Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

PT Boats from Hell

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> PT Boats from Hell Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
PT Boats from Hell - 8/14/2004 9:11:10 AM   
Xargun

 

Posts: 3690
Joined: 2/14/2004
From: Near Columbus, Ohio
Status: offline 		Was there a major change in the number of PT Boats given to the allies in the new OOB ? I'm just seeing lots of them in the DEI and at PH that I didn't see last game before the patches..

Xargun
Post #: 1
RE: PT Boats from Hell - 8/14/2004 9:25:18 AM   
Brady


Posts: 10701
Joined: 10/25/2002
From: Oregon,USA
Status: offline 		The US Navy had 500(aprox.) World Wide in Service in WW2.

_____________________________





Beta Team Member for:

WPO
PC
CF
AE
WiTE

Obi-wan Kenobi said it best: A lot of the reality we perceive depend on our point of view

(in reply to Xargun)
Post #: 2
RE: PT Boats from Hell - 8/14/2004 7:00:49 PM   
Grotius


Posts: 5798
Joined: 10/18/2002
From: The Imperial Palace.
Status: offline 		Well, they sure seem deadly. Their torpedoes seem to find a target more frequently than my submarines' torpedoes. Maybe that's the way it's supposed to be, but these PT boats rarely miss.

(in reply to Brady)
Post #: 3
RE: PT Boats from Hell - 8/14/2004 7:24:20 PM   
spence

 

Posts: 5400
Joined: 4/20/2003
From: Vancouver, Washington
Status: offline 		Don't know the game specifically but the Dutch had some kind of equivalent in the DEI and perhaps the game includes all motor torpedo boats under a generic "PT Boat"

Just some idle curiousity - the British had a Motor Gunboat type that they used in the English Channel in company with their Motor Torpedo Boats - anybody know if any of those were used in the Pacific as well?

(in reply to Grotius)
Post #: 4
RE: PT Boats from Hell - 8/15/2004 9:46:06 AM   
Maliki


Posts: 2217
Joined: 12/25/2002
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Grotius

Well, they sure seem deadly. Their torpedoes seem to find a target more frequently than my submarines' torpedoes. Maybe that's the way it's supposed to be, but these PT boats rarely miss.


Interestingly enough in my game they only use them sparingly.The way i use my PT's is against Jap Supply or transport convoys,if something bigger is headed their way i stand them down.Sometimes they open up with 20mm guns but mostly they like to rake the Jap ships with 50 calibre.Though it cuts both ways.I watched one AG take 3 torpedo hits several 20 mm hits and some 50. hits and it never sankSometimes it seems like this game gives weird results...another example being an AK that took 61(yes 61) shots from a heavy cruiser force before it sank or a group of 3 destroyers and 2 light cruisers that managed to maul 3 of my battleships despite taking numerous hits from them,and managed to sail away without one of their force sinking.Just go with the flow and expect some results that always don't seem possible.

_____________________________

"..if you want to make a baby cry, first you give it a lollipop. Then you take it away."

(in reply to Grotius)
Post #: 5
RE: PT Boats from Hell - 8/15/2004 10:30:42 AM   
shoevarek

 

Posts: 141
Joined: 5/2/2004
Status: offline 		Why do you need battleships if you have PT boats?

Seriously, I just bumped into them in Lae and they seem to be invincible. Sure I can sink 2 or 3 in one battle but AI seems to have dozens of them. No matter how many screen light ships I have they always find the way to put few torps in my capital ships. And there is one more thing that really pisses me off - I saw PT boat taking several 14inch hits and several smaller rounds hits. This is ridiculous!!! All battles seem to take place in 2000 yard range. They can't see the boat just disintegrated???!!! Why do they use big guns anyway??? After few battles with 6 PT TFs even the strongest TF is completely broken and out of ammo.

(in reply to Xargun)
Post #: 6
RE: PT Boats from Hell - 8/15/2004 11:27:53 AM   
fbastos


Posts: 827
Joined: 8/7/2004
Status: offline 		Historically, the PT boats were very expensive and not really worth of it...

(in reply to Xargun)
Post #: 7
RE: PT Boats from Hell - 8/15/2004 5:22:31 PM   
Grotius


Posts: 5798
Joined: 10/18/2002
From: The Imperial Palace.
Status: offline 		I sympathize with Shoevarek: PT boats seem surprisingly tough on defense, and as I said before, their torpedoes seem surprisingly accurate and deadly. How does one deal with them? CVs won't attack them with airstrikes, and Port Attacks usually miss them, it seems. It's foolhardy to risk even one capital ship. I suppose a bunch of DDs might be a good bet.

Maybe I'm just seeing skewed results, but I keep seeing the same results: PT boats blowing the enemy out of the water. If the enemy is a Transport TF, even escorted, the PT boats will carve it up.

(in reply to fbastos)
Post #: 8
RE: PT Boats from Hell - 8/15/2004 5:47:38 PM   
Belphegor


Posts: 2209
Joined: 5/10/2004
Status: offline 		I would reward a gunner who put a 14" shell into a PT boat with a commission and make him gunnery officer. Capital ships would not fire main armament at PT boats. Secondaries and if available tertiaries yes, but certainly not large main guns.

PT boats should be hard to hit, they are small, and ships are not stable gun platforms. Perhaps a limit on the number of PT boats in a TF would prevent the swarming?

Also, send your float planes after the PT boats. Small things after small things. They do quite well strafing at 100 Ft and won't sink PT boats but will certainly damage them. Use the float planes present on your ships for naval attack at 100 ft.... instead of all on naval search (as long as you don't expect to go up against large ship TFs)

< Message edited by Belphegor -- 8/15/2004 4:09:12 PM >

(in reply to Grotius)
Post #: 9
RE: PT Boats from Hell - 8/15/2004 6:26:54 PM   
mccavage

 

Posts: 21
Joined: 7/5/2004
Status: offline 		Phooey - I just had a 6 boat Dutch squadron fail to seriously hurt an already injured IJN AP. My PT's in the Phillipines and DEI have been harmless including a single IJN DD killing 3 and running off another 3 when hitting a fat convoy.

(in reply to Belphegor)
Post #: 10
RE: PT Boats from Hell - 8/15/2004 8:14:59 PM   
BoerWar


Posts: 506
Joined: 6/12/2004
From: Arlington, VA
Status: offline 		I hit one Dutch PT 40+ times with guns of various sizes in one battle before it finally sank. The rest of the squadron got away.

(in reply to mccavage)
Post #: 11
RE: PT Boats from Hell - 8/15/2004 8:22:38 PM   
mongo


Posts: 260
Joined: 6/30/2004
From: Ohio, USA
Status: offline 		PT boat effectiveness has been hashed nearly to death in other threads. The conditions (if PTs are caught in daylight by DDs and CLs, they bleed) make a huge difference.

Fighter bombers work fairly well on naval attack provided there aren't better targets.

As with everthing else, the results in the game seem streaky. Some folks will see them be hell on water for a while, and others find them useless. The numbers seem to flow in curves - ups and downs..

_____________________________

"Mongo only pawn..in game of life"

(in reply to mccavage)
Post #: 12
RE: PT Boats from Hell - 8/15/2004 9:58:43 PM   
shoevarek

 

Posts: 141
Joined: 5/2/2004
Status: offline
quote:

PT boat effectiveness has been hashed nearly to death in other threads. The conditions (if PTs are caught in daylight by DDs and CLs, they bleed) make a huge difference


I can imagine at daylight PT boats can't come to close range and that is why they are useless. At night they should be more effective but.... I had TF with 6DD, 2CL and 4BB. For some reason my screen ships did not fire single shot and my BBs took few torps. I tried light force TF - only DDs and CLs - still not very effective. So is there any counter tactics against PT boats night attacks? It seems to me that by putting 20 PT boats in the port the base becomes virtually immune to night bombardment attacks.

(in reply to mongo)
Post #: 13
RE: PT Boats from Hell - 8/15/2004 10:12:26 PM   
shoevarek

 

Posts: 141
Joined: 5/2/2004
Status: offline
quote:

I suppose a bunch of DDs might be a good bet.



I tried this. Personally I don't think it works well. PT boat is woth 1 point, DD - at least 6. Last night I lost 1DD and 1DD damaged in return for 2PTs. At 2000 yards range PT not only can put a torp but also demolish DD with AA and machine guns.

I believe in La Manche they used fast gunboats for defence against German PTs. Did anybody try to use PCs against them?

(in reply to Grotius)
Post #: 14
RE: PT Boats from Hell - 8/15/2004 10:16:44 PM   
mongo


Posts: 260
Joined: 6/30/2004
From: Ohio, USA
Status: offline 		I don't know what to tell you shoe..

I still think it's bad luck

I know I've seen PT tfs get ripped in both night and day, and by both DD tfs and regular (mixed) tfs..

Until someone is willing to fire up the tutorial (makes a great tester) and rip off 100 replays, I guess we won't know for sure about the code.

FWIW, I think they were deadlier in v1.0.. I personally believe they were toned down a bit.

_____________________________

"Mongo only pawn..in game of life"

(in reply to shoevarek)
Post #: 15
RE: PT Boats from Hell - 8/16/2004 8:23:28 PM   
Belphegor


Posts: 2209
Joined: 5/10/2004
Status: offline 		I believe you guys about strong PT boats, honestly. But a transport TF (AKs and APs and no escort) with deck guns just kicked the crap out of my PT boats (10 strong.)

I am not sure what that means except I think more data should be collected.

< Message edited by Belphegor -- 8/16/2004 6:24:44 PM >

(in reply to mongo)
Post #: 16
RE: PT Boats from Hell - 8/16/2004 8:26:55 PM   
Caltone


Posts: 651
Joined: 9/5/2001
From: Raleigh, NC USA
Status: offline 		I've had some luck hitting PT's from CV's by setting the groups alt to 100 ft. I believe PT boats and barges can only be attacked by planes at that alt.

_____________________________

"Order AP Hill to prepare for battle" -- Stonewall Jackson

(in reply to Belphegor)
Post #: 17
RE: PT Boats from Hell - 8/16/2004 8:48:49 PM   
Toro


Posts: 578
Joined: 4/9/2002
From: 16 miles southeast of Hell (Michigan, i.e.), US
Status: offline 		Caltone's right. A/c will attack them if set to 100ft altitude.

My impression of them (noting I'm Allies against AI Japan) -- they are fairly useless. I've gotten a couple torpedoes on target, but against large surface ships I get my a@$# handed to me consistently. Of course, I'm not creating fleets of them, only small squadrons of six or so. Roll of the die, I guess.

(in reply to Caltone)
Post #: 18
RE: PT Boats from Hell - 8/16/2004 9:29:04 PM   
Damien Thorn

 

Posts: 1107
Joined: 7/24/2003
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Caltone

I've had some luck hitting PT's from CV's by setting the groups alt to 100 ft. I believe PT boats and barges can only be attacked by planes at that alt.


Yes, but if there is a surface combat group with good AA in range all of your pilots will get slaughtered. It only has to happen once to screw the Japanese pilot pool for the next one to two years. There is no reason we should have to set our planes to 100 feet to attack PT boats. If the game needs some sort of 'flag' altitude setting then let it be 12000 or some other number that won't totally screw the pilots if the AI decides to send them against a non-PT target.

The solution in my games is to reclassify PT boats as "PG" class ships. By classifiying them as Patrol Gunboats they don't get the special programming code that the PTs get-- no 2000 yard starting range, no bonus to hit, no form-insta-task force if your port is attacked. Now they work fine, just like other little ships.

(in reply to Caltone)
Post #: 19
RE: PT Boats from Hell - 8/16/2004 9:36:45 PM   
anarchyintheuk

 

Posts: 3921
Joined: 5/5/2004
From: Dallas
Status: offline 		What other weapon systems do you neuter? Just wondering.

(in reply to Damien Thorn)
Post #: 20
RE: PT Boats from Hell - 8/16/2004 9:42:28 PM   
Damien Thorn

 

Posts: 1107
Joined: 7/24/2003
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: anarchyintheuk

What other weapon systems do you neuter? Just wondering.


Japanese ASW... oh wait, that wasn't me. That was the developers.

I don't neuter the PT boats. They still have their torpedoes, just like subs or DD or CL ships. It's just now they have to actually close the range to use them LIKE EVERYBODY ELSE does.

(in reply to anarchyintheuk)
Post #: 21
RE: PT Boats from Hell - 8/17/2004 1:03:17 AM   
mongo


Posts: 260
Joined: 6/30/2004
From: Ohio, USA
Status: offline 		I've had PTs start at 10k yards.. It was daylight of course.

They got just slaughtered. I think Musashi got in a couple 18" hits..

_____________________________

"Mongo only pawn..in game of life"

(in reply to Damien Thorn)
Post #: 22
RE: PT Boats from Hell - 8/17/2004 1:08:43 AM   
UncleBuck

 

Posts: 633
Joined: 10/31/2003
From: San Diego, CA, USA
Status: offline 		I think the PT and Barge attack level of 100 feet is a bit much. If it were say 5K that would be resonable. Patrol Planes flew higher than 1000 feet, just doign a normal patrol, and they would attack PT's. I would like to have a better chance of attacking Barges and PTS without destroying my morale and increaseing Fatigue through the roof.

UB

_____________________________


(in reply to mongo)
Post #: 23
RE: PT Boats from Hell - 8/17/2004 1:59:29 AM   
Jim D Burns


Posts: 4013
Joined: 2/25/2002
From: Salida, CA.
Status: offline 		I think the problem with PT boats may be due to night ambushes. In my game every time I try to offensively use my PT’s (I move them into a Japanese base with a task force) they get slaughtered. However if I leave them on a defensive mission with a reaction range set, the AI avoids the base like the plague. If I move the PT’s away the AI attacks the base, so I’m guessing there is significant ambush code built into PT boat combats when they are defending a base.

If players want to sail into a hex containing PT boats on these defensive missions without first trying to destroy them with air power, then there should be a risk of a surprise attack that can potentially sink a capital ship or two. Players should sweep the base for a turn or two with a couple air groups set to 100 feet to be sure there are no possible PT’s lurking about before they move into a base hex.

Simply complaining until they are disabled by Matrix is a mistake in my opinion. We should strive to understand what is going on first before we cry for a change. Are these poor results being discussed occuring as a result of an ambush (did you sail into a hex containing PT’s) or are these occurring as a result of offensive use of these craft? Personally I’ve never had a single success when using PT’s offensively, so I suspect people are getting stung by surprise ambushes.

Recon planes are in the game for a reason, players need to slow down and systematically assault bases. First good recon (several days or weeks), then continuous prep bombing and strafing, followed by several turns of shore bombardments and surface sweeps. Only then should the transports move in to assault said base. These operations could take weeks, but this is how it was done historically. Rushing in against prepared defenders should cost you, even if those defenders are just PT boats.

Jim

_____________________________


(in reply to UncleBuck)
Post #: 24
RE: PT Boats from Hell - 8/17/2004 2:10:39 AM   
DrewMatrix


Posts: 1429
Joined: 7/15/2004
Status: offline
quote:

"All that is necessary for evil to succeed is that good men do nothing." -Edmund Burke

"Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as when they do it from religious conviction." -Blaise Pascal


I am just trying to sort that out. So is doing nothing out of religious convicition the worst evil? Or is it just the most cheerful evil?

_____________________________


Beezle - Rapidly running out of altitude, airspeed and ideas.

(in reply to Jim D Burns)
Post #: 25
RE: PT Boats from Hell - 8/17/2004 3:43:40 AM   
cyberwop36

 

Posts: 306
Joined: 7/5/2004
From: Valparaiso, Indiana
Status: offline 		Remember 1 historical point. The motor torpedo boat "PT" is the reason the destroyer was 1st invented. DD's were originally called Torpedo Boat Destroyers. When PT type craft 1st came out they scared the hell out of all the large Dreadnought based navies.

Under the right conditions and used properly a small relitivly cheap speed boat cold kill a huge and massively expensive capital ship.

(in reply to DrewMatrix)
Post #: 26
History of the DD - 8/17/2004 4:58:58 AM   
mogami


Posts: 12789
Joined: 8/23/2000
From: You can't get here from there
Status: offline 		Hi, Before WWI there was no such ship as the Destroyer. The Dreadnought was the ultimate weapon. Then one was sunk by a motor torpedo boat.
The Birth of the Destroyer. (Full name Motor Torpedo Boat Destroyer)

Sorry Cyberwop, don't know how I missed your post. I'll change mine to "What he said"

Because DD made MTB some what ineffective. The DD was modified to fill the role of the MTB (was armed with torpedos) Then the submarine further broadened it's role (it was given depth charges)

Now a new ship was required to combat the DD. The CL arrived. Then something to combat the CL the CA appeared. Now the BB had something other then enemy BB. The circle was complete and the BB began to grow larger again. Then some whacko figured airplanes could sink ships cheaper then ships could sink ships so the CV arrived. All the ships exposed to air attack now became escorts for their own CV. After this all ships that could not defend against enemy air or submarine threats vanished.

< Message edited by Mogami -- 8/16/2004 10:07:36 PM >

_____________________________






I'm not retreating, I'm attacking in a different direction!

(in reply to cyberwop36)
Post #: 27
RE: History of the DD - 8/17/2004 11:26:37 AM   
Ron Saueracker


Posts: 12121
Joined: 1/28/2002
From: Ottawa, Canada OR Zakynthos Island, Greece
Status: offline 		Problem I think lies with the fact that Task Forces are over simplified. There is no differentation between types of ship, roles of ships, positions of ships, etc, etc, etc...

Preferably, some sort of subdivision of TFs, with some sort of cause and effect flow to it, could have been attempted. Perhaps "Capital Ships" and "Screen" fields within the TF make up. This would most likely alter the present results significantly. Make the PTs have to deal with the screening light forces prior to getting a crack at the heavies. No more free shots I'd bet.

_____________________________





Yammas from The Apo-Tiki Lounge. Future site of WITP AE benders! And then the s--t hit the fan

(in reply to mogami)
Post #: 28
RE: PT Boats from Hell - 8/17/2004 11:36:07 AM   
von Murrin


Posts: 1760
Joined: 11/13/2001
From: That from which there is no escape.
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Jim D Burns

I think the problem with PT boats may be due to night ambushes. In my game every time I try to offensively use my PT’s (I move them into a Japanese base with a task force) they get slaughtered. However if I leave them on a defensive mission with a reaction range set, the AI avoids the base like the plague. If I move the PT’s away the AI attacks the base, so I’m guessing there is significant ambush code built into PT boat combats when they are defending a base.

If players want to sail into a hex containing PT boats on these defensive missions without first trying to destroy them with air power, then there should be a risk of a surprise attack that can potentially sink a capital ship or two. Players should sweep the base for a turn or two with a couple air groups set to 100 feet to be sure there are no possible PT’s lurking about before they move into a base hex.

Simply complaining until they are disabled by Matrix is a mistake in my opinion. We should strive to understand what is going on first before we cry for a change. Are these poor results being discussed occuring as a result of an ambush (did you sail into a hex containing PT’s) or are these occurring as a result of offensive use of these craft? Personally I’ve never had a single success when using PT’s offensively, so I suspect people are getting stung by surprise ambushes.

Recon planes are in the game for a reason, players need to slow down and systematically assault bases. First good recon (several days or weeks), then continuous prep bombing and strafing, followed by several turns of shore bombardments and surface sweeps. Only then should the transports move in to assault said base. These operations could take weeks, but this is how it was done historically. Rushing in against prepared defenders should cost you, even if those defenders are just PT boats.

Jim


Some very sharp observations there, none of which I can disagree with. I too have noticed a difference between offensive and defensive usage, but I would feel more comfortable with such an assessment after many more encounters.

_____________________________

I give approximately two fifths of a !#$% at any given time!

(in reply to Jim D Burns)
Post #: 29
RE: PT Boats from Hell - 8/17/2004 3:22:08 PM   
tsimmonds


Posts: 5498
Joined: 2/6/2004
From: astride Mason and Dixon's Line
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Jim D Burns

Simply complaining until they are disabled by Matrix is a mistake in my opinion. We should strive to understand what is going on first before we cry for a change.

You wild-eyed raving radical, you! Good post.

_____________________________

Fear the kitten!

(in reply to Jim D Burns)
Post #: 30
Page:   [1] 2   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> PT Boats from Hell Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

2.203