Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: The price

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Decisive Battles: Battles in Normandy >> RE: The price Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: The price - 9/13/2004 11:28:08 AM   
Adam Parker


Posts: 1848
Joined: 4/2/2002
From: Melbourne Australia
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Joe 98

In Australia, the price of a first release good quality computer game, is AUD$89.00

It has been that price for 10 years.

BIN at USD$59.99 – comes out at about AUD$85.00 – a bargain!


Joe, that includes the costs of shipment and storage in store, merchandising, producing the physical medium and don't forget the Liberal's extra. There's also a myriad of currency conversions between place of shipment and place of retail.

Wouldn't you kind of expect some flow-back of these to the consumer by Digital Download?

Btw - what's the dollar today

(in reply to Fred98)
Post #: 31
RE: The price - 9/13/2004 12:48:00 PM   
JSS

 

Posts: 781
Joined: 10/15/2003
Status: offline 		Adam,

BiN's price is an incredible value for what you're getting. I really think it's worth more than US$100.

I'm REALLY glad companies like SSG, 2by3, and Matrix still make/sell wargames worth buying.

JSS

(in reply to Adam Parker)
Post #: 32
RE: The price - 9/13/2004 1:50:43 PM   
Kung Karl

 

Posts: 323
Joined: 7/1/2003
Status: offline 		The use of digital download is great even if I would like to have the box with my other games instead of burnt cd without cover.

(in reply to JSS)
Post #: 33
RE: The price - 9/13/2004 1:52:24 PM   
2gaulle

 

Posts: 466
Joined: 2/16/2004
From: Montreal
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Sarkus

I'm glad to see my post generated a discussion.

While there is no doubt that many hard-core wargamers are willing to pay $59.99 for BiN, my fear is that it's too high a price for more casual wargamers and too high for those thinking about getting into the hobby. I've been watching this hobby get less and less mainstream with each passing year so Matrix's apparent strategy to just go after the existing market bothers me as short-sighted.

In addition, two other issues come to mind in response to some of the comments above. First, I don't buy the "gamers demand better graphics" argument. While it's true that BiN is more graphically advanced than many past wargames, I really doubt that it required the level of graphics modeling skill of something like Combat Mission, let alone a mainstream title. Wargames are still produced with relatively tiny development teams, so it's not like the cost has risen like it has with other types of games. Too argue that the price must go up to compensate strikes me as flawed.

Second, I thought the whole point of selling wargames online was to get more money to the developers? So, SSG is avoiding a greedy publisher's cut, a retail cut, and the cost of producing physical copies of the game, manual, and box, and they're still gonna charge more than what is the accepted price of a computer game? IMHO paying $50 under these circumstances is more than enough fan support.

Sarkus


You are my voice!

(in reply to Sarkus)
Post #: 34
RE: The price - 9/13/2004 2:49:59 PM   
Kung Karl

 

Posts: 323
Joined: 7/1/2003
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: 2gaulle

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sarkus

I'm glad to see my post generated a discussion.

While there is no doubt that many hard-core wargamers are willing to pay $59.99 for BiN, my fear is that it's too high a price for more casual wargamers and too high for those thinking about getting into the hobby. I've been watching this hobby get less and less mainstream with each passing year so Matrix's apparent strategy to just go after the existing market bothers me as short-sighted.

In addition, two other issues come to mind in response to some of the comments above. First, I don't buy the "gamers demand better graphics" argument. While it's true that BiN is more graphically advanced than many past wargames, I really doubt that it required the level of graphics modeling skill of something like Combat Mission, let alone a mainstream title. Wargames are still produced with relatively tiny development teams, so it's not like the cost has risen like it has with other types of games. Too argue that the price must go up to compensate strikes me as flawed.

Second, I thought the whole point of selling wargames online was to get more money to the developers? So, SSG is avoiding a greedy publisher's cut, a retail cut, and the cost of producing physical copies of the game, manual, and box, and they're still gonna charge more than what is the accepted price of a computer game? IMHO paying $50 under these circumstances is more than enough fan support.

Sarkus


You are my voice!


Mine too!

We customers lost and Matrix won when they dropped the retail chain. At first I thought that the price would drop when the middle hand was taken away. Boy was I wrong, it went up instead!

I would like to add that I dont have any anger against Matrix. If the world was a game money would be victory points and they are just trying to take as many they can from us.

< Message edited by Kung Karl -- 9/13/2004 12:55:29 PM >

(in reply to 2gaulle)
Post #: 35
RE: The price - 9/13/2004 8:09:36 PM   
scout1


Posts: 2899
Joined: 8/24/2004
From: South Bend, In
Status: offline 		Guys,

As a consumer, I too will always wish for a lower price. I have seen threads in just about every game forum on this website concerning price. Almost universally, these are
all negative.

Frankly, I think you are all missing the point. This is a free market society. If a seller,
in this case Matrix Games, though they could sell a product for $250 each and have sufficient sales volume, this is EXACTLY what they'll do. Now if as a consumer, you really want to get the product but feel it is not appropriately priced, then DON'T buy it. What's the point of complaining, Matrix Games/2 by 3, like any other supplier will attempt to
maximize their profit. If they over price, the product doesn't sell and either they change their ways or they go out of business.

So, I would love to see their games priced equivalent to all the mass market games, but this is a niche market. They are free to approach their product and future in a manner that fits their plans.

So go ahead and price your games anyway you choose. I just hope for my selfish reasons that
a) I can afford them and,
b) it keeps a company that produces a product that I like stays in business.

Happy gaming !

(in reply to Kung Karl)
Post #: 36
RE: The price - 9/13/2004 8:20:27 PM   
mbMike

 

Posts: 174
Joined: 4/26/2004
From: Kaiserslautern, Germany
Status: offline 		I think we defend Matrix because we know the people who are Matrix. If we didn't know them, nobody would defend these outrageous prices.

But like I said in another thread, if you are poor or can't afford it or simply won't pay for it, Matrix is one of the only companies I know that has quality products in the same genre for free. That's right, for free.

They are not shutting you out by making the price $60USD, they are simply limiting your choices. And if there was a comparable wargame down the street at the next web site, and they sold something just as good for 49.99, I'd go there, but guess what? There isn't another web-site. So you suck it up and pay the price and enjoy it.

(in reply to scout1)
Post #: 37
RE: The price - 9/13/2004 8:26:49 PM   
marc420

 

Posts: 224
Joined: 9/23/2002
From: Terrapin Station
Status: offline 		I'd say I probabaly own a smaller percentage of games that Matrix publishes than from most other publishers I like. Usually when I find a publisher that publishes games I like, I buy most of what they offer. Typically I find one game I like from the publisher, and then just from being around the forums and websites of the publisher I end up ordering a lot of their other stuff as well.

With Matrix, everything is priced at the very upper limit. And now with no retail sales, there's never anything in the discount bin from Matrix. So for everything on Matrix's site, its a very hard choice as to whether to buy the game or not. Therefore I make much fewer impulse buys from Matrix and end up owning fewer games from Matrix.

Also, since everything is priced at the upper limit of how much money they think they can take with people, to me there's a certain bad aftertaste from buying games from Matrix. If the game is good, then its just a matter of low-level grumbling about how much I paid for it. But if its a game that has problems or in which I lose interest in a short while after buying it, then I end up with a bad feeling about how much I paid.

Not to mention that with these prices any purchase from Matrix pretty much cleans out the game buying budget for awhile.

Either way, whenever I buy a game from Matrix, the high price means I'm almost always going to be saying that this is it and I won't be back to buy more for at least awhile.

Its just an impression, but for me I think Matrix ends up getting less of my money because of the high prices. Look at it this way.

BIN -- Matrix will get their $60 from me.
Campaigns on the Danube -- won't buy now. Normally might be interested, but BIN will strip budget. Anyways, I have doubts about the game from what I've read. Mainly about how much interest I'd have in the game longer term. With no discount bin, I'll probably never get this game.
WITP: At a lower price, I'd buy this game. But having cursed Grigsby's interfaces and game designs before, I simply won't pay $70 for this.
Starshatter: This is a game I might buy just to check out. Its not really a game I'm interested in, but close enough that I might check out. But not at Matrix's prices and the dent Matrix is putting in my budget with BIN.

So Matrix will get $10 to $20 extra from me for BIN. But there's at least three other games in their catalogue that I won't buy largely because of the way Matrix prices games.

_____________________________

Guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism. ~George Washington

(in reply to Adam Parker)
Post #: 38
RE: The price - 9/13/2004 8:46:24 PM   
jungelsj_slith

 

Posts: 244
Joined: 2/16/2004
Status: offline 		$60 for a single downloadable scenario and another scenario that I've already played 3-4 times. Ouch :(

What happens if I don't like that particular scenario?

I can't think of any other game that spends the time to build an entire engine and then hinges the success of it on a single experience. I hated the main scenario in Korsun Pocket, and I got burned because of it. I could see the potential for the engine, but just had zero interest in the main battle. Perhaps if Matrix purchased some of these great user-made scenarios and ported them to the new engine for inclusion in the release.. but to ask $60 for a single downloadable chance at fun (however long the scenario lasts) is just asking too much of this consumer.

Hmm, now I'm sounding bitter. :)

< Message edited by molotov_billy -- 9/13/2004 7:14:12 PM >

(in reply to aysi)
Post #: 39
RE: The price - 9/13/2004 9:19:03 PM   
BravoZulu

 

Posts: 5
Joined: 9/13/2004
Status: offline 		OK, first, it is clearly up to Matrix and SSG to do what is best for them to maximize profits. Second, I think most would agree that there is a set of fans that will buy this game at $40 or at $80, the price is immaterial.

But let me say that I'm the example of the risk they are taking (calculated though it may be). I have been sitting on buying KP for about 2 months now, knowing that BIN was "imminent". But without a demo, without a "hard" cd and manual (at least w/o paying even more) and at a premium price, I'm struggling to make the purchase (ok, I *will* struggle when it's available). Sure, I can play TAO1 but I seriously doubt they want that to be representative of their brand spanking new $60 beauty.

So while they will certainly maximize the profits on the given purchasers, it will be very interesting to hear how they do with fencesitters such as myself. Furthermore, it doesn't exactly help to "expand the base" of wargamers when the cost of entry is so high. This may, although not certainly, impact the long term value of wargames -- I don't think anyone would argue that pricing WITP has this effect due to its grognard level.

Again, none of this is to say that Matrix is evil or any of that junk, just that I think there are some questions about the strategy. Frankly, given all of the above, it's amazing that I'm still on the fence. That is a real testament to the "word on the street" of KP, BIN and all the other Matrix games. I have HTTR and have enjoyed it tremendously (even if I stink at it) but atm I'm awfully hesitant to take the plunge.

(in reply to jungelsj_slith)
Post #: 40
RE: The price - 9/13/2004 9:19:25 PM   
Marc von Martial


Posts: 10875
Joined: 1/4/2001
From: Bonn, Germany
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: molotov_billy

$60 for a single downloadable scenario and another scenario that I've already played 3-4 times. Ouch :(

What happens if I don't like that particular scenario?

I can't think of any other game that spends the time to build an entire engine and then hinges the success of it on a single experience. I hated the main scenario in Korsun Pocket, and I got burned because of it. I could see the potential for the engine, but just had zero interest in the main battle. Perhaps if Matrix purchased some of these great user-made scenarios and ported them to the new engine for inclusion in the release.. but to ask $60 for a single downloadable chance at fun (however long the scenario lasts) is just asking too much of this consumer.

Hmm, now I'm sounding bitter. :)


The game contains 9 scenarios and a grand campaign, not only one scenario. It also contains another spiced up version of TAO.

< Message edited by Marc Schwanebeck -- 9/14/2004 2:19:47 AM >

_____________________________

Marc von Martial
instagram stream

(in reply to jungelsj_slith)
Post #: 41
RE: The price - 9/13/2004 9:36:26 PM   
jungelsj_slith

 

Posts: 244
Joined: 2/16/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Marc Schwanebeck
The game contains 9 scenarios and a grand campaign, not only one scenario. It also contains another spiced up version of TAO.


Do any of these scenarios take place in any setting other than normandy? Is the grand campaign anything more than the other scenarios attached to eachother?

I'm just going off of what I saw in Korsun Pocket, of course. If I had no interest in the main battle, then of course I had no interest in playing only the western side, or only the eastern side, or only the latter half of the battle, or a 'what-if' spinoff of the main battle.

Whiking whiteout was great, though, and I'm glad I had purchased Korsun at a time after the main release when user made scenarios had filled out the content a bit. I definately got the $30 value out of the game through Whiking as well as some of the "Husky" scenarios.

I would not hesitate to buy this game If I knew that a wide variety of scenarios were included - variety in both location, size, and complexity.

(in reply to Marc von Martial)
Post #: 42
RE: The price - 9/13/2004 9:59:43 PM   
Rainbow7


Posts: 404
Joined: 11/4/2003
From: Ottawa
Status: offline 		@molotov_billy,
by your previous message it almost seems that you are suggesting they take the free scenarios (from the users) and package them into something to sell. Why would you want this? There are already several free scenarios in the works for BiN. Check out the run5 website.

_____________________________

Troubles overcome are good to tell. -Yiddish saying

(in reply to jungelsj_slith)
Post #: 43
RE: The price - 9/13/2004 10:00:14 PM   
Marc von Martial


Posts: 10875
Joined: 1/4/2001
From: Bonn, Germany
Status: offline 		The scenarios are about the Normandy campaign of course, like the game name suggests.

We have:

- Breakout
- Carentan
- Cherbourg
- Falaise
- Montys Landing
- Mortain
- Omaha
- Rommel (´s Plan)

and the Overlord full campaign.


The grand campaign is the whole thing, not attached scenarios.

< Message edited by Marc Schwanebeck -- 9/14/2004 3:07:04 AM >

_____________________________

Marc von Martial
instagram stream

(in reply to jungelsj_slith)
Post #: 44
RE: The price - 9/13/2004 10:27:22 PM   
freeboy

 

Posts: 9088
Joined: 5/16/2004
From: Colorado
Status: offline 		Marc, how recent is that list, from the ssg/r5 folk we heard that there was no full campaign anymore, so Rob and I are both planning a user one????

(in reply to Marc von Martial)
Post #: 45
RE: The price - 9/13/2004 10:52:00 PM   
jungelsj_slith

 

Posts: 244
Joined: 2/16/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Rainbow

@molotov_billy,
by your previous message it almost seems that you are suggesting they take the free scenarios (from the users) and package them into something to sell. Why would you want this? There are already several free scenarios in the works for BiN. Check out the run5 website.


Hi Rainbow

My frustration is simply the price tag. I can understand a limited number of scenarios, if the price tag matched.

My suggestion was that the developers worked with the scenario designers to get their scenarios ported over to the new engine, in order to flesh out the content of the game. They did this with a patch to Korsun pocket, if I remember correctly?

If some of the user made scenarios had been included with Battles in Normandy, I would not hesitate to buy it - even considering the fact that I've played those scenarios already.

< Message edited by molotov_billy -- 9/13/2004 9:00:44 PM >

(in reply to Rainbow7)
Post #: 46
RE: The price - 9/13/2004 10:53:40 PM   
jungelsj_slith

 

Posts: 244
Joined: 2/16/2004
Status: offline
quote:


The grand campaign is the whole thing, not attached scenarios.


Hmm, I guess I could argue that... nevermind :) I'll let it rest. I don't want to discourage anyone else from buying the game, because I want games like this to keep being made :)

I will just say that I hope the content of the next game matches the price tag. I have no doubt that the engine is incredible, but if I'm not particularly fond of this battle in history, all of that value is lost.

< Message edited by molotov_billy -- 9/13/2004 9:00:11 PM >

(in reply to Marc von Martial)
Post #: 47
RE: The price - 9/13/2004 11:27:40 PM   
freeboy

 

Posts: 9088
Joined: 5/16/2004
From: Colorado
Status: offline 		All the user made scenarios that we as a community PORT over to this new engine will be available for a free download.. fyi.. They, SSG, cannot include what hasn't been done, and these user made scenarios cannot be changed to BIN without access, so your request to have them included is not really one SSG could complete, nor should it stop you from getting it as many of these will be re-released...
If its just about price, think of it as 25 games.. I bet there are at least that many scenarios available for "free" to owners of BIN this time next year...

And the biggest selling point, it is a great pbem engine, I used to regularly kick the ia, now good players are a challenge..

< Message edited by freeboy -- 9/14/2004 5:29:50 AM >

(in reply to jungelsj_slith)
Post #: 48
RE: The price - 9/13/2004 11:43:37 PM   
jungelsj_slith

 

Posts: 244
Joined: 2/16/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: freeboy
They, SSG, cannot include what hasn't been done, and these user made scenarios cannot be changed to BIN without access, so your request to have them included is not really one SSG could complete, nor should it stop you from getting it as many of these will be re-released...


That's not true, this is something that is very possible, especially for a smaller company that can't mass produce content like other developers can. It's something that has been done and will continue to be done with other games.

I think the point here is that BiN should stand as a worthwhile product on it's own. Something is not right when a game doesnt live up to it's value unless the players create large sections of content to fill out the game.

Scenarios of a single battle may be enough for alot of people, and I hope it is. I hope that the product sells well at $60. I can't spend $60 on a game where I may or may not enjoy the single battle. I will have to wait for said scenarios to come out.

< Message edited by molotov_billy -- 9/13/2004 9:44:13 PM >

(in reply to freeboy)
Post #: 49
RE: The price - 9/14/2004 12:08:28 AM   
Marc von Martial


Posts: 10875
Joined: 1/4/2001
From: Bonn, Germany
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: freeboy

Marc, how recent is that list, from the ssg/r5 folk we heard that there was no full campaign anymore, so Rob and I are both planning a user one????


I took that list from the game's scenario menu.

Well the "Overlord" campaign is 32 days with "lot´s of units" involved (as per SSGs description )

< Message edited by Marc Schwanebeck -- 9/14/2004 5:09:11 AM >

_____________________________

Marc von Martial
instagram stream

(in reply to freeboy)
Post #: 50
RE: The price - 9/14/2004 12:18:42 AM   
ggallagher

 

Posts: 114
Joined: 5/17/2002
From: Southern California
Status: offline 		I think the confusion here is the difference in the Overlord Campaign, and the Cobra scenario. Previous info from SSG led you to belive that both were more or less co-equal campaigns. I think that now Overlord is the Normandy Campaign that brings you up to (but not including) Cobra, with the latter being a separate scenario of less scope than the Overlord Campaign.

_____________________________


(in reply to Marc von Martial)
Post #: 51
RE: The price - 9/14/2004 12:33:23 AM   
freeboy

 

Posts: 9088
Joined: 5/16/2004
From: Colorado
Status: offline 		yep, 32 half days is the overlord, there was talk of a giant campaign being included, but thankfully they didn't try to add this or we wouldn't see this till even later!
GO BIN

(in reply to ggallagher)
Post #: 52
RE: The price - 9/14/2004 4:09:57 AM   
Ron

 

Posts: 506
Joined: 6/6/2002
Status: offline 		I agree the price at $60 US seems a little high compared to other games, but I doubt if trying to raise the issue here will change anything with Matrix. As others have said 'vote' with your pocket book and simply don't buy it if you feel that strongly. That's the only way to send a strong message. Obviously Matrix feels it is right and they have a better idea than the rest of us based on previous experience.

I concur with marc420. I purchased KP and ATD this year and I will buy BIN, but probably nothing else in the forseeable future. Money is a concern yes, but also time as I know I will get a lot of gaming from BIN.


Ron

(in reply to freeboy)
Post #: 53
RE: The price - 9/14/2004 5:35:53 AM   
mbMike

 

Posts: 174
Joined: 4/26/2004
From: Kaiserslautern, Germany
Status: offline 		I will make sure the positive reviews far outweigh the negative reviews before I buy. I fully expect to be buying BiN, but I don't operate on blind faith with any video game maker.

(in reply to Ron)
Post #: 54
RE: The price - 9/14/2004 8:30:43 AM   
Fred98


Posts: 4430
Joined: 1/5/2001
From: Wollondilly, Sydney
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Adam Parker

Joe, that includes the costs of shipment and storage in store, merchandising ets etc etc.....

Wouldn't you kind of expect a discount to the consumer.....in the case of a download


Yes of course. And there is. Obviously the sales will be a pittance compared to Doom 3 and yet the price will be the same. The price should be higher than Doom 3. The savings is because of the digital download

_____________________________


(in reply to mbMike)
Post #: 55
RE: The price - 9/14/2004 8:39:15 AM   
Fred98


Posts: 4430
Joined: 1/5/2001
From: Wollondilly, Sydney
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mbMike

I will make sure the positive reviews far outweigh the negative reviews before I buy......I don't operate on blind faith .........




The predecessor games in the series, were The Ardennes Offensive 2 “TAO2” and Korsun Pocket “KP”

TAO2 is a free download and only runs on WIN 98

I play/played both games and both are excellent.

I know BIN too will be excellent because I am a fanboy ( ) of the series.

It is not a question of reviews – its a question of whether you like the genre
-

_____________________________


(in reply to mbMike)
Post #: 56
RE: The price - 9/14/2004 9:12:35 AM   
Hertston


Posts: 3564
Joined: 8/17/2002
From: Cornwall, UK
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Sarkus

In addition, two other issues come to mind in response to some of the comments above. First, I don't buy the "gamers demand better graphics" argument. While it's true that BiN is more graphically advanced than many past wargames, I really doubt that it required the level of graphics modeling skill of something like Combat Mission, let alone a mainstream title. Wargames are still produced with relatively tiny development teams, so it's not like the cost has risen like it has with other types of games. Too argue that the price must go up to compensate strikes me as flawed.




Flawed it certainly is. It's actually the "casuals" and newcomers most likely to be put off by the price who are likely to be influenced by the graphics. The "$100 is cheap" brigade are far less likely to bother. I'm not in that catagory, but while KP looks better than the HPS games I still play them as often as KP.



$10 too much IMHO, which is why I'm still humming and haa-ing rather than putting my credit card on standby. That said, I know myself well enough to realise $10 will seem very insigificant once "BiN released" goes up on the front page !



quote:

ORIGINAL: Joe 98

Obviously the sales will be a pittance compared to Doom 3 and yet the price will be the same.



You need to shop around... you can pick up D3 for half what BiN will cost. "Shopping around", of course, is something you can't do with digital downloads. Indeed there are some around here who seem to think doing so for retail boxes is only one step removed from piracy !

< Message edited by Hertston -- 9/14/2004 7:16:17 AM >

(in reply to Sarkus)
Post #: 57
RE: The price - 9/14/2004 3:54:51 PM   
elmo3

 

Posts: 5820
Joined: 1/22/2002
Status: offline 		WITP was a "maybe" for me until I saw the price. It went off the radar at that point. BIN was a "must buy" for me until seeing the price. Now it is in the "maybe" category. I'll need to see some solid reviews and watch the forums for a while. These prices are at my upper limit for entertainment. If upcoming titles (particularly GGWAW, COA, and Command Operations) are in the same price range then it will mean tougher choices and fewer purchases for me.

(in reply to Hertston)
Post #: 58
RE: The price - 9/15/2004 3:53:14 AM   
Rubblestone

 

Posts: 39
Joined: 7/27/2004
From: Red Deer, Alberta, Canada
Status: offline 		I was really looking forward to geting this game, but at this price I just cant justify it right now, so this game will go into my 'maby in the future' category... unfortunantly I rarely ever get to those games

(in reply to elmo3)
Post #: 59
RE: The price - 9/15/2004 4:26:52 AM   
mbMike

 

Posts: 174
Joined: 4/26/2004
From: Kaiserslautern, Germany
Status: offline
quote:

It is not a question of reviews – its a question of whether you like the genre


Fortress Europe.

(in reply to Fred98)
Post #: 60
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Decisive Battles: Battles in Normandy >> RE: The price Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.672