Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

Level Bomber effectiveness

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> Level Bomber effectiveness Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Level Bomber effectiveness - 7/9/2004 2:42:18 AM   
doktor1957

 

Posts: 134
Joined: 6/6/2004
Status: offline 		The manual is somewhat confusing. It indicates that level bombers will suffer a reduced effectiveness bombing at or below 5000. Is this correct? It seems to me that they would be more effective at lower altitudes. Further on, the manual indicates that bomber crews will suffer a possibly serious morale penalty bombing below 6000. If there is no benefit to lower altitude bombing effectiveness, why would anyone ever bomb below 6000?


Thanks,

Dave
San Diego
Post #: 1
RE: Level Bomber effectiveness - 7/9/2004 6:04:22 AM   
rogueusmc


Posts: 4583
Joined: 2/8/2004
From: Texas...what country are YOU from?
Status: offline 		The average bombsight on a WWII level bomber was optimum at 6000 feet I believe

_____________________________

There are only two kinds of people that understand Marines: Marines and the enemy. Everyone else has a second-hand opinion.

Gen. William Thornson, U.S. Army


(in reply to doktor1957)
Post #: 2
RE: Level Bomber effectiveness - 7/9/2004 6:13:39 AM   
Tanaka


Posts: 4378
Joined: 4/8/2003
From: USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: doktor1957

The manual is somewhat confusing. It indicates that level bombers will suffer a reduced effectiveness bombing at or below 5000. Is this correct? It seems to me that they would be more effective at lower altitudes. Further on, the manual indicates that bomber crews will suffer a possibly serious morale penalty bombing below 6000. If there is no benefit to lower altitude bombing effectiveness, why would anyone ever bomb below 6000?


Thanks,

Dave
San Diego



hmmm so i guess the lower the altitude for attacking the better results you get doesnt apply anymore??? or at least for level bombers???

(in reply to doktor1957)
Post #: 3
RE: Level Bomber effectiveness - 7/9/2004 7:02:55 AM   
doktor1957

 

Posts: 134
Joined: 6/6/2004
Status: offline 		I'm almost certain that the manual is in error here. Obviously, a bomber at lower altitude would be more accurate than one at higher altitude. I suspect the manual contains a misprint. The exact wording is, I believe, 'bombers at below (sic) 5000 suffer a penalty to accuracy and effectiveness.' I'll bet they meant at or above.

Dave
San Diego

(in reply to Tanaka)
Post #: 4
RE: Level Bomber effectiveness - 7/9/2004 7:05:44 AM   
bradfordkay

 

Posts: 8683
Joined: 3/24/2002
From: Olympia, WA
Status: offline 		No, they meant below 6000 feet because the bombsights were designed for higher altitudes. As well, the aircrews tended to be a little more hasty with dumping the bombload when confronted with the heavier AA found at lower altitudes. We went through all this in UV. At first, level bombers were deadly at 1000 feet, adn had to be toned down.

_____________________________

fair winds,
Brad

(in reply to doktor1957)
Post #: 5
RE: Level Bomber effectiveness - 7/9/2004 7:10:54 AM   
Drongo

 

Posts: 2205
Joined: 7/12/2002
From: Melb. Oztralia
Status: offline 		Effectively what it means is that level bombers will be more accurate the lower they fly up (down) to a point. That point is 5000 ft. At or below that, their accuracy is decreased. The optimal altitude for level bomber accuracy should be 6000 feet (excluding Flak effects).

< Message edited by Drongo -- 7/9/2004 5:12:06 AM >

_____________________________

Have no fear,
drink more beer.

(in reply to bradfordkay)
Post #: 6
RE: Level Bomber effectiveness - 7/9/2004 9:08:38 AM   
Odin


Posts: 1052
Joined: 1/3/2001
From: Germany, Wanne-Eickel
Status: offline 		Is that for 4-engined bombers?

Or for tacticals like B-25 and B-26 also?

(in reply to Drongo)
Post #: 7
RE: Level Bomber effectiveness - 7/9/2004 9:46:16 AM   
irrgang

 

Posts: 16
Joined: 7/4/2004
Status: offline 		As I read the manual the morale drop for level bombers below 6000ft only occurs if there are more damaged planes than ready planes at the end of the resolution phase.

(in reply to Odin)
Post #: 8
RE: Level Bomber effectiveness - 7/9/2004 10:19:11 AM   
SunDevil_MatrixForum

 

Posts: 783
Joined: 6/13/2001
From: Tempe, AZ
Status: offline 		In real life isn't flak more dangerous the lower the altitude you are? Does this come into play at all in the game?

(in reply to irrgang)
Post #: 9
RE: Level Bomber effectiveness - 7/9/2004 10:23:33 AM   
Drongo

 

Posts: 2205
Joined: 7/12/2002
From: Melb. Oztralia
Status: offline 		Yes.

_____________________________

Have no fear,
drink more beer.

(in reply to SunDevil_MatrixForum)
Post #: 10
RE: Level Bomber effectiveness - 7/10/2004 12:12:22 PM   
Tanaka


Posts: 4378
Joined: 4/8/2003
From: USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Drongo

Effectively what it means is that level bombers will be more accurate the lower they fly up (down) to a point. That point is 5000 ft. At or below that, their accuracy is decreased. The optimal altitude for level bomber accuracy should be 6000 feet (excluding Flak effects).


how does this apply to level bombers like nells and betties that make torpedo attacks???does this apply to them as well???

if they are making port attacks you dont know if they will be launching torpedos or bombs.

< Message edited by Tanaka -- 7/10/2004 5:14:20 AM >

_____________________________


(in reply to Drongo)
Post #: 11
RE: Level Bomber effectiveness - 7/10/2004 12:57:10 PM   
Drongo

 

Posts: 2205
Joined: 7/12/2002
From: Melb. Oztralia
Status: offline 		It does not apply to torpedo attacks by level bombers as they are not level bombing. I think the penalty for the altitude is applied at the time of the actual attack (when the game has determined which weapon will be used).

IIRC, skip bombing is also not affected (although it has severe penalties of its own).

< Message edited by Drongo -- 7/10/2004 11:01:22 AM >

_____________________________

Have no fear,
drink more beer.

(in reply to Tanaka)
Post #: 12
RE: Level Bomber effectiveness - 7/10/2004 1:00:12 PM   
Deathifier

 

Posts: 362
Joined: 6/17/2002
From: Sydney, Australia
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Tanaka

quote:

ORIGINAL: Drongo

Effectively what it means is that level bombers will be more accurate the lower they fly up (down) to a point. That point is 5000 ft. At or below that, their accuracy is decreased. The optimal altitude for level bomber accuracy should be 6000 feet (excluding Flak effects).


how does this apply to level bombers like nells and betties that make torpedo attacks???does this apply to them as well???

if they are making port attacks you dont know if they will be launching torpedos or bombs.


Planes doing dive or torpedo attacks follow their own rules (fly to target at set altitude, dive to drop altitude, climb [maybe] and fly away).

If forced into a level bombing attack they'll fly at the altitude set.

- Deathifier

(in reply to Tanaka)
Post #: 13
RE: Level Bomber effectiveness - 7/10/2004 5:39:21 PM   
Pascal_slith


Posts: 1651
Joined: 8/20/2003
From: back in Commiefornia
Status: offline 		Norden bombsight on US bombers was effective and very accurate above 7-8000 IIRC. Have to check the book on its history...

< Message edited by Pascal -- 7/10/2004 4:40:22 PM >

_____________________________

So much WitP and so little time to play.... :-(


(in reply to Deathifier)
Post #: 14
RE: Level Bomber effectiveness - 7/13/2004 6:22:23 AM   
Tanaka


Posts: 4378
Joined: 4/8/2003
From: USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Deathifier

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tanaka

quote:

ORIGINAL: Drongo

Effectively what it means is that level bombers will be more accurate the lower they fly up (down) to a point. That point is 5000 ft. At or below that, their accuracy is decreased. The optimal altitude for level bomber accuracy should be 6000 feet (excluding Flak effects).


how does this apply to level bombers like nells and betties that make torpedo attacks???does this apply to them as well???

if they are making port attacks you dont know if they will be launching torpedos or bombs.


Planes doing dive or torpedo attacks follow their own rules (fly to target at set altitude, dive to drop altitude, climb [maybe] and fly away).

If forced into a level bombing attack they'll fly at the altitude set.

- Deathifier



ah yes but what if i want my nells to port attack hoping they will use torpedos at 1000ft. if they decide to use bombs then they will be penaltied. this is what im saying. you cant set your level bombers to torpedo attack under 5000 feet because they may get the level bomber penalty if they are assigned bombs instead of torpedos which you have no control over.

< Message edited by Tanaka -- 7/13/2004 12:06:17 AM >

_____________________________


(in reply to Deathifier)
Post #: 15
RE: Level Bomber effectiveness - 7/13/2004 4:57:46 PM   
Black Cat

 

Posts: 615
Joined: 7/4/2002
Status: offline 		When the Allies started to use the twin engine bombers at low level against ships a iron bombsite costing about $2 was welded to the top front of the pilots instrument panel, simple thing, somethime calibrated for altitude, often just set at 500 or 1000' , that allowed you to line up the target as you approached.

B-52`s still used them in the 1970`s although they were now call " Last Resort Bombsites" and cost about $10,000

< Message edited by Black Cat -- 7/13/2004 2:59:07 PM >

(in reply to Tanaka)
Post #: 16
RE: Level Bomber effectiveness - 7/13/2004 5:12:46 PM   
strawbuk


Posts: 289
Joined: 4/30/2004
From: London via Glos
Status: offline 		With respect ie very little, sorry , NOT the bloody Norden stuff again. The most overated gadget (outside fanboyed Long Lances) Yeah, better in that it could actually put a bomb on A city block not one of 4 but that's about it. (Please put me straight using proving ground data and I'll point you to Martin Middlebrook on Regensburg). Any bom sight/bomber is more accurate at lower level if noone is shooting at them.

How to remove/put out of any target with a 4 engine heavy? Get LOTS of them, get LOTS of fighter to keep his out the way, keep them high enough not to be distracted by the 20-40mm aa tracer, low enough to see the aim point and don't worry about flattening the surrounding area.

Yes I am a Brit and yes we flattened cities with Lancs cause we could (and becuase we had really good pathfinders/radar/nav systems)


Mr 'just got smacked by AI today' grumpy

(in reply to Pascal_slith)
Post #: 17
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> Level Bomber effectiveness Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

4.093