Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

German/Russian rocket types in SPWAW

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Steel Panthers World At War & Mega Campaigns >> German/Russian rocket types in SPWAW Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
German/Russian rocket types in SPWAW - 7/27/2001 3:14:00 AM   
Jaques Rico

 

Posts: 27
Joined: 7/9/2001
From: Dresden/Germany
Status: offline 		First some data about russian rocket types used in SPWAW: M-8 original Data Diameter: 82mm Lenght: 745 mm Weight complete: 8 kg Weight Explosive: 0,64 kg Weight Fuel: 1,18 kg Velocity: 315 m/s Range: 5515 m M-8 Data extracted from SPWAW Warhead: 5 HE-Penetration: 40 HE-Kill: 8 Range 112 hex/5600 m M-13 DD original Data Diameter: 132 mm Lenght: 2120 mm Weight complete: 62,5 kg Weight Explosive: 4,9 kg Weight Fuel: 15 kg Velocity: 520 m/s Range: 11800m M-13 DD Data extracted from SPWAW Warhead: 10 HE-Penetration: 60 HE-Kill: 22 Range: 160 hex/8000 m M-31 UK original Data Diameter: 300 mm Lenght: 1760 mm Weight complete: 95 kg Weight Explosive: 28,9 kg Weight Fuel: 11,25 kg Velocity: 245 m/s Range: 4000 m M-31 UK Data extracted from SPWAW Warhead: 17 HE-Penetration: 132 HE-Kill: 40 Range: 112 hex/5600 m Now on to the german systems: 150 mm Wurfgranate 41 Spreng original Data (used by 15cm Nebelwerfer 41 and Panzerwerfer (Maultier)) Diameter: 158,5mm Lenght: 940mm Weight complete: 34,2kg Weight Explosive: 2,06kg Weight Fuel: 6kg Velocity: 340m/2 Range: 6700m 150 mm Wurfgranate 41 Spreng Data extracted from SPWAW Warhead: 10 HE-Penetration: 51 HE-Kill: 18 Range: 128hex/6400m 210 mm Wurfgranate 43 original Data (used by 21 cm Nebelwerfer 42) Diameter: 214,5mm Lenght: 1260mm Weight complete: 111kg Weight Explosive: 39,2kg Weight Fuel: 18kg Velocity: 320m/s Range: 7850m 210 mm Wurfgranate 43 Data extracted from SPWAW Warhead: 13 HE-Penetration: 65 HE-Kill: 27 Range: 224hex/11200m 280 mm Wurfkörper Spreng original Data (used by Wurfrahmen 40 and 28/32cm Nebelwerfer 41) Diameter: 280mm Lenght: 1260mm Weight complete: 82kg Weight Explosive: 45,4kg Weight Fuel: 6kg Velocity: 149m/s Range: 1925m 280 mm Wurfkörper Spreng Data extracted from SPWAW Warhead: 15 HE-Penetration: 95 HE-Kill: 32 Range: 56hex/2800m 320 mm Wurfkörper Flamm original Data (used by Wurfrahmen 40 and 28/32 cm Nebelwerfer 41) Diameter: 327mm Lenght: 1300mm Weight complete: 79kg Weight Explosive: 50kg Weight Fuel: 6kg Velocity: 153m/s Range: 2200m 320 mm Wurfkörper Flamm Data extracted from SPWAW Warhead: 17 HE-Penetration: 150 HE-Kill: 40 Range: 56hex/2800m 380 mm Wurfgranate 4581 original Data (used by Sturmtiger) Diameter: 380mm Lenght: 1500mm Weight complete: 345,2kg Weight Explosive: 125kg Weight Fuel: 40kg Velocity: n/a Range: 5000m 380 mm Wurfgranate 4581 Data extracted from SPWAW Warhead: 21 HE-Penetration: 138 HE-Kill: 53 Range: 88hex/4400m 300 mm Wurfkörper Spreng original Data (used by 30cm Nebelwerfer 42 and Gebirgsraketenwerfer 43) -->This one doesnt exist in SPWAW, its here to make the list complete and because I think it should exist in SPWAW. Diameter: 300mm Lenght: 1250mm Weight complete: 127kg Weight Explosive: 48,2kg Weight Fuel: 15,1kg Velocity: 230m/s Range: 4500m The original Data is taken from "Raketen und Lenkwaffen des zweiten Weltkrieges - 1. Raketen der Klasse Boden-Boden" (Rockets and guided weapons of the Second World War - 1. Rockets of the class surface-to-surface) from K.A. Kusnezow, who should be known to military-interested people.) The discrepancies between the original range of the missiles and the range used by SPWAW are obvious. But I would like to know how the SPWAW-team got the amour penetration and the HE-Kill ratings for all the rocket systems. For example lets compare the M-31 and the 280 mm Wurfkörper Spreng: The M-31 has 28,9kg explosive, an amour-penetration rate of 132 and a HE-kill rate of 40. The 280 mm rocket has 16,5kg explosive more but the penetration is only 95 and the HE-kill only 32. Or lets look at the 210mm Wurfgranate 43. That rocket was fragmentation mine projectile, which should with an direct hit penetrate any armour in the game. But for its 39,2kg (other sources said 38,6kg) explosive it gets in SPWAW only an amour-penetration of 65 and a HE-kill rate of 27. And that with 10kg more explosive than the M-31! And very, very much interesting are the ratings for the 380mm Wurfgranate. With more than 4 times of the explosive of the M-31 it only has an amour-penetration of 138 and an HE-kill rate of 53. I am not so sure about the HE-kill rates but the amour-penetration appears to be a bit low. That projectile was able to penetrate 2,5 m of reinforced concrete. It is reported that in January of 1945, a single shot fired by a Sturmtiger from PzStuMrKp 1001 completely destroyed three American M4 Sherman tanks located in the village, which was the target. So, that was it for now. I hope now for some reactions. Greetings JR [ July 26, 2001: Message edited by: Jaques Rico ]

_____________________________
Post #: 1
- 7/27/2001 3:37:00 AM   
Warrior


Posts: 1808
Joined: 11/2/2000
From: West Palm Beach, FL USA
Status: offline 		It's probably a playability issue. I can't speak for the people who set these values in the game, but in my humble opinion if the actual stats for rocket damage were used, it wouldn't be any use playing the game. You wouldn't have a prayer against a rocket that can kill three tanks at a time. I'd prefer to have the game use non-historical values, and have a chance at winning, rather than just getting my entire force wiped out by the first salvo of enemy rockets. Rockets in the game are already plenty good killers. If you were expecting to find that the game has total historical accuracy (and thank goodness it doesn't), I'm afraid you'll be disappointed. [ July 26, 2001: Message edited by: Warrior ]

_____________________________

Retreat is NOT an option.



(in reply to Jaques Rico)
Post #: 2
- 7/27/2001 4:05:00 AM   
Jaques Rico

 

Posts: 27
Joined: 7/9/2001
From: Dresden/Germany
Status: offline 		I know that there have to be certain compromises between playability and historical accuracy. But I suppose it would not affect the game to much to use for example the correct range values. And about different penetration and HE-Kill values, well I dont know how much that would affect the gameplay, but I would really like to know how the SPWAW-team got their numbers in the first place. About the Sturmtiger, only 17 of them were build, but if the allieds found one of them usually several (!) artillery groups were commanded to shot at it. And while rockets have a huge impact in the game you need to suppy them steadily with ammunition, so if you can locate the place of the enemy rocket launchers, one artillery bombardment is often enough to destroy the ammo trucks and render the rocket launchers useless. Greetings JR

_____________________________


(in reply to Jaques Rico)
Post #: 3
- 7/27/2001 6:42:00 AM   
gators

 

Posts: 106
Joined: 5/16/2001
Status: offline 		jacques there's already a recurring debate about how much realism is involved; its probably true of every attempt to simulate something with so many variables. I have quibbles too my favorite one is the missing gebirgsjager. There are always trade offs I suppose.

_____________________________

"It ain't the gun, Sonny. It's the operator" Bob the Nailer

(in reply to Jaques Rico)
Post #: 4
- 7/27/2001 4:41:00 PM   
Jaques Rico

 

Posts: 27
Joined: 7/9/2001
From: Dresden/Germany
Status: offline 		@freyburg I dont complain about missing units, or at least not to much. But I wonder why there are such discrepancies with allready existing units. And the rocket systems are surely not the only weapon systems who could live with a little bit more realism. For example Iam still searching for data about the 12,8cm Pak 44, but the existing data conflict with each other. Chamberlain and Doyle have different values than Devey, who has again values who differ greatly from Etterlin´s. But why should the 12,8 have less penetration than the 8,8? The field reports said it penetrated nearly everything. Part of the confusion may be that some of the sources use the penetration data of the APC-grenade and not of the Panzergranate 43 (APCBC) for the Jagdtiger. Greetings JR

_____________________________


(in reply to Jaques Rico)
Post #: 5
- 7/27/2001 7:33:00 PM   
panda124c

 

Posts: 1692
Joined: 5/23/2000
From: Houston, TX, USA
Status: offline
quote:

Originally posted by Jaques Rico: @freyburg I dont complain about missing units, or at least not to much. But I wonder why there are such discrepancies with allready existing units. And the rocket systems are surely not the only weapon systems who could live with a little bit more realism. For example Iam still searching for data about the 12,8cm Pak 44, but the existing data conflict with each other. Chamberlain and Doyle have different values than Devey, who has again values who differ greatly from Etterlin´s. But why should the 12,8 have less penetration than the 8,8? The field reports said it penetrated nearly everything. Part of the confusion may be that some of the sources use the penetration data of the APC-grenade and not of the Panzergranate 43 (APCBC) for the Jagdtiger. Greetings JR
In the OOB / TO&E's / Military Equipment forum they are discussing OOB changes and how the values are arrived at. So you might be able to get a more definite answer there.

_____________________________


(in reply to Jaques Rico)
Post #: 6
- 7/27/2001 8:09:00 PM   
Jaques Rico

 

Posts: 27
Joined: 7/9/2001
From: Dresden/Germany
Status: offline 		@PBEAR Thank you for the suggestion. I will post my topic there. Greetings JR

_____________________________


(in reply to Jaques Rico)
Post #: 7
- 7/27/2001 9:42:00 PM   
Paul Vebber


Posts: 11430
Joined: 3/29/2000
From: Portsmouth RI
Status: offline 		Appreciate the Rocket data - much of the data was carried over fromt earlier games and "guesstimates" in teh lack of info. TRying to find definitive info on EVERY weapon used by EVERY combatant is daunting, and often mistakes occur. INput like this helps us improve. On 88 vs 128 AT guns the game give the 88L71 a base pen of 232 and the 128mm 243. (this based on info in Lorrin Bird and Robert Livingstons new book).

_____________________________

http://www.matrixgames.com/images/sig-logo-02.gif

(in reply to Jaques Rico)
Post #: 8
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Steel Panthers World At War & Mega Campaigns >> German/Russian rocket types in SPWAW Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.984