Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

The point system

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Steel Panthers World At War & Mega Campaigns >> The point system Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
The point system - 1/17/2002 11:26:00 PM   
Tortfeasor

 

Posts: 137
Joined: 9/4/2000
From: helsinki. Finland
Status: offline 		What I would rather improved and that is the point system ( in my opinion ) The New point system.
5 points for a Victory
4 points for a agreement Victory (His enemy pressd on f9 for surender)
3 points for a Draw
2 points for a agreement Defeat (Hi pressd on F9 key for surender)
1 points for a Defeat An example.
I playd against xxxxxxxxx and i got 11 493 points and my Friendly enemy got 3021 points.
(he press on f9 for surender)
11 493 / 3021 = 3,804369414101. is rounded 3.8 + those 5 points of the decisive victory that i achieved vould make me a 8.804 Man. ( or an 88:er )
If i had playd a littel battle for exampel with 3000 purchase points it had been the same results anyway ( mayby ) 8.804
The results is directly comparable to other battles.
Then if the next I play is a 7.767 game.
7.767 + 8.804 = 16,571 / 2games = 8,2855 That is a good score.
Then all the battels would be comparable up to some degree. What I mean with "agrement victory" is that if the other player ho is loosing the battle, or he thinks that he is loosing, can offer his oponent a "agrement victory" (or a Draw) so that the player ho have "agrement Defet" (pissd in his pants) gets 2 points and the winner gets 4 points for his "agrement victory".
Then comes that wen he is asked a "agrement victory" he understand that if he assaults with brut force mayby he can get a Victory insted, thats 5 points and so on. It means that this New System would be mutch more flexibel than the current system.
You got more comparative advantage of it, just compare what you friend got in his game against somebodyels.
What do you think ?

_____________________________

My opinion might have been changed, but not the fact that I am correct.
Post #: 1
- 1/19/2002 4:14:00 AM   
Tortfeasor

 

Posts: 137
Joined: 9/4/2000
From: helsinki. Finland
Status: offline 		Dos this path lead but to the grave ? [ January 18, 2002: Message edited by: Tortfeasor ]



_____________________________

My opinion might have been changed, but not the fact that I am correct.

(in reply to Tortfeasor)
Post #: 2
- 1/19/2002 8:42:00 AM   
Drex

 

Posts: 2524
Joined: 9/13/2000
From: Chico,california
Status: offline 		Good luck Tortfeasor. If you are talking about league scoring, the combat command forum is where to place this. However many different scoring suggestions have been put forward with no results.

_____________________________

quote:

Col Saito: "Don't speak to me of rules! This is war! It is not a game of cricket!"

(in reply to Tortfeasor)
Post #: 3
- 1/19/2002 12:53:00 PM   
Tortfeasor

 

Posts: 137
Joined: 9/4/2000
From: helsinki. Finland
Status: offline 		I have tryed to make changses in the league scoring, I but was in the end bluntly turnd away.
I think that the scoring system in the game is very good, but chould be developed furthermore for the PBEM games.
By the way, SPWAW is STILL the moust realistic wargame in the world.

_____________________________

My opinion might have been changed, but not the fact that I am correct.

(in reply to Tortfeasor)
Post #: 4
- 1/19/2002 5:37:00 PM   
Khan7

 

Posts: 132
Joined: 7/27/2001
From: StL
Status: offline 		Ah yes, the only problem is that there must be impetus for any change. If something ain't broke people won't fix it, and depending on the community, something may have to be really, really, life-threateningly broke to get fixed. Of course, from what I've observed this is a remarkably effective community that is perpetually acting to fix things. Matt

_____________________________

Khan7

(in reply to Tortfeasor)
Post #: 5
- 1/19/2002 6:52:00 PM   
Tortfeasor

 

Posts: 137
Joined: 9/4/2000
From: helsinki. Finland
Status: offline 		what point-systen would you use if you could chose betwen the orginal system or this proposald version.
What do you think Khan7, Drex and you others??
You know where mine vote would go. Shall we trye to vote
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! OK 1-0 to the new point-system.

_____________________________

My opinion might have been changed, but not the fact that I am correct.

(in reply to Tortfeasor)
Post #: 6
- 1/19/2002 9:15:00 PM   
King__Thunder

 

Posts: 22
Joined: 10/10/2000
From: Finland in the capital of Kimi Räikkönen.
Status: offline
quote:

Originally posted by Tortfeasor:

What do you think Khan7, Drex and you others??
You know where mine vote would go. Shall we trye to vote
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! OK 1-0 to the new point-system.
I dont know howe it would work practily, but I think that the old method of assessment is a litele unfear, example, I got 2167 points and the enemy got 1125 points, its a draw ? .
2-0 to the your proposal.

_____________________________

If you are a deserter and allalone frezing to the bones in a deep cold forest and would like to have some company, call for friendly fire.

(in reply to Tortfeasor)
Post #: 7
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Steel Panthers World At War & Mega Campaigns >> The point system Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.938