Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

Mines vs. subs

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> The War Room >> Mines vs. subs Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Mines vs. subs - 9/9/2005 5:49:29 AM   
Aawulf

 

Posts: 116
Joined: 7/14/2005
Status: offline
Thus far, my mine warfare ventures have been catastrophic at best. Seems that my ships are more magnetic than my enemies' in that my vessels have struck more of my mines during retirements with idiotic routing than has the enemy. Additionally, the enemy subs seem to be immune to minefields because they pass through high density hexes regularly without incident.

Since my real target of my mining is the enemy subs, I need to know if I am wasting my time and resources. Are subs safe from mine fields in this game?

< Message edited by Aawulf -- 9/9/2005 5:51:08 AM >


_____________________________

Never ever ever ever let a day pass without remembering that we are fighting a war for our survival. God bless our troops.
Post #: 1
RE: Mines vs. subs - 9/9/2005 5:55:27 AM   
Twotribes


Posts: 6929
Joined: 2/15/2002
From: Jacksonville NC
Status: offline
Generally yes. They have a chnace to strike mines but I suspect it is much lower than the chance a surface ship will strike one. My experience is that unless you have a bazillion mines they are nearly useless even for surface shps.

(in reply to Aawulf)
Post #: 2
RE: Mines vs. subs - 9/9/2005 6:33:16 AM   
EUBanana


Posts: 4552
Joined: 9/30/2003
From: Little England
Status: offline
I hear you re. your catastrophic effects.

I mined a Jap base with about 600 mines or so, and then did a battleship bombardment of it to catch the ships in port, and BB Idaho caught a mine and is now in port for six months. Bah.

So bombarding battleships really can strike mines, but only if they are your mines...

(in reply to Twotribes)
Post #: 3
RE: Mines vs. subs - 9/9/2005 8:49:09 AM   
Gen.Hoepner


Posts: 3645
Joined: 9/4/2001
From: italy
Status: offline
i've just badly damaged an allied dutch sub with my mines in the Malacca strait. It can be done, but the chances are really few

_____________________________

[image]http://yfrog.com/2m70331348022314716641664j [/image]

(in reply to EUBanana)
Post #: 4
RE: Mines vs. subs - 9/10/2005 6:19:07 AM   
Aawulf

 

Posts: 116
Joined: 7/14/2005
Status: offline
Thanks for the replies. I'm glad there is evidence that it is possible and relieved that I am not alone in sabotaging friendly assets.

Regards,

Michael Fleshman

_____________________________

Never ever ever ever let a day pass without remembering that we are fighting a war for our survival. God bless our troops.

(in reply to Gen.Hoepner)
Post #: 5
RE: Mines vs. subs - 9/10/2005 9:18:13 AM   
testarossa


Posts: 952
Joined: 9/24/2004
From: Vancouver, Canada
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: EUBanana
So bombarding battleships really can strike mines, but only if they are your mines...


BBs never hit mines with "Escorts don't bombard option". They are bombarding from a long range. if that option enabled they will move closer, so will get a chance to hit a mine.

(in reply to EUBanana)
Post #: 6
RE: Mines vs. subs - 9/10/2005 7:11:45 PM   
Feinder


Posts: 6589
Joined: 9/4/2002
From: Land o' Lakes, FL
Status: offline
Yes, subs can hit mines. I had a raider TF of subs land at an enemy base, which was mined. One of my subs did hit a mine, and ended up sinking before making it to port. I don't see many mine hits tho, more of an annoyance than anything else (way it should be). You probably have a higher chance to hit mines during "close in" missions, like landing, close bombard, etc. But patrolling probably was assigned a lower chance, since it's farther out.

-F-

_____________________________

"It is obvious that you have greatly over-estimated my regard for your opinion." - Me


(in reply to testarossa)
Post #: 7
RE: Mines vs. subs - 9/10/2005 8:10:23 PM   
EUBanana


Posts: 4552
Joined: 9/30/2003
From: Little England
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: testarossa

quote:

ORIGINAL: EUBanana
So bombarding battleships really can strike mines, but only if they are your mines...


BBs never hit mines with "Escorts don't bombard option". They are bombarding from a long range. if that option enabled they will move closer, so will get a chance to hit a mine.


I don't think this is true, as I never set escorts to bombard, and my battleship hit a mine.

A slightly unusual situation though, as it was an offensive minefield that I myself had placed, rather than a defensive one.

(in reply to testarossa)
Post #: 8
RE: Mines vs. subs - 9/10/2005 11:23:40 PM   
String


Posts: 2661
Joined: 10/7/2003
From: Estonia
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: testarossa

quote:

ORIGINAL: EUBanana
So bombarding battleships really can strike mines, but only if they are your mines...


BBs never hit mines with "Escorts don't bombard option". They are bombarding from a long range. if that option enabled they will move closer, so will get a chance to hit a mine.


yes they will, I had BB Fuso hit one (or was it Yamashiro) off Noumea in my PBEM vs Andy Mac

(in reply to testarossa)
Post #: 9
RE: Mines vs. subs - 9/11/2005 1:56:45 AM   
Halsey

 

Posts: 5069
Joined: 2/7/2004
Status: offline
I thought everyone already knew this.

Never ever send one of your TF's into an enemy base hex that you have mined.
All minefields that are not in a friendly base are hostile.
It's been like this since UV.

_____________________________


(in reply to EUBanana)
Post #: 10
RE: Mines vs. subs - 9/11/2005 8:03:38 AM   
Raverdave


Posts: 6520
Joined: 2/8/2002
From: Melb. Australia
Status: offline
Yes subs CAN hit mines..........I had 4 subs in a minelaying TF move to truk to lay mines and two of them hit jap mines in the same turn.

_____________________________




Never argue with an idiot, he will only drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.

(in reply to Halsey)
Post #: 11
RE: Mines vs. subs - 9/11/2005 4:51:14 PM   
Mike Solli


Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline
I lost one of the Japanese minelaying subs on 7 Dec 41 to a British mine.

(in reply to Raverdave)
Post #: 12
RE: Mines vs. subs - 9/12/2005 4:25:44 AM   
testarossa


Posts: 952
Joined: 9/24/2004
From: Vancouver, Canada
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: String
yes they will, I had BB Fuso hit one (or was it Yamashiro) off Noumea in my PBEM vs Andy Mac


What's the probability of 6 BBs bombarding a port with 8000 mines to hit one?
Was done to me two times. No hits. I conducted 3 bombardments against mined port (Batavia) (by my own minelayers, so its around 1000 mines there). No hits.

(in reply to String)
Post #: 13
RE: Mines vs. subs - 9/12/2005 6:10:45 AM   
jwilkerson


Posts: 10525
Joined: 9/15/2002
From: Kansas
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: testarossa

quote:

ORIGINAL: String
yes they will, I had BB Fuso hit one (or was it Yamashiro) off Noumea in my PBEM vs Andy Mac


What's the probability of 6 BBs bombarding a port with 8000 mines to hit one?
Was done to me two times. No hits. I conducted 3 bombardments against mined port (Batavia) (by my own minelayers, so its around 1000 mines there). No hits.


You also bombarded Gili-gili with 7000 of my mines and no hits ... I've been told "working as designed" and that designers intended that bombardments be "almost" immune to mines ...



_____________________________

AE Project Lead
New Game Project Lead

(in reply to testarossa)
Post #: 14
RE: Mines vs. subs - 9/12/2005 7:52:35 PM   
worr

 

Posts: 901
Joined: 2/7/2001
Status: offline
The most productive mine attacks for me have been when I hit my own. The enemy can sail in and out of the same port, but I usually hit my own as the IJN player.


(in reply to jwilkerson)
Post #: 15
RE: Mines vs. subs - 9/12/2005 8:29:19 PM   
EUBanana


Posts: 4552
Joined: 9/30/2003
From: Little England
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Halsey

I thought everyone already knew this.

Never ever send one of your TF's into an enemy base hex that you have mined.
All minefields that are not in a friendly base are hostile.
It's been like this since UV.


Oh I know that - but i assumed that the people here who said mines wouldnt hit a bombarding force with escorts set to not fire were right.

These people were wrong. Idaho got mined. I won't do that again.

(in reply to Halsey)
Post #: 16
RE: Mines vs. subs - 9/13/2005 1:38:25 AM   
Aawulf

 

Posts: 116
Joined: 7/14/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: worr

The most productive mine attacks for me have been when I hit my own. The enemy can sail in and out of the same port, but I usually hit my own as the IJN player.

It is good to know that I am not alone in that accomplishment.

(in reply to worr)
Post #: 17
RE: Mines vs. subs - 9/13/2005 2:33:26 AM   
testarossa


Posts: 952
Joined: 9/24/2004
From: Vancouver, Canada
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: EUBanana
These people were wrong. Idaho got mined. I won't do that again.


I was wrong saying they NEVER hit the mines. How about 0.01% chance to hit a mine?

Bombardment is the only way to shut down enemy airfield. And it is the only way to suppress the artillery during the landing. And it is the only way to kill engineers, and make possible to capture resources intact. It is the only mean for Japanese to dissuade Allied player from concentrating 1000 aircrafts in one place. And defensive minefields don't work against bombardments.

May be offensive minefields are treated differently by the game, as both your cases involved your own offensive minefield at the target base... Both my hits with subs were caused by offensive minefields too... So who really knows except developers...

(in reply to EUBanana)
Post #: 18
RE: Mines vs. subs - 9/13/2005 4:34:13 AM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Aawulf


quote:

ORIGINAL: worr

The most productive mine attacks for me have been when I hit my own. The enemy can sail in and out of the same port, but I usually hit my own as the IJN player.

It is good to know that I am not alone in that accomplishment.


{Nodding head silently in acknowledgement of being a member of that club... but will never admit it out loud!}

(in reply to Aawulf)
Post #: 19
RE: Mines vs. subs - 9/13/2005 11:33:11 AM   
String


Posts: 2661
Joined: 10/7/2003
From: Estonia
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: testarossa

quote:

ORIGINAL: EUBanana
These people were wrong. Idaho got mined. I won't do that again.


I was wrong saying they NEVER hit the mines. How about 0.01% chance to hit a mine?

Bombardment is the only way to shut down enemy airfield. And it is the only way to suppress the artillery during the landing. And it is the only way to kill engineers, and make possible to capture resources intact. It is the only mean for Japanese to dissuade Allied player from concentrating 1000 aircrafts in one place. And defensive minefields don't work against bombardments.

May be offensive minefields are treated differently by the game, as both your cases involved your own offensive minefield at the target base... Both my hits with subs were caused by offensive minefields too... So who really knows except developers...



Indeed, I was making regular daily bombardment runs to Noumea for about a month. two 3 BB TF's one day and one 4 BB TF the other day. You can work out the percentages yourself

(in reply to testarossa)
Post #: 20
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> The War Room >> Mines vs. subs Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

2.047