Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: New Planes

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> Scenario Design >> RE: New Planes Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: New Planes - 12/13/2004 3:41:08 PM   
rhohltjr


Posts: 536
Joined: 4/27/2000
From: When I play pacific wargames, I expect smarter AI.
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: trojan

Does anyone have stats and pics for the Me109e, f and g. here are some pics I have modified

[image][/image]





Very Very Nice. You have top views as well?

_____________________________

My e-troops don't unload OVER THE BEACH anymore, see:
Amphibious Assault at Kota Bharu
TF 85 troops securing a beachhead at Kota Bharu, 51,75
whew! I still feel better.

(in reply to trojan58)
Post #: 31
RE: New Planes - 12/13/2004 5:39:09 PM   
bstarr


Posts: 881
Joined: 8/1/2004
From: Texas, by God!
Status: offline 		here's an odd plane idea that I almost went with -

basically, add a generic trainer to the force pool with units coming into play very late in the war. The planes should have few, if any weapons. No factories produce these planes, and they don't upgrade, and no one in their right mind would convert factories to them. The jap player would convert these planes to kamikazis (they ain't good for nothin' else) as soon as the units became available. Their sole purpose is to simulate the late war kamikaze runs made by trainer aircraft. This wouldn't waste planes or replacements, since the units would arrive fully equipped.

downside-
it's impossible to know exactly when these planes would be needed: example, it would be silly to have trainer suicide planes available if you still own Luzon. Also, there are only so many jap plane slots, and I can think of several better uses for them.

< Message edited by bstarr -- 12/13/2004 3:40:16 PM >

_____________________________



(in reply to Rainerle)
Post #: 32
RE: New Planes - 12/14/2004 12:45:59 AM   
trojan58


Posts: 266
Joined: 8/8/2004
From: bendigo, Victoria, Australia
Status: offline 		top views for the achi sieran, ki 83 and G5/g6 aircraft

Attachment (1)

(in reply to bstarr)
Post #: 33
RE: New Planes - 12/15/2004 6:39:37 PM   
bstarr


Posts: 881
Joined: 8/1/2004
From: Texas, by God!
Status: offline 		rhohltjr,
I've added your F7F and added your Ki-83 to my mod twice, once as an F and again as a NF (I already had the G8N and the F8F). The only thing I changed from you stats was the Ki-83s maneuverability. I dropped it to 33 - it's hard to imagine a twin engine plane with the turn radius of a P51.

If I add the Ki-200 what units would recieve it. I wouldn't think it would be mainstream. Oh, and shouldn't the Ki-200 be a jet fighter? Or does the jet fighter block work in the database? Nevermind, I'll post another thread on this. I'd like to know about electronic warfare planes as well.

_____________________________



(in reply to rhohltjr)
Post #: 34
RE: New Planes - 12/15/2004 7:21:02 PM   
bstarr


Posts: 881
Joined: 8/1/2004
From: Texas, by God!
Status: offline 		trojan,
added your pics as well. nice work, thanks.
bs

_____________________________



(in reply to trojan58)
Post #: 35
RE: New Planes - 12/16/2004 2:45:34 AM   
trojan58


Posts: 266
Joined: 8/8/2004
From: bendigo, Victoria, Australia
Status: offline 		here is the side art for the q1w. I also dont agree with decreasing the ki 83 manouver to 33. Manouverability also includes speed, climb and dive rate and roll rates.

[image][/image]

Attachment (1)

(in reply to bstarr)
Post #: 36
RE: New Planes - 12/16/2004 7:19:44 PM   
rhohltjr


Posts: 536
Joined: 4/27/2000
From: When I play pacific wargames, I expect smarter AI.
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: bstarr

...The only thing I changed from you stats was the Ki-83s maneuverability. I dropped it to 33 - it's hard to imagine a twin engine plane with the turn radius of a P51.

If I add the Ki-200 what units would recieve it. I wouldn't think it would be mainstream. Oh, and shouldn't the Ki-200 be a jet fighter? Or does the jet fighter block work in the database? Nevermind, I'll post another thread on this. I'd like to know about electronic warfare planes as well.


When I played Dynamix Aces of the Pacific and flew F8Fs against those Ki-83s they brought along a lot of "pucker factor" IMO.

Yes, Ki-200 Kikka was the Japanese version of ME262 jet. Only a few units would have been equiped with them probably(your choice). Don't know about jet fighter block. One thing though, dont think there would be any cooresponding jet engine sound you could coordinate with either if you like to listen to the SFX.

_____________________________

My e-troops don't unload OVER THE BEACH anymore, see:
Amphibious Assault at Kota Bharu
TF 85 troops securing a beachhead at Kota Bharu, 51,75
whew! I still feel better.

(in reply to bstarr)
Post #: 37
RE: New Planes - 12/16/2004 7:29:31 PM   
rhohltjr


Posts: 536
Joined: 4/27/2000
From: When I play pacific wargames, I expect smarter AI.
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: trojan

I also dont agree with decreasing the ki 83 manouver to 33. Manouverability also includes speed, climb and dive rate and roll rates.



Hmmm. How do you know about the Ki-83? What good stuff have you dug up??

The Rita would have been a Betty on steroids.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

My e-troops don't unload OVER THE BEACH anymore, see:
Amphibious Assault at Kota Bharu
TF 85 troops securing a beachhead at Kota Bharu, 51,75
whew! I still feel better.

(in reply to trojan58)
Post #: 38
RE: New Planes - 12/17/2004 12:46:31 AM   
trojan58


Posts: 266
Joined: 8/8/2004
From: bendigo, Victoria, Australia
Status: offline 		in regards to the Ki-83 the only info I have is from William Greens Fighter Vol 3 which describes the Ki 83 as having exceptional manouverability and being able to execute a loop at 403 mph in 31 seconds the diameter of the loop being 2,200 feet. His reports are based on allied tests post war. It is described as being very aerodynamically clean.

It was fast, had a high climb rate and although no dive rate is listed its extra weight would have given it a high dive speed.

(in reply to rhohltjr)
Post #: 39
RE: New Planes - 12/17/2004 1:23:04 AM   
bstarr


Posts: 881
Joined: 8/1/2004
From: Texas, by God!
Status: offline
quote:

I also dont agree with decreasing the ki 83 manouver to 33.

actually, climb is a separate stat in the game and the Ki-83 already benefits from outstanding climbing ability. now, roll and dive would be included in Maneuverability; however, roll is one of the problems with rating the Ki-83 too high. Twin engine planes have very slow roll rates when compared to singles. The Me-110 had a good turn radius, but it was still easily outmaneuvered in a dogfight. Keep in mind that the rating I gave the plane still makes it the most manueverable twin engine in the war, and, combined with that incredible climb, it's definitely one of the best fighters in the game. Maybe still the best jap fighter in the game considering that most jap fighters have around 2700 climb, and we all know how important climb is, both in the game and in the real world. Of course we all agree it was an outstanding bird and we (the allies) are lucky it never saw an assembly line.
bs

ps. by the way, I have a pair of pics that I've cooked up but haven't the slightest idea how to post them. How are y'all doing that?

_____________________________



(in reply to trojan58)
Post #: 40
RE: New Planes - 12/18/2004 5:20:12 PM   
Herrbear


Posts: 883
Joined: 7/26/2004
From: Glendora, CA
Status: offline 		Can anyone produce a P-43 Lancer and a P-66 Vanguard in Chinese markings. Including the tops as well?
Thank you.

(in reply to rhohltjr)
Post #: 41
RE: New Planes - 12/19/2004 11:26:05 AM   
trojan58


Posts: 266
Joined: 8/8/2004
From: bendigo, Victoria, Australia
Status: offline 		attached file has side and top view for the ki-200 kikka

[image][/image]




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Herrbear)
Post #: 42
RE: New Planes - 12/20/2004 7:52:25 PM   
rhohltjr


Posts: 536
Joined: 4/27/2000
From: When I play pacific wargames, I expect smarter AI.
Status: offline 		Nice Kikka! Where do you guys get these pics? I google too, but never saw anything like that one out there.

Thanks for these pics guys. Ki-83, Rita(B17) and now Kikka. Anyone want to try the F8F, F7F and P80? Please. Pretty Please

_____________________________

My e-troops don't unload OVER THE BEACH anymore, see:
Amphibious Assault at Kota Bharu
TF 85 troops securing a beachhead at Kota Bharu, 51,75
whew! I still feel better.

(in reply to trojan58)
Post #: 43
RE: New Planes - 12/20/2004 7:56:59 PM   
rhohltjr


Posts: 536
Joined: 4/27/2000
From: When I play pacific wargames, I expect smarter AI.
Status: offline 		Post'em where? Here or over at Spookys?

For here, look down at the box with "Embed picture in post" and click that box.
And then where it says "Click here to upload!" click that. I am assuming your
pics are on the drive of the computer you are using to brouse this forum???



_____________________________

My e-troops don't unload OVER THE BEACH anymore, see:
Amphibious Assault at Kota Bharu
TF 85 troops securing a beachhead at Kota Bharu, 51,75
whew! I still feel better.

(in reply to bstarr)
Post #: 44
Art for the G10N1 - 12/21/2004 7:49:05 AM   
trojan58


Posts: 266
Joined: 8/8/2004
From: bendigo, Victoria, Australia
Status: offline 		Art top and side for the G10N1 Fugaku. Now does anyone have the ratings for it under witp

[image][/image]




Attachment (1)

(in reply to rhohltjr)
Post #: 45
RE: New Planes - 12/21/2004 9:03:15 AM   
Splinterhead


Posts: 335
Joined: 8/31/2002
From: Lenoir City, TN
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: rhohltjr

Nice Kikka! Where do you guys get these pics? I google too, but never saw anything like that one out there.

Thanks for these pics guys. Ki-83, Rita(B17) and now Kikka. Anyone want to try the F8F, F7F and P80? Please. Pretty Please


Platoonist posted an F8F some time ago but I don't think he sent it to Spookies

Attachment (1)

(in reply to rhohltjr)
Post #: 46
RE: New Planes - 12/21/2004 9:05:53 AM   
Splinterhead


Posts: 335
Joined: 8/31/2002
From: Lenoir City, TN
Status: offline 		And the side...

Attachment (1)

(in reply to Splinterhead)
Post #: 47
RE: Art for the G10N1 - 12/21/2004 7:22:27 PM   
rhohltjr


Posts: 536
Joined: 4/27/2000
From: When I play pacific wargames, I expect smarter AI.
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: trojan

Art top and side for the G10N1 Fugaku. Now does anyone have the ratings for it under witp



I googled for about an hour and could not find anything extra

_____________________________

My e-troops don't unload OVER THE BEACH anymore, see:
Amphibious Assault at Kota Bharu
TF 85 troops securing a beachhead at Kota Bharu, 51,75
whew! I still feel better.

(in reply to trojan58)
Post #: 48
RE: New Planes - 12/22/2004 1:18:56 PM   
bstarr


Posts: 881
Joined: 8/1/2004
From: Texas, by God!
Status: offline 		I hate to be a party pooper, but the Ki-200 was a Japanese copy of the Me-163, not the Me-262.

http://www.combinedfleet.com/ijna/j8m.htm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitsubishi_J8M

That really sucks, since the Me-262 is a beautiful plane, and the Me-163 looks like something aliens would probe you with.

_____________________________



(in reply to rhohltjr)
Post #: 49
RE: New Planes - 12/22/2004 5:42:06 PM   
rhohltjr


Posts: 536
Joined: 4/27/2000
From: When I play pacific wargames, I expect smarter AI.
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: bstarr

I hate to be a party pooper, but the Ki-200 was a Japanese copy of the Me-163, not the Me-262.

http://www.combinedfleet.com/ijna/j8m.htm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitsubishi_J8M

That really sucks, since the Me-262 is a beautiful plane, and the Me-163 looks like something aliens would probe you with.


OK. My bad. Too much sorting through websites where I am lucky to even get a glimpse of
information I really seek. The Kikka WAS the Japanese attempt at the Me-262.

(in reply to bstarr)
Post #: 50
RE: New Planes - 12/22/2004 7:51:16 PM   
bstarr


Posts: 881
Joined: 8/1/2004
From: Texas, by God!
Status: offline 		You know, even though the Ki-200/Me-163 would be more realistic, I may go with the Kikka for my mod . . . just because I like it better. I wonder what the stats would be.

_____________________________



(in reply to rhohltjr)
Post #: 51
RE: New Planes - 12/25/2004 7:40:50 PM   
MKSheppard

 

Posts: 51
Joined: 9/29/2000
Status: offline

Shiden, B-32 Dominator
F2G Super Corsair, Sea Fury
F7F Tigercat, F8F Bearcat
Meteor F3, AD-1 Skyraider
P-80 Shooting Star

No top views, sorry

Link to it here, in BMP
format

(in reply to bstarr)
Post #: 52
RE: New Planes - 12/26/2004 12:38:31 AM   
MKSheppard

 

Posts: 51
Joined: 9/29/2000
Status: offline 		AD-1 Skyraider Top (zoomed in 2x for clarity)




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by MKSheppard -- 12/25/2004 10:50:18 PM >

(in reply to MKSheppard)
Post #: 53
RE: New Planes - 12/26/2004 12:50:43 AM   
MKSheppard

 

Posts: 51
Joined: 9/29/2000
Status: offline 		F8F Bearcat top




Attachment (1)

(in reply to MKSheppard)
Post #: 54
RE: New Planes - 12/28/2004 8:44:33 AM   
pad152

 

Posts: 2871
Joined: 4/23/2000
Status: offline 		I've seen a lot of pretty air plane pictures, but haven't seen anybody put together top views, bottom views, alpha top views, database data, squadron numbers, upgrade paths, and production data.

Is anybody putting together a complete scenario with all of these aircraft?

(in reply to MKSheppard)
Post #: 55
RE: New Planes - 12/30/2004 1:28:09 AM   
bstarr


Posts: 881
Joined: 8/1/2004
From: Texas, by God!
Status: offline 		hey, i think i figured out how to upload pics! here's my finest work yet. feel free to add it to any of your mods.




sorry, I don't have a top view.

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by bstarr -- 12/29/2004 11:29:29 PM >

_____________________________



(in reply to rhohltjr)
Post #: 56
RE: New Planes - 12/30/2004 5:04:17 AM   
pad152

 

Posts: 2871
Joined: 4/23/2000
Status: offline 		Ok but, can you get a sign that says that in Japanese

(in reply to bstarr)
Post #: 57
RE: New Planes - 12/30/2004 5:09:09 AM   
bstarr


Posts: 881
Joined: 8/1/2004
From: Texas, by God!
Status: offline 		Nope. I have a phobia of kanji.

_____________________________



(in reply to pad152)
Post #: 58
RE: New Planes - 1/5/2005 2:42:39 AM   
pad152

 

Posts: 2871
Joined: 4/23/2000
Status: offline 		Hi Trojan

I have created tops and alpha's for your aircraft (Ki-83, Sieran float bomber). I would like to submit them to Don Bowen for part of the Combined Historical Scenario, Do I have your permission??

Please let me know!

(in reply to trojan58)
Post #: 59
RE: New Planes - 1/5/2005 5:27:16 AM   
trojan58


Posts: 266
Joined: 8/8/2004
From: bendigo, Victoria, Australia
Status: offline 		Not a problem I would appreciate it if you could send me a copy as I have not got the hang of making alpha's for the planes

(in reply to pad152)
Post #: 60
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> Scenario Design >> RE: New Planes Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

4.328