Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

Naval annihilation in 1941

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> Naval annihilation in 1941 Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Naval annihilation in 1941 - 7/5/2005 9:29:51 PM   
fdeutsch

 

Posts: 390
Joined: 11/20/2004
Status: offline 		Here's the battle who have won it?

Day Time Surface Combat, near Kendari at 33,71

Japanese aircraft
no flights

Allied aircraft
no flights

Japanese aircraft losses
E13A1 Jake: 2 destroyed
F1M2 Pete: 1 destroyed

Allied aircraft losses
SOC-3 Seagull: 6 destroyed
C.XI-W: 3 destroyed

Japanese Ships
CA Myoko, Shell hits 53, and is sunk
CA Haguro, Shell hits 55, on fire, heavy damage
CA Nachi, Shell hits 45, on fire, heavy damage
DD Yamakaze, Shell hits 22, and is sunk
DD Kawakaze, Shell hits 30, and is sunk
DD Umikaze, Shell hits 15, and is sunk
DD Suzukaze, Shell hits 41, and is sunk
DD Shiokaze, Shell hits 22, and is sunk

Allied Ships
CA Houston, Shell hits 14, and is sunk
CL Java, Shell hits 11, on fire, heavy damage
CL De Ruyter, Shell hits 18, and is sunk
CL Tromp, Shell hits 4, on fire
CL Marblehead, Shell hits 2
CL Boise, Shell hits 12, on fire
DD Alden, Shell hits 2, and is sunk
DD Edsall, Shell hits 6, and is sunk
DD John D. Edwards, Shell hits 7, and is sunk
DD Paul Jones, Shell hits 8, and is sunk
DD Parrott, Shell hits 18, and is sunk
DD Whipple, Shell hits 5, and is sunk
DD Stewart, Shell hits 15, and is sunk
DD Evertsen, Shell hits 21, and is sunk
Post #: 1
RE: Naval annihilation in 1941 - 7/5/2005 9:42:06 PM   
harrer

 

Posts: 753
Joined: 12/1/2004
Status: offline 		the allied I think, see the VP, it isn't a 4 to 1 for the japanese

Harrer

(in reply to fdeutsch)
Post #: 2
RE: Naval annihilation in 1941 - 7/5/2005 9:42:16 PM   
spence

 

Posts: 5400
Joined: 4/20/2003
From: Vancouver, Washington
Status: offline 		Admiral Pyrrhus in command on both sides it seems.

(in reply to fdeutsch)
Post #: 3
RE: Naval annihilation in 1941 - 7/5/2005 9:44:47 PM   
harrer

 

Posts: 753
Joined: 12/1/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: spence

Admiral Pyrrhus in command on both sides it seems.




He should reaffect him to a transport TF right now or something like that .. far away from the front .. if not dead of course

Harrer

(in reply to spence)
Post #: 4
RE: Naval annihilation in 1941 - 7/5/2005 9:53:19 PM   
spence

 

Posts: 5400
Joined: 4/20/2003
From: Vancouver, Washington
Status: offline
quote:

He should reaffect him to a transport TF right now or something like that .. far away from the front .. if not dead of course


Oh sure, I can see the combat report now:

"Troops landing across the beach at Funafuti
Coastal guns are non-existent
10,875 casualties reported"



< Message edited by spence -- 7/5/2005 9:57:09 PM >

(in reply to harrer)
Post #: 5
RE: Naval annihilation in 1941 - 7/5/2005 10:28:54 PM   
cookie monster


Posts: 1693
Joined: 5/22/2005
From: Birmingham,England
Status: offline 		Looks like allies won. Although it depends upon the reason for the battle.

The allied CA is an auto replacement and DD's are ten a penny, depends on your game though how significant the result is.

Musta been a good battle to watch

(in reply to spence)
Post #: 6
RE: Naval annihilation in 1941 - 7/5/2005 10:33:19 PM   
Andy Mac

 

Posts: 15222
Joined: 5/12/2004
From: Alexandria, Scotland
Status: offline 		Allies.

Most CL's were afloat at the end and the DDD#s were mostly Flushdeckers.

Likley all three IJN CA's will sink as well

(in reply to cookie monster)
Post #: 7
RE: Naval annihilation in 1941 - 7/5/2005 10:39:02 PM   
Bradley7735


Posts: 2073
Joined: 7/12/2004
Status: offline 		wow. Not 1 torpedo hit. I must remember to try for daylight fights as allies.

I agree, allies won. Probably 3 heavies to 1 heavy and 1 light on the cruiser sunk ratio. 5 to 8 on DD's, but mostly flush decker. At worst, it's a tie, which still means allies won. (Japan must win for a true win. any tie is really a win for the allies.)

_____________________________

The older I get, the better I was.

(in reply to Andy Mac)
Post #: 8
RE: Naval annihilation in 1941 - 7/5/2005 10:40:15 PM   
Charbroiled


Posts: 1181
Joined: 10/15/2004
From: Oregon
Status: offline 		Looks like a good site for future recreational diving (virtual, of course)

(in reply to Andy Mac)
Post #: 9
RE: Naval annihilation in 1941 - 7/5/2005 11:21:43 PM   
harrer

 

Posts: 753
Joined: 12/1/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: spence

quote:

He should reaffect him to a transport TF right now or something like that .. far away from the front .. if not dead of course


Oh sure, I can see the combat report now:

"Troops landing across the beach at Funafuti
Coastal guns are non-existent
10,875 casualties reported"






I said far away from the front

Harrer

(in reply to spence)
Post #: 10
RE: Naval annihilation in 1941 - 7/5/2005 11:33:29 PM   
Iridium


Posts: 932
Joined: 4/1/2005
From: Jersey
Status: offline 		It's that damn Boise (Brooklyn class) that fragged alot of those Japanese ships...Something about 15 x 6"/47 guns...IIRC it's armored like a CA almost too, the reasoning for classifying it as a CL was the gun size though if memory serves. It displaced 9,700 tons, which to me is well into the CA weight catagory.

What a waste of good Japanese CA's, oh well...

_____________________________

Yamato, IMO the best looking Battleship.

"Hey, a packet of googly eyes! I'm so taking these." Hank Venture

(in reply to harrer)
Post #: 11
RE: Naval annihilation in 1941 - 7/5/2005 11:35:49 PM   
harrer

 

Posts: 753
Joined: 12/1/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Iridium

It's that damn Boise (Brooklyn class) that fragged alot of those Japanese ships...Something about 15 x 6"/47 guns...IIRC it's armored like a CA almost too, the reasoning for classifying it as a CL was the gun size though if memory serves. It displaced 9,700 tons, which to me is well into the CA weight catagory.

What a waste of good Japanese CA's, oh well...


heard some things like that about that ship .. a good ship for a lot of people .. why not when I'm playing the allied ?

Harrer

< Message edited by harrer -- 7/5/2005 11:36:35 PM >

(in reply to Iridium)
Post #: 12
RE: Naval annihilation in 1941 - 7/6/2005 12:59:17 AM   
SuperKing


Posts: 33
Joined: 4/29/2005
From: Split,Croatia
Status: offline 		all of his ships sunk next turn,and I kept one CA....well at least something.By the way fdeutch,do you think Lady Lex will escape?(enterprise already gone)?My bet is two turns the most& she'll hit the bottom


< Message edited by SuperKing -- 7/6/2005 1:01:57 AM >

_____________________________

Keyes: By your actions, sir, you are risking the future of the human race!
General Sline: To guarantee the American way of life? I'm willing to take that risk.

(in reply to Iridium)
Post #: 13
RE: Naval annihilation in 1941 - 7/6/2005 3:01:10 AM   
RUPD3658


Posts: 6922
Joined: 8/28/2002
From: East Brunswick, NJ
Status: offline 		Trading 1 for 2 as the Allies is a good deal. Japan gets few replacement ships as the game goes on while the Allies get more then they know what to do with.

I call this a victory for the Allies although the sailors on these particular ships may disagree....

_____________________________

"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has limits"- Darwin Awards 2003

"No plan survives contact with the enemy." - Field Marshall Helmuth von Moltke


(in reply to fdeutsch)
Post #: 14
RE: Naval annihilation in 1941 - 7/6/2005 9:39:58 AM   
Yamato hugger

 

Posts: 5475
Joined: 10/5/2004
Status: offline 		Whoever was trying to keep the other guy from doing what he wanted to do won.

(in reply to RUPD3658)
Post #: 15
RE: Naval annihilation in 1941 - 7/6/2005 2:07:44 PM   
Speedysteve

 

Posts: 15998
Joined: 9/11/2001
From: Reading, England
Status: offline 		You sure it wasn't proton torpedo launchers on Boise?

They are deadly and I mean DEADLY

_____________________________

WitE 2 Tester
WitE Tester
BTR/BoB Tester

(in reply to Yamato hugger)
Post #: 16
RE: Naval annihilation in 1941 - 7/6/2005 2:16:15 PM   
LargeSlowTarget


Posts: 4443
Joined: 9/23/2000
From: Hessen, Germany - now living in France
Status: offline 		Jeez, the Admirals in charge must have been an aggressive lot - looks like they were of the 'to the last shell' type.

_____________________________

AE Mod "Bottlenecks" UPDATED 01/2022

(in reply to Speedysteve)
Post #: 17
RE: Naval annihilation in 1941 - 7/6/2005 2:25:31 PM   
Speedysteve

 

Posts: 15998
Joined: 9/11/2001
From: Reading, England
Status: offline 		Maybe Hitler was in charge for both sides?

"No retreat, no surrender. To the last shell. I don't care if you've been hit 45 times. Fire that gun."

_____________________________

WitE 2 Tester
WitE Tester
BTR/BoB Tester

(in reply to LargeSlowTarget)
Post #: 18
RE: Naval annihilation in 1941 - 7/6/2005 2:32:35 PM   
Terminus


Posts: 41459
Joined: 4/23/2005
From: Denmark
Status: offline 		"But my Führer, all our guns are destroyed! All we have left is this slingshot! Then fire IT, dammit!"

_____________________________

We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.

(in reply to Speedysteve)
Post #: 19
RE: Naval annihilation in 1941 - 7/6/2005 3:10:05 PM   
Speedysteve

 

Posts: 15998
Joined: 9/11/2001
From: Reading, England
Status: offline 		"After the slingshot close for ramming. Even if only 1 boiler is working properly. Close and then ram them. Then throw yourself at them"

_____________________________

WitE 2 Tester
WitE Tester
BTR/BoB Tester

(in reply to Terminus)
Post #: 20
RE: Naval annihilation in 1941 - 7/6/2005 7:16:44 PM   
Terminus


Posts: 41459
Joined: 4/23/2005
From: Denmark
Status: offline 		"And bite them on the ankles! That's what we used to do in the trenches during WWI!"

< Message edited by Terminus -- 7/6/2005 8:19:28 PM >

_____________________________

We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.

(in reply to Speedysteve)
Post #: 21
RE: Naval annihilation in 1941 - 7/6/2005 8:07:44 PM   
panda124c

 

Posts: 1692
Joined: 5/23/2000
From: Houston, TX, USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Iridium

It's that damn Boise (Brooklyn class) that fragged alot of those Japanese ships...Something about 15 x 6"/47 guns...IIRC it's armored like a CA almost too, the reasoning for classifying it as a CL was the gun size though if memory serves. It displaced 9,700 tons, which to me is well into the CA weight catagory.

What a waste of good Japanese CA's, oh well...


God do I love a good shotgun.

(in reply to Iridium)
Post #: 22
RE: Naval annihilation in 1941 - 7/7/2005 12:23:14 AM   
fdeutsch

 

Posts: 390
Joined: 11/20/2004
Status: offline 		In fact CL Boise and Marblehead escaped. CA Haguro and CL Java sunk from naval damage. Only CL Tromp was picked up by Nells.

If the is no other raid on Entreprise, she'll have no difficulties to escape. We'll see

(in reply to SuperKing)
Post #: 23
RE: Naval annihilation in 1941 - 7/7/2005 6:36:30 AM   
SuperKing


Posts: 33
Joined: 4/29/2005
From: Split,Croatia
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: fdeutsch

In fact CL Boise and Marblehead escaped. CA Haguro and CL Java sunk from naval damage. Only CL Tromp was picked up by Nells.

If the is no other raid on Entreprise, she'll have no difficulties to escape. We'll see


I guess she had trouble after all,but now she's all calm & content with the fish,at the bottom of the ocean.

_____________________________

Keyes: By your actions, sir, you are risking the future of the human race!
General Sline: To guarantee the American way of life? I'm willing to take that risk.

(in reply to fdeutsch)
Post #: 24
RE: Naval annihilation in 1941 - 7/7/2005 6:38:36 AM   
Tophat

 

Posts: 460
Joined: 8/6/2002
From: Cleveland,Ohio
Status: offline

hmmmn,
just so there is justice in the world i really hope the ship gets below 20% flotation damage then founders in port! muhahahahaha

(in reply to SuperKing)
Post #: 25
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> Naval annihilation in 1941 Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.453