Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) Page: <<   < prev  104 105 [106] 107 108   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/28/2022 1:11:14 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Nailed a merchant off Hokkaido...

Submarine attack near Toyohara at 124,48

Japanese Ships
xAK Singapore Maru, Torpedo hits 1

Allied Ships
SS O16

xAK Singapore Maru is sighted by SS O16
SS O16 launches 2 torpedoes at xAK Singapore Maru

And bombarded Norfolk, North of New Zealand: the 32 Naval Garrison unit is there...

Night Naval bombardment of Norfolk Island at 113,170

Allied Ships
CA Vincennes
CL Nashville
CL Detroit
CL Raleigh
CL Concord
DD Kane
DD Dewey
DD Downes
DD Shaw

Japanese ground losses:
52 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 3 disabled
Engineers: 1 destroyed, 1 disabled

Airbase hits 7
Airbase supply hits 1
Runway hits 18
Port hits 23
Port supply hits 2


(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 3151
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/28/2022 11:17:38 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Aug 25th, 1942

Fighting in China and Lashio...




Ground combat at Lashio (62,46)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 19718 troops, 185 guns, 68 vehicles, Assault Value = 695

Defending force 11751 troops, 46 guns, 186 vehicles, Assault Value = 347

Japanese adjusted assault: 167

Allied adjusted defense: 1318

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 7 (fort level 3)

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), forts(+), leaders(+), experience(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
1572 casualties reported
Squads: 8 destroyed, 83 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 10 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 16 disabled

Allied ground losses:
153 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 15 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Lowpe -- 1/29/2022 12:22:08 AM >

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 3152
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/29/2022 12:27:10 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Our destroyer screen around Baker decided to bombard Baker and retire to rearm and refuel at Canton, American destroyers are pretty decent at bombardments.

Night Naval bombardment of Baker Island at 149,136

Allied Ships
DD Aylwin
DD Clark
DD McCalla
DD Lardner

Airbase supply hits 1
Runway hits 1
Port hits 5

DD Aylwin firing at Baker Island
DD Clark firing at Baker Island
DD McCalla firing at Baker Island
DD Lardner firing at Baker Island

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 3153
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/29/2022 11:00:03 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Colombus continues their evacuation, down to 6k troops I believe...some Hurricanes test the water and swept...these results look okay, but I end up losing a dozen to Japans four.

Japan had squadrons at 34k, 31k, most at 19k, some at 6k

Morning Air attack on Colombo , at 29,48

Weather in hex: Heavy rain

Raid spotted at 45 NM, estimated altitude 40,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 10 minutes

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 81
A6M5 Zero x 18

Allied aircraft
Hurricane IIb Trop x 15

Japanese aircraft losses
A6M2 Zero: 1 destroyed

Allied aircraft losses
Hurricane IIb Trop: 2 destroyed

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 3154
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/29/2022 11:34:20 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Aug 26th, 1942

The Gilberts takeover has started...will escalate very quickly. That large bombardment force will break up, and some will go to take sea control around Tabby and start bombarding there.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 3155
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/29/2022 11:59:32 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Japan turned around again. Extravagant fuel usage for sure!

Toying with doing some crazy stuff with Trincomalee and Devonshire SAG...but probably will just sweep with P38s.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 3156
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/29/2022 12:12:58 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		China...






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 3157
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/29/2022 12:56:22 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Got a decent sized snowstorm here today, and honorable Japan has the following weather:

Complete opposite here. Tropical storms as I sweat it out in shorts, singlet and a cold beer.


I think a singlet might be known here as a wife-beater. Not sure.

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 3158
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/29/2022 10:45:25 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Aug 27th, 1942

Japan lands one armored unit, 40 AV, on Addu and after two battleship bombardments takes the base. 90 AV of Marines surrender and a handful of engineers.


P38s do well...






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 3159
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/30/2022 1:13:35 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		August 28, 1942

A solid strike on Chinese conquered industry...three waves, this was the first. All flying at extended range, so half the normal payload.

Despite over 5k fires at Chungking yesterday, no damage done to the economy there.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 3160
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/30/2022 1:44:49 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Chinese reinforcements make it to the mountains in time for this attack:


Ground combat at 81,40 (near Tienshui)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 21599 troops, 219 guns, 425 vehicles, Assault Value = 547

Defending force 31260 troops, 85 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 697

Japanese adjusted assault: 162

Allied adjusted defense: 949

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 5

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), supply(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
767 casualties reported
Squads: 3 destroyed, 52 disabled
Non Combat: 6 destroyed, 47 disabled
Engineers: 1 destroyed, 11 disabled
Vehicles lost 83 (8 destroyed, 75 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
586 casualties reported
Squads: 9 destroyed, 72 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 4 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Guns lost 3 (1 destroyed, 2 disabled)


Also repulse the Japanese to the northeast...

Lots of sweeps of Chungking...but not much in the way of bombing.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 3161
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/30/2022 12:30:08 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		The true enemy of Japan is the USN...a lot of JFB lose sight of this, and go traipsing off on operations that don't damage the USN. I am working to really take large chunks of territory now...

The Baker Island Invasion forces is loading at Pearl Harbor...

Loading the Gilbert Island dot base (already own) reinforcements...

Death Star is moving up to Baker Island...

All but the Pennsylvania, Arizona, Nevada, Oklahoma are moving forward for the Marcus Island operation. I plan on using SC in their task forces for bombardment on Marcus...I haven't tested this yet, but I did confirm that the SC can be added to a surface task force.

Support ships...the AE, AKE, AVD, AD, AR, ARDs, ACMs, AGP are all moving forward into positions to support the Gilberts and Marcus Island operations.

Moving the Marine Defense units (those with CD guns) forward to help secure islands.

Short of Minelayers...but what we have is moving forward to help with bases.

PT boat creation taskforces have been created, but with the damage to Canton Island down to 30 Port, the level 2 Port was able to create a dozen PT boats this day (previous best was 1). These PT boats will move forward with fuel ship (xak) so they can get into the Gilberts. Will create another dozen PT boats tomorrow...the Gilberts will be overwhelmed with PT boat squadrons...

Subs are doing double duty, transporting troops (SST) to forward bases still held by the Allies, the large subs (60 capacity) supplies go forward, the others are acting as screens, patrolling enemy bases, and as pilot recovery task forces.

I am hoping to push into the Gilberts with the aid of the DS, then rotate them for the Marcus Island invasion, while using smaller ships and SSTs to continue pushing forward reinforcing all the way to Lunga area (where I still have a bunch of islands).

Other forces are bombarding IJ at Norfolk Island (north of NZ), and building up Wallis Island north of IJ forces at Pago Pago and Suva.

Troops are prepped for the Marianas and the Jimas.

Reinforcing the Aleutians from Canada is progressing.

Troops are just south of Darwin...building bases for better supply flow. Other troops are more than half way to Kalgoorlie...

I am not sure how far I can get...but I will push


(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 3162
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/30/2022 3:16:03 PM   
Gnack

 

Posts: 8
Joined: 1/29/2011
Status: offline 		Long time lurker. I appreciate your write ups and maps. thank you!

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 3163
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/30/2022 5:22:06 PM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline 		You plan on creating 12 more PTs after creating 12 already? Are you sure your pools have that many PTs?

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 3164
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/30/2022 8:55:56 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Aug 29th, 1942

sweep again, Japan does a bit better...






Attachment (1)

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 3165
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/30/2022 9:05:50 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

You plan on creating 12 more PTs after creating 12 already? Are you sure your pools have that many PTs?


I will switch mission to escort, give them an xakl or sc, and send them to the Gilberts...






Attachment (1)

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 3166
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/30/2022 9:09:52 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Baker Island invasion, 2 rgt, 1 armor, some support, is on its way.

Almost in position to take sea and air control of the Gilberts...more task forces will leave today as Deathstar catches up.

North Carolina is in port at Christmas Island...and will sit this one out I think, unless when TF South Dakota arrives at Christmas Island tomorrow they can make it in time for these operations...perhaps they will help with Tabby...maybe Baker.




Additionally, subs missed a merchant ship (of 3 spotted) of Nauru too. I bet Japan is worried about a shortage of resources...easy to do if China isn't conquered.

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Lowpe -- 1/30/2022 9:31:01 PM >

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 3167
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/31/2022 1:59:34 AM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline 		I see a sub 3 hexes E of DS. I assume the Japanese would send a Glen sub out to search the area it is in. Does DS show any detection?

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 3168
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/31/2022 10:51:34 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Gnack

Long time lurker. I appreciate your write ups and maps. thank you!


Hello there!

Welcome and thanks....this game is going to be a hectic ride I think...Even were I to lose the Deathstar in a cataclysmic clash, I think I am getting to the point where I can keep moving forward....

(in reply to Gnack)
Post #: 3169
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/31/2022 10:53:29 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

I see a sub 3 hexes E of DS. I assume the Japanese would send a Glen sub out to search the area it is in. Does DS show any detection?


SBDs found those subs...so despite no DL, only the two SAGs to the west have DL on the now btw, I am sure he knows they are there.



(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 3170
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/31/2022 11:02:28 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		A report from my codebreakers:






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 3171
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/31/2022 11:04:13 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

A report from my codebreakers:







Not complete, since I haven't loaded every turn into tracker as RL interfered with the game, but still pretty good. I definitely haven't been using the intel reports as well as I should be. Perhaps they not as important early game...

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 3172
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/31/2022 11:29:42 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Thoughts on Clemson class conversions (spoiler - I like and use them all-- wish I had more of them):

APDs are darn useful. Good for a long time as the Allies are severely short fast transport capability.

DMS are very good to add to the BB bombardment task forces and safer CA bombardment groups. Perhaps they are too valuable in this role than in invasion task forces where AMs' can serve just as well (perhaps there are fuel concerns with AMs' though).

DE are extremely useful with AKV, BB bombardment task forces, hunter killer groups and fuel replenishment groups. Some of the latter American destroyers are also very good ASW platforms but they have better guns...they give some peace of mind.

DM..I have noticed a definite shortage of minelaying ships (not subs) early on for the Allies. This isn't so critical since production of the mines isn't great.

DD: leaving them as destroyers isn't a bad choice either, good raiders just avoid IJN SAGs...hide them in dot bases and use them when Japan least expects them. However, they are probably better off in other roles as they can provide greater utility for longer game time.

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 3173
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/31/2022 1:19:36 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		August 30th, 1942

Sub action... around Tabby






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 3174
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/31/2022 1:20:11 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Japan knows the Deathstar is in the area...primary invasion force 32 hexes away moving fast.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 3175
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/31/2022 1:34:54 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Japan rushing forward shipping to Tabby...

I spotted a BB or two at Darwin a day ago...plus four BBs, and 400 CV planes at Ceylon. Gonna push hard into the Tabby area very shortly.

What should my tactics be with Deathstar?






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 3176
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/31/2022 3:51:49 PM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline 		At this stage of the war I have always thought of DS as invasion coverage against naval and air attack for your TFs, not using up sorties to pound enemy troops. The latter is OK, I guess, if you have the ability to replenish sorties but your carrier aircraft and pilots will still be fatigued. So in this situation I would have DS dancing away from his subs by going west of invasion targets. Sinking his reinforcement convoys in the Gilberts would help your plans a lot.

And if he already has too much on Tabituea, Abemama is a good buildable islet too.

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 3177
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/31/2022 5:45:06 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Almost all the Gilberts are buildable, with somewhat generous troop levels.

I am pretty shocked to see all the forces I have available for this operation...the weak spot certainly is shipping (the AP, AK, APDs needed for this 0 port bases) and the other weak spot would be fear of a KB vs DS clash.

Flew 18 floats into Arorae with a naval strike of 2-3.

Deathstar is moving west, to four hexes east of Arorae with screening patrolling SAGS in the hex west, northwest and in the DS hex itself. Naval strikes to range 3, with half the cap escorting capping to range 3...would be happy just to take ground and avoid naval clashes at present (but the moonlight is high).

PT boats left in a one big group from Canton.

Minesweepers will arrive at Baker today...


(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 3178
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/31/2022 8:24:52 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		August 31st, 1942

12 torpedoes fired in the midst of a heavy thunderstorm:






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 3179
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/31/2022 8:38:49 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Bad weather, decent moonlight, too late to call them back...they were expendable.

Nothing will stop the Gilbert operations...most IJ SAGs are fleeing west or not spotted.

SSTs are dispatched...interesting to note than only one SST can load troops at a time and of course they have to be in a solo task force (task force size 1).

Will Japan hide some CLs and DD in dot bases? Who knows. Midget subs? Will hopefully get recon on Tabby today...

Mines most likely in Tabby...we won't let that slow us down even if we have to find them the old fashioned way...

Baker Island invasion force 25 hexes away (yesterday was it 32?).




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 3180
Page:   <<   < prev  104 105 [106] 107 108   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) Page: <<   < prev  104 105 [106] 107 108   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.860