Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

Gamey....?

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> Gamey....? Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Gamey....? - 8/13/2004 6:45:58 PM   
52nd Lowland


Posts: 244
Joined: 6/16/2004
Status: offline 		Taking the replacement aircraft from the escort carriers in June '43 campaign,throwing them into the Solomons and putting all those F4U and Hellcat Marine units on the now empty escort carriers.
Means that i have now several wings of Hellcats and Helldivers (albeit with v low experience) and using them on the march up the islands.
They jump from 28 to 50 experience when first used and rise rapidly when in combat.

_____________________________
Post #: 1
RE: Gamey....? - 8/13/2004 7:11:22 PM   
UncleBuck

 

Posts: 633
Joined: 10/31/2003
From: San Diego, CA, USA
Status: offline 		I don't think it is Gamey. You are using the assets you have available. The small number of Fighetrs you could put on the CVE's is pretty in-effective. I think they have a max of 27. Many of the USMC and USN squadrons are bigger than this. I say Go for it. My question is why not leave teh Fighters on land, sicne they ar enot Carrier based, but Carrier capable, and cover teh strike planes. Or are you using those poor FM-2's to do that?

UB

_____________________________


(in reply to 52nd Lowland)
Post #: 2
RE: Gamey....? - 8/13/2004 7:13:34 PM   
tsimmonds


Posts: 5498
Joined: 2/6/2004
From: astride Mason and Dixon's Line
Status: offline 		I believe basing non-organic squadrons on carriers will result in increased operational losses. The designation "carrier-capable" is in this case somewhat misleading. There will be a price to pay.

_____________________________

Fear the kitten!

(in reply to 52nd Lowland)
Post #: 3
RE: Gamey....? - 8/13/2004 7:16:09 PM   
Mr.Frag


Posts: 13410
Joined: 12/18/2002
From: Purgatory
Status: offline
quote:

I believe basing non-organic squadrons on carriers will result in increased operational losses. The designation "carrier-capable" is in this case somewhat misleading. There will be a price to pay.


It's perfectly legitimate to do so. That is why there is a rule built into the game to offer up the punishment of higher operational losses.

Only thing you need to keep in mind is while you are training your F4U's, you are also killing them from operational losses. The choice is yours.

(in reply to tsimmonds)
Post #: 4
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> Gamey....? Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

2.594