Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in cheek aar

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East 2 >> After Action Reports >> RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in cheek aar Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in che... - 1/27/2022 9:55:13 PM   
Stamb

 

Posts: 1030
Joined: 10/26/2021
Status: offline
What are safe % for TBs in order not to lose VP/AP?

_____________________________


(in reply to Beethoven1)
Post #: 61
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in che... - 1/28/2022 6:14:00 AM   
56ajax


Posts: 1950
Joined: 12/3/2007
From: Carnegie, Australia
Status: offline
Your thoughts on Sov Mot Eng Sapper Batts. Disband? They do exactly the same job as non mot batts but tie up extra trucks?

_____________________________

Molotov : This we did not deserve.

Foch : This is not peace. This is a 20 year armistice.

C'est la guerre aérienne

(in reply to Stamb)
Post #: 62
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in che... - 1/28/2022 11:29:17 AM   
Beethoven1

 

Posts: 754
Joined: 3/25/2021
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: 56ajax

Your thoughts on Sov Mot Eng Sapper Batts. Disband? They do exactly the same job as non mot batts but tie up extra trucks?


You should disband them eventually for that reason, but it may not make sense to do so immediately in 1941. That is because if you disband them, you can't make non-motorized engineers without spending AP initially in 1941. So if you disband them, the manpower will be going into your divisions rather than into engineers. So until you get to the point where it is 0 AP to make more engineers, the question then is, is it better to have more fort construction capacity or to have more manpower and rifle elements in your actual divisions? Personally, I would say it is better to have more fort construction capacity, so I would leave the motorized engineers probably until winter, and then disband them, and then make more non-motorized engineers in the spring of 1942 when you will want more fort construction capacity again.

(in reply to 56ajax)
Post #: 63
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in che... - 1/28/2022 11:56:08 AM   
Stamb

 

Posts: 1030
Joined: 10/26/2021
Status: offline
Is there any list what units will be available for Soviets and when? Also when some of them will cost 0 AP to build?

_____________________________


(in reply to Beethoven1)
Post #: 64
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in che... - 1/28/2022 12:40:50 PM   
loki100


Posts: 10920
Joined: 10/20/2012
From: Utlima Thule
Status: offline
in the production chart or the editor

_____________________________


(in reply to Stamb)
Post #: 65
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in che... - 1/28/2022 1:17:06 PM   
Stamb

 

Posts: 1030
Joined: 10/26/2021
Status: offline
awesome, thanks for info, like always!

_____________________________


(in reply to loki100)
Post #: 66
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in che... - 1/28/2022 5:05:35 PM   
RedJohn

 

Posts: 517
Joined: 9/20/2019
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: 56ajax

Your thoughts on Sov Mot Eng Sapper Batts. Disband? They do exactly the same job as non mot batts but tie up extra trucks?


I disband them. Overall engineers if left to build up manpower, will reach 300k men.


(in reply to 56ajax)
Post #: 67
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in che... - 1/28/2022 11:58:56 PM   
RedJohn

 

Posts: 517
Joined: 9/20/2019
Status: offline
Turn 4 - mud arrives across the front, and Pskov/Kiev are surrounded. I'm surprised Kiev wasn't just assaulted, and I'm also surprised Pskov was surrounded. Was hoping that cutting off AGN would mean they didn't have the fuel to do it, oh well.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to RedJohn)
Post #: 68
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in che... - 1/29/2022 12:19:37 AM   
RedJohn

 

Posts: 517
Joined: 9/20/2019
Status: offline
Post moves. An additional 20-30 rifle divisions have been sent from the reserve to the map. Mostly 50% TOE trash, but they will do a good enough job at forcing MP expenditure and exerting ZOC.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to RedJohn)
Post #: 69
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in che... - 1/29/2022 12:23:01 AM   
RedJohn

 

Posts: 517
Joined: 9/20/2019
Status: offline
Fyodor Tolbukhin is given command of the 28th army, containing some of the strongest Soviet units available to me right now.

My opponent's supply is not looking good. Muds will exacerbate his concerns for the time being.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to RedJohn)
Post #: 70
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in che... - 1/29/2022 12:29:29 AM   
RedJohn

 

Posts: 517
Joined: 9/20/2019
Status: offline
OOB as of turn 4. We slowly creep closer to the 3m mark, at which point things tend to go downhill for Germany - but it's still early.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to RedJohn)
Post #: 71
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in che... - 1/29/2022 8:22:48 PM   
RedJohn

 

Posts: 517
Joined: 9/20/2019
Status: offline
Turn 5, the vaunted 18th army strikes. Not in ideal conditions, we had to move many hexes and it's light mud and light forest, but each attack is successful and we liberate 4-6 rifle divisions.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to RedJohn)
Post #: 72
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in che... - 1/29/2022 8:23:33 PM   
RedJohn

 

Posts: 517
Joined: 9/20/2019
Status: offline
Hit 1 - not using any mech for this one, just infantry to hit a regiment.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to RedJohn)
Post #: 73
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in che... - 1/29/2022 8:24:16 PM   
RedJohn

 

Posts: 517
Joined: 9/20/2019
Status: offline
Hit 2 - 18th army. Acceptable losses.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to RedJohn)
Post #: 74
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in che... - 1/29/2022 8:25:10 PM   
RedJohn

 

Posts: 517
Joined: 9/20/2019
Status: offline
Hit 3 - less acceptable losses, but hey it was to open a pocket so I'll count it as a win.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to RedJohn)
Post #: 75
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in che... - 1/29/2022 8:26:09 PM   
RedJohn

 

Posts: 517
Joined: 9/20/2019
Status: offline
And hit 4 - again just infantry this time. Very much a win.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to RedJohn)
Post #: 76
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in che... - 1/29/2022 8:36:17 PM   
Shiversprite

 

Posts: 5
Joined: 12/1/2019
From: Denmark-Norway
Status: offline
Talk about a clash of titans with all those tanks!

_____________________________

The more difficult the scenario, the more rewarding it is to upset the inevitable assumed outcome.

(in reply to RedJohn)
Post #: 77
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in che... - 1/29/2022 8:53:16 PM   
RedJohn

 

Posts: 517
Joined: 9/20/2019
Status: offline
Post moves.

For the reserves, I've deployed an additional 8-10 rifle divisions to Kursk (mostly 50% TOE trash as per usual) and another 3 cavalry divisions to dneprov.

I have also deployed 2,000 AFVs - around 7 tank divisions and 3 mech divisions, all 80%+ TOE- to Kharkov. I was considering deploying them to Moscow but I figured the potential to hit advancing panzers is much greater here than at Smolensk.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Shiversprite)
Post #: 78
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in che... - 1/29/2022 8:59:00 PM   
RedJohn

 

Posts: 517
Joined: 9/20/2019
Status: offline
OOB as of turn 5.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to RedJohn)
Post #: 79
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in che... - 1/29/2022 9:40:07 PM   
Stamb

 

Posts: 1030
Joined: 10/26/2021
Status: offline
Looking on a map I have to say good luck advancing to a North and Center.

_____________________________


(in reply to RedJohn)
Post #: 80
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in che... - 1/29/2022 9:53:34 PM   
Jango32

 

Posts: 307
Joined: 3/15/2021
Status: offline
What we're also seeing is the south not getting completely abandoned, but instead getting defended by a token force only. Curious to see what the impact of that will be. I suspect no detrimental effects for the Soviets.

(in reply to Stamb)
Post #: 81
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in che... - 1/29/2022 9:55:04 PM   
RedJohn

 

Posts: 517
Joined: 9/20/2019
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Jango32

What we're also seeing is the south not getting completely abandoned, but instead getting defended by a token force only. Curious to see what the impact of that will be. I suspect no detrimental effects for the Soviets.


Yes I suppose to be more exact the strategy is leaving a mobile force of cavalry and other such relatively useless defensive units to guard the rivers.

I still consider it abandoning the south, but one could argue otherwise!

(in reply to Jango32)
Post #: 82
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in che... - 1/29/2022 10:43:10 PM   
RedJohn

 

Posts: 517
Joined: 9/20/2019
Status: offline
Turn 6 start. Odessa falls to 140,000 Germans. More grinding at Leningrad.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to RedJohn)
Post #: 83
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in che... - 1/29/2022 10:44:12 PM   
AlbertN

 

Posts: 3693
Joined: 10/5/2010
From: Italy
Status: offline
I've sung already what Stamb said above in other threads.
In the game where I play Soviet I am fighting in the south too but I do agree presently the gimmick is to retreat and keep the Germans on their logistic limits.

(in reply to Stamb)
Post #: 84
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in che... - 1/29/2022 10:47:00 PM   
RedJohn

 

Posts: 517
Joined: 9/20/2019
Status: offline
These ratios make me hearken back to the good old days before AFV changes, where I'd have lost half of this. Alas.

Instead we settle for a 3-1 ratio.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to RedJohn)
Post #: 85
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in che... - 1/29/2022 10:50:18 PM   
RedJohn

 

Posts: 517
Joined: 9/20/2019
Status: offline
Rokossovosky's 16th army hits hard. I didn't notice the level 1 fort, could have very well been a fail!




Attachment (1)

(in reply to RedJohn)
Post #: 86
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in che... - 1/29/2022 10:54:55 PM   
RedJohn

 

Posts: 517
Joined: 9/20/2019
Status: offline
Our new tank army is formed at Kharkov. Commander still needs to be replaced, of course, but ideally these boys won't see combat until CPP is up.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to RedJohn)
Post #: 87
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in che... - 1/29/2022 11:15:22 PM   
RedJohn

 

Posts: 517
Joined: 9/20/2019
Status: offline
Post moves. Central front, newly arrived this turn, will be designated as my 2nd assault next turn.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to RedJohn)
Post #: 88
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in che... - 1/29/2022 11:16:47 PM   
RedJohn

 

Posts: 517
Joined: 9/20/2019
Status: offline
OOB Turn 6.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to RedJohn)
Post #: 89
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in che... - 1/30/2022 12:05:59 AM   
Stamb

 

Posts: 1030
Joined: 10/26/2021
Status: offline
New house rule incoming "no transfer of entire south armies to the reserve" :)

_____________________________


(in reply to RedJohn)
Post #: 90
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East 2 >> After Action Reports >> RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in cheek aar Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.578