S L-Band Wing Radar it's not a radar</summary>
<detail>

Su-35S L-Band Wing Radar (sensor_5714) is too powerful (even more than ground-based L-Band radars xD) and it's a mistake, that antenna on the Su-35 works more like IFF or ESM than anything else. I think it's not a radar. Same with the Su-57.

quote:

The Su-57 is also said to incorporate L-band radar arrays blended inside its large maneuvering leading edge extensions. These radars are more for target discrimination and identification than anything else.

This has been previously discussed on the forum:

https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=4373897

I think it's the Type 4283 IFF:

quote:

ON-BOARD MULTIFUNCTIONAL
DIGITAL INTERROGATOR WITH ACTIVE
PHASED ANTENNA GRILLE (AFAR)

</detail>
<evidence>
https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=4373897
https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/20434/no-the-su-57-isnt-junk-six-features-we-like-on-russias-new-fighter
https://www.key.aero/article/sukhoi-su-35-ultimate-flanker
</evidence>

Thanks! :)

(in reply to 14yellow14)

Post #: 7211

RE: OH-58 Data Base Error? - 11/22/2021 12:31:37 PM

14yellow14

Posts: 117
Joined: 12/8/2019
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: KLAB

https://rg.ru/2021/11/22/reg-cfo/u-su-35-nashli-dva-dopolnitelnyh-radara-protiv-stesls-celej.html

It may be something to do with terminology and translation but this article is unequivocal that it's three L band phased array "radars".
K

Thanks.

I've been doing some research and those claims of L-band anti-stealth radar functions are very dubious.

An antenna can be AESA and have other functions, such as IFF or communications. It doesnt mean its a search radar.
(THALES example https://www.edrmagazine.eu/thales-unveils-its-tsa-6000-aesa-flat-panel-iff)

The article you quote appeared yesterday and seems to confuse the SU-35 IFF suite (4283MP) with the SU-57 (N036L-1-01).

https://militarywatchmagazine.com/amp/article/su35-triple-radars-detect-stealth

Most sources I have consulted refer to these antennas as IFF or EW (including ECM and maybe search in the case of the much powerful SU-57 suite).

quote:

The (SU-35S) Type 4283MP IFF interrogator has an active electronic scanning array (AESA) located along the wing leading edges.

https://www.keymilitary.com/article/game-changing-flanker

quote:

The (SU-57) suite also has two N036L-1-01 L-band arrays on the wing's leading edge extensions that are not only used for friend-or-foe identification but also for electronic warfare purposes. Computer processing of the X- and L-band signals enable the systems information to be significantly enhanced.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Byelka_(radar)

Other aircraft have the same type of antennas in the same position for EW or communications.
https://img.militaryaerospace.com/files/base/ebm/mae/image/2016/07/th_0610mae_news04.png?auto=format&w=720

If it had a search function, an L-band radar needs to be huge to be able to track VLO targets at a certain distance and what these aircraft have are very small antennas.

In any case these sensors are incorrectly modelled in the game, it is not possible for an antenna with just a dozen modules on a fighter to have as much search power as a dedicated ground radar like the NEBO M L-BAND. Right now a Su-35S can detect VLO targets like the F-35 at the same distance as a dedicated L-band radar like the NEBO M...

Cheers
:)

< Message edited by 14yellow14 -- 11/22/2021 12:48:57 PM >

(in reply to KLAB)

Post #: 7212

RE: OH-58 Data Base Error? - 11/22/2021 1:18:49 PM

KLAB

Posts: 355
Joined: 2/27/2007
Status: offline

For what its worth I think there is definitely something being lost in translation as I have found examples of translations which refer to "electro optical radar" meaning something like the OLS-35 electro optical sensor with a built in track and scan function etc, clearly not a radar in any sense of the English meaning of "radar" but only in the sense of a device which detects things from a distance (not using the human eye).

< Message edited by KLAB -- 11/23/2021 9:53:55 AM >

(in reply to 14yellow14)

Post #: 7213

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 11/22/2021 9:26:28 PM

Scorpion86

Posts: 239
Joined: 2/26/2017
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: CV60

quote:

ORIGINAL: Scorpion86
Hey, could you post this in the CWDB thread too?

Where is the CWDB thread? I couldn't fine it, and it didn't show up in my search

quote:

ORIGINAL: KLAB
https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=3436158
it is the thread below this one?

CV60, it's the exact thread KLAB linked to! There you can request addition and ammends to the CWDB!

(in reply to CV60)

Post #: 7214

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 11/22/2021 11:18:51 PM

CV60

Posts: 992
Joined: 10/1/2012
Status: offline

quote:

CV60, it's the exact thread KLAB linked to! There you can request addition and ammends to the CWDB!

Thanks. I interpreted the title to mean requested additions to the database, not additions and corrections

(in reply to Scorpion86)

Post #: 7215

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 11/23/2021 10:12:39 AM

KLAB

Posts: 355
Joined: 2/27/2007
Status: offline

<type>ADD</type>
<summary>Single Survivor life Raft [2m] Generic Military</summary>
<detail>Nice to have would be a single survivor life raft. (I have not been able to find one with DB search so if it exists apologies?)

Noticed when working on some CSAR scenarios the smallest crew life raft has two people in it. Would be nice to have the ship equivalent of the facility #2046 - Stranded Personnel (1x) (Generic - 0)

As a downed aircrew it would be nice to have one crew member and perhaps give it have some form of secure comms - emergency radio which most military aircrew would have? Long term aim being that there would be comms DF?

The script is in its infancy but I am working towards getting the number of life rafts/survivors to match the crew size of the downed aircraft with a variable on survivors from aircraft by type.
At the moment if a single seat fighter gets shot down the life raft has two people in it.
In the longer term depending on my dubious LUA skills I am looking to limit the number of personnel the SAR/CSAR helo can pick up as I noticed they do not seem to ever run out of space, so my 412 rescue helo had about thirty people on board at one point!
As ever just an idea and for consideration.
K
</detail>
<evidence>That one person ejects the life raft would only have one person in it

</evidence>

< Message edited by KLAB -- 11/23/2021 7:44:13 PM >

(in reply to CV60)

Post #: 7216

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 11/23/2021 7:21:13 PM

BDukes

Posts: 1695
Joined: 12/27/2017
Status: offline

<type>UPDATE</type>
<summary>Add additional Mk-13 loadouts to #418 Tejas</summary>
<detail> More photos have become available with operational loadouts. Noticing more Archers than Pythons lately. That is probably the standard AAM.</detail>
1)Heavy 6 Mk-13 1000lb bombs, 2 Archers, 1 725kg drop tank
2)Long range 2 Mk-13, 3 725kg drop tanks, 2 Archers, 1 Lightening Pod
3)Standard 4 Mk-13, 2 725Kg drop tanks, 2 Archers, 1 Lightening Pod
</detail>
<evidence>
https://twitter.com/warplane_porn/status/1456656937504890887
https://thebharatmilitaryreview.blogspot.com/2013/12/indian-light-combat-aircraft-lca-tejas.html
https://defenceforumindia.com/threads/lca-tejas-mk1-mk1a-news-and-discussion.81401/page-213#lg=attachment49623&slide=0
https://twitter.com/JaidevJamwal/status/1402898829851054080/photo/1
https://thebharatmilitaryreview.blogspot.com/2012/10/indian-air-forces-lca-light-combat.html
</evidence>

< Message edited by BDukes -- 11/23/2021 11:10:07 PM >

_____________________________

Don't call it a comeback...

(in reply to KLAB)

Post #: 7217

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 11/23/2021 8:58:29 PM

BDukes

Posts: 1695
Joined: 12/27/2017
Status: offline

<type>Update</type>
<summary>Russian SA-13 [9K-35 Strela-10] Updated with 9M333 Missile. New unit referred to as SA-13M</summary>
<detail>Russian SA-13's have been updated with a more capable missile called the 9M3333. This has been requested in the past so first are that. Additional info added. Check out the last link too. Describes the differences in launchers and missile tech.</detail>
<evidence>
http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/fb.asp?m=4930514
http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/fb.asp?m=4931373
https://www.janes.com/defence-news/news-detail/russian-forces-receive-9m333-sams
https://rostec.ru/news/kalashnikov-vypolnil-goz-po-postavke-minoborony-rf-zenitnykh-raket/
https://en.topwar.ru/178528-zenitnaja-raketa-9m333-buduschee-dlja-zrk-strela-10.html
https://www.defenseworld.net/news/12987/Russia_Offers_To_Upgrade_India_s_Strela_Missile_System#.YZ1jgNDMJhE
https://www.airrecognition.com/index.php/news/defense-aviation-news/2021/november/7884-kalashnikov-delivers-latest-missiles-for-strela-air-defense-system-to-russian-troops.html
</evidence>

< Message edited by BDukes -- 11/23/2021 11:09:44 PM >

_____________________________

Don't call it a comeback...

(in reply to BDukes)

Post #: 7218

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 11/23/2021 9:09:13 PM

BDukes

Posts: 1695
Joined: 12/27/2017
Status: offline

<type>Add</type>
<summary>Add Algerian Mig-29M2 2021 x14</summary>
<detail>Pictures and movies of Algerian Mig-29M2 taken so probably a good add. Loadouts similar to Egypt's.</detail>
<evidence>
https://twitter.com/warplane_porn/status/1458529374873997324
https://twitter.com/RealAirPower1/status/1359203797613092871
https://www.scramble.nl/military-news/first-mig-29m-m2-fighter-aircraft-delivered-to-algeria
https://www.scramble.nl/military-news/brand-new-algerian-mig-29m2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cJf347CsE04
</evidence>

< Message edited by BDukes -- 11/23/2021 11:09:21 PM >

_____________________________

Don't call it a comeback...

(in reply to BDukes)

Post #: 7219

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 11/23/2021 9:38:02 PM

BDukes

Posts: 1695
Joined: 12/27/2017
Status: offline

<type>Add</type>
<summary>ADD Swedish LVS-103[Patriot PAC-3 MSE]SAM x4 2021</summary>
<detail>Swedish PAC-3 MSE Batteries are now in service.</detail>
<evidence>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1NoXkZwWEis&t=3s
https://www.armyrecognition.com/defense_news_november_2021_global_security_army_industry/sweden_officially_introduces_us_patriot_pac-3_mse_air_defense_missile_system_into_service.html
https://www.dsca.mil/press-media/major-arms-sales/sweden-patriot-configuration-3-modernized-fire-units
https://www.army-technology.com/news/sweden-acquires-patriot-defence-missile-system/
</evidence>

< Message edited by BDukes -- 11/23/2021 11:08:58 PM >

_____________________________

Don't call it a comeback...

(in reply to BDukes)

Post #: 7220

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 11/23/2021 10:30:44 PM

BDukes

Posts: 1695
Joined: 12/27/2017
Status: offline

<type>Update</type>
<summary>Add out of service date of 2020 to Fort Grange/Rosalie class #1604</summary>
<detail>Out of service last year and sold to Egypt this year.</detail>
<evidence>
https://www.navalnews.com/naval-news/2021/10/uk-sells-two-fort-rosalie-class-replenishment-ships-to-egypt/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fort_Rosalie-class_replenishment_ship
https://www.janes.com/defence-news/news-detail/egypt-buys-second-hand-fleet-support-ships-from-uk
</evidence>

< Message edited by BDukes -- 11/23/2021 11:08:40 PM >

_____________________________

Don't call it a comeback...

(in reply to BDukes)

Post #: 7221

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 11/23/2021 10:47:35 PM

BDukes

Posts: 1695
Joined: 12/27/2017
Status: offline

<type>Update</type>
<summary>Update #4623 Name from EA-03 to WZ-7</summary>
<detail>There are a number of these in active service now. Looks like first recon missions were 2018-2019.</detail>
<evidence>
https://twitter.com/RupprechtDeino/status/1458495283139162116
https://twitter.com/wenluomo/status/1458541687488200706
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WZ-7
https://www.armyrecognition.com/defense_news_november_2021_global_security_army_industry/new_largest_chinese-made_hale_combat_drone_wz-7_soar_dragon_enters_into_service.html
</evidence>

_____________________________

Don't call it a comeback...

(in reply to BDukes)

Post #: 7222

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 11/23/2021 11:01:57 PM

BDukes

Posts: 1695
Joined: 12/27/2017
Status: offline

<type>Add</type>
<summary>Add CM-802B Missile [YJ-83KB]</summary>
<detail>There is a new version of missile that has integrated active radar/passive IIR dual mode seeker. Benefit is one missile can do both land and sea strike. Note air and sea launched variants. Looks like PLAN JH-7a is the initial carrier.</detail>
<evidence>
https://twitter.com/RupprechtDeino/status/1448213167876841479
https://twitter.com/stoa1984/status/1453750132592287751/photo/1
https://twitter.com/Defence_IDA/status/1442703214672027649
https://twitter.com/Defence_IDA/status/1442703214672027649
</evidence>

< Message edited by BDukes -- 11/24/2021 12:01:09 AM >

_____________________________

Don't call it a comeback...

(in reply to BDukes)

Post #: 7223

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 11/24/2021 3:13:58 PM

tylerblakebrandon

Posts: 173
Joined: 5/11/2020
Status: offline

<type>Add</type>
<summary>Romeo SSB Conversion</summary>
<detail>Recent North Korean conversion of an existing Romeo SS to an SSB. Conversion includes lengthening the sail to accommodate 3 Pukguksong-3 or Pukguksong-4 SLBM's at the cost of endurance from a reduced battery compartment. </detail>
<evidence>
http://www.hisutton.com/ROMEO-Mod_Submarine.html
http://www.hisutton.com/Korean-KSS-III-And-ROMEO-Mod-Class-Submarines.html
http://www.hisutton.com/North-Korea-Pukguksong-SLBM.html?fbclid=IwAR2NU-5eLsOY1_pbjzV7NcjLjphJLO5iy_4ow5k8Q1ul2Qer16T1swb90vw
https://www.navalnews.com/naval-news/2020/10/unusual-submarine-likely-to-increase-threat-from-north-korea/?fbclid=IwAR1nEPgptctI_YQ9jh_jZ_KnQuDv7PfA6blmXElj45o-dlEjYE20FGvsgnI
https://www.navalnews.com/naval-news/2021/10/north-korea-fires-possible-pukguksong-ballistic-missile/
https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/29122/north-koreas-new-ballistic-missile-submarine-is-a-refurbished-antique
https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/42803/north-korea-tests-pint-sized-submarine-launched-ballistic-missile
</evidence>

(in reply to BDukes)

Post #: 7224

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 11/24/2021 3:50:53 PM

tylerblakebrandon

Posts: 173
Joined: 5/11/2020
Status: offline

<type>Update</type>
<summary>Update SLBM armament for Indian Arihant SSBN</summary>
<detail>Public Sources indicate the 12 K-15 SLBM or 4 K-4 SLBM, propose to add the new weapons to the DB3K and update SSBN armament from the current Agni III</detail>
<evidence>
http://www.hisutton.com/Vanquisher%20of%20Enemies%20-%20INS%20Arihant.html
http://www.hisutton.com/Revealed%20-%20INS%20Arihant%20SSBN.html
https://www.navalnews.com/naval-news/2021/05/5-years-of-submarine-secrecy-indias-unique-arihant-class-is-still-in-hiding/?fbclid=IwAR1T2n2-QEjRH-M-cLzhBF-gNiapoH1Zl7cl8DZG3aUQVvSDhYDSHS4dN8c
http://www.military-today.com/navy/arihant_class.htm
https://warontherocks.com/2019/01/angles-and-dangles-arihant-and-the-dilemma-of-indias-undersea-nuclear-weapons/
https://www.naval-technology.com/projects/arihant-class/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/K-4_(missile)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sagarika_(missile)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arihant-class_submarine
https://www.naval-technology.com/news/newsindian-navys-k-15-slbm-successfully-completes-development-trials/
http://www.ipcs.org/comm_select.php?articleNo=3870
https://www.armscontrol.org/act/2020-03/news/india-tests-submarine-launched-missile
https://thediplomat.com/tag/k-15-submarine-launched-ballistic-missiles/
https://thediplomat.com/tag/k-4-slbm/
https://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/world/india/k-4.htm
</evidence>

(in reply to tylerblakebrandon)

Post #: 7225

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 11/26/2021 9:30:24 AM

14yellow14

Posts: 117
Joined: 12/8/2019
Status: offline

<type>Update</type>
<summary>96L6 radar is operating in the wrong radar band</summary>
<detail>

The 96L6 Cheese Board radar operates in C-band (G only?) but is currently modelled as an S-band (E) radar.

quote:

This is flanked by a 96L6E (NATO reporting name Cheese Board) C-band (5.25GHz to 5.925GHz) early warning and target acquisition radar with a range of up to 162nm (300km).

This affects both the individual facility and the sensors of the S-400 batteries.
Of the S-400 system, the radar that operates in S-band is the Big Bird D radar (F band).

</detail>
<evidence>
https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/russia/96l6.htm
https://www.radartutorial.eu/19.kartei/02.surv/karte044.en.html
https://i.imgur.com/gLHFNtF.png
https://www.armadainternational.com/2021/08/turkey-antiradar-missile/
</evidence>

Thanks! :)

< Message edited by 14yellow14 -- 11/26/2021 9:59:23 AM >

(in reply to tylerblakebrandon)

Post #: 7226

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 11/28/2021 9:38:34 PM

14yellow14

Posts: 117
Joined: 12/8/2019
Status: offline

<type>Update</type>
<summary>Norway's F-35A (aircraft_3326) loadout with external JSM should be able to carry 4 missiles externally (6 total)</summary>
<detail>

Currently it only carries 2 externally and loses total capacity.

</detail>
<evidence>
https://theaviationist.com/2013/05/13/two-jsm-f35/
https://www.secretprojects.co.uk/data/attachments/139/139364-699853bce1f315ac352cd548962051fe.jpg
</evidence>

Thanks!

(in reply to 14yellow14)

Post #: 7227

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 11/29/2021 2:50:52 PM

lumiere

Posts: 99
Joined: 3/19/2019
From: Japan
Status: offline

(DB3K v491) Sorry if sub had any modification IRL, but Kamehameha (Submarine #96) is missing "Benjamin Franklin" magazines for torpedo reload.

_____________________________

"War claims its bitter, useless, sacrifice."

(in reply to 14yellow14)

Post #: 7228

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 12/2/2021 10:01:33 PM

FifthDomain

Posts: 82
Joined: 8/5/2020
Status: offline

Could I request the XQ-222 Valkyrie be capable of launch from carriers please it will launch from LHA but not CVN, thanks.

(in reply to ComDev)

Post #: 7229

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 12/4/2021 3:51:01 AM

KLAB

Posts: 355
Joined: 2/27/2007
Status: offline

<type>UPDATE</type>
<summary> UAE F-35 - Not happening Rafale F4 is. </summary>
<detail>
UAE has bought 80 Rafale instead.
Request/Suggest either
1. Overwrite UAE F-35 DB entry with Dassault Rafale F4.
2. Change entry for F35 to hypothetical.
3. Update title to show order cancelled.
4. Deletion. But suspect will cause issues. </detail>
<evidence>
https://www.france24.com/en/live-news/20211203-uae-signs-deal-for-80-french-rafale-fighter-jets-officials
</evidence>
Thanks
K

(in reply to FifthDomain)

Post #: 7230