Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

42 Offensive N or S?

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East 2 >> 42 Offensive N or S? Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
42 Offensive N or S? - 2/20/2022 4:45:15 PM   
Cavalry Corp

 

Posts: 3107
Joined: 9/2/2003
From: Sampford Spiney Devon UK
Status: offline
Quick Question break through in the South Kharkov achieved early June...

Ok we can head toward Moscow BUT can someone tell me if the cutting of the oil to the Soviets has a big effect as most bizzare I think it did nothing in WITE 1

Please advise someone?
Post #: 1
RE: 42 Offensive N or S? - 2/20/2022 4:49:44 PM   
Stamb

 

Posts: 1030
Joined: 10/26/2021
Status: offline
Oil is irrelevant for both sides. It has 0 effect.

< Message edited by Stamb -- 2/20/2022 4:50:20 PM >


_____________________________


(in reply to Cavalry Corp)
Post #: 2
RE: 42 Offensive N or S? - 2/20/2022 4:57:32 PM   
Cavalry Corp

 

Posts: 3107
Joined: 9/2/2003
From: Sampford Spiney Devon UK
Status: offline
Ok maybe they should look at it at least denying it to the Russians should have some effect at least -

(in reply to Stamb)
Post #: 3
RE: 42 Offensive N or S? - 2/20/2022 5:12:19 PM   
Stamb

 

Posts: 1030
Joined: 10/26/2021
Status: offline
In theory it should. Same rules should apply to an Axis.
Probably there are higher priorities for a dev team right now.

_____________________________


(in reply to Cavalry Corp)
Post #: 4
RE: 42 Offensive N or S? - 2/21/2022 5:05:14 PM   
Cavalry Corp

 

Posts: 3107
Joined: 9/2/2003
From: Sampford Spiney Devon UK
Status: offline
Yes happy for it to cut both ways.

another thing would be for the objective to be set by the politicians for the 42 offensive say by making the VP worth more but the other side does not know - that would be good.

(in reply to Stamb)
Post #: 5
RE: 42 Offensive N or S? - 2/21/2022 7:13:51 PM   
Speedysteve

 

Posts: 15998
Joined: 9/11/2001
From: Reading, England
Status: offline
Based on what Loki did to me in our 42 time period I’d either stay put, slowly gobbling up 2-5 units every turn or 3 OR only go for broke if an auto victory is in sight. If you go for the middle ground you’ll likely end up like history - exposed further away from your supply sources and with a more stretched out force, which is less fortified and supplied (makes it virtually impossible to make ground against as the Soviets in 43). My 2p anyhow!

_____________________________

WitE 2 Tester
WitE Tester
BTR/BoB Tester

(in reply to Cavalry Corp)
Post #: 6
RE: 42 Offensive N or S? - 2/22/2022 5:58:49 AM   
exalted

 

Posts: 6
Joined: 2/3/2022
Status: offline
Not an expert but my preference is limited attacks in 42, focusing on reducing the Red Army numbers by small encirclements and taking any attack that deals a lot of manpower damage. If your successful the soviets wont be able to stop offensives anywhere in 43.

(in reply to Speedysteve)
Post #: 7
RE: 42 Offensive N or S? - 2/22/2022 8:30:13 AM   
Cavalry Corp

 

Posts: 3107
Joined: 9/2/2003
From: Sampford Spiney Devon UK
Status: offline
What is needed for auto win in 42?

Watching TV last night - Hitler ( in secret recordings) was v disapointed that Russia did not fall in 41 and wanted a total victory in 42. Maybe the game should not allow you to sit tight though for sure some generals would have liked that. seems gamey to me.

One thing to do that would be make Moscow worth more pts in 42 and more importantly make the cutting of the oil more significant for a game of such detail this is disappointing that it has no effect. So where are the Soviets getting al their oil from?

(in reply to exalted)
Post #: 8
RE: 42 Offensive N or S? - 2/22/2022 9:23:25 AM   
DarkHorse2

 

Posts: 77
Joined: 2/4/2022
Status: offline
I guess you would need to load the scenario as the Soviets and take a peek?

Also, by mid '42, the Soviet oil stockpiles may be so high that cutting off supply in the south may take some time before they even notice. Plus, you really have to drive deep to reach the high producing oil fields.

Where do you stand on Leningrad? I find that once I have that secured it really frees up a bunch of forces for other tasks. Plus it is easier to defend once taken.

Makes a lot of strategic options available.

(in reply to Cavalry Corp)
Post #: 9
RE: 42 Offensive N or S? - 2/22/2022 9:38:45 AM   
Cavalry Corp

 

Posts: 3107
Joined: 9/2/2003
From: Sampford Spiney Devon UK
Status: offline
Leningrad not taken but just taken Sebastapol 2nd June I think.

5.2 m Russian out I think I am on 900k - very little armour loss but very short of trucks still ( partly due to the bug just fixed) . 76,000 in repair.


(in reply to DarkHorse2)
Post #: 10
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East 2 >> 42 Offensive N or S? Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.625